Metal Gear
08-24-2008, 11:05 PM
I am of the opinion that homosexuality is a choice. First of all, what one fantasizes about does not have to translate to action, so somebody can be attracted to the same sex, yet not be involved with them for a variety of reasons. But secondly, indeed even the urges people fantasize about are programmable, all the way from being attracted to family members, to bestiality, to sexually sadistic/necrophiliac serial killers, to interracial attraction, to attraction to children, to being attracted to the same sex.
This may come to a shock to many of the racialists on this forum, but it is my viewpoint. While one does not chose the amount of testosterone they are born with, indeed, sexual attraction is culturally relative and environmentally influenced. You may have relatives, brothers/sisters, mothers/fathers, and they may be attractive, yet you are able to not feel attracted to them, because you are culturally conditioned not to. Not to mention people are more attracted to people within their ethnic group than outside of it, despite any alleged universal standards of human beauty, the correlation still holds.
Many ask "why would people chose this." The answer is that people make bad choices all the time. Idealists make models of human behavior, assuming that people always promote their best interests, but clearly they don't. Just as economic models based on the assumption of people perusing self-interest fail (this is widely known in the field of economics), so do other models of human behavior. Just because it's ideal for somebody to not behave a certain way, does not mean they will live up to the ideal. Why do we have jails, why are regimes constantly overthrown, and why is there war? The point is that the answer is similar, humanity cannot be counted on to peruse its best collective or individual interests, if such a standard of morality even exists to begin with!
The mind is a programmable machine, and homosexuals program themselves to be deviants. I totally reject the idea that someone can be born gay, because of a gay gene, or because of of a "female brain in a male" or a "male brain in a female."
This may come to a shock to many of the racialists on this forum, but it is my viewpoint. While one does not chose the amount of testosterone they are born with, indeed, sexual attraction is culturally relative and environmentally influenced. You may have relatives, brothers/sisters, mothers/fathers, and they may be attractive, yet you are able to not feel attracted to them, because you are culturally conditioned not to. Not to mention people are more attracted to people within their ethnic group than outside of it, despite any alleged universal standards of human beauty, the correlation still holds.
Many ask "why would people chose this." The answer is that people make bad choices all the time. Idealists make models of human behavior, assuming that people always promote their best interests, but clearly they don't. Just as economic models based on the assumption of people perusing self-interest fail (this is widely known in the field of economics), so do other models of human behavior. Just because it's ideal for somebody to not behave a certain way, does not mean they will live up to the ideal. Why do we have jails, why are regimes constantly overthrown, and why is there war? The point is that the answer is similar, humanity cannot be counted on to peruse its best collective or individual interests, if such a standard of morality even exists to begin with!
The mind is a programmable machine, and homosexuals program themselves to be deviants. I totally reject the idea that someone can be born gay, because of a gay gene, or because of of a "female brain in a male" or a "male brain in a female."