The forum

We at Free Media Productions are impressed by our broad audience of viewers. We realize that forums are dominated by a small group of people who are used to using them. We understand that it can be difficult for a “forum virgin” to start posting. Signing up with an email (that has to be real) and a password can be intimidating.

To ease your intimidation, we are allowing guests to post and perform searches. You will not have the full privileges of membership, such as the ability to edit your profile. In order to have the ability to edit your profile, you must become a member. In order to send private messages and view who is online, you must become a trusted member.

But to make things easier for our virgin audience – the numerous people who google us and find us but never post – we have enabled you to post as a guest.

I did it on my own and while I chose to involve other’s, I really didn’t need them.

I still to this day defend my actions and kindly ask you to fuck off if you disagree.

I however subject my views to constant scrutiny and am always looking for ways to perfect them. I sense that the average person does not possess this trait and I question why I even try to reason with the average person. The average person would prefer to believe in what is comfortable rather than to believe in what can be proven with evidence. And the average person does not know the difference between this fantasy and reality. Sometimes it may be comforting to pretend that the truth isn’t real, but a problem materializes when the person does not realize that they are pretending. It may be comforting to pretend I am the CEO of WWE or descended from ancient Dinosaurs, but if I did, I would know that I am pretending! I would not start to actually BELIEVE it, but know that I am setting up a false comfort zone! I would continue to separate reality from fantasy. The masses cannot separate reality from fantasy.

Expecting people to think rationally is like expecting people to peacefully give up their religion (in masses) or expecting people who speak Ebonics to in masses speak English correctly. It isn’t going to happen!

Mussolini would prefer fifty thousand rifles to fifty thousand votes. I think he was right!

It worked, but now I am cleaning things up because I feel it is important to deliver the correct message.

Some posts were moved to the Johnny Gulag account, and others were edited.

Jared Taylor, current editor of the American Renaissance, denies the term “white nationalist” and explains why he is not a “white supremacist.” But, what this established journalist claims, is that he is a “race realist.” Taylor’s views have become an important piece of the race relations puzzle, and can often be found in studies, essays, newspapers (including the Washington Post) and books. Taylor has been called everything from a racist to a “true paragon of tolerance.” He takes a few moments to discuss with Jamie Hines what is a “race realist,” why there is no need for the civil rights battle, and what he thinks of President Barack Obama.

JH: I’ve read that you describe yourself as a “race realist.” What is a “race realist?”

JT: Race realism is rejection of the agreeable fantasies about race that have become orthodoxy since the 1960s. First, it is obvious that most people prefer the company of others of their own race. Forced integration therefore causes tension and resentment.

Second, race is an important element in individual and group identity, which means it is impossible to build a society in which race does not matter.

Third, people of different races build different societies. Blacks—wherever they are found in large numbers—establish communities with certain characteristics, and whites and others do the same.

Fourth, the combination of the first three factors means that racial diversity is a source of constant conflict. This is blindingly obvious, yet one of the requirements of respectability in this country is to pretend—and to repeat loudly at every opportunity—that diversity is a strength.

Fifth, the evidence is overwhelming that there is a substantial genetic contribution to well-established racial differences in average IQ. North East Asians living in America have higher incomes, better test scores, and more education than whites because they are, on average, smarter. Whites are smarter than Hispanics, who are smarter than blacks. It is vital to recognize this because otherwise “society” (meaning whites) is blamed for the failures of blacks and Hispanics.

Finally, race realism recognizes that whites have legitimate group interests just like everyone else.

JH: What are the legitimate group interests of whites?

JT: It is vital to eliminate the stark racial double standard that denies whites even have legitimate interests as a group. White pride or racial consciousness is considered “bigotry” or “hatred,” while any other kind of racial consciousness is considered to be a healthy form of ethnic self-esteem. This means every group in the country—except whites—is constantly pushing its collective interests, while whites are not allowed even to have interests as a group, much less work for them.

Some of the interests of whites are obvious. The first is not to be reduced to a minority. Most whites don’t want this but they dare not say so for fear of being accused of “hate.” Hispanics, on the other hand, are constantly rejoicing in their increased numbers and influence, and it is considered natural for them to look forward to eventually become a majority. Their gain is our loss, so why are they allowed to be happy about their gain but we are not allowed to resist our loss?

Whites have every right to prefer the kind of society that they create and to resist demographic shifts that are already changing their country in profound ways. Jews have a right to a Jewish state, and they keep it Jewish through selective immigration. Japanese have a right to a Japanese state and they keep it that way through restrictive immigration. Whites also, whether in North America or Europe, have the right to live in nations that reflect their culture and heritage.

Second, what is known as “affirmative action” is really discrimination against whites. If the kinds of preferences shown to blacks or Hispanics were shown to whites it would be a nation scandal, but because the victims are whites (and sometimes Asians) it is of no consequence. Whites must work to eliminate this while it is still possible to do so. When non-whites become majorities, they are likely to push for even more extensive racial preferences than the ones they enjoy today.

JH: Do you consider yourself a White Nationalist and/or a White Supremacist? Why or Why not?

JT: No. I don’t know what the term white nationalist is supposed to mean. White supremacists presumably want to rule other races, and race realists have no such desire. I believe people of every race should be free to pursue their own destinies, and this is impossible in societies in which they become minorities.

It should not be necessary to add that a concern for one’s own interests implies no hostility to others. Race realists understand that people of all races have the same rights: to preserve their culture and identity against any force that would dilute or replace it. One’s race is one’s extended family. Putting the interests of family before the interests of strangers is not hostility to strangers. One can become good friends with strangers but family comes first.

JH: After doing some research, I’ve found that your parents were “conventional liberals” who were missionaries in Japan. At what point, and why, did your views shift from what you seen at a younger age?

JT: I, too, was a conventional liberal until I was in my 30s. I preferred being a liberal. Liberals are happy to consider themselves morally superior to conservatives (and certainly to anyone who could be called a “racist,” whatever that means). Also, liberalism is the driving, majority ethos of the United States, and it is more comfortable to agree with the majority. I clung desperately to liberalism. It was the study of history and economics as well as extensive travel in Europe and Africa that finally ground away my liberal illusions.

JH: How do you feel about the election of the first black President?

JT: It was bound to happen eventually, given the collapse of the white majority. Until 1965, we had an immigration policy designed to keep the country majority white. Since that time, the white percentage has declined from about 88 percent to perhaps 62 percent. Do not forget: 55 percent of whites voted for Mr. Obama’s opponent. Twenty years ago, any candidate who got 55 percent of the white vote became president. Now, a majority of whites can vote for a candidate but his opponent may win. In this sense, because of demographic change, you could say that whites did not get the president they wanted. Why should whites encourage that kind of change?

As for Mr. Obama, he encourages the population shifts that are displacing whites. He has sued a state that simply wants to enforce the duly established immigration laws that the federal government refuses to enforce. He wants to give amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants, most of whom are non-white. In these respects, he is probably not much different from his main Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. However, even she would not have ordered the Justice Department to drop its voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panthers. This sort of thing is alienating whites.

JH: Describe the current state of race relations in America.

JT: Race is, and always will be, a serious social fault line in this country. Relative peace is maintained because whites tolerate “affirmative action” and massive non-white immigration. They do this because they are browbeaten and bamboozled into thinking it is wrong for whites to act in their own interests. This will not always be the case, and race relations will get worse as more and more whites begin to resist dispossession.

JH: What are your thoughts about people who say, “race doesn’t matter?”

JT: They are fools. Race obviously matters. Ninety percent of the churches in the United States are at least 80 percent one race. Is that an accident? Residential segregation is not much different from patterns in the 1950s. Why is that? The NAACP, the Urban League, the Congressional Black Congress, the National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and literally thousands of other groups and associations are based deliberately and specifically on race. Try telling their members race doesn’t matter.

It is almost exclusively white people who say race doesn’t matter, and this is because they are the only people who are required at least to pretend that it doesn’t matter. This, in turn, is because they are not allowed to have explicit racial interests of their own, and must deliberately close their eyes to the racial chauvinism of others lest they acknowledge this anti-white double standard.

JH: Do you believe that there is a need to fight for civil rights in America?

JT: What do you mean by “civil rights”? People of all races have the same legal rights in the United States, so the “civil rights” struggle was won long ago. Many blacks and Hispanics seem to think racial preferences for themselves are “civil rights” but they are actually a power grab at the expense of whites

The way this entire project ties together is very impressive. It has carved a niche. All the various components have formed a very nice whole that is greater than the sum of the parts.

My results suggest that I would not have been a nazi.

Congratulations! You are not susceptible to brainwashing, your values and cares extend beyond the borders of your own country, and your Blind Patriotism does not reach unhealthy levels. If you had been German in the 30s, you would’ve left the country.

Conclusion: born and raised in Germany in the early 1930’s, you would not have been a Nazi.

Free Media Productions is not a philosophy-based website, even though many contributors express an interest in political philosophy and know that it is important. What binds us together is a goal – and that goal is to create an alternative media using various technological mediums which is free of business interests, political correctness, internet egos accompanied by typical forum drama on a solely vbulletin medium and invasion of privacy on a public social networking medium. While FMP tends to shy away from the centrist mainstream (i.e. liberalism), members are not tested for political philosophy and categorized based on their philosophy. We have a goal, and we work towards it.

Readers may notice a few tendencies that perhaps stand out a bit more than others, including a general antipathy towards liberalism, capitalism, globalism, imperialism and so forth. However, there are very few things that the staff will not tolerate, and we do our best to maintain a relatively open platform for discussion.

If you think you may be interested in contributing, click here.

The internet is pretty discredited as a medium when compared to professional source.

Your thoughts?

-Fine blog. I got a lot of effective info. I’ve been following this technology for awhile. It’s intriguing how it keeps shifting, yet some of the core elements stay the same. Have you seen much change since Google made their most recent acquisition in the arena?

-I must say that by and large I am really impressed with this site.It is easy to see that you are chuffed about your writing. Trust all your future posts turn out as well. Cheers!

-I was browsing tonight, unsure of what I was looking for, but knew that I needed help with my finances, and your site just popped up. (Divine intervention, or what!)

-I am really satisfied with this posting that you have given us. This is really a stupendous work done by you. Thank you and looking for more posts by you.

-Hey this is a great post. I’m going to email this to my friends. I stumbled on this while surfing for some freebies, I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.

-Hiya there, I encountered your blog by means of Google and your place looks extremely occupying for me.

-Hey this is a great article. I’m going to email this to my friends. I stumbled on this while googling for some popular lyrics, I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.

-I like the layout of your blog and I’m going to do the same thing for mine. Do you have any tips? Please PM ME on yahoo @ AmandaLovesYou702 8 4 4

Rest in peace.

The link

Demographic “realism” is part of marketing. True it is not as precise as psychograpahic history, but without knowledge of actual individual buying patterns, the next best strategy is to go by demographics. The logic behind this is that while you will occasionally make a false judgment, at least a percentage of the time you will be correct in your stereotype.

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Using technology from top Silicon Valley companies such as Cisco and Intel, advertisers are creating a new breed of digital signs that can be customized depending on a viewer’s age and gender.

Already starting to appear in selected malls and other spots around the country, the signs have the potential to revolutionize the retailing industry, but their intrusiveness has led to criticism from privacy advocates and nervousness from some in the marketing industry itself.

“The vast majority of people walking in stores, near elevators and in other public and private spaces have no idea that the innocent-looking flat screen TVs playing videos may be capturing their images and then dissecting and analyzing them for marketing purposes,” the nonprofit, Southern California-based World Privacy Forum warned in a report it issued on digital signs in January. “Controls need to be put in place now, before this technology runs amok.”

Businesses insist the signs are good for them and for consumers, because they can offer more focused and effective advertising. And the burgeoning market has caught the eye of Silicon Valley companies. Among them is San Jose-based Cisco, which makes gear that displays images and management software for the signs. It’s not a huge business yet for the company, according to Thomas Wyatt, general manager of Cisco’s digital media systems unit. But he said it’s growing, adding “these are really emerging technologies.”

The trend stems from a desire among marketers to make ads more effective by making them more relevant to those seeing them.

“If you come by a sign and it’s playing something you’re not interested in, it’s noise to you,” said Joe Jensen, a manager at Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel, which touts the ability of its chips to provide visually appealing ad images and to process the audience data the signs capture. But if the message is tailored to a specific individual’s needs, he added, the person often will welcome the information.

Using facial-recognition software from other companies — such as TruMedia of Tampa, Fla. — the signs can recognize the demographic characteristics of people standing in front of them and instantly change their ads.

Tony Leger, a TruMedia sales director, said hundreds of signs with that capability are in operation worldwide in retail malls, airports, banks and other places. But he said it’s unclear how many are automatically adjusting their ads for customers because many businesses that have installed them don’t want to reveal that to competitors.

Some of the signs have proven controversial, including digital billboards Castrol operated in London in September. Equipped with cameras, the signs read the license plates of each passing motorist, accessed a database that revealed the automobile’s model and year, and flashed the driver a message about what type of oil their vehicle should use.

The ads were blasted as intrusive and a potentially unsafe distraction, and Castrol halted them after only a few days.

The digital devices are beginning to resemble the brainy signs featured in the 2002 science-fiction movie “Minority Report,” which could recognize people and hail them by name. Many can gauge the sex and approximate age of those standing in front them. That way, if a pre-teen girl watching the screen wanders away and an adult male approaches, the sign automatically can switch from showing an ad for Hello-Kitty Dress-Me Bears, for example, to one for men’s work boots. Samsung claims its versions can even determine the race and nationality of a viewer.

These digital signs are part of a growing push to personalize ads through technology.

Web ads that are customized based on a user’s interests and demographics have been a staple for companies like Google and Yahoo for years. Although critics have decried the tactic, Forrester Consulting found that 77 percent of the marketers it surveyed in January “are planning to use or already use audience targeting for their online strategy.”

More recently, companies have used GPS technology in mobile phones to tailor ads to a user’s location (“25% off lattes” as someone walks by a coffee shop, for instance). Although many retailers won’t send such ads unless invited to do so by a consumer, the practice worries the Center for Digital Democracy. In a letter to the federal government on Monday, the nonprofit public interest organization warned against letting the practice proliferate “without strong privacy and consumer health-related safeguards in place.”

Any ad targeting makes some people uncomfortable. A survey of 1,000 adults last year by University of California-Berkeley and University of Pennsylvania researchers found that 66 percent opposed such pitches.

Count Will Douglas among them. The 25-year-old consultant from Oakland, Calif., who was shopping at the Milpitas Great Mall, termed the idea “weird” and wondered if the equipment might make insulting errors about “someone of ambiguous gender” or mistake a short person for a child. Assuming a sign “can tell something about you strikes me as arrogant,” he said.

“That’s so wrong,” added state agricultural technician Bobbi Thornton, 55, of Milpitas, who was at the same mall searching for a handbag. “This is like the Internet search engines that follow your shopping behavior. It’s so invasive.”

Face-assessing digital displays even make some advertisers skittish. Last month, Point of Purchase Advertising International published guidelines for using the signs, advising among other things that consumers always be told when they are under surveillance. Despite the advantages of such technology, the industry group concluded, being able to monitor a consumer’s every move and facial feature “sends shivers down the spine of even the boldest marketer.”

In addition here are some stats for unique viewers of free media productions :

The date is listed, followed by unique monthly visitors, by total visitors, by pages, by hits, by bandwidth, then the length of each month (the first month started mid month).

Jun 2009 1918 3955 45536 104652 1.23 GB (20 day time period)
Jul 2009 2236 5153 45877 108254 1.83 GB (31 day time period)
Aug 2009 2448 5860 39203 100889 1.83 GB (31 day time period)
Sep 2009 3049 8199 49428 111716 1.92 GB (30 day time period)
Oct 2009 3196 8212 38400 89962 1.66 GB (31 day time period)
Nov 2009 3992 10128 66877 158462 3.00 GB (30 day time period)
Dec 2009 4375 10595 76268 177501 2.13 GB (31 day time period)
Jan 2010 4441 10791 57813 129035 1.85 GB (31 day time period)
Feb 2010 4781 11154 67142 162148 1.88 GB (28 day time period)

Each statement made on Free Media Productions is made individually, not collectively.  Simply put, this operation is not run by Democratic Centralism but convergence via happenstance.  For instance not all of Metal Gear’s statements are proofread and supported by Besosvhili, and vice versa, not all of Besoshvili’s statements are proof read and supported by Metal Gear.

Yes he hates anonymous people who use their position of being anonymous to abuse people who have real names attached to their writings indirectly.

Yes he took revenge against another website.  Get over it.

Perhaps good women are the ones who take on their co-sexualists, and admit that they are responsible for everything that is wrong with America right now. It doesn’t matter if women are necessary for reproduction. We can change that with a technocracy.

This letter was sent to me from America’s Heartland.

Dear Dick,

I live in Nebraska where anyone with a decent job can afford to buy a house. Recently, I’m seeing a trend in the amount of women who feel that they can AND SHOULD buy their own house. “How the fuck do these women expect to mow the lawn?” I asked a friend of mine who is buying a house. She replied, “You.” After I finished laughing, she asked if she could borrow my lawnmower to do it. “How are you going to get the mower from my house to yours?” I said. She replied, “Your truck.”

Property ownership for women should be discouraged, starting at the real estate agent.

CE in Nebraska.

Well said, CE in Nebraska. Women should not own property.

A woman owning property is like giving a monkey a dog on a leash. It doesn’t mean the monkey has a pet. It means some idiot tied a dog to a monkey.

Women owning property doesn’t mean that they themselves aren’t property.

But what’s the worst that could happen? So a few women buy a few houses and fuck them up, it’s not like that will fuck up the entire global economy, right?

Wrong. Women caused the subprime mortgage meltdown.

You Are What You Eat

Women don’t know how to treat property. Just look at how they treat themselves! Getting fat as hell, speaking when they could just sit there and look pretty, giving it up on the first date. Women are the world’s oldest property and they treat themselves like shit.

They also treat their cars and houses like shit. The last time I let a woman drive me anywhere, I didn’t. I insisted on driving her car myself and she had to kick through a foot of trash and debris in her passenger seat to even sit down. That’s how a woman treats something she owns. She lets it go to hell.

If women can’t fuck to make a problem go away, or at least pretend they’re going to fuck after the problem goes away, then the problem goes unsolved. Take my new best friend CE from Nebraska. Sure, he could get his freak on for mowing some dozy bitch’s lawn, but that’s a waste of time and worse yet, it’s a loss of Man Points.

The maximum amount of work any man can do to get laid without losing Man Points is 30 minutes. Any more means you give a shit.

Women Are Consumers

Women don’t understand ownership. They only understand consumership. That’s why they should only purchase things that can be used. Things like make-up, clothing, pots and pans, and especially birth control; all things meant to be used up or thrown away when something better comes along — just like women.

Men are owners. We invented ownership and we fought the wars that resulted from this awesome invention. Ownership is about putting work into something, including ourselves, in order to increase its value. Women just complain until someone either pays more for access to their sex organs, or lies better while doing it.

A boob job doesn’t make a girl smarter, it just makes her look smarter.

Subprime Fuck Up

Subprime is the first word I think of when I think of women and their shit brains. However, it also perfectly describes their real estate investments.

If you don’t understand what the subprime mortgage crisis is, I’ll explain it in man terms.

Let’s say you’re throwing a party and stocking it with booze. You get a bottle of Patron, a 12 pack of Pacifico, and a case of Ralph’s brand charcoal filtered potato Vodka.

Guess what, no one will fucking drink Ralph’s brand charcoal filtered potato Vodka and the people who will drink it, you don’t want at your party! That’s the subprime alcohol at my party crisis. The Pacifico will be gone in ten minutes and the Patron will get smashed on your car by pissed off, sober party guests during an angry mass exodus.

In 2003, one in five home purchases were made by single women.

In 2006 women were 32% more likely to receive a subprime mortgage than men.

In 2006 women were 41% more likely to receive a high-cost subprime mortgage than men.

In 2006, 30% of mortgage borrowers were women

In 2006, 38.8% of subprime mortgage borrowers were women.

In 2006, women were 29.1% more likely to be stupid and irresponsible.

Men are better than women.

The economy is like a symphony. It doesn’t take an orchestra to fuck it up, it just takes like 29.1% of the instruments.

Accountability? Who Me?

Women are experts at shooting themselves in the foot. I think men have too much practice not shooting ourselves in the foot from pissing outside our entire lives. We learn to account for wind, splash factor, all kinds of shit. We learn not to piss all over our shoes. But women don’t. According to women, the reason they accepted shitty mortgages from banks and didn’t use LendingTree.com to shop around like TV told them to, is because banks are sexist.

Fuck you. Banks hate everyone. To banks you are a number not a name and a collection of statistics to milk for cash — not a person. For more information on banks, consult your local library — or ask Mel Gibson. I’m sure he has some interesting theories.

Financial Advice From the Retarded

Aside from trash books telling women not to base their self-worth on men — which they will anyway — financial advice books written by women for women are some of the biggest selling titles out there.

Among money saving pearls like, “Bring your own snacks to the movies”, and “Don’t bother getting a car, just get some man to drive you everywhere!” you’ll will also encounter the following gem amongst the kitschy self-empowerment slogans:

Home ownership is the key to building wealth.

What women fail to realize is that affording a home is the key to home ownership. Women are economically retarded. They’ll write checks until their checkbook is empty. They’ll pay the minimum required amount on their credit cards just for fun. They’ll buy the Extended Warranty because it makes them feel better. Then they’ll throw all the fucking receipts away and cry when their shitty little television breaks two years in.

The point is, women are fiscally retarded.

Financial Advice For the Retarded

“Women are Disproportionately Represented in High-Cost Mortgage Market.” -CFA 2006

So what if women got offered shitty deals? They still took them. That makes it their fault. Who knows how much shit women forgot to put on their applications or how much effort they put into researching the loan process or even looking up the word “loan” before taking one out and leaving the global economy alone on the swing set while trying to convince her friends that she’s had a busy day. Running errands is not having a busy day.

Women wouldn’t know a good deal if it offered them a ride home in exchange for a blowjob. That’s a good deal! It’s five minutes of work vs. an hour of walking. Do the math.

But women can’t do math. Women look at APR and amortization rates and closing costs and fiduciary terms and their little heads start replaying the training montage in Dirty Dancing. “Maybe this time she’ll get in the air without laughing like a whore!” thinks a woman as she’s signing away daddy’s retirement plan.

Daddy

All problems by women are actually caused by men. Men who think their daughter, wife, sister, girlfriend, mother, fuck buddy, or co-worker, has anything more than shit between her ears.

In the case of the subprime meltdown, some man thought it was a good idea to give his daughter a down payment. It wasn’t.

Welcome to the big leagues, ladies. Having the world on your shoulders isn’t as fun as it looked, is it? Make sure your degrees in Political Science are framed to match your bedroom set when the repo man comes to collect both.

“Though no statistics exist to compare foreclosure rates among men and women, it is logical to conclude that higher rates of subprime mortgages among women translates to higher rates of foreclosure.” -Allen J. Fishbein

Here’s a statistic for you. Women have only been allowed to own property for 1% of the time we’ve been around as a species. There’s a reason for that.

Manclusion

“35 percent of women home equity borrowers used the loans to pay off credit card debt, and a third of those borrowers had rebuilt the same credit card debt within four years.” – Money Magazine, July 2004

I should have just lead with that quote, but since it also ends the discussion, I saved it for the end.

End of discussion. Women are fucked.

If I was a bank, I would never lend money to a single woman wanting to buy a house because I know she’s going to blow half of it on overpriced furnishings and a new puppy she won’t discipline for shit. Besides, she’s just going to get married in a few years anyway, and the day a woman gets married all her money suddenly becomes discretionary. Yours is hers and hers is hers. Welcome to marriage. That means whenever a bank signs a mortgage over to a single woman, they’re actually signing it over to her future husband.

Since when is it good banking to give loans to imaginary people!

Before the recession I was not so open about my serial killer style hatred of women, but now all my prejudices are coming out because I’m angry with the world. Women are like snakes – some of them may not be poisonous but the ones who are not will strangle you.

When the lyceum was formed, I was less extreme. I wanted to separate between “good women” and “bad women.” At one point we banned someone “for being a women” and I protested. I wasn’t too kind to the pedophora poster Starr, but that’s not only for her womanhood.

Now I’ve become more extreme. Women do nothing but sit in the kitchen and distract men from their superior goals. Imagine if you are shooting the foul shot to win a basketball game, and then you stop to look at a women and miss the shot. That is what women are like. A giant waste of time. Useless. Worth nothing.

But women find me physically attractive, and this is a biological fact. Obviously my physical condition is very high. Because I don’t fully articulate the extent I hate women when talking to the average person casually, they actually find me likable. But they don’t know I hate them.

I know “racial awareness” will appreciate this post!

For the first time in recorded history, women outnumber men on the nation’s payrolls.

This benchmark is bittersweet, as it comes largely at men’s expense. Because men have been losing their jobs faster than women, the downturn has at times been referred to as a “man-cession.”

Women’s new majority in the nation’s workplaces comes decades after women first began trading in their aprons for pantsuits in droves, and it reinforces expectations that women will continue on the path to pay parity.

“Important milestones remain to be achieved, but women’s surpassing 50 percent of employment is something that historians will note for years to come,” said Casey B. Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago who has been tracking the recession’s effects on both sexes.

According to seasonally unadjusted data released on Friday by the Labor Department, women held the majority of nonfarm payroll jobs in January. They also did so during February, March, November and December of last year, but the shift emerged only on Friday when the Labor Department revised its 2009 data. Women’s slender lead was highest last month, when they held 50.3 percent of the nation’s nonfarm payroll jobs in the raw numbers.

Over the last few decades, women have been steadily claiming a greater share of the nation’s payrolls. In 1964, the first year for which the government began collecting this data, less than a third of the nation’s nonfarm payroll jobs were held by women.

But it was the recession that finally pushed women into the majority.

As in previous recessions, male workers have borne the brunt of the job losses in the last two years. Since the recession began in December 2007, men have lost 7.4 million jobs on net, whereas women have lost 3.9 million jobs.

In other words, both sexes are worse off than they were before the downturn, but men have suffered more.

The types of jobs held by men and women help explain the shift. Men are more likely to work in industries like manufacturing, which rise and fall with the economic cycle. Women are more likely to work in government, health care and education, among the safest categories in a downturn. Health care employment has been among the strongest of any type during the recession.

It is also “no accident” that women pushed ahead of men during colder months, says Professor Mulligan.

Male-dominated industries are actually especially cyclical in two different ways: They are not only influenced by the business cycle, but also by the seasonal cycle. Industries like construction, which tend to employ men, get more work in warmer months.

If you adjust for these regular seasonal factors that affect the job market, women would have held just less than half of the nation’s payroll jobs in January, at 49.9 percent.

All of this means that women are likely to fall back to a minority of the nation’s payrolls again once the weather warms and the recovery gains a foothold in the labor markets. Still, the longer-term trend of stronger representation on the nation’s payrolls will most likely continue, economists say.

Russian nation was created by Russian climate and Russian blood.

Contrary to common misconception, Russians living on territory of Russian Federation are not of Slavic blood. The ancient inhabitants of Kiev’s principate were Slavic people, that’s true. When Moscow principality was created a few centuries later in the 14th century, its population was overwhelmingly Urgo-Finns. Descendants of Kiev’s genealogical tree, their princes were originally of Slavic blood. But when Kiev’s armies moved north with their small troops, they conquered enormous vast variety of Finnish tribes who lived on enormous territory of European Russia. Only aristocrats of Russia were originally Slavs. Simple folk were descendants of Finns. That is why it is practically no different between “Chuvash” and “Finn.” And that is why Serbs are so different from Russians. Because Serbs are Slavs.

Russians are a depressive tribe because of centuries they were living in shadows of moisty forests. Russians are as unhappy with alcohol as Finns are.

So, forget about Slavs. When you will adopt my vision of Russian history, and of Russians, you will understand who Russians are.

I am the best Russian writer, but I am forced to confess that I hate Russian language. Russian words are painfully long, they remind me of naked slimy worms. You know, those pink awful creatures that you can see on some hot summer night on path you walk. Worms get out of soil to copulate under the moonlight. Russian words are copulating on my table every day and night. I am looking at them with hate and I am screaming. I am gnashing my teeth. Why should put “icheskaya” to the end of “social” in “Social Republic?” Seven letters I am adding for what fuck? Fucking “icheskaya!” Hysterical, hystericheskii laugh goes out of me when I am imaging those fucking Urgo-Finns in their shadowy forests. They move in slow motion, they take their time. Why wasn’t I born in a clear lucid language dealing in “Achtung!” and “Shnell?” And when I think that Russians are only a handful of 142 million readers, it’s really depressing for a writer.

The so called “Russian Soul” can be also explained by origins of the Russian people. Proverbial slowness of Finns (”hot finish lads!”) can be seen as phenomenon of Russian soul. Enigmatical Russian Soul is simply Russian man, uncertain, slow to decide, hesitating, never sure of itself, never sure of its own decision. Forest man with a milky skin, with thin blond hair. Not a Slav, but a Finn, Finn, Finn! And don’t accuse me of racism. Happily we have Turks and all sorts of Mongols amongst us. But the sick from alcoholism urban Russian Europeans are descendants of native Urgo-Finns and their tribes. They have shadowy mysterious souls because for hundred generations their ancestors were living by the river banks in the forests. They like to get drunk and to weep. Of too many trees, of too much of river’s water the Russian Soul is created.

Then, of course, we live in a terrible climate. We have eight months of winter and only four of summer. This summer, however, can be called a “summer” only such on condition that you have never travelled abroad. The lack of sunshine is chronic on the Russia’s territory. Everything is explained by its climate and the Urgo-Finn blood. Even more, the blood is explained by the climate. It moves slowly because of the freeze. No sunshine makes our kids look sad. When I was young, I thought almost everyday why “we Slavs” (I thought we were Slavic people) living in such an unhuman, uncomfortable climate? Why we didn’t move out of that terrible territory? However, I had tried to move. Our national ideas for centuries was to move south. We fought First World War to capture the the straights of Bosphorus and Dardanelles. We didn’t get it, alas. (Before that, in January of 1878, we were some kilometers from Istanbul-Constantinople before English bastards intervened.) Russian man carries all weight of his climate on itself. My deepest belief is that Russia should swallow Kazakhstan territory if we want our children to have sunshine.

Russian women are very, very bad. The worst of all. Russian women is like the Russian Government. Most Russian women at least are good looking when they are in their twenties. Some Russian women are gorgeously beautiful. But they are bad. They are treacherous because they have no moral principles. Christian faith was eliminated during existence of the Soviet Union so nobody taught Russian women morals. No such discipline was taught in Soviet schools. Russian woman hates man because she is envying him. She wants to be as brutal and stupid as him, she wants to lay on a divan doing nothing as man does, but she has less possibilities. Russian woman is disastrous, relationships with her destined to be tragedy. There is no way that you will end happily. You must subjugate her. If not, she will subjugate you. On both occasions, you will lose. Don’t forget that abortions and divorces were permitted even in Stalin’s Russia, so our country educated women as bitches. Millions of bitches walking our streets. I am absolutely and positively on the side of Muslim strict code of behavior for women. Their system of separation of sexes if effective and healthy.

Russian Government is bloody beast eating human flesh. It is deeply medieval in its principle conceptions. Russian Government strongly believed that Russians are subjects of Russian Government, that they are its property, that Russians should be physically punished for not showing proper respect for its Government. European Governments behave cruelly towards foreign populations, towards Yugoslavs or toward Iraqis. But Russian Government represses its own citizens. Russian Government never said one honest word. Blatant lies, we, citizens, hear from Government. They terrorize us.

Their instrument are police, brutal and unhuman, just millions of scoundrels dressed in grey uniforms. And judges: archaic men and women with terrible medieval faces and black souls under their judges clothes.

As you understand, my view of Russia is macabre, like Lovecraft’s work. I hope country will change soon, I am working for it. Then I will look at my country through rosy tinted glasses. Just wait.

Interesting. This may explain why Russians have tiny traces of Mongoloid blood (but not as much as Finns do).

There is nothing which makes me happier than the knowledge of my virginity; there is nothing more sensual or alive than the knowledge that I am pure forever. It is my virginity which sustains me and separates me from disease, criminal lust, hypersexual negroes and mestizos, as well as other brute beasts of the field.

I was convinced the media was run by a bunch of patriotards who want to shove Negroes and Sharia practicing Muslims (some of which are barely Caucasoid) right down my throat until I finally puke and abandon the federal government altogether.

The media is obviously controlled by Jews, but that in itself is not a reason to be against it.

Being a misogynist means exactly that : not trusting women. Being celibate can be motivated by misogyny (like me). It can be motivated by many things. One such motive is Catholicism. I read instant messages over meebo, and if one more person charges that I am being celibate so that I can “reclaim Catholic roots,” I will inform them that secularism is my religion and I will not waver.

I want to thank these guests, the one’s who weren’t trolling with gross pictures, for broadening the topic of discussion. We want to discuss as many different types of topics as we can.

Feel free to make suggestions in the comments.

To start:
Dick Masterson
“Racial Awareness” who posts here and on Anthroscape.
Larry Summers
Otto Weininger
David Buss
Benito Mussolini

Post questions here in the comments. I’ll also get questions off of other forums.

One of countless films about the leaders of the Revolution and he founders of the Soviet state is “Hostile Whirlwinds” by Mikhael Kalatazov, about the life and work of the great F.E. Dzerzhinsky during the years 1918-21.

This is a scene from “The Return of Maksim”, the second volume of Kozintsev and Trauberg’s trilogy about Maksim. The film is set in July 1914, with the Bolsheviks and Mensehviks compete for representation of the working-class in the Duma. Maksim, who just returned from exile, calls the workers to strike as a protest against the firing of six of their colleagues. The traitor Platon Dymba assaults Maksim, wounding him severely. When the strike unfolds the workers demonstrate by the thousands, the news of the outbreak of World War I suddenly arrives. Maksim gets drafted.

Next is a scene from “Pavel Korchagin”, a film based on the book “How the Steel was Tempered” by Ostrovsky. The film depicts the revolutionary upsurge of he people of which Korchagin feels himself to be only a small part. For many generations of Russian youth, Korchagin became a moral example because of his communist principles and unswerving will.

The film “Girl with Personality” by Konstantin Yudin is a light-hearted comedy about life in the new Russia. Katya Ivanova comes to Moscow to try to find justice for a director-burreaucrat who spoiled al the work of a cattle farm in the Far East. Having made a saboteur harmless on her way, she finds work in a dining car, fur shop, and a record factory. She is assigned director of a cattle farm as a reward for catching the saboteur.

[04:02] Anonymous: hey kane
[04:02] Metal Gear: yeah
[04:03] Anonymous: Do you know what happened to VLad?
[04:03] Anonymous: the jewish guy
[04:03] Metal Gear: what is the address for the new biodivesity forum?
[04:03] Metal Gear: helios you mean
[04:03] Anonymous: yes
[04:04] Metal Gear: when i told him i was a saddam hussein fan (sorry i know that pisses you off because your kurd) he flipped out and called me a neo-con and blocked me. i never heard from him again
[04:04] Anonymous: when was that?
[04:04] Metal Gear: 2 years ago
[04:04] Anonymous: and why are you a saddam hussein fan?
[04:04] Metal Gear: because i’m against sharia
[04:05] Anonymous: the guy was a defunct dictatorial genocidal murderer
[04:05] Anonymous: nothing short of pan-arabist who killed people
[04:05] Anonymous: He wasn’t anti sharia because it was ideological
[04:06] Metal Gear: he did it in the name of modernization
[04:06] Anonymous: he was anti sharia because of religious people being a contending force
[04:06] Anonymous: that’s total bullshit
[04:06] Anonymous: had he bought the clerics
[04:06] Anonymous: it would be all the same
[04:08] Anonymous: he was just emulating stalin, by surpressing ethnicities and other political contenders… he even eliminated fellow baathist’s just so he and his clan could consolidate their power
[04:08] Metal Gear: well i think it was a natural set of events that he didn’t get along with religious leaders
[04:08] Anonymous: he spared all the sunni clerics and the clergy who were pro-baath
[04:09] Metal Gear: that’s true. saddam was tolerate towards more moderate muslims but that is still an improvement over support of sharia law.
[04:09] Anonymous: he even turned a blind eye toward’s it… don’t forget… secularism doesn’t mean a complete supression and rejection of all religious forces
[04:10] Anonymous: those sunnis weren’t moderate… they were just benign and malleable
[04:10] Anonymous: their agenda was no diffrent then islamist iran… in regards to upholding sharia law’s
[04:10] Metal Gear: true but i think hussein would not have tolerated them if they went that route
[04:10] Anonymous: that’s not true
[04:11] Anonymous: he would only have reacted had they shown any amibition
[04:11] Anonymous: political amibtion
[04:11] Metal Gear: that’s what i mean.
[04:12] Metal Gear: pol pot killed muslims no matter what. hussein tolerated them, but basically told them they had to submit to his ba’athist ideas.
[04:12] Anonymous: he didn’t give a fuck what they preached aslong as they stayed out of politics… they could preaching death and destruction of everything and everyone if they so pleased
[04:12] Anonymous: hussein was a muslim himself
[04:12] Anonymous: your forgetting… that islam is still a very important part of arab communities
[04:12] Metal Gear: i doubt that he was a very sincere Muslims. I view “moderate islam” as a contradiction.
[04:13] Anonymous: islam is a part of arab nationalist identities
[04:13] Anonymous: everywhere
[04:13] Anonymous: in egypt, in algeria, in libya, in iraq, in syria
[04:13] Metal Gear: And that’s to their detriment. Hail the Pharonic religion.
[04:13] Metal Gear: more precisely, hail secularism.
[04:14] Anonymous: had he gone out of his way to condem islam as the opium of the people
[04:14] Anonymous: people would rebel
[04:14] Anonymous: he was very pro-islamic infact.. inofficially
[04:14] Metal Gear: i agree with you, so he co-opted them.
[04:14] Anonymous: he was butt kissing palestinians, syrians, saudis, gulf arabs
[04:14] Metal Gear: he co-opted what he couldn’t realistically destroy
[04:15] Anonymous: Cmon your overestimating this guy
[04:15] Anonymous: You think he was some slick clever politician, who acted like professional dictator
[04:16] Metal Gear: u are saying he was basically an opportunist
[04:16] Anonymous: He was just some genocidal dictator who was erratic in his dealing’s he was good at holding postures.
[04:16] Anonymous: he was a tribal opportunist
[04:16] Anonymous: who had no formal education
[04:17] Anonymous: and who tried to act like he was the leader
[04:17] Anonymous: all he did was a vague reflection of stalin
[04:17] Anonymous: in his own distorted way.
[04:17] Anonymous: if he was really that clever
[04:17] Anonymous: he would have never have invaded Kuwait
[04:18] Anonymous: or sent his airplanes to IRAN to be safegaurded
[04:18] Metal Gear: i agree but his iranian invasion was actually logical to stop the spread of shia theocracy.
[04:18] Anonymous: he basically viewed iraq as his tribal territory
[04:20] Anonymous: he didn’t really do it to stop pro-iranian theocracy… he did it so he could build baseses in khuzestan
[04:21] Anonymous: so the iranians would not threaten his domain militarily
[04:21] Metal Gear: in a hypothetical world where sharia was not a threat to saddam, i agree that he may not have fought that war. He perceived a threat and tried to eliminate it. But the conditions make him a logical ally if you oppose sharia.
[04:22] Anonymous: Oh cmon do you really think anti-sharia was his agenda?
[04:22] Anonymous: he prayed 5 times for pitsakes
[04:23] metal gear: no i don’t but i think his secularism forced him to take out enemies who were pro-sharia
[04:23] Anonymous: he paid clerics from saudi arabia to open mosques even
[04:23] Anonymous: since he thought sunnis were more of a arab sect
[04:24] Anonymous: You shouldin’t worry about iran
[04:24] Anonymous: or shiaah sharia
[04:24] Anonymous: you should worry about salafists
[04:24] Anonymous: wahabis
[04:24] Anonymous: who want to dominate the west
[04:24] Anonymous: and they are far more extreme
[04:24] metal gear: oh
[04:24] Anonymous: iran doesn’t even care about spreading shiism in the west
[04:24] Anonymous: iran is a benign force.
[04:26] Anonymous: he was actually supporting sharia
[04:26] Anonymous: by giving saudis
[04:26] Anonymous: money
[04:26] Anonymous: egyptians
[04:26] metal gear: i see. but i think that was mainly strategic. domestically he was more secular.

What any supporters who may have became alienated by the growth of such ideology must understand is that I have enough power to insure that such growth isn’t used to set a party line and exclude others. Therefore posters like Repeal17thamendment, who are openly anti-communist, should know that the existence of a certain group of posters doesn’t pose a threat to their participation. Posters like Ogenoct should know that they are invincible from being purged, even if the Islamists appear to be gaining excessive influence and Marxist posters are increasingly leaning towards Islam.

The balance of power has changed since the days of the lyceum and phora. An alliance between Muslims, questionable Socialists and Nazis is no longer in the position to purge dissent like in the past. This is partially due to the lack of participation of former members, partially due to the lack of the forum circle jerk nature and partially due to my rising influence.

 The aggression against the people of Waziristan undertaken by the Pakistani army is part of a plot hatched up in Washington, Brussels, and Tel-Aviv/Yaffo. There was absolutely no justification for this bloody adventure by the Pakistani military, as it is only further destabilizing the country and generating a humanitarian crisis. It does not have the support of the Pakistani people, as we have heard in the protests of Jemaat-e-Islami and other progressive organizations. As the former amir of Jemaat-e-Islami said:

…the US, Israel and India had hatched a conspiracy against Pakistan and succeeded in their mission to create an insurgency-like situation in the country.

The latest aggression is part of the imperialist strategy to establish total hegemony over the region: they want to weaken and pin down Pakistan, drown in blood the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination, and also isolate China. The current unrest in Pakistan is caused by Washington’s disastrous adventure in Afghanistan, the brazen attacks upon Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and of course Washington’s direct intervention in the northwest. Progressive forces must stand by the Republic of Waziristan and its right to self-defence and self-determination.

The courageous, battle-hardened people of Waziristan will not capitulate, but will send the lawless, barbarian invaders of the Pakistani army straight to their graves.

“Protestors Transform Jerusalem Day into Iran Day”

“Thousands Demonstrate in Tehran Against Ahmadinejad ‘the dictator’”

“New Protests surge in Iran as Ahmadinejad denies Holocaust again”

But as this video shows, millions of people poured out into the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, and other cities to demonstrate their revolutionary resolve, steadfast solidarity with the Palestinian national liberation struggle, condemnation of the ongoing Zionist occupation of al-Quds and Palestinian lands, dedication to the ideals of Imam Khomeini, and support to Supreme Leader Khamenei and President Ahmadinejad’s democratic government.

The bourgeois media is promoting the fiction that significant anti-government protests were staged by Mousavi’s bands, but the number of people who participated in them is less than a tiny dot in the universe compared to the millions of peoples’ amazing display of dedication to the Supreme Leader. The turnout just for President Ahmadinejad’s brilliant speech at Tehran University was at least 20 times the amount of those pro-Mousavi hooligans who tried in futility to hijack the day. Yet, the bourgeois media has stopped short of ignoring these peaceful and democratic demonstrations in favor of Palestine; at best, they depicted the day as consisting of a bunch of rival protests and clashes. But as Iran’s Press TV proves, this was far from the case:

As millions marched in Iran in a display of solidarity with Palestinians, supporters of Iran’s opposition movement have joined the major annual commemorative rally showing their loyalty to their leaders. The demonstrators chanted slogans in support of Mousavi and Karroubi.

July – 2236 unique visitors

August – 2448 unique visitors

We know who links to us and the search queries used to find us too.

The Marxist-Leninists insist that they are materialists, and that in their materialism they differ sharply with the utopian socialists, who are based only in the world of ideas and are therefore impotent in real struggle.

Materialism being the belief that the interactions of “Matter” is the source of all of out ideas, and that our ideas, and therefore ideals, cannot exist apart from matter.

I don’t object. I live in the material world afterall. I am a material being.

However, “Marxism” without ideals appears to be a very harsh ideology, which I find a hard time visualizing entirely apart from ideals.

Go on any, website of the extreme left, and read any standard article, and you will find them expressing “Ideals” since after all, we as human being speak in terms of ideals.

Isn’t this a contradiction?

Seeing, as I understand that living in the material world, I am the subject of forces I cannot control, pre-determined forces, I am certainly no libertarian, but that doesn’t mean I give up on all self-determination towards liberty, as small as I may be against the tide of economic determination. I have always been, therefore, a dualist of some sort, supporting both the individuals struggle for liberty, and the laws of determinism.

How does Marxist materialism differ, from all the other philosophers who uphold dualism, and materialism?

Philosophies which combine contradictions, as there is no other way of resolving them, other than by tolerating both.

Do Marxist-Leninists realize, that although they might object to the Bourgois-liberal historian categorizing them as being no different than Fascists, that despite important differences, they do in fact, on a merely amateur level share much more in common with Nationalists, Fascists, Populists, Social-democrates, Trotskites, Left-Anarchists and the like?

Furthermore, why does it seem that the “Correct line” is so difficult for Orthodox Marxist-Leninists to uphold? Why is is, that even the successor of Enver Hoxha, the icon and symbol of anti-revisionism, Ramiz Alia, restored capitalism in Albania?

Other than merely predicting failure, in the form of “counter-revolutions” and “betrayals” can those who defend Marxist-Leninism, have some kind of eternal moral by which they can justify all of the actions and reactions, which are taken in this process of philosphy through action? 

Nevertheless, as much as I can respect both democracy itself and the crushing of ruling-class democracy in the name of a desired objective, it does seem to me that the very structure of the system itself requires this very two-faced expression, “Democratic centralism.”

Take for example the “democratic” question on the subject of Stalin’s “Aggravation of class struggle under socialism” or Trotsky’s line, “Continuation of class struggle within the party.”

Which is correct?

If I am right the Trotskites equate the Marx-Lenin-Stalin line, with Fascism because it holds “the Party” together as a united unit or “nation.” (Even while it isn’t actually a nation, but a cross-national party, acting as a united-nation.)

While the Marx-Lenin-Trotsky line would claim that the divisions which continue to exist within the party should be taken as a continuation of class struggle?

In practice, what is the difference?

Stalin holds a system together after a revolution, and plans to continue changing certain things gradually, when that change is possible. Meaning he first has to deal with the outside threats of the capitalists, and the internal threats of dissent and the growing uncomfortableness of those dissenting.

Trotsky on the other hand, wants to continue revolution directly without regard, to disagreement within, and the coming threats of other states without.

Is my assessment correct?

So why, is it that those of us who originate on the populist-nationalist anti-liberal right wing are more willing to identify nationalism with Stalin’s Communism, and consider it a positive thing, while Trotskites take it as negative, and M-L’ers themselves deny it.

My thought?

Stalin is a “Community-ist” and a “Party-ist” and in this, preserves nations, institutions and peoples, while Trotsky is a “Break-up-ist” who insists on changing the definition of class, in order to meet some ill-defined objective of perfect human equality.

Would the Marxist-Leninist please respond, as I am trying to understand what exactly your view is, and why you justify, Stalin’s position behind his actions, on behalf of that portion of the worlds “working class” which fell under their political control?

Those who desire to start discussions should check out the forum.

Thomas Schwankhaus ——————————————————————(666)187-6969

213 High Brow Lane ▪ Zogcity, MN______________KeyboardCommandoStarr@gmail.com

Objective

A shoutbox, forum, or instant messenger position in support of disrupting the activities of legitimate political dissidents.

Education – Reading/Writing posts on Vanguard News Network, Stormfont

False Flag Operation Experience

• Joined and rose to staff positions in a “free speech forum” which legitimate and well intentioned people were lured into.
• Blasted the personal information of legitimate political dissidents over the internet who mistakenly trusted us.
• Expelled the original founder of the forum.
• Allowed child pornography to be sent over  the private message system.

Harassment Experience

• Signed up on a “race realist” website and impersonated the identity of another poster.  Pretended the poster plagiarized and then put him through torturous circle jerking afterwords.
• Impersonated a poster on a right wing forum multiple times.  Threatened to do it again and then the poster finally threatened back.  Banned that poster.
• Released personal information of dissenting posters.
• Called the family members of a poster.
• Created photoshopped pictures and fake “youtube raps” of a particular poster.
• Created imposter profiles on MySpace and Twitter, assuming the identity of a poster.
• Still maintain that we are infact that real victims of the situation.  Nobody was resisting our harassment, just trolling us.

Trolling Experience

• “Negative repped” posters into the red.
• Handed out infractions without proper justification.  This is proof of supreme scheming and intelligence.
• Reported posts that did not violate any rules.
• Questioned the well documented ancestral background of political dissidents in an attempt to portray it as fraudulent.

Zog-Resistance Experience

• Trolled away posters who were intelligent and sophisticated enough to have ideologies that are more complicated than primitive obsession with “zog.”
• Threw eggs at a police station.
• Shot politician’s child with a watergun.  Called it a drive by shooting.
• Joined the Democratic party and supported Barack Obama while our friend joined the Republican party and supported John McCain.  Together we are infiltrating the system and advocating for the “silent majority.”

Work Experience : Shoutbox Operational Manager

• Starting 4/23/2005, part time shoutbox duties were assumed in controlling and operating a community of fake dissidents.
• Starting 3/4/2004, Web Development Duties included installing Vbulletin Software and taking MySql backups.  These are true accomplishments from a tech perspective.

Greetings,
My name is Stan Singleton (it changes with each forum profile) and I would like to join your political movement in resistance against the status quo in America. I will pollute your movement with idiotic zog conspiracies, worthless trolling and circle jerking. I have much experience and it is documented in my contained resume.

Would you like me to join your organization?

Sincerely,

Mike Jemming (I know my name changes each time)

If we were to compare to gangster rap, the keyboard activist would be a studio gangster. At worst an FBI infiltrator, at best a troll who does not know who he or she is messing with. They hide behind the computer screen and try to “outdo” each other with “shocking” comments. Their profile in life doesn’t match their profile online and comments are exaggerated. They generally focus on social networking; not getting things done. They continue to draw a line between “the internet” and “real life” and argue that the two are not connected when releasing the personal information of their combatants for the world to see, yet they never miss an opportunity to cause division and tension within the causes of real activists. Their dedication to this cause is proof that they know the internet IS real life even though they deny it when releasing personal information of their political opponents.

Another symptom is Ideological perfectionism. They refuse to work with a lesser evil against a greater evil in actual protests. Yet their obsession with “mainstream appeal” neuters and destroys the message. They claim to represent public opinion or speak for a silent majority, and lash at anyone who disagrees with the ideology the silent majority allegedly backs. In specific detail, an obsession with these people exists in polluting counter-liberal movement with “zog” conspiracy theories and obsession with “the Jews (sic)” to fulfill liberal wet dreams and imperialist interests. Zog stands for “Zionist Occupied Government” for those who are fortunate enough not to have been exposed to this idiotic terminology. In a supposed attempt to show the opinion of the nonexistent silent majority, they talk of defying their ZOG but have done nothing to oppose the ruling order more serious than jaywalking or driving 5 miles over the speed limit. Worse yet, their idiocy and circle jerking has caused more trouble and advances the interests of the neo-liberal society that they mislabel ZOG.

Offline, they go past the point of avoiding conflict. I may avoid discussing dissident politics in business, political and social situations, but don’t go so far as to pretend to be a neo-liberal or republican or democrat. They actually lie and collaborate with mainstream movements they say they dislike online.

Free Media Productions is the real deal and encourages collaboration with the legitimate. Keep your mind open and be careful who you run with.

The message slanders and denigrates the Iranian working-class who with their Basij militia volunteers are mounting a resolute struggle against the right-deviationist hooligan gangs of the billionaire oligarch Rafsanjani. The Tudeh has not come out in condemning the savage violence by terrorists and hooligans, including the bombing of a section of the sacred mausoleum of Imam Khomeini, the burning of the Lolagar mosque, the destruction of people’s property, and smashing of windows of shops.

There victory of the Iranian Revolution is denigrated by Tudeh, which equates the unprecedented gains made by the working-class and peasantry of Iran since Imam Khomeini’s arrival in Tehran to the suffering and misery the nation went through in order to perpetuate the wealth and privileges of the royal family, capitalists, and the imperialist-zionist bloc. Tudeh has clearly failed to appreciate the unprecedented progress enjoyed by Iran in all aspects of life, including education, health care, industry, and culture.

Tudeh, despite identifying as a Marxist organization, has failed to analyze the class content and motivations of these disturbances. That they have seemingly aligned themselves with the hooligan gangs of billionaire oligarch Rafsanjani confirms the party’s counter-revolutionary nature. While the Iranian proletariat, peasantry, artisans, and state employees overwhelmingly supported President Ahmadinejad in order to safeguard the hard-won gains, the liberal bourgeoisie and bourgeoisified intellectuals are determined to privatize the economy, slash subsidies, and liquidate the gains of the Iranian toilers. The election of President Ahmadinejad is comparable to the development of popular-democratic governments in countries such as Venezuela and Bolivia. As President Chavez of Venezuela put it, the election of his Iranian counter-part is “an ample victory in all corners.”

For “Tudeh” to construe Khamenei’s inspirational sermon in Friday prayers at Tehran University on 19 June 2009 as “a declaration of war” is cynical. While hundreds of thousands of patriotic Iranians attending the Supreme Leader’s sermon were moved by the great man’s words, Tudeh demonstrates just how out of touch it is with Iranian society. The Supreme Leader called for reconciliation and peace among the country’s different political factions and congratulated the Iranian people on the affirmation of their revolutionary gains. 

While the Tudeh claims to be a party representing the Iranian masses, it turns around and slanders the working-class and its heroic Basij volunteer militia. What Tudeh and other enemies of Iran do not seem to understand is that the revolutionary warriors of Basij are a firm part of Iranian society. The suggestion that the Basij attacked peaceful protestors is contrary to the facts, for the riots and acts of destruction have been anything but peaceful. In one incident, the Basij simply fought back when one of their buildings was under siege by right-wing gangs. In addition, the Basij provide social services, assist the poor, and provide valuable security against criminal elements. Above all, the Basij displayed unprecedented heroism in the sacred era of the defense of the revolution. To denigrate the name of the Basij must be strongly opposed.

Tudeh in this message basically engages in the denial of the fact that there are hostile outside forces at work in these riots. According to Tudeh, the Iranian Government spreads “spurious anti-West slogans.” But the irrefutable fact is that imperialist and counter-revolutionary forces have put in considerable effort to try and smash the Iranian Revolution. Kenneth Timmerman, a prominent American neoconservative, spilled the beans on the premeditated nature of these disturbances. Writing outside of Iran, Timmerman wrote the day before the election: There’s the talk of a “green revolution” in Tehran. As a Pakistani General confirmed on a radio discussion, there is irrefutable evidence that the United States has spent about $400 million to stir a counter-revolution in Iran. This is already considering the fact that the U.S. imperialists have laid siege to Iran’s economy since the Revolution. Imperialist and reactionary regimes around the world have poured billions of dollars in disseminating hostile and counter-revolutionary propaganda through Voice of America, BBC, Al-Arabia, etc. Seymour Hersh’s reporting has proven that the United States has been waging a covert war against the Iranian Republic. As a consequence, there have been countless terrorist attacks against the Iranian Republic, including the one against the Zahedan mosque in the lead-up to the election. As the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Seyyed Khamenei said in his brilliant Friday sermon, “Foreign elements triggered a line of destruction, arson, pillage of public wealth and unrest; they have no link to people or supporters of candidates rather they are related to ill wishers of the Iranian nation and mercenaries of western and Zionist spy services.”

Free Media Productions is unwavering in its solidarity in its defense of the popular-democratic Revolution of Iran and firmly supports the right of the Iranian people to choose their own form of government as they did in the referendum of 1 April 1979. We demand Tudeh and other petit-bourgeois right-opportunists to reconcile with the Iranian Revolution and come out of the fringes of the Iranian emigrant community.

Furthermore, we have evidence in our possession indicating that the perpetrators of these attacks are linked to several online discussion boards, and possibly affiliates of several online “front” organizations linked to reactionary pro-Zionist, liberal, neo-Nazi and feminist organizations in the United States. Our tech team is currently investigating the matter. Thankfully, there was an increase in activity on the FMP site just prior to the attack(allowing our administrative team to record their IP addresses), and we are working diligently to uncover this plot aimed at paralyzing freemediaproductions.info and expose the miscreant culprits responsible.

Likewise, it’s widely known that these types of sub-human garbage often conduct their anti-social campaigns with the full endorsement and encouragement of certain government agencies and special interest groups representing the interests of international finance capital. Though at the current time we simply do not have all the information necessary to point fingers in particular directions,

We apologize to our readers and subscribers for the inconvenience resulting from this pernicious attack against our site. We should have the site fully online shortly.