note to the poster “racial awareness” : you’ll enjoy that there is women bashing in this post!
The link

Russian nation was created by Russian climate and Russian blood.

Contrary to common misconception, Russians living on territory of Russian Federation are not of Slavic blood. The ancient inhabitants of Kiev’s principate were Slavic people, that’s true. When Moscow principality was created a few centuries later in the 14th century, its population was overwhelmingly Urgo-Finns. Descendants of Kiev’s genealogical tree, their princes were originally of Slavic blood. But when Kiev’s armies moved north with their small troops, they conquered enormous vast variety of Finnish tribes who lived on enormous territory of European Russia. Only aristocrats of Russia were originally Slavs. Simple folk were descendants of Finns. That is why it is practically no different between “Chuvash” and “Finn.” And that is why Serbs are so different from Russians. Because Serbs are Slavs.

Russians are a depressive tribe because of centuries they were living in shadows of moisty forests. Russians are as unhappy with alcohol as Finns are.

So, forget about Slavs. When you will adopt my vision of Russian history, and of Russians, you will understand who Russians are.

I am the best Russian writer, but I am forced to confess that I hate Russian language. Russian words are painfully long, they remind me of naked slimy worms. You know, those pink awful creatures that you can see on some hot summer night on path you walk. Worms get out of soil to copulate under the moonlight. Russian words are copulating on my table every day and night. I am looking at them with hate and I am screaming. I am gnashing my teeth. Why should put “icheskaya” to the end of “social” in “Social Republic?” Seven letters I am adding for what fuck? Fucking “icheskaya!” Hysterical, hystericheskii laugh goes out of me when I am imaging those fucking Urgo-Finns in their shadowy forests. They move in slow motion, they take their time. Why wasn’t I born in a clear lucid language dealing in “Achtung!” and “Shnell?” And when I think that Russians are only a handful of 142 million readers, it’s really depressing for a writer.

The so called “Russian Soul” can be also explained by origins of the Russian people. Proverbial slowness of Finns (”hot finish lads!”) can be seen as phenomenon of Russian soul. Enigmatical Russian Soul is simply Russian man, uncertain, slow to decide, hesitating, never sure of itself, never sure of its own decision. Forest man with a milky skin, with thin blond hair. Not a Slav, but a Finn, Finn, Finn! And don’t accuse me of racism. Happily we have Turks and all sorts of Mongols amongst us. But the sick from alcoholism urban Russian Europeans are descendants of native Urgo-Finns and their tribes. They have shadowy mysterious souls because for hundred generations their ancestors were living by the river banks in the forests. They like to get drunk and to weep. Of too many trees, of too much of river’s water the Russian Soul is created.

Then, of course, we live in a terrible climate. We have eight months of winter and only four of summer. This summer, however, can be called a “summer” only such on condition that you have never travelled abroad. The lack of sunshine is chronic on the Russia’s territory. Everything is explained by its climate and the Urgo-Finn blood. Even more, the blood is explained by the climate. It moves slowly because of the freeze. No sunshine makes our kids look sad. When I was young, I thought almost everyday why “we Slavs” (I thought we were Slavic people) living in such an unhuman, uncomfortable climate? Why we didn’t move out of that terrible territory? However, I had tried to move. Our national ideas for centuries was to move south. We fought First World War to capture the the straights of Bosphorus and Dardanelles. We didn’t get it, alas. (Before that, in January of 1878, we were some kilometers from Istanbul-Constantinople before English bastards intervened.) Russian man carries all weight of his climate on itself. My deepest belief is that Russia should swallow Kazakhstan territory if we want our children to have sunshine.

Russian women are very, very bad. The worst of all. Russian women is like the Russian Government. Most Russian women at least are good looking when they are in their twenties. Some Russian women are gorgeously beautiful. But they are bad. They are treacherous because they have no moral principles. Christian faith was eliminated during existence of the Soviet Union so nobody taught Russian women morals. No such discipline was taught in Soviet schools. Russian woman hates man because she is envying him. She wants to be as brutal and stupid as him, she wants to lay on a divan doing nothing as man does, but she has less possibilities. Russian woman is disastrous, relationships with her destined to be tragedy. There is no way that you will end happily. You must subjugate her. If not, she will subjugate you. On both occasions, you will lose. Don’t forget that abortions and divorces were permitted even in Stalin’s Russia, so our country educated women as bitches. Millions of bitches walking our streets. I am absolutely and positively on the side of Muslim strict code of behavior for women. Their system of separation of sexes if effective and healthy.

Russian Government is bloody beast eating human flesh. It is deeply medieval in its principle conceptions. Russian Government strongly believed that Russians are subjects of Russian Government, that they are its property, that Russians should be physically punished for not showing proper respect for its Government. European Governments behave cruelly towards foreign populations, towards Yugoslavs or toward Iraqis. But Russian Government represses its own citizens. Russian Government never said one honest word. Blatant lies, we, citizens, hear from Government. They terrorize us.

Their instrument are police, brutal and unhuman, just millions of scoundrels dressed in grey uniforms. And judges: archaic men and women with terrible medieval faces and black souls under their judges clothes.

As you understand, my view of Russia is macabre, like Lovecraft’s work. I hope country will change soon, I am working for it. Then I will look at my country through rosy tinted glasses. Just wait.

Interesting. This may explain why Russians have tiny traces of Mongoloid blood (but not as much as Finns do).

The link
An interesting thread about some conclusions I’ve reached from studying more about haplogroups.

The link
If you read about this y chromosome haplogroup, the only Caucasoids which have it are Arabs. It does not exist in Iranians (except through Arab expansion) and South Asian Indians. It does not exist in North Africa. It does not exist in Europe.

Yet East Asians also have it.

I wonder if Mongols evolved out of White Arabs who had a noticeable mutation.

edit : see this thread. I have switched my position, and concluded that these markers existed before racial groups (modern ones) did.

Demographic imperialism, mass miscegenation and political correctness designed to shut people up are not good things. Black crime is not a good thing. Mexican boarder hopping is not a good thing. However, the idea that people should be denigrated or exalted as individuals because of “membership” of a group is retarded. Even if Blacks are more animalistic than Eurasians, I don’t hate all animals. There are good golden retrievers and there are bad golden retrievers. I may not for example like what Ottomans did to Armenians during WWI (I believe the story), but nevertheless, then and now there are good individual Turks. I may think Hitler lost his mind, but then and now, there are good individual Germans and Austrians.

It’s even dumb to fail to distinguish between members of families. Should I fail to note that Nero and his mother had different traits? Or are they all the same because they belong to the same family? Because Nero killed his mother, I would say there is a difference!

I officially reject and want nothing to do with racists who categorize people into groups and then hate people just because they belong to the groups. I “believe in race” but I’m also detail-oriented. Most of these clowns people don’t know jack shit about anthropology either. And believe it or not, there are a few “good” Black people. And I’ll attack any ethnic group I want to. If I want to attack Irish Catholics for example, I will, so shut up!

Analogously, If a 25 year old punches me in the face, I won’t hate all people who are 25 years old. Another analogy : even though I hate most women, I don’t hate “the good” women.

Racism is a bad idea. Realism is a good idea.

But realism is pretty cruel and politically incorrect.

The reason most people laugh at white nationalism is that it refuses to discuss differences within the European continent. It implies that there is a magical line separating Europeans from non-Europeans instead of a gradual drift from Armenians, to Romanians, to Turks, to Near Easteners, to Gulf Arabs. It is linear, not binary. People like Ted Sallis are the reason that white nationalism is laughed at. It’s also the way that White Nationalist try everything they can to gain the approval of open neo-nazis, and then wonder why confused liberals confuse them with Nazis.

To a White Nationalist, there is no difference between an Italian, a Russian and a German, yet there is a humongous difference between all Jews and all Gentiles. Go figure.

“White Nationalism” is a contradiction. It isn’t nationalism. It’s anthropology for a crippled mind.

I’m sorry, but I’m going to be frank here.

Most of the “free speech” forums and Zionist forums and skinhead forums are so far below my level of comprehension that it’s impossible to carry a beneficial discussion. There are so many people who just don’t strictly apply scientific principles to human beings. If you do that, you’ll find that Coon had a lot of good ideas, though of course he’s been improved upon, and you’ll find that racial science is frequently corrupted for political ends by liberals, Afro-centrists, Zionists, Nordicists and KKK types.

The Thread
I made a thread on anthroscape which explains what I believe race is and how to define it. I used the Caucasoid race in this example, but the logic applies to Mongoloid, Negroids, Aboriginals etc. too.

The reason (that the Caucasoid race exists) is that bone structure, not pigmentation, determines the race.

Analogously, it is not the color of the pine needles or leaves that determines what type of tree a tree is, but the structure of the branches. You can have a pine tree with red needles, yellow needles, green needles, and it’s still a pine tree.
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_g7-review/colorswap.jpg
http://static-p3.fotolia.com/jpg/00/06/44/52/400_F_6445278_HpENOxtlfnmNEyReO9H8FGcrRJx0Zang.jpg
http://www.maxcor.com/img/Pine_Tree.jpg

IT’S STILL A PINE TREE! IT DOESN’T MATTER THE COLOR! AND IF THE SKELETON IS CAUCASOID, IT’S STILL A CAUCASOID!

For once in my life, I agree with Martin Luther King. It is indeed not the color of the skin. It’s the structure of the bones!

For the love of Satan, I cannot stand these people.

They post pictures of obviously negroid admixed Berbers and Arabs and argue that the Caucasoid race is a social construct. There is no “Arab race” there is no “African race” there is no “European race” there is no “Asian race” there is no “Mexican race” there is no “Jewish race” there is no “Russian race” there is no “Soviet race.”

There is a Negroid race and there is a Caucasoid and there is a Mongoloid race race and there is an Aboriginal race and there are people of mixed race. Can it be any clearer?

The eye color of most Negroids is similar to that of non-humanoids such as dogs.

And then we have those amateur clowns in anthropology circles who think eye color and pigmentation are important!

I have been theorizing about why Southern Europeans look more like “classic Caucasoids” (Middle Easterners) compared to Northern Europeans. I think I am reaching an answer that satisfies me.

What we have to remember is that blondism and red hair occur at low rates even in Arab and Mediterranean populations. These are not “new evolutions” or “racial traits” but just genes that “grew in popularity.” The term “Aryan” and the term “Semite” have linguistic roots and are not tied to racial origins. The Caucasoid race was always capable of depigmentation, because pigmentation is controlled by the complex interaction of genes and it only takes a single “bad gene” to cause someone to lose pigmentation. Look at an Albino black! But the bone structure is what makes Negroids a separate race!

What I’m arguing is that the change in pigmentation is not genetically important. Northern Europeans really are just depigmented Mediterraneans. Mediterraneans are just classical Caucasoids. Terms like “Alpine” and “Nordic” are not really logical. While there is an east-west genetic divide within Europe, there is little evidence that “Alpines” and “Nords” are separate races with distinct histories. It is merely random variation.

I really think the answer is sexual selection. Part of it is nature and part of it is human beings becoming conscious of the environment. People know the environment is colder, Mediterraneans are adapted to the desert, and that is what causes the change.

An interesting point is that Jews in Northern Europe are more depigmented than other Jews, even though they are (partially) genetically linked to other Jews. All Caucasoids are capable of depigmentation.