The sad thing is that I know this is a result of the education system purposely not teaching people about anthropology. You learn about biology and white racism in high school, but not anthropology.

Liberalism is causing people to not know how to think!

I would think VNN and Stormfront are educated compared to some of the things I read.

If a person blames Jews for everything wrong in the world, it usually is a person of lower character, lower intelligence and poor social skills. It may be true that some people adopt anti-semitism as a political move to exploit the stupid. If a person fails to attack libertarian capitalism because they are busy attacking Jews instead, then that says something about that person’s ethics and intelligence. If a person divides people into races, does not include Jews into the White race and then argues that Jews are solely responsible for non-White immigration into White countries, then do not even go within a mile of that person.

If a person denies that Jews do anything wrong ever, that person is usually someone without the guts to tell it like it is. This is the kind of person who fears, sometimes irrationally, the consequences of speaking his/her mind. If a person starts talking about “the chosen people,” coming from a Christian or a follower of Judaism, that person is usually an idiot. If a person attempts to throw religion into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a justification for either side, whether a Jew or Muslim, that person is usually a profiteer or an idiot. It is probably true that Trotsky can be admired as a war leader, but if a person argues that Stalin was an anti-semite and Trotsky the correct replacement, then that raises red flags.

If a person does not think some Jews at least try and sometimes succeed in manipulating the American media, then that person does not understand how cowardly business leaders are. But if a person thinks that a media without Jewish influence would be radically different, then he/she does not understand that many business leaders are too bourgeois to really push a viewpoint that they view as potentially damaging to the company’s reputation. This mentality of “reputation anxiety” exists everywhere where people are weak – even on message forums that are looking for increased membership rather than profit.

Anyone who emphasizes the holocaust too much – whether denying it or politically using it to advance specific Jewish activist causes – has questionable motivations. The position one takes is not that important if one is not obsessed, but those who become obsessed usually have an agenda.

If a person pragmatically works with Jews for the purpose of reaching goals (not out of fear or political correctness), that person usually has higher social skill, a better sense of vision, and more intelligence. They get from point a to point b and are willing to involve Jews in the ride from point a to point b. They work WITH Jews in parallel, but do not get sidetracked by political correctness or fear. Good examples of leaders who worked with Jews, but were not undermined by Jews, would include the revolutionary American and later Confederate leaders. They may not have attacked capitalism but they understood pragmatism, it is fair to say. Napoleon, Lenin, Stalin and Mussolini are other examples of people who worked towards goals including Jews into their day to day projects, but were never undermined by Jews. Many Slav nationalists, when possible, undermined Hitler and worked with individual Jews during WWII.

I’m still offended by my mistreatment on the forum, but I’ll give Chaim credit where it is due.  Practically every word he said was right.  There is a Caucasian race but “white nationalism” is a bizarre ideology which exaggerates the extent Hitler was “generous” to “European gentiles.”  White nationalism wrongly believes Jews and Arabs are non-whites, and wrongly believes that whiteness can be socially constructed into a national ideology.  White nationalists like Hitler.  But Hitler liked Arabs and hated most European nationalities.   So white nationalists should hate Hitler because they disagree on who is good and who is bad.  The only thing agreed upon is Jews.

In my opinion, the only people who would disagree with leaving and with integrating are the extremely religious. Racists would be willing to leave to live with their own perceived people, and most ordinary workers would be willing to integrate. I’m secular, and I do not care about the religious Jews, and for that matter, I do not care for the Sharia supporting Muslims either as a group. Even pragmatically, secular people cannot deal too much with religious extremists without the religion showing itself in the day to day action.

So that leaves us with two options.
1) accept integration
2) leave.

And I think that is what should happen. The Jews who are willing to integrate should integrate, the rest should leave and perhaps set up a state somewhere else, and the religious Jews should be told to shut their mouths as should anyone who wants to involve Islam in the territorial conflict.

It should be noted that Saddam took a similar approach to geopolitical conflict between Shia Arabs, Sunni Arabs and Kurds. He repressed the religious and then he dealt carefully with issues of identity among the secular people. In addition, as a third positionist and not an anti-revisionist, I must say that Marx’s “opiate of the people” quote is relevant and accurate. The reason Israel is located in Palestine is because of religion. Besoshvilli/Berianidze made this point to me when we debated Zionism, and it was hard to disagree with. Arab resistance is sometimes secular but religion unfortunately plays a role at times too.

You are free to comment and suggest your own solution.

2) In order to ramrod globalization down the throats of concerned citizens, the liberal bourgeois capitalist class has pushed myths such as “race does not exist” and “immigration does not effect crime rates.” As a consequence of globalization, the study of human genetic variation is suppressed. The truth should replace the lies.

3) Race is genetic, therefore the racial materialist view has to agree that all true Caucasoids are a race, all true Negroids are a race, all true Mongoloids are a race and all true Australoids are a race. Groups like Cambodians and Ethiopians are clearly of mixed race (but can be categorized based on appearance). Certainly humanity does not fracture along the hodgepodge of races thrown by liberal groups and “white activist” groups. Perhaps an argument can be made that American Indians are not true Mongoloids, but Cavalli-Sforza disagrees.

4) White nationalist keyboard commandos and neo-nazi keyboard commandos are a joke and should be shunned. Anyone who argues that race is something more than physical material should be shunned. “White Nationalists” and neo-nazis should not even be on the radar screen or be seen as fighting a common enemy in any way, but be ridiculed just as harshly as liberals are. To their credit, Neo-nazis at least realize that Hitler hated Slavs, but the WNs haven’t figured that one out yet!

5) Jews are not the cause of mass immigration. The real cause is capitalism, and Catholicism provides a good “opiate of the masses” for the naive majority. Satanism and atheism should be supported over the bourgeois concept of religion which serves as a weapon in the class war. August Bebel stated that anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools, and Lenin that anti-Semitism is a diversion to re-target anger away from the ruling class. They are correct. Even if many Jews have embraced the bourgeoisie or made common cause out of pragmatism, the chief cause is not Jews, and every missile aimed at Jews is a missile that could have been aimed at the bourgeoisie. Not to mention, in some cases it is friendly fire.

6. Nothing will change until capitalism is altered or disposed of. Libertarians are of no use.

“Behind the Doric columns of the ‘Pyatlyetki,’ the Five Year Plans, behind the rows of figures of the ‘Gosplan,’ there stretches not Asia, but another Europe: ‘the’ other Europe (in the sense in which America too is another Europe). The steel cupola of Marxism + Leninism + Stalinism (the gigantic dynamo of the U.S.S.R. according to Lenin’s formula: Soviet + electrification = Bolshevism) is not the mausoleum of Genghis Khan but – in the very sense that bourgeois folk find so distasteful – the ‘other’ Parthenon of Europe. ‘The Volga,’ says Pilnyak, ‘flows into the Caspian Sea.’ Yes, but it does not rise in Asia: it rises in Europe. It is a European river. The Thames, the Seine, the Potomac are its tributaries.”
– Curzio Malaparte, THE VOLGA RISES IN EUROPE

Julius Evola is not a role model for people that are serious about preserving the White race. If one wants to save the White race, one needs to adopt a staunch materialist outlook. Only through the thorough application of materialist principles can Europe be saved. Materialism dictates that spirituality stems from matter. Both Evola’s and Francis Parker Yockey’s notion of a “spiritual race” is therefore a contradiction in itself since race is matter and not spirit. A race may possess a higher or lower degree of spirituality but this does not change its physical make-up. Spirituality is a direct result of the workings of the brain which in its turn is a part of an organism that varies according to the race it belongs to. What good does it do if various non-Europeans possess “Aryan attributes” (whatever that might be) but are incapable of passing these on through procreation without diluting the European gene pool? The notion of a “spiritual race” is an abstract and meaningless, if not downright hostile to European preservation efforts, concept. Therefore, Dr. HT Hansen (who wrote the introduction to Evola’s MEN AMONG THE RUINS) is right when he argues that Evola espouses a peculiar brand of anti-racism through his peculiar “racial” theories. Actually, Evola seems not interested in any kind of racist theories per se but more in formulating an unnecessarily obfuscating concept of aristocracy that uses race as a pretext but is really more concerned with essentially universalist matters of hierarchy. Evola is a universal humanist because his theories postulate that a “spiritual race” is open to all members of “humanity.” Lest we forget that this supposedly global community has already been discredited (because of its non-existence) by serious racist thinkers.

Finnish National Bolshevik (or maybe Racial Bolshevik would be more accurate) Kai Murros says, “One must understand the nation as a product of material forces in history – this is the cornerstone of the progressive nationalism and progressive socialism.” Murros is right when he argues that “progressive nationalism” (or racism) must be strictly materialist in its outlook. Only in this manner can any kind of historical success be achieved. After all, one has to remember that history itself is driven by the constant flux of dialectical materialism. Murros also argues that “[f]or practical reasons, metaphysics must always be subordinated to physics.” In a rude manner of speaking, mental masturbation should be secondary to real sex. One can theorize all one wants about the importance of “racial spirituality,” if the race does not produce children, then the race is doomed to die. Right now, fucking is more important than thinking. The luxury of metaphysics can only be afforded in a society that is content with itself and secure in its continuing existence.

Nature has no will. Man has will. Aryan man has the Faustian will. Paganism is a dead-end street. Being is the key, not believing and/or worshipping. The gods die when the race (that created them) dies. The gods are not eternal. Paganism was a temporary manifestation of the Race’s mood at a particular time. The Race willed Paganism into existence. It did not exist before it and is already dead while the Race still lives. The Race can be without ascribing its being to forces beyond itself. The solace of the Race today is science and not religion. Rockets will propel us to the place where the gods once lived. The gods will be replaced by us. Thor is dead, long live the Astronaut! While Thor once hurled lightning FROM the sky, we will propel like lightning INTO the sky.

L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza and his collaborators Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza have devoted fourteen years to one of the most compelling scientific projects of our time: the reconstruction of where human populations originated and the paths by which they spread throughout the world. In this volume, the culmination of their research, the authors explain their pathbreaking use of genetic data, which they integrate with insights from geography, ecology, archaeology, physical anthropology, and linguistics to create the first full-scale account of human evolution as it occurred across all continents. This interdisciplinary approach enables them to address a wide range of issues that continue to incite debate: the timing of the first appearance of our species, the problem of African origins and the significance of work recently done on mitochondrial DNA and the popular notion of an “African Eve,” the controversy pertaining to the peopling of the Americas, and the reason for the presence of non-Indo-European languages–Basque, Finnish, and Hungarian–in Europe.The authors reconstruct the history of our evolution by focusing on genetic divergence among human groups. Using genetic information accumulated over the last fifty years, they examined over 110 different inherited traits, such as blood types, HLA factors, proteins, and DNA markers, in over eighteen hundred, primarily aboriginal, populations. By mapping the worldwide geographic distribution of the genes, the scientists are now able to chart migrations and, in exploring genetic distance, devise a clock by which to date evolutionary history: the longer two populations are separated, the greater their genetic difference should be. This volume highlights the authors’ contributions to genetic geography, particularly their technique for making geographic maps of gene frequencies and their synthetic method of detecting ancient migrations, as for example the migration of Neolithic farmers from the Middle East toward Europe, West Asia, and North Africa.Beginning with an explanation of their major sources of data and concepts, the authors give an interdisciplinary account of human evolution at the world level. Chapters are then devoted to evolution on single continents and include analyses of genetic data and how these data relate to geographic, ecological, archaeological, anthropological, and linguistic information. Comprising a wide range of viewpoints, a vast store of new and recent information on genetics, and a generous supply of visual elements, including 522 geographic maps, this book is a unique source of facts and a catalyst for further debate and research.

How much longer will the American public tolerate the anti-white rhetoric coming from the mouths of liberal politicians and the pen of the media?

Over the past few months, CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post and Democrat politicians, including former President Clinton and others, have questioned the legitimacy of the Tea Party movement because, as they say, it is “too white.”

To them, such “whiteness” is evidence of “racism.” They are attempting to drumbeat into the American consciousness two principles: one, that political speech and positions vocalized primarily by white people is, basically, invalid; and, two, opinions emanating from non-liberal white people is motivated by racism.

Throughout the entire healthcare debate, liberals assigned “racism” to those opposed to the massive overhaul. In fact, the opposition among the middle class had nothing to do with “hidden racism” but was a neutral and understandable desire to maintain for themselves the liberty to choose their own doctor, the fear of diminished quality care, the horror of being over-taxed to a degree that leaves little disposable income for working parents for their own family, and the bedrock, historic American belief of self-responsibility.

Similarly, those wanting closed borders and an end to illegals entering the country and blithely living off taxpayer largess are accused of “white racism.” when the underlying reason has to do with protecting themselves from crime, rape, murder, property damage and the closing of schools, hospitals and other essential services due to local and state bankruptcy born of the expenses of subsidizing illegals.

The left is trying to muzzle its political opposition by brainwashing us into accepting their mantra that non-liberal whites are racist. Our reply in proving that we are not racist has been to show that blacks are among Tea Party members. To be sure, that is important, but, by so doing, we are capitulating to the premise that by itself “white” opinion is somehow invalid.

Nowhere in the Bill of Rights is found a footnote or asterisk that freedom of speech or assembly is conditioned on its racial diversity, its “un-whiteness.” Our answer to those who ask “how many blacks, Muslims, or Hispanics are members of your group, should be: “It doesn’t matter, what matters is the cogency of our argument.”

We should have enough confidence to answer: “The problem is not with our beliefs, rather with those who do not share our core American values or are unwilling to gather and associate with a group overwhelmingly white”.

Freedom of speech and assembly should not be based on a quota system. Will we now have a situation in speech, like that in hiring, that requires 12% black or 11% Hispanic or 2% Muslim for that speech to be politically valid and acceptable?

What started out years ago as inclusiveness of others has dangerously degenerated into an exclusion of speech and validity if exercised by the white community. Obsessive identification with minority-group views has led to, among elite liberals, a complete indifference and callousness to the feelings and yearnings of the majority white population.
Truthfully, this has always been the goal of liberal multiculturalism. Its intention was never to simply open up our society but to close down those representing the historic ethos and values of America: the white middle class.

For the liberal left, other cultures are not simply to be admitted but should reign supreme—a tyranny of the minority over the majority, orchestrated by white liberals, and minority power brokers, wishing to subdue the majority standing in the way of their political and cultural hegemony, and feeling righteous doing so out of a conviction that non-liberal white people are racist and must be stomped down.

The truth is that many in the liberal community preaching to us about racism are, themselves, bigots against white Christians, labeling them red-necks, un-educated, racists, and simpletons. No one calls them on their bigotry since it’s difficult to conceive that those always touting civil rights and diversity are imbued with their own bigotry. Their never-ending indictment of American society as racist cloaks what is their own variety of bigotry.
The crusade of the liberal establishment to sew into the collective consciousness a belief that whites are inherently racist and “extremist” was displayed in the media’s endless speculation about a “white male” as the perpetrator during the first hours of the Times Square terrorist incident and yet played down the Moslem origin of the actual terrorist when so discovered. Even Rep. Jerold Nadler (D.-N.Y.) and Mayor Michael Bloomberg alluded to a white person “angry over the healthcare bill.” In the liberal mind, white people are closet Timothy McVeighs. It is a subtle bigotry that the American public dare not allow seep into their world view. It is a presumption which must be decried as racism against the white majority.

This belief is so ingrained that after the discovery of the Pakistani terrorist, Mayor Bloomberg warned that: “No reprisals and backlash against the Pakistani community will be tolerated.” Why the need to make this warning given that since 9/11 and numerous Islamic attacks since then, there have been no burnings of mosques or backlash riots against Islamic communities?

Instead of liberals admiring the majority, white community for their monumental restraint and fairness, liberals continue to peddle to “white America” how our evil impulses must be continually reigned in. President Obama has often delivered this very same message, and in a weekly radio address appealed to “Blacks, Muslims, Latinos and women to coalesce into standing behind his hopes and agenda for America”.

The reason for this never-ending liberal portrayal of “racist and extreme white-male America” is to intimidate us into silence. The left knows that the only thing standing in the way of their complete takeover of American government, culture and values is disenfranchising the legitimacy of the middle class. America is unique and different than other countries that are divided into a ruling class and a recipient class, with a very weak middle class. Americanism, on the other hand, comes from a prosperous, self-assured and vigorous middle class.

Liberals cannot out-rightly condemn the middle class. They have decided to strip it of its self-confidence and legitimacy by categorizing it as “white,” with all the orchestrated belittlement and demonization of whiteness we are now hearing. The economy is being transformed in such a way that entrepreneurship and small business, the backbone of the middle class, is being thwarted. An impoverished middle class is an impotent class. The elites are engaged in the destruction of the historic American ethos and value system embodied in the American majority. They want to convince us that “white values” are dangerous. What we have here is nothing less than cultural ethnic cleansing.

Overnight, I was simultaneously repped and thanked by a Syrian-Armenian, so it is good to see that people of different backgrounds recognize the strength of my argument.

Southern European “white nationalists” like to identify themselves with Northern Europeans and act as if they share nothing with other Mediterraneans. There’s nothing more hilarious then reading some Italian or Greek writing on race forums that he/she can’t stand the fact that Jews and Gypsies are “non-whites.”

Let’s use this thread to debunk once and for all the idea of a “European race” and a “Semitic race” divided by some bold line drawn on a map by Stromfront or the Apricity.

The first line of evidence is that European “aryans,” despite their language, cluster closer to Semites then they do to Indians/Iranians/Pakis regularly and consistency.

The next line of evidence is that Europe was formed by multiple migrations, but both the Paleolithic and Neolithic migrations were tied to the near east.

Haplogroups are not perfect, but they clearly point to a Mediterranean link between the continents.

Finally, Jews repetitively cluster closer to Europeans and Turks than they do to Arabs. In some cases (but not always), they cluster closer to Northern Europe than some Southern Europeans do and physical appearance also is less exotic.

CHICAGO (AP) – Angered by a controversial Arizona immigration law, tens of thousands of protesters – including 50,000 alone in Los Angeles – rallied in cities nationwide demanding President Barack Obama tackle immigration reform immediately.

“I want to thank the governor of Arizona because she’s awakened a sleeping giant,” said labor organizer John Delgado, who attended a rally in New York where authorities estimated 6,500 gathered.

From Los Angeles to Washington D.C., activists, families, students and even politicians marched, practiced civil disobedience and “came out” about their citizenship status in the name of rights for immigrants, including the estimated 12 million living illegally in the U.S.

Police said 50,000 rallied in Los Angeles where singer Gloria Estefan kicked off a massive downtown march. Estefan spoke in Spanish and English, proclaiming the United States is a nation of immigrants.

“We’re good people,” the Cuban-born singer said atop a flatbed truck. “We’ve given a lot to this country. This country has given a lot to us.”

Public outcry, particularly among immigrant rights activists, has been building since last week when Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed the legislation last week. The law requires local and state law enforcement to question people about their immigration status if there’s reason to suspect they’re in the country illegally. It also makes it a state crime to be in the United States illegally.

The law’s supporters say it’s necessary because of the federal government’s failure to secure the border, but critics contend it encourages racial profiling and is unconstitutional.

“It’s racist,” said Donna Sanchez, a 22-year-old U.S. citizen living in Chicago whose parents illegally crossed the Mexican border. “I have papers, but I want to help those who don’t.”

Organizers estimated about 20,000 gathered at a park on Chicago’s West Side and marched, but police said about 8,000 turned out.

The event resembled something between a family festival – food vendors strolled through with pushcarts – and a political demonstration with protesters chanting “Si se puede,” Spanish for “Yes we can.” A group of undocumented students stood on a stage at the Chicago park and “came out” regarding their immigration status.

Juan Baca was among those students. Baca, 19, whose parents brought him from Mexico illegally when he was 4 months old, said he has had to drop out of college and work several times already because he can’t qualify for financial aid.

“It’s been a struggle,” he said. “I missed the mark by four months.”

Obama once promised to tackle immigration reform in his first 100 days, but has pushed back that timetable several times. He said this week that Congress may lack the “appetite” to take on immigration after going through a tough legislative year. However, Obama and Congress could address related issues, like boosting personnel and resources for border security, in spending bills this year.

At the White House, U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, an Illinois Democrat, was among 35 people arrested in a demonstration of civil disobedience against the Arizona law.

In Dallas, police estimated at least 20,000 attended a Saturday rally. About a dozen people there carried signs depicting the Arizona governor as a Nazi and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, known for his tough illegal immigration stance, as a Klansman. Organizers were asking sign holders to discard those placards.

Juan Hernandez, the Hispanic outreach coordinator for Arizona Sen. John McCain’s unsuccessful presidential run, attended the Dallas rally. He said Arizona was once considered by those south of the border to be a model state with particularly close ties to Mexico.

“It went beyond what most states do,” he said. “Now they are a state that goes beyond what the Constitution says you should do.”

Juan Haro, 80, was born and raised in Denver, where about 3,000 people rallied. He said he thinks Arizona’s new law targets Mexicans.

“This country doesn’t seem to be anti-immigrant,” said Haro, whose family is originally from Mexico. “It seems to be anti-Mexican.”

In downtown Miami, several hundred flag-waving demonstrators – many with Cuban and Honduran flags, but mostly American ones – called for reforms.

Elsewhere, an estimated 7,000 protesters rallied in Houston, about 5,000 gathered at the Georgia state Capitol in Atlanta and at least 5,000 marched in Milwaukee. About 3,000 attended a Boston-area march.

And in Ann Arbor, Mich., more than 500 people held a mock graduation ceremony for undocumented immigrant students near the site of Obama’s University of Michigan commencement speech.

In Arizona, police in Tucson said an immigration rights rally there drew at least 5,000 people. Several thousand people gathered in Phoenix for a demonstration Saturday evening.

A smattering of counterprotesters showed up at rallies. In Tucson, a few dozen people showed up in support of the new law and Brewer. A barricade separated about two dozen counterprotesters from a pro-immigrant rights rally in San Francisco.

The counterprotesters there carried signs that read, “We Support Arizona” and “We Need More Ice At This Fiesta,” an apparent reference to the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.

May 1 – International Workers Day – is a traditional date for political demonstrations. Immigration advocates latched onto that tradition in 2006, when more than 1 million people across the country – half a million alone in Chicago – protested federal legislation that would have made being an illegal immigrant a felony. That legislation ultimately failed.

- by SOPHIA TAREEN

Demographic “realism” is part of marketing. True it is not as precise as psychograpahic history, but without knowledge of actual individual buying patterns, the next best strategy is to go by demographics. The logic behind this is that while you will occasionally make a false judgment, at least a percentage of the time you will be correct in your stereotype.

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Using technology from top Silicon Valley companies such as Cisco and Intel, advertisers are creating a new breed of digital signs that can be customized depending on a viewer’s age and gender.

Already starting to appear in selected malls and other spots around the country, the signs have the potential to revolutionize the retailing industry, but their intrusiveness has led to criticism from privacy advocates and nervousness from some in the marketing industry itself.

“The vast majority of people walking in stores, near elevators and in other public and private spaces have no idea that the innocent-looking flat screen TVs playing videos may be capturing their images and then dissecting and analyzing them for marketing purposes,” the nonprofit, Southern California-based World Privacy Forum warned in a report it issued on digital signs in January. “Controls need to be put in place now, before this technology runs amok.”

Businesses insist the signs are good for them and for consumers, because they can offer more focused and effective advertising. And the burgeoning market has caught the eye of Silicon Valley companies. Among them is San Jose-based Cisco, which makes gear that displays images and management software for the signs. It’s not a huge business yet for the company, according to Thomas Wyatt, general manager of Cisco’s digital media systems unit. But he said it’s growing, adding “these are really emerging technologies.”

The trend stems from a desire among marketers to make ads more effective by making them more relevant to those seeing them.

“If you come by a sign and it’s playing something you’re not interested in, it’s noise to you,” said Joe Jensen, a manager at Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel, which touts the ability of its chips to provide visually appealing ad images and to process the audience data the signs capture. But if the message is tailored to a specific individual’s needs, he added, the person often will welcome the information.

Using facial-recognition software from other companies — such as TruMedia of Tampa, Fla. — the signs can recognize the demographic characteristics of people standing in front of them and instantly change their ads.

Tony Leger, a TruMedia sales director, said hundreds of signs with that capability are in operation worldwide in retail malls, airports, banks and other places. But he said it’s unclear how many are automatically adjusting their ads for customers because many businesses that have installed them don’t want to reveal that to competitors.

Some of the signs have proven controversial, including digital billboards Castrol operated in London in September. Equipped with cameras, the signs read the license plates of each passing motorist, accessed a database that revealed the automobile’s model and year, and flashed the driver a message about what type of oil their vehicle should use.

The ads were blasted as intrusive and a potentially unsafe distraction, and Castrol halted them after only a few days.

The digital devices are beginning to resemble the brainy signs featured in the 2002 science-fiction movie “Minority Report,” which could recognize people and hail them by name. Many can gauge the sex and approximate age of those standing in front them. That way, if a pre-teen girl watching the screen wanders away and an adult male approaches, the sign automatically can switch from showing an ad for Hello-Kitty Dress-Me Bears, for example, to one for men’s work boots. Samsung claims its versions can even determine the race and nationality of a viewer.

These digital signs are part of a growing push to personalize ads through technology.

Web ads that are customized based on a user’s interests and demographics have been a staple for companies like Google and Yahoo for years. Although critics have decried the tactic, Forrester Consulting found that 77 percent of the marketers it surveyed in January “are planning to use or already use audience targeting for their online strategy.”

More recently, companies have used GPS technology in mobile phones to tailor ads to a user’s location (“25% off lattes” as someone walks by a coffee shop, for instance). Although many retailers won’t send such ads unless invited to do so by a consumer, the practice worries the Center for Digital Democracy. In a letter to the federal government on Monday, the nonprofit public interest organization warned against letting the practice proliferate “without strong privacy and consumer health-related safeguards in place.”

Any ad targeting makes some people uncomfortable. A survey of 1,000 adults last year by University of California-Berkeley and University of Pennsylvania researchers found that 66 percent opposed such pitches.

Count Will Douglas among them. The 25-year-old consultant from Oakland, Calif., who was shopping at the Milpitas Great Mall, termed the idea “weird” and wondered if the equipment might make insulting errors about “someone of ambiguous gender” or mistake a short person for a child. Assuming a sign “can tell something about you strikes me as arrogant,” he said.

“That’s so wrong,” added state agricultural technician Bobbi Thornton, 55, of Milpitas, who was at the same mall searching for a handbag. “This is like the Internet search engines that follow your shopping behavior. It’s so invasive.”

Face-assessing digital displays even make some advertisers skittish. Last month, Point of Purchase Advertising International published guidelines for using the signs, advising among other things that consumers always be told when they are under surveillance. Despite the advantages of such technology, the industry group concluded, being able to monitor a consumer’s every move and facial feature “sends shivers down the spine of even the boldest marketer.”

There seems to be a confusion between race and “inbred population”, or “reproductively isolated population”. For example, Steve Sailer defines race as follows:
“A racial group is an extended family that is inbred to some degree.”

goddless capitalist uses races as a synonym for “reproductively isolated groups”.

It’s true that relative inbreeding (within the race) is a necessary condition for a race to exist. But, it is not sufficient as we will show by means of examples.

Example #1. The Amish are an inbred population. Occasionally foreigners marry into the Amish population, but not often. The Amish are a population that is inbred not to some degree, but to a great degree. Are they a race? Of course not. They are simply a genetic isolate within the Caucasoid race. The same is true for the Samaritans, a genetic isolate of about 650 members in Syria and Lebanon. The Samaritans are also a genetic isolate within the Caucasoid race.

It was recently proven that Caucasoids, Mongoloids, Negroids, Australoids and Amerindians could be distinguished from one another with an objective test. That is because these groups are inbred populations that have had enough time to evolve group specific genetic profiles. That is what makes a race.

Consider the example of a hypothetical island on which 500 Swedish and 500 Nigerian settlers intermix to form a hybrid population. After a few generations of interbreeding, the population will remain what it is: a racially mixed population. Its individuals will be random assortments of genes in the parental gene pools. But, they won’t be a race distinct from others in the sense that Caucasoids and Mongoloids are distinct. Over time, this inbred population may also develop into a race, as it evolves separately from the rest of mankind and develops its own genetic profile.

These examples should caution us against using “reproductively isolated group”, or “partially inbred extended family” as synonyms for race.

Link Two

I cannot agree with everything he writes.  I disagree with his support of the Iraq War and his exaggerated view that most Arabs do not belong to the Mediterranean race because they are “non-white.”  But these two writings are sound and deserve respect.

I do not believe the best way to improve relations between Ashkenazi Jews and the rest of the world is to deceive oneself. At some point the harsh reality has to be faced. Ever since the Bolshevik revolution was on the verge of taking power in Eastern Europe, these people have been despised. And when Jews quit Bolshevism for Zionism, it only increased hatred from Arabs. Even in America, the Ku Klux Klan officially adopted an anti-Semitic line – which it previously had not taken – in 1915, as the Bolsheviks rose and finally took power in 1917. These are the people who competed with Stalin for control over the Bolshevik movement and collaborated throughout Europe, resulting in both Hitler’s rise and their ejection from the Bolshevik party. Even Gypsies contributed to 1940’s Romanian pogroms against Ashkenazi Jews with the assistance of the Iron Guard (which was then banned), while Winston Churchill carefully chose his words to separate between “good and bad” Jews. Even Northeastern Slavs (subhumans to Hitler) such as Poles and Ukrainians disposed of some of these people.

Ashkenazi Jews are going to have to stop crying about persecution and start being more friendly to their neighbors. This hate does not come out of thin air. The only place Ashkenazi Jews are not hated is America, but that’s because Americans are generally well off and rich people and the means of communication are controlled by Jews.

A right-wing Jewish extremist has been disseminating calls for the assassination of leftists and Ashkenazim on Internet sites in Israel and abroad.

One film clip posted on YouTube, for instance, declares: “You are about to view a handful of leftist Ashkenazim that Hitler and Eichmann did not manage to incinerate. Before we begin, please remember: 90 percent of the moderate left are Ashkenazim!! 100 percent of the extreme left are Ashkenazim!!”

Next comes a picture of President Shimon Peres with the caption: “The murderer!” It is followed by pictures of Benjamin Netanyahu, Yossi Beilin and other politicians.

The clip concludes: “Now, after you have seen these unclean Ashkenazim, how degraded the Ashkenazi race is, and what a pity it is that Hitler and Eichmann did not finish off the Ashkenazim, I ask of you: Search for information on Google about Stiven Malik; there ‘the document’ awaits you.”

The document in question is also full of incitement to violence: “If only we, too, could finish what Hitler began by destroying all the Ashkenazim, the descendants of the Jews who betrayed Germany.”

Supportive comments have been posted on the Stiven Malik forum on the Israeli portal 2all; the forum has received thousands of visitors in recent month. Malik’s anti-Ashkenazi incitement can also be found on the Israeli portals Tapuz and goop.co.il and on sites such as fresh.co.il.

A Haaretz investigation has concluded that “Malik” is a fictitious name used by a right-wing extremist who was once affiliated with Baruch Marzel’s Jewish Front party, but was later expelled from it.

After Haaretz approached the relevant Israeli portals, some of Malik’s writings were removed. Tapuz said it had given the material to the police, and Peres’s office said it had given it to the Shin Bet security service. YouTube had not responded by press time.

Dienekes attacks Arthur Kemp
Arthur Kemp Responds
Dienekes Responds

Anon vs racial reality:

Anon vs Racial Reality
Racial Reality Responds

Dienekes may be scientifically correct about race mixing, except the problem is that demographically whites are getting small enough that they will not be able to absorb other races.  He is also correct that interbreeding often does not occur even when close proximity occurs.  That said, I would not encourage hybridization on a massive level because at some point it could be irreversible if the birth rates are not strong enough.

For this fight in general, Dienekes is upholding the scientific line and Arthur Kemp the bullshit white nationalist revisionist line.  When Anon attacked Racial Reality, I thought it might just be an isolated incident, but not anymore. The whole website is full of crap!

I think the Italian Racial Reality has a pro-Mediterranean view of the world and so does the Greek Dienekes, but they at least try to base their views off of science.  This is more than could be said about the Brit Arthur Kemp or the German Anon.  I do not have any animosity for Arthur Kemp or Anon and have never interacted with them in any way, however they are either propagandists or people desperately in need of an education.  I cannot blame them if they are propagandist.  Every great dictator is!

Unlike the self-hating meds on the website “stirpes” which recently announced it is closing, as far as I can tell, Dienekes and Racial Reality do not have an inferiority complex and they do not prostitute themselves to white nationalist ideology. Ted Sallis is another example of a Southern European quack who denies the existence of both the Caucasian race and the Nordic subtype. Racial Reality and Dienekes are good Mediterraneans! So is the poster “Crimson Guard” on anthroscape. These people admit that Europe genetically links to the populations across the Mediterranean sea, even if in neolithic and paleolithic times.

Join the anthropology forums post on the blogs:
Forum Biodiversity
Anthrocivitas
Anthroscape
Racial Reality Blog
Dienekes Anthropology Blog

Russian nation was created by Russian climate and Russian blood.

Contrary to common misconception, Russians living on territory of Russian Federation are not of Slavic blood. The ancient inhabitants of Kiev’s principate were Slavic people, that’s true. When Moscow principality was created a few centuries later in the 14th century, its population was overwhelmingly Urgo-Finns. Descendants of Kiev’s genealogical tree, their princes were originally of Slavic blood. But when Kiev’s armies moved north with their small troops, they conquered enormous vast variety of Finnish tribes who lived on enormous territory of European Russia. Only aristocrats of Russia were originally Slavs. Simple folk were descendants of Finns. That is why it is practically no different between “Chuvash” and “Finn.” And that is why Serbs are so different from Russians. Because Serbs are Slavs.

Russians are a depressive tribe because of centuries they were living in shadows of moisty forests. Russians are as unhappy with alcohol as Finns are.

So, forget about Slavs. When you will adopt my vision of Russian history, and of Russians, you will understand who Russians are.

I am the best Russian writer, but I am forced to confess that I hate Russian language. Russian words are painfully long, they remind me of naked slimy worms. You know, those pink awful creatures that you can see on some hot summer night on path you walk. Worms get out of soil to copulate under the moonlight. Russian words are copulating on my table every day and night. I am looking at them with hate and I am screaming. I am gnashing my teeth. Why should put “icheskaya” to the end of “social” in “Social Republic?” Seven letters I am adding for what fuck? Fucking “icheskaya!” Hysterical, hystericheskii laugh goes out of me when I am imaging those fucking Urgo-Finns in their shadowy forests. They move in slow motion, they take their time. Why wasn’t I born in a clear lucid language dealing in “Achtung!” and “Shnell?” And when I think that Russians are only a handful of 142 million readers, it’s really depressing for a writer.

The so called “Russian Soul” can be also explained by origins of the Russian people. Proverbial slowness of Finns (”hot finish lads!”) can be seen as phenomenon of Russian soul. Enigmatical Russian Soul is simply Russian man, uncertain, slow to decide, hesitating, never sure of itself, never sure of its own decision. Forest man with a milky skin, with thin blond hair. Not a Slav, but a Finn, Finn, Finn! And don’t accuse me of racism. Happily we have Turks and all sorts of Mongols amongst us. But the sick from alcoholism urban Russian Europeans are descendants of native Urgo-Finns and their tribes. They have shadowy mysterious souls because for hundred generations their ancestors were living by the river banks in the forests. They like to get drunk and to weep. Of too many trees, of too much of river’s water the Russian Soul is created.

Then, of course, we live in a terrible climate. We have eight months of winter and only four of summer. This summer, however, can be called a “summer” only such on condition that you have never travelled abroad. The lack of sunshine is chronic on the Russia’s territory. Everything is explained by its climate and the Urgo-Finn blood. Even more, the blood is explained by the climate. It moves slowly because of the freeze. No sunshine makes our kids look sad. When I was young, I thought almost everyday why “we Slavs” (I thought we were Slavic people) living in such an unhuman, uncomfortable climate? Why we didn’t move out of that terrible territory? However, I had tried to move. Our national ideas for centuries was to move south. We fought First World War to capture the the straights of Bosphorus and Dardanelles. We didn’t get it, alas. (Before that, in January of 1878, we were some kilometers from Istanbul-Constantinople before English bastards intervened.) Russian man carries all weight of his climate on itself. My deepest belief is that Russia should swallow Kazakhstan territory if we want our children to have sunshine.

Russian women are very, very bad. The worst of all. Russian women is like the Russian Government. Most Russian women at least are good looking when they are in their twenties. Some Russian women are gorgeously beautiful. But they are bad. They are treacherous because they have no moral principles. Christian faith was eliminated during existence of the Soviet Union so nobody taught Russian women morals. No such discipline was taught in Soviet schools. Russian woman hates man because she is envying him. She wants to be as brutal and stupid as him, she wants to lay on a divan doing nothing as man does, but she has less possibilities. Russian woman is disastrous, relationships with her destined to be tragedy. There is no way that you will end happily. You must subjugate her. If not, she will subjugate you. On both occasions, you will lose. Don’t forget that abortions and divorces were permitted even in Stalin’s Russia, so our country educated women as bitches. Millions of bitches walking our streets. I am absolutely and positively on the side of Muslim strict code of behavior for women. Their system of separation of sexes if effective and healthy.

Russian Government is bloody beast eating human flesh. It is deeply medieval in its principle conceptions. Russian Government strongly believed that Russians are subjects of Russian Government, that they are its property, that Russians should be physically punished for not showing proper respect for its Government. European Governments behave cruelly towards foreign populations, towards Yugoslavs or toward Iraqis. But Russian Government represses its own citizens. Russian Government never said one honest word. Blatant lies, we, citizens, hear from Government. They terrorize us.

Their instrument are police, brutal and unhuman, just millions of scoundrels dressed in grey uniforms. And judges: archaic men and women with terrible medieval faces and black souls under their judges clothes.

As you understand, my view of Russia is macabre, like Lovecraft’s work. I hope country will change soon, I am working for it. Then I will look at my country through rosy tinted glasses. Just wait.

Interesting. This may explain why Russians have tiny traces of Mongoloid blood (but not as much as Finns do).

But Greeks and Southern Europeans are similar to Middle Easterners on BOTH sides – paternal and maternal – while Ashkenazi Jews have European blood pumped in through their maternal line. MtDNA proves this but so do recent autosomal studies.  Jon Entine, a man I have read since being a little teenager, agrees with me in the book Abraham’s Children!

There are two explanations for this.  Firstly, some people suggest that at one point of history, Jewishness was transferred by the father instead of the Mother and that the definition was modified later in history.  Karaite Jews determine Jewishness this way.  Secondly, conversions may have been involved.

The key factor in my argument is that Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans can be distinguished, and distinguished enough that in some ways hybrid Jews can slip between them genetically!  Graphs indicate that the European blood that Ashkenazi Jews have is Northern, not Southern.  In a nutshell, we now have graphs which show that Ashkenazi Jews have more northern European blood than Southern Europeans do!

The Study

(The genetic variation is tracked on two different axis lines – vertical and horizontal.  The vertical line is divided into units which are twice the size numerically as the horizontal line’s units.)

Horizontally, Jews are clustering around the fringe of Europe and towards the near east. Vertically, Jews are with Northern Europeans.  So while Jews may have Middle Eastern origins, they’ve mixed enough that in some ways their genome goes off in a completely different direction.  Ashkenazi Jews are endogenous, but only in intervals.  In certain periods of history, there has been mixing.  In addition, it should be noted for the sake of clarity that even Near Easterners are Caucasian Mediterraneans.

In calculating genetic distance, we have to add both the horizontal and vertical distance.  When making that calculation, Ashkenazi Jews are “beating” Greeks and Italians!  ADD BOTH THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DISTANCE FOR THE GREEKS AND THE ITALIANS!

I can’t wait to see the self-hating Mediterraneans piss themselves over this one!

Anthroscape : the forum which helped provide information
Occidental Dissent
The Occidental Observer
Information about “Anon”
Anon’s Website

The functional importance of the roughly 98% of mammalian genomes not corresponding to protein coding sequences remains largely undetermined1. Here we show that some large-scale deletions of the non-coding DNA referred to as gene deserts2, 3, 4 can be well tolerated by an organism. We deleted two large non-coding intervals, 1,511 kilobases and 845 kilobases in length, from the mouse genome. Viable mice homozygous for the deletions were generated and were indistinguishable from wild-type littermates with regard to morphology, reproductive fitness, growth, longevity and a variety of parameters assaying general homeostasis. Further detailed analysis of the expression of multiple genes bracketing the deletions revealed only minor expression differences in homozygous deletion and wild-type mice. Together, the two deleted segments harbour 1,243 non-coding sequences conserved between humans and rodents (more than 100 base pairs, 70% identity). Some of the deleted sequences might encode for functions unidentified in our screen; nonetheless, these studies further support the existence of potentially ‘disposable DNA’ in the genomes of mammals.

This is proof that a large amount of DNA in modern organisms is either “junk,” performing functions that are too insignificant to recognize, or unactivated and stored away for future use. In my opinion, it’s probably not being used at all, it’s probably junk, because I believe in the theory of evolution which would make it logical for neutral mutations to continue to exist and have no pragmatic affect.

For creationists, the existence of this junk dna presents a serious problem to their argument.

It also presents a serious problem for people who try to define race based on tiny markers found in populations as opposed to a combination of physical traits and ancestry.

Oh how I’d love to purge both the left and the right and bring an entirely new mentality to America!

Many people point out that all Europeans share a few mutations that non-Europeans do not share and consider the argument settled. If they really studied haplogroups of the Y Chromosome and Mitochondrial DNA, they’d learn how inconsequential and randomized this is, but I digress. To them, there is no Mediterranean race, but only Europeans and non-European Caucasoids. They are wrong.

I am going to oversimplify things here, but let’s imagine an original Caucasoid type that exists in the Middle East and then moves to Europe. The populations develop a few random mutations that can be used to identify genetic differences, but still share a genetic link and phenotype.

So we have Middle Eastern Mediterraneans, and European Mediterraneans, but they are both Mediterraneans.

Now imagine that depigmented Caucasoids spawn out of European Mediterraneans due to the climate and sexual selection. Lighter skin Caucasoids.

Well no duh, if you test the DNA, the newer Europeans are going to show some links with the older Europeans. But this does not in any way refute the fact that there is a Mediterranean race, and that all Caucasoids come from that foundation. The fact that all Europeans share a few mutations doesn’t refute the fact that some Europeans have the physical appearance of older types of Caucasoids. There is of course phenotype variation if you get away from the Mediterranean region in the Middle East. A Saudi doesn’t look quite like a Syrian, and an Iranian doesn’t look quite like a Lebanese person.

I should note that Southern Europeans who attempt to involve themselves in neo-nazi circles are some of the most annoying people I’ve ever met. They have such an inferiority complex (Constantin Von Hoffmeister agrees with me).

Hispanic people are not a race. I’ve been saying that they aren’t a race since 2005. Even Mexicans aren’t a race, but they are sometimes of mixed race. Mestizos are different from Spaniards, but even Mestizos are not a race but a mixture of races.

Spanish people (like Romans, Greeks, Syrians and the Lebanese) are members of a darker “Mediterranean” branch of the Caucasoid race. Spaniards are not northern Europeans, but they are clearly Caucasoids as much as Romans are. South Americans often (but not always) are mixed with Indian blood, but do not have any racial traits that they developed on their own. Mexican immigration is a major problem. But the Census happens to be right.

In addition, the Census is correct to identify the majority of North Africans and Middle Easterners as Caucasians. Please understand that I am sophisticated enough to argue for reduced immigration and still recognize that a Caucasian race obviously exists and that all are tightly linked.

Seriously, the main difference between Northern Europeans and other Caucasians is skin color. That’s not a very big difference. And I do not have a Mediterranean appearance myself and still realize this.

Yet East Asians also have it.

I wonder if Mongols evolved out of White Arabs who had a noticeable mutation.

edit : see this thread. I have switched my position, and concluded that these markers existed before racial groups (modern ones) did.

I’m not antisemitic but I know Hunter Wallace well enough that I don’t disown him just for disagreeing with me.  Anyways, he starts out calling Sarah Palin “the most white bread candidate since Pat Buchanan” and talks about how “Jews hate Whites.”  I comment, and unmask the fact that Palin is Jewish by Jewish law.  She has a Jewish mother.

Jews are Caucasoids who while they may not have absorbed total European DNA, they did phenotypically adapt to European climates.  The people who swear they can “spot Jews” often can’t identify a non-practicing Jew.  They wouldn’t be able to tell a Syrian for an Italian either.  They think they could, but they couldn’t.   Not without DNA testing.

It’s even dumb to fail to distinguish between members of families. Should I fail to note that Nero and his mother had different traits? Or are they all the same because they belong to the same family? Because Nero killed his mother, I would say there is a difference!

I officially reject and want nothing to do with racists who categorize people into groups and then hate people just because they belong to the groups. I “believe in race” but I’m also detail-oriented. Most of these clowns people don’t know jack shit about anthropology either. And believe it or not, there are a few “good” Black people. And I’ll attack any ethnic group I want to. If I want to attack Irish Catholics for example, I will, so shut up!

Analogously, If a 25 year old punches me in the face, I won’t hate all people who are 25 years old. Another analogy : even though I hate most women, I don’t hate “the good” women.

Racism is a bad idea. Realism is a good idea.

But realism is pretty cruel and politically incorrect.

The race deniers hit back saying White should mean European in a literal geographic sense instead of Europid or Caucasoid, but then why include Australians, British (who live on an Island) and Apartheid Africans who have ancestry from Europe? Such a move is simply an attempt to say race is not biological and assign affirmative action benefits to Arabs and Iranians at the expense of Slavs, Southern Europeans, Germanics and other Europeans. Some Arabs are indeed mixed with Negroid blood and Iranians with Mongoloid, but still, the whole purpose of racial classification is to give benefits to minorities over whites. As long as that is what it’s used for, it should be rejected altogether. But aside from this, most Arabs and Iranians can be classified as Caucasoid, and many Arabs have not a Southern “Arabid” type but a near eastern “Mediterranean” type similar to darker Europeans. But even those who have the Arabid and Iranid types are still part of the Caucasoid family, and even the full out non-white ones (a minority) shouldn’t get to rip white people off with affirmative action.

That said, if such a move was used to reduce the immigration of Muslims, I would support it even though biologically I think it is baloney. What it would be used for, however, is anti-white affirmative action.

I’m definitely the former, not the later. My view on human nature would still be harsh if the entire world was white.

The reason (that the Caucasoid race exists) is that bone structure, not pigmentation, determines the race.

Analogously, it is not the color of the pine needles or leaves that determines what type of tree a tree is, but the structure of the branches. You can have a pine tree with red needles, yellow needles, green needles, and it’s still a pine tree.
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_g7-review/colorswap.jpg
http://static-p3.fotolia.com/jpg/00/06/44/52/400_F_6445278_HpENOxtlfnmNEyReO9H8FGcrRJx0Zang.jpg
http://www.maxcor.com/img/Pine_Tree.jpg

IT’S STILL A PINE TREE! IT DOESN’T MATTER THE COLOR! AND IF THE SKELETON IS CAUCASOID, IT’S STILL A CAUCASOID!

For once in my life, I agree with Martin Luther King. It is indeed not the color of the skin. It’s the structure of the bones!

They post pictures of obviously negroid admixed Berbers and Arabs and argue that the Caucasoid race is a social construct. There is no “Arab race” there is no “African race” there is no “European race” there is no “Asian race” there is no “Mexican race” there is no “Jewish race” there is no “Russian race” there is no “Soviet race.”

There is a Negroid race and there is a Caucasoid and there is a Mongoloid race race and there is an Aboriginal race and there are people of mixed race. Can it be any clearer?

Racialist Anti-Semitism
The basic logic behind the hardcore anti-Semite who operates under a racialist platform is that Jews are responsible for “white genocide” (mass immigration, liberalism, Third World and Black criminality) therefore Jews should be exterminated to save the white race. Black nationalist anti-Semitism is a little more logical than white racialism, as it hates Jews as Whites. But white nationalists are about the most retarded people I’ve ever seen on the internet.

I won’t even talk morally. I’ll debunk this argument logically.

Jews do not control people’s minds. For every Jew that supports the status quo, they do not force gentiles to follow along. Jews are irrelevant without the support of Gentiles in a liberal Democratic system. There is no dictatorship in America. The responsibility to resist liberalism lies on the white gentile majority, not the Jews! When Jews say “jump,” the rest of the society does not have to say “how high?”

Crazy people point out that Jews have promoted lies and falsehoods and think they have won the argument. The fact that Jews are disproportionately involved in promoting programs that are formed in egalitarian obsession is forgivable if similar-minded crazy Jew haters have always existed as they always have. Yes I’m advocating a double standard. Historically, racial awareness has been perverted by anti-Semitic lunatics who are more interested in Jews than human biology. Jewish anti-racists are more innocent than other anti-racists, because of the historical anti-Jewish nature of racialism. It’s an unnecessary obsession that only rednecks advocate and can be corrected with a more refined version of racialism. Also consider that other groups, such as Irish Catholics, have been very active in anti-racist ideological activism.

Some Jews may know they are lying, some may be naive, some may be scared, some may not even consider their Jewishness to be important, but it doesn’t matter. Crazy people have always existed and focused on Jews, so Jewish behavior is forgivable. The double standard is logical. The Jews are not “advocating a genocide.” All of America is complicit. Most of these people do not even understand liberal capitalism!

Jews as non-Whites
Note : I have to clarify that I’m referring to the majority of Jews for this argument. There are of course individual Jews of every racial makeup imaginable. But I’m talking about the majority of Jews.

There is the argument that Jews are non-Whites but only an ignorant redneck unschooled in the very definition of race would deny that Europeans, Jews and in fact many Middle Eastern and North African populations belong to the same race with Ashkenazi Jews usually clustering around Armenians, Georgians and Turks and ranging in phenotype. Eurasia is a single continent! These crazy people actually believe that because Jewish Caucasoids and European Caucasoids lived in different continents for part of history, they are no longer the same race!

The same Northern Middle Eastern basic “type” which formed the original European peoples is closely related to the Jews who later randomly mixed with Europeans in controlled quantities. Phenotype internal to the Caucasoid race is more about sexual selection (with the climate playing a roll) than common ancestry. Hence Jews look “different” in Northern and Southern Europe, even if they are linked by some ancestry. Likewise, Gentile Mediterraneans in both Southern Europe and the Near East look similar because of the climate. Blondism and blue eyes have existed since the birth of the Caucasoid race, but have only become more common in environments which encourage it. As noted above, Some Jews who are genetically clearly Jewish look Northern European.

Typology is outdated and most reasonable people know that mutations in DNA often are unrelated to phenotype. The Basques and Finns prove this, as while they frequently show greater genetic distance from Europe than Jews do (at least by Y Chromosome), Basques still look like Spaniards and Finns still look like Northern Europeans. But Biblical Jews and Ashkenazi Jews are both clearly of the same race of Europeans, as are Berbers and a good amount of Arabs. Jews can be “distinguished” from other nationalities. But guess what, each nationality can also be distinguished as can individuals on a genetic level. You can be distinguished from your mother and father. It applies to other races too. Chinese and Japanese can be distinguished.

Orthodox Jews may grow beards like Amish people and Arabs while wearing hats, but biologically, they are white. Period.

Anti-Zionist Anti-semitism
It’s funny to watch people jump on a moral high horse on the issue of Zionism while falsely pretending to be communists, atheists and racialists. People claim to reject abstract morality then oppose Zionism on humanitarian grounds! What a joke! I hope the Zionists expose the barbaric nature of Sharia law so that something can be done to rectify it!

“Material conditions” cause you to oppose Zionism. Bullshit, Islam is a feudal religion.

Christian and Muslim Anti-Semitism
Jews have contributed to the world theologically. Now I’m an atheist but I respect the winner. A group of people who invented an Abrahamic religion (Judeo-Christian-Islam) that has taken the world by storm deserve credit. The religion may be flawed, but it’s ideas have shaped the world. Now Anton Lavey, another ethnic Jew, is coming to destroy the Abrahamic religion that has outlived its usefulness. Christian and Islamic “anti-Semites” are plagiarists who stole their religion from Jews. Enough said.

Marxism
Marxist anti-Semitism is retarded. Even though Trotsky may have been treasonous, Marx (an ethnic Jew) provided the original foundation for Communism and Jews in massive numbers supported the revolution. The redneck crowd may say that this justifies a right wing Anti-Semitism, but it does not. However evil Lenin may have been (the only Communist leader with any Jewish ancestry, 1/4), the Tzars were more evil. However crazy Communism is, liberal Democracy is more crazy. Only third position authoritarianism can correct.

Atheistic Anti-Semitism
Jews may have founded the Abrahamic religion, but the most crazy and fanatical adherents are rarely Jews and Judaism by nature does not seek to impose itself on others by killing those who won’t support it. Jews are not a threat to atheists, and many people born Jewish become atheists. The same cannot be said about Islam. The Jewish contributions to the sciences is obvious.

I have dismantled basically every argument in this post. I’ve killed many birds with one stone and will link to this article permanently.

What we have to remember is that blondism and red hair occur at low rates even in Arab and Mediterranean populations. These are not “new evolutions” or “racial traits” but just genes that “grew in popularity.” The term “Aryan” and the term “Semite” have linguistic roots and are not tied to racial origins. The Caucasoid race was always capable of depigmentation, because pigmentation is controlled by the complex interaction of genes and it only takes a single “bad gene” to cause someone to lose pigmentation. Look at an Albino black! But the bone structure is what makes Negroids a separate race!

What I’m arguing is that the change in pigmentation is not genetically important. Northern Europeans really are just depigmented Mediterraneans. Mediterraneans are just classical Caucasoids. Terms like “Alpine” and “Nordic” are not really logical. While there is an east-west genetic divide within Europe, there is little evidence that “Alpines” and “Nords” are separate races with distinct histories. It is merely random variation.

I really think the answer is sexual selection. Part of it is nature and part of it is human beings becoming conscious of the environment. People know the environment is colder, Mediterraneans are adapted to the desert, and that is what causes the change.

An interesting point is that Jews in Northern Europe are more depigmented than other Jews, even though they are (partially) genetically linked to other Jews. All Caucasoids are capable of depigmentation.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/2649287/1/

My opinion is yes.

If we didn’t have morons polluting the internet with their garbage, the science of anthropology could advance easier.

I think you all know what I’m talking about.

This is a multiple choice poll. Guests may participate. The potential answers are these.

Serial killers successfully lure “nice” victims into their own deaths all the time. America has all the power in the world, but is afraid of using it.

If I was running America, things would be “different” (if you know what I mean). I could even argue that I’m not part of White Guilt because I’m Eastern European and a Yankee.

Without guilt, the American empire could rule the world as a good fascist state. Yes it is multiracial, but so was the Roman empire. The American Empire should be race aware but not racially pure. The White race of course should survive as should other aspects of the empire, like Native Americans and Blacks.

During WWII, the hatred aimed at Jews shifted to Germans. Everyone hated Germans. Americans put Germans in concentration camps. Mussolini tried everything he could not to ally with Hitler. Poles and Soviets mass expelled Germans after WWII, leading to millions of deaths.

Now, everyone hates Muslims. And the secular Arab Nationalists hate the extreme Muslims.

Jews are Yesterday’s issue. Germans are too. Muslims are today’s issue! Any nationalist who can’t see that is an idiot or a subversive.

Polako and Racial Awareness take the position that Native Americans and Mongoloids are not a single racial category.

I do not know if they have since changed their minds, but before Anthroscape was hacked, Racial Reality and Dienekes took the position that it is one race.

I want whoever would like to participate to explain their position and perhaps we could all learn more.

My position is that although they cluster apart, their physical appearance is similar and physical appearance is controlled by DNA. Most DNA is junk. So the fact that junk DNA mutated doesn’t make them a different race. You don’t become a different race until the DNA that changes is related to behavioral and physical characteristics. I don’t see much evidence that there was evolution involved, only mutation of DNA that doesn’t make code or doesn’t make code that affects the interaction with the environment.

That’s my position, but I’m willing to listen to others.

It is not an anti-Semitic position to say “hey Abe Foxman. Your views are way too far to the left and you need to shift them to the right. You need to stop trying to make money by convincing Jews to fear Christian Europeans and come to terms with racial reality. Your views are wrong and you should change them.” To make such a statement is not anti-Semitic and right wing Jews would line up behind you in agreement.

The anti-Semitic approach is to attack Jews on account of their Jewish identity. To say “hey Abe, at the minimum no Jew should live in my country and preferably no Jew should live at all. Your tribe created the holocaust in your imagination but deserve a new one.”

Philosemites are not “controlled by the Jews.” They seek alliances with decent human beings.

I speak here of White Power, not so much as a chauvinistic, divisive, and predatory project aligned with imperialism, but an all-encompassing civilizational project belonging to the popular classes of European-Americans stemming from their deep brokenness and desire for self-determination, one constituting the path and national constants by which any of our revolutionary patriots must travel if seeking to place our people on the solid footings of the resistance option.

A photograph of me, John Paul Cupp, founder of the European-American Socialist People's Front

In the face of a conspiracy for genocide and the humiliation of the White proletariat, simply proclaiming your White identity in the US today, while not the revolution itself, is a revolutionary and defiant act, and a necessary condition for socialist construction. It is a will to live. My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front, calls for a patriotic front which closes ranks with our people and nurtures their resolve, while struggling among them for a correct line that brings forth the resistance option: White Power in form, national democratic and communist in content.

Within the context of our European-American nation, the redneck is not without a great many self-defeating flaws, namely vulgar anti-intellectualism, a lack of scientific class consciousness and geo-political international understanding and a fully distorted view of the nature of true patriotism, but the proletarian redneck remains the heartbeat of our people. The redneck is more than an impoverished but proudly self-reliant Southerner dawning mossy oak long after deer hunting is out of season or a Midwestern farm boy in a long sleeve flannel shirt and blue jeans whose reality is corn and football, but the best organic project the popular classes of our people have against assimilation, liberalism and a world that despises us as “backwards White trash” and wants to eventually kill us after it is done forceably ducking our heads in a mud puddle. In a broad sense these cosmopolitan times treat all of us like we are rednecks, “White Supremacists” or “White trash” whether we work in an office or a foundry, whether we hail from New Jersey or Oklahoma, South Carolina or Washington if our completely natural and healthy desire to preserve and enrich our ethnic character becomes too visible. Any White European-American who thinks and feels White, who wants to stay White and a build a future for White children, and wants to define and come to grips with our reality on our own Eurocentric terms receives the haughty mockery and disdain directed towards the redneck today. For that reason, the Confederate Battle Flag, a symbol hated and feared by anti-White cosmopolitans, belongs to all of us and is more than a symbol of regionalism today. Our motto: This multicultural politically correct Kosher world can kiss our collective White ass!

While I am not without a great deal of criticism of my current experiences in the rural South, one of the things that truly delights me is that to a certain degree, White people still are White. Jews, Hollyweird, liberal cosmopolitanism, and corporate globalism still stands out as alien foreign elements, despite the idiotic hours our people spend in front of their big screen Talmudic televisions wasting their lives away on football when they should be preparing for a guerrilla war. We define what it means to be attractive according to our own standards. A beautiful lady is a lady that reminds you of your mother and sisters or the neighbor lady or school teacher you had a crush on as a small child, not a bimbo celebrity dancing around to hip hop. Keep in mind, if Marilyn Monroe were born today she would be too fat and earthy for the mega sex symbol which has come to traumatize both White and non-White girls alike. Judaized Whites could never understand how gorgeous and divinely feminine Patsy Cline was or appreciate our tens of millions like her today, women who now think they‘re naturally ugly and starve themselves while being doused in Jewish whore paint to avoid being paralyzed as they walk out the front door. David Lane taught us to admire the aesthetic beauty of the White woman so much that we are willing to go hog wild as we kill and die for it. In such a spirit, a fight has to go on today for just what White masculinity and femininity means according to our own terms.

That said, being close to the enemy has its good points and far away its bad points. A genuinely White person in New York and California knows exactly what it means living under the tyranny of Jewish domination when Shylock shorts you on your paycheck. Experience teaches them that multiculturalism means having to get up in the morning and beat the holy hell out of immigrants and lumpen gang bangers who want to rape or rob you on your way to work as the government’s goons turn their eyes the other way. One doesn’t see the gigantic shrines of Jewdom and corporatism in healthy towns of the rural areas and traditional states. The enemy that wants to exterminate us and controls every aspect of our lives today seems more abstract. It seems easier to focus on local short term realities and hate the degenerate lumpens from below who rob our paycheck while ignoring the far bigger monster which constitutes the true power structure.

We need to quickly turn what is left of White reality into base areas, and dynamically redouble our commitment to on-the-ground organizing. That means starting off with a fishing trip, a couple of beers or coffee with family and friends or a simple chat in the break room at work. Yet it needs to be more than that, much more. We’re making up for decades of lost time today, and the enemy definitely controls the momentum. We need a revolution, and while the material conditions on the ground are in our favor, both time and the ideological and military preparedness of our people are greatly working against us.

We need to stay White by being White culturally and spiritually, but let us not abandon our scientific class analysis nor ever forget that we’re going to have to strap bombs around ourselves the way Palestinians do before it gets better rather than worse. After that we intensify the class struggle towards socialism, but not before. You can’t build White European-American socialism without White European-American people when they no longer exist. I guess you could say that we need redneck Maoism.

Good find, from Racial Reality.

Let’s celebrate human genetic diversity
By Bruce Lahn and Lanny Ebenstein
Nature
8 October 2009

Science is finding evidence of genetic diversity among groups of people as well as among individuals. This discovery should be embraced, not feared, say Bruce T. Lahn and Lanny Ebenstein.

A growing body of data is revealing the nature of human genetic diversity at increasingly finer resolution. It is now recognized that despite the high degree of genetic similarities that bind humanity together as a species, considerable diversity exists at both individual and group levels (see box, page 728). The biological significance of these variations remains to be explored fully. But enough evidence has come to the fore to warrant the question: what if scientific data ultimately demonstrate that genetically based biological variation exists at non-trivial levels not only among individuals but also among groups? In our view, the scientific community and society at large are ill-prepared for such a possibility. We need a moral response to this question that is robust irrespective of what research uncovers about human diversity. Here, we argue for the moral position that genetic diversity, from within or among groups, should be embraced and celebrated as one of humanity’s chief assets.

The current moral position is a sort of ‘biological egalitarianism’. This dominant position emerged in recent decades largely to correct grave historical injustices, including genocide, that were committed with the support of pseudoscientific understandings of group diversity. The racial-hygiene theory promoted by German geneticists Fritz Lenz, Eugene Fischer and others during the Nazi era is one notorious example of such pseudoscience. Biological egalitarianism is the view that no or almost no meaningful genetically based biological differences exist among human groups, with the exception of a few superficial traits such as skin colour. Proponents of this view seem to hope that, by promoting biological sameness, discrimination against groups or individuals will become groundless.

We believe that this position, although well intentioned, is illogical and even dangerous, as it implies that if significant group diversity were established, discrimination might thereby be justified. We reject this position. Equality of opportunity and respect for human dignity should be humankind’s common aspirations, notwithstanding human differences no matter how big or small. We also think that biological egalitarianism may not remain viable in light of the growing body of empirical data.

Many people may acknowledge the possibility of genetic diversity at the group level, but see it as a threat to social cohesion. Some scholars have even called for a halt to research into the topic or sensitive aspects of it, because of potential misuse of the information. Others will ask: if information on group diversity can be misused, why not just focus on individual differences and ignore any group variation? We strongly affirm that society must guard vigilantly against any misuse of genetic information, but we also believe that the best defence is to take a positive attitude towards diversity, including that at the group level. We argue for our position from two perspectives: first, that the understanding of group diversity can benefit research and medicine, and second, that human genetic diversity as a whole, including group diversity, greatly enriches our species.

[...]

Box 2. Emerging understanding of human genetic diversity

Genetic diversity is the differences in DNA sequence among members of a species. It is present in all species owing to the interplay of mutation, genetic drift, selection and population structure. When a species is reproductively isolated into multiple groups by geography or other means, the groups differentiate over time in their average genetic make-up.

Anatomically modern humans first appeared in eastern Africa about 200,000 years ago. Some members migrated out of Africa by 50,000 years ago to populate Asia, Australia, Europe and eventually the Americas. During this period, geographic barriers separated humanity into several major groups, largely along continental lines, which greatly reduced gene flow among them. Geographic and cultural barriers also existed within major groups, although to lesser degrees.

This history of human demography, along with selection, has resulted in complex patterns of genetic diversity. The basic unit of this diversity is polymorphisms — specific sites in the genome that exist in multiple variant forms (or alleles). Many polymorphisms involve just one or a few nucleotides, but some may involve large segments of genetic material. The presence of polymorphisms leads to genetic diversity at the individual level such that no two people’s DNA is the same, except identical twins. The alleles of some polymorphisms are also found in significantly different frequencies among geographic groups. An extreme example is the pigmentation gene SLC24A5. An allele of SLC24A5 that contributes to light pigmentation is present in almost all Europeans but is nearly absent in east Asians and Africans.

Given these geographically differentiated polymorphisms, it is possible to group humans on the basis of their genetic make-up. Such grouping largely confirms historical separation of global populations by geography. Indeed, a person’s major geographic group identity can be assigned with near certaintly on the basis of his or her DNA alone (now an accepted practice in forensics). There is growing evidence that some of the geographically differentiated polymorphisms are functional, meaning that they can lead to different biological outcomes (just how many is the subject of ongoing research). These polymorphisms can affect traits such as pigmentation, dietary adaptation and pathogen resistance (where evidence is rather convincing), and metabolism, physical development and brain biology (where evidence is more preliminary).

For most biological traits, genetically based differentiation among groups is probably negligible compared with the variation within the group. For other traits, such as pigmentation and lactose intolerance, differences among groups are so substantial that the trait displays an inter-group difference that is non-trivial compared with the variance within groups, and the extreme end of a trait may be significantly over-represented in a group.

Several studies have shown that many genes in the human genome may have undergone recent episodes of positive selection — that is, selection for advantageous biological traits. This is contrary to the position advocated by some scholars that humans effectively stopped evolving 50,000–40,000 years ago. In general, positive selection can increase the prevalence of functional polymorphisms and create geographic differentiation of allele frequencies.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/461726a.html

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/box/461726a_BX1.html

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/06/racial-science-is-overcoming-race-denial/feed/ 0 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/third-positionist-is-too-broad-a-term/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/third-positionist-is-too-broad-a-term/#comments Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:21:38 +0000 Metal Gear http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2099 I am gaining an increasing disdain for clerical fascism, nazism, traditionalism and anything that does not understand the industrial-bureaucratic nature of dictatorship. The most profitable lie of the Soviets is that Fascism and Nazism were indistinguishable. Fascism is worth rehabilitating, as it is basically strengthening the state to correct the problems caused by liberalism and true capitalism. Unlike simple traditionalism, it intends to permanently strengthen the state. In other words, not just long enough to fight revolutionaries, but permanently. Nazism and Clerical fascism are based on myths. While far less evil than Nazism, and certainly more of an ally to rational thinking people, even Torah Zionism is based on myths. Revisionist Zionism is not, however.

I think for the purpose of defining movements that correct class warfare via nationalism, the term is adequate but otherwise it is overly broad. I’ll still continue to use it to categorize posts though. There is a big difference between using a state to discourage class warfare, which is fascism, and using genocides in a misguided attempt to remove class conflict, which is Croatian Nationalism and Nazism. One method actually works and the other doesn’t. One method is actually an ideology and the other is just prejudice disguised as ideology.

This is not a denial of race; I believe in race but I don’t think Neo-Nazis are good anthropologists and I don’t think it should be central to every single political question. I would venture to say that liberals would still consider me a racist, even though I am a more general right wing authoritarian. I do not support any massive immigration. If the massive immigration came from the Ukraine into Russia or Vice-versa, I’d still oppose it. Not to mention, I don’t think neo-nazis and their supporters know what they are talking about when it comes to human biodiversity, but even so, race should not be the answer to every political question. Yes I oppose aggressive globalization done in the name of “modernization” as a way to troll society. Liberal globalists take us for idiots. But this is not the same thing as basing all politics off of race.

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/third-positionist-is-too-broad-a-term/feed/ 3 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/the-european-american-national-liberation-struggle/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/the-european-american-national-liberation-struggle/#comments Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:07:23 +0000 John Paul Cupp http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2097 If you ask me if I am a patriot, as a Communist and son of the nation, my obligation and honor would be to affirm a resounding “Yes!” However, telling our people the truth, when they roll around in their own feces and then rejoice of salvation and pride, is my supreme duty both as a patriot and a proletarian internationalist.

The Zionist-controlled American government is the most evil and reactionary government the modern world has ever seen. In collusion with globalist stooges and petty imperialists, the Jews have demonstrated an evil conspiracy of death and destruction. Contrary to conventional wisdom, our own people aren’t so far down the totem pole from the Palestinians in this sinister plot for the subjugation of all nations.

Hence, while our people in the US don’t need to be excessively disparaged and demoralized as done by Western “leftists,” they do play a whole series of reactionary social roles and cling to a whole series of opportunistic self-defeating tenets deeply embedded in their psychology. Getting to the root of this destruction takes precedence above and beyond pragmatism and political expediency.

The lines of the “left” and right promoted to our people are treasonously criminal and will get us nowhere. Racial and national nihilism, anti-family degeneracy, and anti-moral lines fomented by the “left” on behalf of their Jewish and globalist masters break down the solidarity of our working class, and promote cosmopolitanism, Zionism and imperialism. Likewise, the rightist, “traditionalist,” and so-called “patriotic” crowd’s promotion of so-called “American Nationalism,” this satanic anti-Christian cult of Judeo- “Christianity,” and the spreading of illusions that paleo-conservativism is a viable alternative to neo-conservativism, are all criminal plots leading to the physical extermination of millions upon millions of people.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front (EASPF), has an extensive amount of material combating the anti-White, philo-Semitic, and cosmopolitan lines of the contemporary “left.” Hence, I wish to  devote this article to combating reactionary ideas and behavior on the Right which stem from our people and are the very heart and soul of our people’s humiliating self-defeat today.

First, we shall take on the myth that this greedy and bloodthirsty banker’s prison house of nations, America, is any sort of real country and one to which our patriotism should attach itself. Second, we shall analyze the origins and consequences of Judeo-“Christianity,” and demonstrate conclusively that whatever one personally thinks of genuine Christianity, is not a form of Christianity at all, but rather violently contrary to it. Third, we shall analyze the origins and scope of conservativism within the United States, and the relationship between paleo-conservativism which openly promotes US imperialism and neo-conservatism invented by Jewish Trotskites which dominates the leading quarters of imperialism today, to show that while objectively anti-imperialist at times, paleo-conservativism ultimately fails as a program of liberation. We shall throughout this piece demonstrate the role of the Jewish enemy, and the particular conspiracy they hatched long ago to exterminate our people and subjugate all the peoples of the world while destroying their distinct ways of life. Lastly, we shall affirm the call for total war and resistance by our people towards both international solidarity and the formation of the liberated European-American Democratic People’s Republic, one ideally to carry forward with socialist construction.

America is the enemy of our people and the world

The now deceased White Separatist guerrilla fighter turned resistance detainee David Lane, whose “14 words” were to become the bedrock of a quasi-national democratic line among White Nationalists, whatever other major differences I have with him, made clear that America is our enemy.

“Determined to destroy the integrity of races, nations and cultures for the Zionist New World Order, The Red, White, and Blue traveling man’s murder machine has been an engine of holocaust, genocide, and death unmatched in human history.

But still the CRAP wraps logic five times around a crooked tree to proclaim themselves “American Patriots” who support “Our Boys” as they bomb helpless nations into the Stone Age and blow tens of thousands or millions of women and children into tiny fragments. Always looking for someone else to blame, the CRAP screams, it’s the Jews, it’s the Jews. Well I’d be the last to deny that the media is dominated by Jews who have an agenda of world domination and of extinction for White Aryans.” — Excerpt from “C.R.A.P. Christian Right-wing American Patriots.”

Indeed, while we must condemn and oppose the Jews and Zionists, Lane’s self-criticism of our people who come from such quarters is completely on the mark, and in this case he was referring to Christian Right-wing American Patriots as “CRAP”. One could go much further in condemning pro-Americanism from amongst our people, because even the more mediocre trends within our genuinely nationalist and anti-globalist quarters are a tiny fraction of the overall European-American populace. Most of our people have no problem whatever, not only with the mass-murder and subjugation of peoples, with the government and ruling classes who perform such crimes against our people and the world, or even with the Jews. Hence, fierce ideological struggle is the first order of the day.

The same GI mercenary goons occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, may death and suffering be upon them, are the very army that will be mass-murdering our people in the streets in the event a genuine revolutionary struggle stems from them. Supposedly “anti-government” rednecks and Southern Nationalists usually whine to no end about “terrorism” and “supporting the troops,” and yet were a Confederate Army or any other anti-government formation by our people to be created, this same government would be calling them “terrorists,” and it would be US troops and police who work to destroy them.

How can this possibly be White Power when the enemy multicultural hellhole bombs hapless Serbia, that is a White Aryan traditionally Christian people and the last truly great European-descended force of resistance, and destroys what was then the last revolutionary unitary project of White Europe, i.e. Yugoslavia? Tomislav Sunic and those like him who invent the existence of a “communist threat” to justify race treason and aiding imperialism in turning brother against brother must rejected.

Can we really believe the Cold War was a good thing? It was Zionism and Jewish finance capital that acted as the shock force for world imperialism in bringing down the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was no more Jewish and Zionist at that point than a Palestinian human bomb, having long since purged the eternal enemy from Soviet and Eastern European power. Can we really believe pointing missiles and nuclear bombs at our White brothers and sisters in Europe because they liberated themselves from finance capital is a form of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the world? Would our people have benefited from White European-descended peoples dropping nuclear weapons on one another? Can we really believe this was even about communism, and not rather a conspiracy of aggression against our continental mother’s womb, just as this same enemy targeted Germany for annihilation by fire twice and has done to our brothers and sisters throughout Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East? I mean just look today and we see Russia isn’t run by Communists, but yet ZOG America’s ruling classes are still bound and determined to provoke another Cold War, crying to no end against the heroic liberation of brotherly South Ossetia and Abkhazia from ZOG Georgia and placing military instillations all over Europe against Moscow.

“Supporting our troops” means asking the Jews and globalists to mass-murder and subjugate both the world and ourselves with their lackeys. Every enemy who falls today at the hands of the Mujahadeen in Iraq and Afghanistan is a common victory for the truly patriotic forces from among our people. Let us “support the troops” only when they refuse the orders of the imperialist ZOG regime, march away from Iraq westward towards Tel Aviv, when they switch sides and turn their guns the other way, and particularly when they atone for their crimes by blowing up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Otherwise, may death and demise be upon them!

Equally, anyone carrying a badge is an enemy and deserves to be killed when attacking our people or anyone. You tell me, all you idiots who cry and whine when Blacks taunt and praise the killing of “the pigs” in their songs, who brought down Ruby Ridge and Waco with arms? Who is the armed wing of the Zionist Occupation Government? Who is spying on us, beating and imprisoning demonstrators, and every step of the way works to infiltrate and sabotage any hopes for our national liberation? Snitching and cop-calling are NOT “patriotic;” the pigs are not our friends!

Of course, I support some Black, Red Indian or Puerto Rican radical that is blowing their brains out. The only question is: WHY AREN’T OUR PEOPLE WILLING TO DO THE EXACT SAME THING WHEN THESE LACKIES OF ZOG COME MARCHING INTO OUR HOMES AND COMMUNITIES HELLBENT ON SUBJUGATING US AND MASS-MURDERING OUR POPULAR CLASSES AND POLITICAL DISSIDENTS?!

An example that I always bring up is the case of my colleague Kevin Walsh, who was felonized after having an armed standoff with government agents attempting to unjustly detain him. People reacted to the case as if he were “nuts.” Yet, many would completely support the very same case if he were in some exotic-sounding “Third World” country far removed from their comfort zones. What, we aren’t suppose to defend ourselves with arms when the enemy is trying to destroy us? Is that really so “extreme” or are our sensibilities so self-defeating and extremely brainwashed that we wind up thinking surrender and humiliation are acceptable?

Yet, the paradigm goes much deeper than being against the government of America. America itself doesn’t have a legitimate right to exist, is again I repeat, A BANKER’S PRISONHOUSE OF NATIONS AND NOT A NATION IN AND OF ITSELF. It is a project directly aligned with the Zionist entity, one more repressive than any other in modern history that will eventually lead to our extermination. Our nation is NOT America. Our hearts and heritage, raped and ravaged by the Zionist multicultural enemy countless times, must for our survival lie with the continental European mother’s womb of our people. In short, we’re White European-descended Aryans who formed a nationality with a common bloodline, language and heritage who require territorial imperatives for our ethnic survival, but we are NOT Americans. To be more exact, call us European-Americans if so long as in so doing we are defining a Eurocentric people and civilization and not a cosmopolitan anti-national project defined by the Red, White and Jew. Delinking our identity from Europe is a Zionist plot to rob of us of our Aryan soul and identity, and rather promote the existence an illusionary “American race” where the Africans, Red Indians, and others perish beside us on an altar of money-worship.

America is itself a concept of immigration and therefore anti-national. From the idiocy of our ancestors fleeing the continental mother’s womb instead of working to make their homeland a better place, to bombing and attempting to break down the ethnic character of the peoples of the world who resist globalism, to spreading such destruction against the various peoples residing in the United States who over the course of centuries each developed unique cultures and heritages with the genocidal use of “open borders” today, America is a dance with death. Hence, to be a nationalist, to believe in nationalism, and even to be an internationalist in the correct context, is to be anti-American and is to delink ourselves from America. The only thing that will ever be White and truly Eurocentric about America are the nihilism and rotting corpses of our people.

American Nationalism is objectively anti-nationalist globalism, for the destruction of the national unit, the great black hole, clearly lacks an ethnic character and patriotic dimension. In practical terms, American Nationalism today is just simply rednecks becoming Jewish and a mass support base for military aggression, globalism and consumerism. Such “nationalism” is our enemy. It cannot logically be construed to mean the patriotic love of our people and working to preserve and enrich what makes us unique.

It’s not only those followers of Marcus Garvey or Puerto Rican freedom fighters for whom the task of delinking from America stands as a sacred patriotic objective. White Power, when correctly defined, ultimately wants both separation from and death to America. Indeed, “White Power, Death to America!”

While our people are very different from both the Arabs and the Koreans, and hence have their own particular road to national liberation, the best models existing today, and worthy of careful study, admiration, and solidarity by our people are those of north Korea and the Iraqi Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party.

Both projects, while guided by scientific socialism, took a far more thorough-going analysis of nationalism than pretending it to be something harmful to the unity of the popular classes or international solidarity, both realizing that nations are more than something which arose as product of capitalist development which will or should “whither away” as socialist construction intensifies. Both projects also defend the principle that to be a good internationalist one should first be a good patriot and that the nation alone decides the course of its struggle as masters of one’s own destiny and revolution.

Equally relevant for us, both projects are guided by a mother party capable of unifying the people though ideological struggle and developing a monolithic and organic ideology in the course of rooting out opportunism and erroneous ideas and behaviors. Like the eventuality of our own struggle against the Jews and American regime, both celebrate the central role of armed struggle and used their unique heritages to build a modern people-first civilizational project. In this regard, one finds leader Kim Jong Il’s On Correctly Understanding Nationalism and On Preserving the Juche Character and National Character of the Revolution and Construction extremely relevant and creatively applicable to our own struggle once liberated from ethnic chauvinism and pro-imperialist illusions.For our people, we call for preserving our ethnic character and heritage without pretending that the platform of the dominant White nationalist paradigm or the old Confederate regime are somehow capable of liberating us. We call for European-American motherland defense equipped with class analysis and a proletarian internationalist outlook as the guiding lens in these Zionized and pro-American times of defeat and despair.

Our nationalism must be a progressive nationalism, which while working to defend our blood and ethnic character against cosmopolitanism, is ultimately part of the global front to preserve the existence of nations and social liberation of the world’s popular classes in general.

Judeo-“Christianity” is our enemy

The historical accuracy of the Bible and the question of the existence of Jesus is not relevant to our struggles today. In practical terms, Christianity is today a two millennia old religious and political force in the world with a large number of adherents. With all due respect to the Pagans and non-religious from among our people, Christianity is simply a reality. While I to detest many of its political uses today and also recognize its origins as something distinctly foreign and Semitic, Christianity is an organic White Eurocentric expression from our people today. It is important, even for those like myself who are atheists, to recognize that Christianity has become a part of our people, and that many true Christians are our comrades today.

Hence, we must always hold a place at the table for all of our Christian brothers and sisters who work for social justice and the advancement and upliftment of our people. In criticizing Judeo-“Christianity,” I do not attack these people or the religion of our ancestors, nor am I attempting to discourage our people from practicing true Christianity. Rather, I attack a political poison masking itself in the image our people, but one that is inherently contrary to their best interests and that cannot be construed as being genuinely “Bible-based” anyways.

One should not be surprised that the Christian Jew was ultimately to submit before the Jewish Jew in the power struggle over domination of finance capital. Talmudism, on both a secular and religious level, being far more handcrafted at the art of subversion and sabotage and the Jews themselves raised in such a manner and spirit, than their Christian counterparts turned lackeys, and logically meaning the domination of Jewish Judaism over “Christian” Judaism. Our Christian population will either find alternative paths ranging from Islam, Buddhism and paganism to simply becoming atheists and agnostics or else they will need to reclaim the revolutionary potential of their creed as many have already done. However, Judeo-“Christianity” is unredeemable and shall be annihilated.

Judeo-“Christianity” presents the false notion that Jewish values are also Christian values and that the Zionist entity is part of the will of God in fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. It is treason to true Christianity, because it perverts Christian values and promotes attacks on real Christians in Palestine and elsewhere in the Arab world. “Love your neighbor as yourself” becomes “defraud and exploit your neighbor and physically attack him if he resists or even objects too much.” The teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin are far closer to the teachings of Christ than any of this predatory Judaeo-“Christian” gutter religion.

Paleo-Conservativism: an infantile disorder

Paleo-conservativism is the general trends of conservativism prior to neo-conservativism. It’s espousers, to varying degrees essentially believe in what one would consider “traditional American values” prior to the particularly Jewish/Trotskite/fanatically interventionist-oriented takeover of both the Republican Party and American nationalist thought. Essentially, while at times objectively anti-imperialist, they’re just whining because White Judeo-“Christian” quarters fail to dominate the leading quarters of imperialist finance capital and policy decisions on domestic and foreign affairs and essentially have the same idiotic attachment to the “American

Dream” as do their neo-conservative rivals. However, they detest America’s globalist role today while glossing over the fact that a whole series of reactionary ideas and behaviors they oppose are the ideological basis for the forming of America and were always tactics and strategies used by the enemy government.

The United States didn’t become imperialistic and hell bent for world domination when it became essentially Jewish. Becoming Jewish just made the problem a whole lot worse. We can trace clear back to wars of aggression against the Red Indians, to support for the Jewish-led slave trade in both the North and South, to the war of aggression against Dixie, and to America’s subversive decision to become an imperialist power clear back to 1898 and the aggression against the Philippines, Cuba and Puerto Rico, while claiming to be their friend and brother against Spanish colonialism.

Miscegenation didn’t begin with Neo-conservatives. Not only were enslaving Africans and mass murdering Red Indians morally wrong and inexcusable, though the meaning, relevance and scope of such actions has become greatly distorted, but they led us to lose our unique European identity by blood and culture for a false and enemy American one, as much as it did to those it colonized. Chinese immigrants, like their Irish counterparts – our brothers today, were brought in on a large scale by those who adhered to the will of the “Founding Fathers” as a source of cheap and easily exploited labor. This can hardly be seen as wanting to preserve our ethnic character.

The fact is, our “Founding Fathers,” without exception, were all garbage, who hailed an anti-national project where people were advised to abandon their ethnic character and nationalist-class struggle for the merchant’s pipe dream of America. Any true White Nationalist is not a paleo-conservative and should hate America’s founding leaders and ideology as much as leftists and peoples oppressed by White World colonialism.

Paleo-conservatives often play an anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist social role at a time when our culture, like those of the entire world, is being rapidly eroded, but they do so from a distorted and defeatist worldview that lacks class analysis, honest historical basis or a path forward. Our duty as patriots must not be to make the impossible return to the origins of our demise before the onslaught of liberalism and globalism, but to build a revolutionary path forward.

Build the European-American National Democratic Front and People’s War!

The illusions must smashed. The American regime, dominated by International Zionism but criminal in its own right, is our arch-enemy and ethnic catastrophe. Here we affirm that as ZOG is standing in the way of our national liberation and behaving as a violent anti-nationalist and anti-popular classes menace around the world by force of arms, armed struggle is the primary mode and necessity for our people’s survival, territorial imperative and the formation of a liberated and independent European-American Democratic People’s Republic. Without undue bravado nor illusions, we call upon our best and brightest sons and daughters to build and enhance the European-American people’s mass struggle, prerequisite for our war of national liberation, with total commitment and selflessness.

We must join hands with the “Axis of Resistance” constituting those groups and lands around the world combating imperialism and the Jews. Primarily this includes the Mujahadeen in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan and Somalia, and the People’s Wars in the Philippines and Colombia. It also constitutes the friendly peoples of Korea, Cuba, Russia, Serbia, Venezuela, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, China, Pakistan and India, Belarus, Myanmar, Sudan, Zimbabwe and others. In so doing, being masters of our own destiny, such solidarity is not a manifestation of flunkies. Hence, such solidarity should not be without mutual autonomy or criticism, but as a genuinely organic expression of solidarity among patriots against a common enemy regardless of ethnic and ideological differences.

The current rejectionist tactics of more advanced White Nationalist groups, namely “lone wolf actions,” anti-regime armed standoffs and “terrorism” are not without extremely positive and effective attributes in light of the absolute necessity of military operations and the lack of a revolutionary mass line and political-military apparatus capable of currently defeating the American regime and the Jews. They are not an end in and of themselves however. Our people must launch a successful guerrilla war capable of galvanizing the political arena and mobilizing the masses of our European-American people or we may well perish.

Our revolutionary struggle for liberation is not a “Race War,” and the designs of International Zionism for such fratricide between ourselves and the Black nation, as espoused by certain myopic and sectarian forces only serves to undermine our struggle and resistance. We also call for the formation of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the United States and African-descended peoples and others based on mutual respect of ethnic identity, brotherhood and friendship, and resistance to a common threat. Any ethnic contradictions between ourselves and Black people and others must be secondary to a recognition of the need for class solidarity and the need for all peoples to correct a whole series of idiotic social roles and ideas, though rejecting of assimilation and racial nihilism. We must ultimately unite in a political-military showdown towards defeating Jewish power, promoting the resistance of peoples outside the US territorial boundaries on the frontlines against globalism, overthrowing the regime, and defending the self-determination and ethnic character of peoples.

Furthermore, we laud the heroic acts of resistance which occurred on September 11^th, 2001 and welcome international combat volunteers, who also recognize in the American regime and the Jews a common enemy of their people and who are currently more advanced politically, spiritually, and militarily to combat them. At a time of total globalist onslaught we cannot pretend that our national borders exist in any coherent and natural sense anyways. This being the case, we respect the calls made by various Jihad organizations for opening up the field of combat both in the United States and the Zionist entity, rather than considering these to be acts of aggression against our people as proponents of the “war on terror” erroneously do.

Many forces conducting solidarity activities, building the movement against war, anti-Zionists, advocates of self-determination and anti-government agitators caution against raising the alarm bells with support of violent resistance to the Jews and regime, promotion of “terrorism” and the call for destroying the United States. Such people would argue that the actual conditions for successfully conducting People’s War currently do not exist or even that “terrorism” is universally immoral and counterproductive. They point out that this is potentially useful for demonizing more “legitimate” organizations, mass-appeal aboveground political work and single issue causes. It’s also true when they argue that this carries with it immense security risks and that the super-majority of people are deeply turned off by such an approach.

Yet, we cannot possibly forsake the revolution for political breadcrumbs or pragmatism. The necessity of armed nationalist-class struggle ranks as the singular greatest imperative both for the survival and liberation of my European-American people and for the final defeat of imperialism and Zionism around the world, i.e. for the national liberation of all peoples as the victory of international proletarian nationalism over cosmopolitanism, Americanism and globalism.

First, as is the duty of all people, I am affirming here the call for the self-determination and liberation of my people as a sacred principle and inalienable right, regardless of calls for moderation. At a time White people are being slated for destruction and demise, with all due respect, moderation and restraint are off the table. Secondly, one has to seriously question if anti-globalist forces within the misnomered “Western World,” unlike their counterparts in the equally misnomered “Third World,” are actually achieving anything at all. This leads to honestly assessing the state of defeat and duress, and presents clearly the centrality of revolutionary dynamism and correct ideology if we are going to tip the balance of power in our favor. Third, again I berate the proponents of dogmatic humanism and moralism for their degenerate blanket condemnations of the truly liberating brutality of resistance terror. The reality is we are fighting an enemy who lacks principles, chivalry or dignity. The idea of rules of engagement becomes a Talmudic length saga, rather than merely stressing the need for focusing attacks on the enemy more so than on our own popular classes (with the exception of the Zionist entity). This has become chains around the arms of our people and objectively enables reactionary anti-human terror of aggression a billion fold more barbaric than collateral damage caused by resistance actions, for it is such resistance actions that help to partially blunt the enemy’s aggression. Lastly, everything I have said about America, that it does not have a right to exist and will ultimately destroy our own just as it has so many others, is completely true. Hence, my position rests on its own merits.

The European-American “left,” unlike their counterparts throughout Eastern Europe, Asia, Arabia, Africa, Turkey and Latin America, overwhelming lack any real national dimension, red meat-eating instinct, willingness and thirst for combat, anti-Judaism and anti-Zionism in their psychology, and even are generally not opposed to globalism and imperialism. They have become chattel slaves, effeminate pacifists and the most loathing and distracted of shabbos goyim and ethnic nihilists. We struggle so that one day the best and brightest of our sons and daughters on the left join the ranks of proletarian Aryan combatant fighters, wishing defeat for the poisons of the New Left and Old Left alike.

Now looking honestly, my brothers and sisters on the right and those still embedded with a sense of salvation and ethnic survival, are not without the many fatal flaws I have mentioned in this appeal. May it be that ideological struggle and the blood of our martyrs cleanses our people, strengthens them, aids their contributions to overall global cause, and finds our people surviving and flourishing. Our greatest threat is apathy, our greatest freedom painful self-criticism, myself included.

We are facing the eventuality of the complete breakdown of imperialist finance capital. The imperialist system of the regime, aside from spreading the ills of multiculturalism, produced a parasitic economy unable to stand. Arise and destroy it with arms!

Glory to the European-American proletarian nation, hail to the White race!

Long live the resistance option, death to our enemies!

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/05/the-european-american-national-liberation-struggle/feed/ 5 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/on-the-need-for-nationalist-and-anti-jewish-ideological-struggle-amongst-communists-and-western-leftists/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/on-the-need-for-nationalist-and-anti-jewish-ideological-struggle-amongst-communists-and-western-leftists/#comments Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:52:34 +0000 John Paul Cupp http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2093 In today’s post-Soviet world, with the exception of those nations where Communists seized state power and developed patriotic models of building socialism, to call oneself a “Communist” today is to be a fifth column agent for Zionism, liberalism, social democracy, defeatism, cosmopolitanism, international Jewry, and imperialist globalization.

Those of us who love our Communist identity, who love the working class of our nation and want to preserve our ethnic character and believe in international solidarity with the popular masses of other countries fighting against Zionism and imperialism, have a profound obligation to tell the truth and struggle to rectify this embarrassing and humiliating situation. This is true no matter how many times we ourselves are accused of espousing “racism,” “xenophobia,” “national chauvinism,” “anti-Semitism,” “White Supremacism” or “Islamo-fascism,” and even “anti-Communism.” As a revolutionary principle, the popular classes struggle together as a national unit to build the revolution. This patriotic class struggle forms proletarian internationalism not based upon wanting to destroy nations and form a “Communist International,” but by the bonds of solidarity and cooperation between patriots of one land with another. The leading forces behind the United States and imperialism worldwide, which struggles to break down the ethnic character of people, are overwhelmingly Jewish.

21^st Century Communism is National Communism, not dogmatic “anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism,” not liberal identity politics and definitely not national nihilism and Jew-loving self-hatred. European-American National Communism isn’t chauvinistic nor the metaphysics of Hitlerite National Socialism, but it will coordinate with our kindred in the White Power national democratic front and other peoples on its own terms. It also will not fall for the trap of “anti-racism” and “anti-fascism” or whatever Jewish and nihilist conspiracy is hatched to prevent us from closing ranks with our kindred, regardless of whether or not they are currently anti-communist.

While we admire Stalin’s leadership during the Soviet-led struggle against Operation Barbarossa, we cannot possibly deny that many good points existed early on in the German revolution of 1933, and that very real limitations existed in the Communist movement, namely Jew-loving illusions and national nihilism. Further, we argue that Adolf Hitler has become the greatest sacred cow of the entire world, a sacred cow that needs to be correctly deconstructed because it stands in the way of our liberation and of movements of national release against globalism throughout the world.

We also will not deny that the dominant White Nationalist movement, regardless of our internal disagreements and its limitations, is not without many positive features. We defend “Europe for the Europeans” and opposition to “open borders” when Arabs and others ask us to “tone it down a notch,” because White people have a right to self-determination as much as Palestinians and Iraqis. Within the United States, multiculturalism is nothing more than a codeword for Zionist-driven cosmopolitanism and nihilistic death for which all of us are ultimately victims. We refuse to differentiate between Jews and Zionists, because it cannot possibly be argued that this lie has any logical benefit for our struggle or the overall struggle against imperialism. We do not deny the existence of races or the centrality of ethno-nationalism as the only genuine form of nationalism today, but merely state that such questions are the internal matter of other peoples and oppose genuine ethnic chauvinism while equally lambasting calls of denunciation against true nationalism when it is slandered by the forces of “political correctness.” Lastly, like all White Nationalists in the US, we love White people, are proudly Eurocentric and openly quarrel with the dominant leftist paradigm that pretends European-Americans are not an oppressed nation today with a right to self-determination.

Our communism is not an attempted subversion of the people through chameleon tactics. We have no hidden agenda, because our goals are public knowledge. Our call for socialism, anti-imperialism and anti-Zionism and the liberation of White people through a coordinated national democratic front is an open and steady call. Our political alliances are honest alliances, regardless of real differences, based on an understanding of needing unified collective White European-American action and eventually coordination with other people to bring down the American regime and Jewish power worldwide. We are not rightists with the rightists and leftists with the leftists, though we do speak to each in ways to which they can relate. We are patriotic communists at all times.

Unlike other group identities formed around religion or based on national identity (without conceding that the Jews constitute a nation), the very act of being a Jew is hostile to the world and without redeeming value. We admire Lenin, but he was wrong on this. Almost no real “Jewish proletariat” exists to be differentiated from the Jewish bourgeoisie, because Jews are lazy predatory creatures who close ranks around a common goal of world domination and economic slavery. We do need to condemn White globalists and others who are power holders in imperialist finance capital and the conspiracy to destroy nation states and think in terms of class analysis, but it is very important to understand that the leading quarters of imperialism and the true power structure of the United States are all Jews and that the entire Jewish community closes ranks with this threat to liberty.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front, calls on honest elements of the White European-descended left to correct their mistakes on the national question and the Jewish problem and join ranks for a nation liberation struggle to come. We call on White European-descended rightists to understand that while the dominant Western leftist political movements are Judaic assaults on the dignity of the white race, that not all of us are without great love for and pride in our people, and we do want a unified front to preserve our identity and promote our liberation. We address our allies outside the realm of our kindred as friends and comrades, but we do not allow that they should possibly dictate the terms of our mass line. We argue that natural differences always will exist between the mass lines of completely different people, but that this should not stand in the way of amiable relations and collective solidarity against a common threat.

Imperialism, not White solidarity, is the real enemy of humanity!

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/on-the-need-for-nationalist-and-anti-jewish-ideological-struggle-amongst-communists-and-western-leftists/feed/ 4 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/hunter-wallace-prozium-are-jews-white/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/hunter-wallace-prozium-are-jews-white/#comments Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:01:44 +0000 Metal Gear http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2091 The Link

Ted Sallis replies to White Advocate and Guy White. Iceman, Ian Jobling, and Lawrence Auster have also argued that Jews are White. The genetic data seems to indicate otherwise. Ashkenazi Jews are distinct from all European populations.

I am “iceman.” Prozium is calling me out!
The other link

Look, if you want to say that Jews are a tribal group of people, who entered Europe at a different time than Latins, Slavs and Germans, and who tried their best not to intermarry, then I’ll agree with you.

But I won’t agree with you that they are flat out non-white in a biological sense. If you designed a disease to kill Caucasoids by DNA, it would kill Jews as well as Europeans.

I find it interesting that WNs like to (correctly) argue that the Egyptians were White in Ancient history. Am I the only person who sees a contradiction here, between arguing that the Egyptians were White and arguing that the Caucasoids of the Middle East are non-white? Not to mention, Jews and Arabs were distinguishable from each other, even before Jews hit Europe and lost a moderate amount of purity.

My point. A Caucasoid race exists, and race is not a social construct. The reason I consider Arabs Caucasoid is not so that I can include them into a political movement, but because to not do so would be race denial which is no better than the race denial advocated by the “race doesn’t exist” crowd.

“Aryaness” has nothing to do with this. “Aryan” refers to an alphabet, one which the Hungarians do not use. If that mattered, then Black people who speak English would be White. It doesn’t. The fact that Jews cluster imbetween Europeans and Semites, and Semites speak non-Aryan languages, is no material to the question of Jews being non-White. A very real genetic and anthropological connection exists between both Semites and Aryans!

Hitler convinced the German people that Jews were not Aryan. And he’s right that in an indigenous sense they speak a Semitic language. But Hitler never convinced the German people that Jews were non-White. He barely even used the word “White” in Mein Kampf, except when he talked about Jews bringing Blacks into Germany. In other words, he used the term “White” when comparing to Blacks, but used the term “Aryan” when comparing to Jews. My point is that if Hitler – one of the most tenacious anti-Semites of all time – couldn’t argue that Jews were non-white, then Prozium will never do it successfully. Confederate and American Law have both considered Jews to be White. Prozium and the people he linked to are working hard to gerrymander the definition of White, but gerrymandering is not science!

If you really believe in genetic determinism for racial origins, then you are absolutely obligated to consider all Caucasoids White. To argue otherwise is to make race political, and you can do that, but quit trying to pretend to have a scientific basis.

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/03/hunter-wallace-prozium-are-jews-white/feed/ 11 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-racial-communism/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-racial-communism/#comments Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:49 +0000 John Paul Cupp http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2080

Racial communism is the highest stage of communist theory and practice for our people. It is an emerging  ideology which seeks to produce the epic works for guiding our future generations to come while defeating the anti-White genocidal conspiracy by raising our people to the level of combatant fighters and successfully engaging in protracted armed struggle. It is a terroristic specter which haunts the lying misanthropic leftists who laugh joyously at the embarrassing state of defeat in which our people wallow. Racial communism prophetically promises them that the “favor” will be returned by a thousand fold when we achieve state power and butcher them en masse through great purges if they fail to correct their treasonous behavior. It stands in diametric opposition to attachment to the enemy liberal Zionist project called “America,” Cold War nonsense and the individualism of the far right, libertarians and paleoconservatives. However, racial communism as a product of collective cells organic to our European-American body also understands that our movement for racial, national and social liberation, even our working class vanguard today, is confused and often among these very same people. Minus ardent conservatives and integrationists, at least some of these types of people still want to be White, which is more than we can say for most of the left. Hence, even during fierce ideological struggle we treat our brothers and sisters differently than we treat anti-White enemies.

Vladimir Lenin was completely correct to call “left-wing communism” the “infantile disorder” that it is in his famous work. On the other extreme, David Lane was correct to affirm that “Christian Right-wing American Patriots” are “C.R.A.P.” in his famous work. While I doubt these two gentlemen would have liked each other very much, they both made real contributions to the kind of synthesis we need today in building a revolutionary European-American nationalistic anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist front, one that is both anti-capitalist and racially aware. Both of these great men understood the centrality of armed revolution, and it is none other than armed revolution which will act as a sort of antiseptic, cleaning our people’s deep wounds and nurturing our collective body and its cells.

“Neither left nor right” makes a certain point in today’s Western context because the “left” is completely cosmopolitan and an avowed enemy of our people, while the right seems lost in nostalgia for archaic, conservative and opportunistic ideas and social roles. However, I think it would be more correct to put my organiztion, the European-American Socialist People’s Front (EASPF), in the camp of leftism. This of course presupposes that unlike the infantilism of “left-wing communism,” EASPF is the guiding lens of “right-wing communism,” a national-racial revolutionary working class calling. In this sense, we are genuinely leftists because we are for socialism and anti-imperialism, but to the right of the infantile enemies, because we are patriots waving the red flag rather than open enemies of our own people’s right to self-determination. We are communists standing for the truest form of anti-revisionist communism among our people: White Power as a communist ideology.

Because the bulk of nationalistic Whites in the Western world belong to the far right or libertarian camps, they lack a tangible path forward and fail to see the contradictions that are brewing within the left, dominated as it is by the cosmopolitan infantile ones. Dialectically, the New Left “picked up a rock and dropped it on its own feet” to paraphrase basic pre-Cultural Revolution Maoist concepts. In becoming so vain and arrogant in their hatred of anything White and even openly holding working class Whites in deep contempt, they have essentially handed us a rope with which to hang them. In this spirit we call on the young leftists as they are being beaten in the streets by ZOG’s police to reconsider their positions and approach while maintaining their zeal for struggle.

One finds more and more average working class and middle class rednecks starting to see through capitalism for what it is, without the illusions that existed during the Cold War. White college students who grew up with blue collar parents are beginning to secretly hold their own dogmatic leftist “comrades” in contempt for their racial sectarianism, for this retarded idea that a “White working class doesn’t exist” or that it is “a racist oppressor.” Indeed, race treason isn’t loyalty to humanity, it’s betrayal of one’s own people. You can’t build the people’s revolution without loving them or by betraying them. This is exactly why cosmopolitan and anti-White misleaders promote such lines. In fact, the Zionist media had a virtual blackout on the militaristic aggression the police had in handling anarchist-leaning youth condemning the G20 summit in Pittsburgh recently. Despite the silly anti-White lines these young kids have, most of our supposedly “reactionary” poor workers when discovering reliable news of such events would like to have seen the anarchists send the government’s agents to hell for daring to attack them or any other citizen standing up for basic rights. As another example worth citing, a young European-American fresh out of ZOG’s imperialist military aggression came home and shot two cops dead recently not far from where I live. What if we mixed the spirit of the ex-GI cop-killer on the right and the young anarchists on the left together while calling on all our people to adopt more effective strategies and ideology for total resistance?

Watching African-Americans mindlessly line up in droves behind Barack Obama, simply because he is Black, even though he’s fanatically imperialistic and destroying the economy for all races and nationalities, has caused many people to reassess if Whites are the only ones who have to correct many foolish notions and behaviors. The idea that ZOG America is “AmeriKKKa,” as the New Left claims, doesn’t seem fitting in an environment where the symbolic leader of imperialism isn’t White and where transnational finance capital isn’t dominated by European-America Southerners. Certainly, if the Ku Klux Klan or other radical White paleoconservatives were the ruling elite today, our country wouldn’t have the idiotic pro-immigration stance that it does.

Now the contradictions are brewing. What seems small is a crack destined to shatter the moribund New Left and send them into the dustbin of history should we play our cards correctly. In such a way we could form and enhance a real true revolutionary White working class movement and develop the anti-capitalist and nationalist-racialist revolution. It’s time for real answers and real action. We need more theoretical debate and discussion, but more than that we need mass work, party building and the stockpiling of weapons and ammunition.

We must continue to encourage the leftist youth to rally under the red flag of socialism, and show them that our Confederate battle flag, a symbol of European-American ethno-nationalist resistance today more so than narrow regionalism or loyalty to an antiquated political system, is also a red-colored flag. We need a people’s war, and we also need a race war against Jewish Supremacy, regardless of whether Jews are a real race or not, since they are attacking us because our racial and national identity threatens their hegemonic goals. So then let us build a people’s war against the enemy regime and finance capital. Let us also build a war for ethnic survival, though not one needlessly attacking other oppressed nationalities, particularly innocent popular class African-Americans, as many of my brothers and sisters on the the far right foolishly espouse. We need racial and national liberation, but we also need class struggle. Both the best of the right and the best of the left make complete sense and are useful sources of inspiration. We also should discard what is unusable or reactionary from them, especially libertarian hangups both sadly seem to share.

Our numbers are small, but things are turning in our favor. People who tuned out only a few years ago are now tuning in to our message today. This is because deep down our masses know the economy isn’t coming back. They also painfully understand that we are dying spiritually, culturally and even in a physical sense as an organic ethnic being. Despite often “going through the motions” or not having a workable solution, our people painfully know that they are oppressed. We simply lack the infrastructure and mass media that the enemy holds, or even the amount of media dogmatic rightist and  leftist groups have. For all that, we can build a revolution when the young rebel leftist kids fighting the system with infantile behavior and ideas correct many of those mistakes and the rest of our people, whom conservative “Judeo-Christians”  and the military industrial complex work hard to subvert, correct many of theirs as well. Then we could theoretically join hands in a shooting war, a mature resistance struggle with an understanding that victory will not be won without the righteous blood of our people as martyrs.

Imagine the deep healing that will come over our people at such a point. With numbers, proper leadership, organizational structure, mass movements, and especially armed resistance, what was today our saddest and most depressing moment can be followed by the greatest moment in the history of our people. The chains that shackles would then be smashed and our creative potential would become seemingly endless. This is to say nothing of what a return to the concept of family and neighborhood would bring, something which can only come when we destroy capitalism and build socialism and communism according to our own national and racial realities.

Our people are deeply yearning for something today. One senses that in whatever quarters they should happen to venture. Unfortunately the feeling of just what they are yearning for and how to achieve it has yet to come over them. That only means our work as revolutionaries must intensify.

Hail victory!

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-racial-communism/feed/ 5 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/jews-judaism-zionism/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/jews-judaism-zionism/#comments Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:24:11 +0000 John Paul Cupp http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2079

Often we hear, particularly from “leftist”, “progressive”, “anti-racist”, and “anti-fascist” organizations and individuals that one is demanded by the most basic and sacrosanct of humane tenets to differentiate between the Jews , who are supposedly one of the greatest victims of scapegoating in world history, and “Zionists”, if in fact we are told to differentiate at all and instead to honor both Jews and Zionists, in either of these scenarios in order to avoid being “anti-Semitic”.

Were one to rationally evaluate this “argument” of supporting Jews and Judaism but not Zionism, one would face a series of problematic questions.  First, what is Jewishness and is it reactionary?  Second, what does Judaism teach, and does it call for the creation of a Zionist entity on stolen soil, as well as support of  a whole series of racist misanthropic parasitic Jewish behaviors we are trained to consider Zionism today, namely the belief that Jews are superior to everyone else?  Third, to what extent do Jews and Judaism differentiate themselves from international Zionism?  Fourth, to what degree are today’s Zionist-dominated Jewish social roles, behaviors, and ideas similar to or different from Jewish social roles, behaviors, and ideas prior to the widespread domination of modern Zionism amongst the Jews?  Fifth, if we were to come to the conclusion that Zionism is not drastically different from Jewishness and  Judaism does that mean one is henceforth obligated to recognize Zionism or the Zionist entity out of avoidance of “anti-Semitism”?  Lastly, is it possible  to be in opposition to collective Jewry and Judaism, that is to say to be against Jews, Judaism and Zionism, without being a reactionary or a chauvinist, i.e. can one be anti-Judaic or even “anti-Jewish” without being a “racist anti-Semite”?

What exactly is Jewishness?

Regarding the Jewish Question, we argue that the Jews are not a nationality with a right to self-determination.  Rather, they are a group based on the religious ideology, Judaism, but also including those who still identify with the camaraderie of “chosen” status  they feel God has “given” them, even if repudiating the existance of any such Being, who organically  play a common parasitic social role with the desire to create an ever-expansive Zionist entity, which both Hertzelite and non-Hertzelite Jews refer to as “Israel”, and to enslave the world, who from the extreme right to the extreme left, secular and religious, share a common willingness to close ranks against the “inferior” masses of the rest of humanity whom they collectively and individually see as out to get them.

On all levels Jewishness is reactionary, and yes for that reason we are “anti-Jewish”.

We note that the Jews do not share a common language, a definable historical territory, a collective history (at least in the sense of the Polish Jew having the history of the Algerian one, all be it with each having a fierce Jewishness about that that subjectively wishes to negate these obvious material limitations), and arguably even a common culture.  Furthermore, we note that even many Jewish Zionist reactionaries, for example the late Arthur Koestler, openly admit that the Ashkenazi Jew does not originate in the lands of 1948 Palestine, but in the lower Volga River Valley in Russia.  Jewishness in and of itself does not even make one a “Semite” i.e. member of a common macrocosm of nationalities (and again Jews are not a nationality) belonging to a language group, one which oddly enough makes all Arabs, but not all Jews, inherently “Semites”.

The reactionary nature of Judaism

Judaism is a tribalistic religion originating in ancient times which preaches exclusivist values based on perceived bloodline and the following of rituals and taboos.  Judaism rejects the universalism of salvation found in most modern religions and openly proclaims its adherents to be superior to all other people. By contrast, major world religions including Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism, preach brotherhood of all believers, actively seek converts rather than isolating themselves, and preach that salvation is attainable to all who practice the faith. Judaism seldom accepts converts and judges membership based on whether a person’s mother was Jewish.

While other religions have applications which are completely reactionary, and that should opposed, the primary difference between Judaism and other religions is that reactionary teachings and behaviors are not so much a deviation from true Judaism as they are the logical application of it.  Even dogmatic atheists, were they to condemn all religions, could never condemn all religions equally, namely because Judaism is not simply reactionary, but, strictly on the ideological level, it is drastically more reactionary than any other major trend, even including Satanism.  Judaism preaches genetic-based supremacy, and the Torah depicts God ordering the “chosen people” to engage in acts that would now be known as ethnic cleansing and genocide (Joshua 6:16-22 is a perfect example.)  Christianity, Islam and Buddhism, on the other hand, teach universal salvation and the brotherhood of humanity.

This is in stark contrast to western leftists who often use dogmatic atheism as a cover for Judaeophiliac tendencies like pretending that the entire history of Islamic civilization was nothing but a feudal persecution of women, and blaming Christianity for having genocidal perspectives based on Torah quotations that should actually be directed to prove that leftists should be anti-Jewish and not necessarily anti-Christian or anti-Muslim.

This is to say nothing of the insane cultish mysticism of the Kabala, as well as the voluminous diatribes advocating tribal-sectarian objectively anti-social behavioral patterns against the entire world on the part of the sinister and the ever-misanthropic Judaism found within the “spiritual wisdom” of the Babylonian Talmud.  This is the very same Talmud which establishes, as a matter of fact, that Judaism and Judaic cultural influence, teaches its children to hate people of other religions, to mock the Virgin Mary as a prostitute or to spit as they walk by crosses.  Can we really expect that this kind of ideology or behavior would have gotten the Jew accepted into deeply religious and Christian-dominated Europe anymore than Jewish sectarian hatred of Muslims and the refusal of Arab Jews to see themselves as Arabs, Persian Jews as fellow Persians, accepted into the various nations of the sacred Ummah?  Only in these Judaeophilic times would such “logic” even be worthy of consideration, much less be regarded as the unquestionable and absolute truth.

Do Jews and Judaism actually “differentiate” between Zionism, support for the Zionist entity and Jewish Supremacy from their Jewishness or the tenets of Judaism?

We argue that other than a small handful of politically and socially irrelevant rabbis against the Zionist entity and Zionism solely because they want such entity-stealing to be more racist and more fascist, and to be led by a certain kind of Hasidic sectarian “messiah” before stealing Palestine, while fully supporting the parasitic social role Jews play, that all other Jews do not meaningfully differentiate between Jewishness and/or practical Judaism from Zionism.  This is true even if they claim to be “anti-Zionist” in some “progressive” neo-Bundist bastardization of the word, or in the Trotskyite sense of calling for “socialist” models of Jews stealing Palestine and promoting Jewish national illusions, rather than capitalistic ones.

Do any of these “anti-Zionists” actually call for the Jews to abandon their illusionary “nationality” and “ethno”-paranoiac Jewishness?  Have they abandoned forever the age old cause of “Israel”, whether messianic or Hertzelite in model?  Do they see themselves as members of the nations to which they belong?  Do they struggle for the social and national liberation of the world around them, rather than partake of the Jew’s role in society?  They certainly do not collectively.

How and to what degree are today’s Zionist-dominated Jewish social roles, behaviors, and ideas similar to or different from Jewish social roles, behaviors, and ideas prior to the widespread domination of modern Zionism amongst the Jews?

Here again, while we argue that the social role of the Jew has become substantially worse with the advent of imperialism, and even worse still with the advent of modern globalism, the social role of the Jew is, was, and always will be reactionary.  One cannot address the pogroms of Russia, inquisitions of Spain, or internment camps of Hitlerite Germany, without considering objectively why the Jews have come to be hated with patriotic fervor by the masses in every country in which they have ever lived in significant numbers, whether under the slave holding society, feudalism, capitalism, or even socialism.

We argue that the Jews their Judaic perversions are inherently and intentionally in the camp of exploiter minority rule against oppressed nations, classes, groups, and individuals because of the market fetish orientation of the Jew.  That Hertzel’s Zionism and the pre-Hertzelite quasi-Zionism of the Jewish enemy either advocate in theory, by tenets, or by de facto collective historical example the collusion with dominant market powers rather than genuine solidarity with national and social liberation is no accident.

We are anti-Zionist regardless of whether Jews or others approve!

Zionism advocates a territorial “solution” to the Jewish question, and this despite the fact that they clearly do not constitute a genuine nation (altogether different from subjectively viewing themselves in such a manner).  Furthermore, Zionism by the direct admission of its founders and leading proponents, through its actions, and in its written tenets, advocates collusion with one or more imperialist powers.  It is both subjectively and objectively aligned against the mass of national liberation movements for self-determination.  It negates in practice the Arab identity of Palestine and the right of the Arabs to unify themselves free of outside domination by imperialist Zionist intrigues and conspiracies.

The Zionist entity does not possess a legitimate right to exist.  Therefore, the acts of martyrdom bombings and other glorious resistance of the Fedayeen cannot be seen as illegitimate acts.  “Israel” does not contain a single “citizen” but rather a collective settler-colonialist negation of the rights of the Arabs.

We reject the existence of normalized relations with the Zionist entity by any nation of this earth and call for Zionist organizations to be annihilated in total and collectively because of their status as one of the greatest dangers facing the planet and an international conspiracy that can only be fully beaten through a global struggle: armed struggle in some places, and boycott activity in others.

While Modern Zionism is a “secular” concept, it cannot be seen as such in the conventional sense, because it espouses an exclusive state for the Jews.  This can no more be seen as secular than one could see the Vatican, ruled by the leader of the Catholic Church, as a secular state, even if it performs secular functions that a state must perform.  Secularism, in practice, has come to mean something far more enlightened than this.

Even those who call for Arab-Jewish co-existence are simply using such sophistry as a Jewish colonialist bargaining chip.  After all, if these Jews like assimilating with their neighbors so much, why didn’t they do that in Russia, Canada, Argentina, or whatever nations to which they each individually belong?  This is neither genuinely secular nor progressive.  The only thing genuinely progressive in the Zionist entity, involving Jews, is a bus bombing in Tel Aviv, with the number dead Jews reflecting the degree of progressiveness of that action.

We militantly reject the Eurocentric racism and opportunism of those who are totally aware of the Jewish threat and the social role that Jews play against all nations to which they belong, and yet who choose the path of dumping the Jews off in the land of Palestine, as if this were some sort of “solution”.  The arrogance of this thought and behavior is boundless!  Purely one’s own racism is at work, if rather than having to deal with their weak stomach for the Jewish question, one instead decides to cooperate with Jews and Zionists and move them out of the country, and which then accurses and punishes the Arab people who have done more than any other people in modern times to fight Jewish Supremacy and Zionism.

As consistent nationalists, must we not insist that the problems of Moscow, Berlin, or anywhere be solved by the national unit alone without making its problems an international drama?  Besides, as a matter of fact, the Jewish danger and Zionism must be fought even if with the firm recognition of the role of the national unit, ultimately on a global scale, in order to win a decisive political/military victory over the enemies of all humanity.

We stand with the Arabs and Muslims resisting the Zionist enemy, just as we stand with all people resisting imperialism and neo-colonialism, opposing all forms of scab behavior in this keynote struggle, and this regardless of how western leftists or international Jewry feel about the matter!

On the “anti-Semitism” misnomer and why our open disdain for Jews and Judaism is neither “anti-Semitic” nor chauvinistic.

Whenever anyone attacks anything about Jews and Zionists, even if such attack clearly is objective and accurate, containing not a shred of racism whatsoever, it is almost always labeled “anti-Semitism” and its author becomes a “racist anti-Semite”.  The basis of this concept is that all Jews are Semites, and that they are being attacked because they are allegedly Semites.

By Semites, again we refer here to a macrocosm of nationalities encompassing one language group, one that makes this paradigm particularly comical as the Arabic language is Semitic, and therefore all Arabs are by definition Semites.  It is an attempt to give the impression that the Jews collectively constitute a nation, and that this nation is a legitimate state.  Well, not all Jews are “Semitic”, as the Jew comes from a number of racial stocks and belongs to an even greater number of nationalities and speaks not a single common tongue

There exists a whole series of things which are unacceptable to the Jews and Zionists, and unfortunately today’s Jewish-controlled western leftists, as well.  These range from the fact that Jews aren’t a nationality and the bulk of them don’t have even a shred of ancestral connection to the land of 1948 Palestine, to the Khazar origins of the Ashkenazi Jews, to the history of the Jews in the transatlantic slave trade which resulted in millions and millions of dead Africans, to the fact that revisionist historians have clearly shown that the three great tenets of the Jewish ‘holocaust’ myth are all lies, to approaching the parasitic social role of the Jew, or even the relationship they have been accused of having with Freemasonry.

How many Jews do you know who like to talk about the holohoax and its relevance to the Zionist entity?  Yet revisionist historians, many of them facing beatings, slayings, and long prison terms, have revealed that a number several hundred percent smaller than 5-6 million died during the Second World War, that no actual attempt to exterminate the Jews took place, and that the homicidal “gas chambers”, whether diesel or dual use Zyklon B, never existed.

When Arab resistance forces launch attacks against “Israel’s” 1948 territories, how many “anti-Zionist” Jews actually support these actions?  Virtually none!

Who gives a damn what the Jews like?!  The fact is that our struggle against Zionism and Jewish Supremacy does not require their approval or for us to “prove” anything to Jews.  In fact, within materialist parameters of struggle against Jewish behavior, ideology and social roles, which are not based on predetermined pseudo-racial characteristics of the Jew, but on individual and collective choices the Jew has made or at least chosen not to break with, it’s actually anti-racist and progressive to be “anti-Jewish”.  In essence, there are anti-Jewish positions which are idealistic and potentially, but not necessarily, chauvinistic, and then there are anti-Jewish positions which are based on materialism and grounded in reality.  Even “anti-Semitism”, actually anti-Jewish racialism, is far less a problem today than is the very Jewish racialism which gives rise and form and content to its mirror image.  Before and behind the reflection of hating the Jew for racial sectarian reasons, there was the Jew and his racial sectarian behavior, which gives rise to malformed expressions of the goyim popular masses.

Here again we argue that the world is exponentially a greater victim of the Jews than the Jews of the world!

II. Beyond Judeophilia: A Vital Look at “Karl Marx on the Jewish Question”

In 1844, Karl Marx published an essay called “On the Jewish Question.”  This essay has often been suppressed or ignored by people calling themselves Marxists, because Judaeophilic tendencies have become dominant in such groups, and what Karl Marx had to say about Jews was certainly not flattering.  The essay is available online at:

www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/index.htm

It is worth studying, because what was written about the Jews 162 years ago is true today as well.  Indeed, the Jews are, if anything, guilty of these vices on a far grander scale.  Let’s be clear of whom Marx was speaking when he criticized Jews.  He wasn’t speaking of bloodline.  Indeed, as many enemies of Marx often point out, that would have been quite a severe self-criticism. He wasn’t speaking of religion, for he makes clear in his essay that he is not speaking of the “Jew of the Sabbath.”  He was clearly speaking of group identity, which would, of course, include secular people who call themselves Jews, even if they have never in their lives set foot in a synagogue.

Marx starts off the essay by berating Jews for calling for their special emancipation.  He asks them why the German people should care about their emancipation, when they don’t care about Germany.  Isn’t it ironic that in certain respects Adolf Hitler came far closer to this position than Ernst Thaelman or Georgi Dimitroff?

Marx also alluded to the Jewish dominance of finance capital, saying that the Jew in Vienna who is banned from German states still controls the fate of Europe.  He also clearly connected Jews with predatory capitalism.  Marx said, “What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering.  What is his worldly god?  Money.”

Marx concludes by calling for the emancipation of the world from Jews, as the emancipation of the world from huckstering.  Marx was right in 1844, and his words are still true today.  We need to eliminate Jews from the world.

Jewish power over finance capital became power over the entire economy, as Lenin observed in “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism,” without referring to Jews. Zionism also became a peculiarly Jewish form of colonialism, though Jewish finance capital backed other kinds of colonialism as well.

Jews are the enemy to all of us, even when they are not overtly Zionist or not overtly involved with imperialism, as their group identification puts their interests over the interests of the peoples among whom they dwell.  As such, Jewish “Marxists,” are invariably traitors.  Trotsky and his followers betrayed the USSR, and they were mostly Jewish.  Stalin purged most of the Jews from the party, and when he had done so, the USSR made tremendous progress.  Even today, Trotskyism and Western “Maoism” are dominated by Jews and Judaeophiles (this is not to imply that there was anything Judaeophilic about Mao Zedong, only his Western “followers.”)

“Anti-Zionist” Jews are invariably that in name only.  Their position turns to treason.  They are “anti-Zionist” in that they call for a return to the 1967 “Israeli” borders or call for “peaceful co-existence” with Palestinians, or claim to support Palestine’s liberation but condemn the actual steps towards it (particularly common is condemnation of human bombs.)

Jewish leaders of the “anti-war” movement in the West invariably take collaborationist positions.  They condemn the Iraqi resistance.  They forward the notion “support ‘our’ troops.”  If they nominally support the Iraqi resistance, it’s with utter insincerity, such as condemning President Hussein or condemning any resistance fighter who isn’t Maoist or Trotskyite or “Marxist.”

Jewish “Marxists,” Jewish leftists, and Jewish “anti-Zionists,” are worse than overt reactionaries, because they fool a lot of honest Marxists, leftists, and anti-Zionists into following them and committing grave errors that objectively harm the movements, despite their good intentions.  Real leftists must not dance around this issue any longer.  This is the elephant in the living room of which no one dares speak.  We cannot effectively fight capitalism, imperialism, or Zionism unless we also fight the Jews.  To attempt that can at best only attack the symptoms and leave the disease unchecked.

Any self-identification as a Jew or adherence to Jewish group identity is inherently reactionary.  Anyone who calls himself a Jew is our mortal enemy.

Leftists, anti-capitalists, anti-imperialists, anti-war people, and anti-Zionists must not tolerate Jews in their leadership or even in their presence.  The only good Jew is an ex-Jew or a dead Jew.

*************************************************************************

List of Endorsers:

1.   Kevin Walsh, Marxist-Leninist anti-Zionist political activist

2.  John Paul Cupp, Public Relations Director of the North American Committee Against Zionism and Imperialism (NACAZAI)

3. Richard Mason

4. Ziad Shaker elJishi, Chairman of the North American Committee Against Zionism and Imperialism (NACAZAI)

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/jews-judaism-zionism/feed/ 8 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-the-caucasoid-race/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-the-caucasoid-race/#comments Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:29:38 +0000 Metal Gear http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=2078 Biological racialists know the Caucasoid race exists. The only people who deny this are the “race doesn’t exist” crowd and anti-semites who can’t believe that Jews are linked to both Arabs and Europeans genetically.

Great Discussion

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/12/01/on-the-caucasoid-race/feed/ 3 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/11/30/fmp-condemns-swiss-anti-islamic-law/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/11/30/fmp-condemns-swiss-anti-islamic-law/#comments Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:26:49 +0000 al-Nasrallah http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/11/30/fmp-condemns-swiss-anti-islamic-law/ Swiss voters on Sunday passed a hostile and antagonistic referendum sponsored by the ultra-reactionary “Swiss People’s Party” effectively banning the construction of minarets, the distinctive architectural designs atop the vast majority of Mosques, or places of worship for adherents of the Islamic faith.

Supporters of the ban claim the minaret is a so-called “symbol” of “militant Islam,” a repulsive and deceitful claim concocted in the minds of ultra-nationalist bourgeois and petit-bourgeois elements among the Swiss ruling class.

Historically, the minaret served the practical purpose of a signal to the Muslim community, and traditionally, though less so today, served as the place for issuing the call to prayer (adhan) to believers.

Response to Sunday’s vote was largely negative – both domestically and abroad. Legal experts criticized the ban on its violation of freedom of religion and incompatible with Switzerland’s constitution. Foreign legal experts also criticized the ban on account of its violation of standing international conventions in Europe that guarantee religious freedom, of which Switzerland is a signatory.

Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Dr. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, issued a statement following Sunday’s vote, denouncing the ban on minarets as an “example of growing anti-Islamic incitement in Europe by extremist, anti-immigrant, xenophobic, racist, scare-mongering ultra-right politicians who reign over common sense, wisdom and universal values.”

Islam is Switzerland’s second largest religion, behind only Christianity. Muslims make up approximately 4 per cent of Switzerland’s population.

Free Media Productions wholeheartedly and unambiguously condemns this blatant and provocative ban against minarets as an inexcusable and prejudiced attack against European Muslims, and demands an immediate end to the propagation of aggressive, malignant and antagonistic Islamophobic policies.

]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/11/30/fmp-condemns-swiss-anti-islamic-law/feed/ 7