The link
This is an excellent post that differentiates between a genetic isolate and a race. They are NOT the same thing. A race must be genetically isolated, but being genetically isolated is not a sufficient condition to have a race.

There seems to be a confusion between race and “inbred population”, or “reproductively isolated population”. For example, Steve Sailer defines race as follows:
“A racial group is an extended family that is inbred to some degree.”

goddless capitalist uses races as a synonym for “reproductively isolated groups”.

It’s true that relative inbreeding (within the race) is a necessary condition for a race to exist. But, it is not sufficient as we will show by means of examples.

Example #1. The Amish are an inbred population. Occasionally foreigners marry into the Amish population, but not often. The Amish are a population that is inbred not to some degree, but to a great degree. Are they a race? Of course not. They are simply a genetic isolate within the Caucasoid race. The same is true for the Samaritans, a genetic isolate of about 650 members in Syria and Lebanon. The Samaritans are also a genetic isolate within the Caucasoid race.

It was recently proven that Caucasoids, Mongoloids, Negroids, Australoids and Amerindians could be distinguished from one another with an objective test. That is because these groups are inbred populations that have had enough time to evolve group specific genetic profiles. That is what makes a race.

Consider the example of a hypothetical island on which 500 Swedish and 500 Nigerian settlers intermix to form a hybrid population. After a few generations of interbreeding, the population will remain what it is: a racially mixed population. Its individuals will be random assortments of genes in the parental gene pools. But, they won’t be a race distinct from others in the sense that Caucasoids and Mongoloids are distinct. Over time, this inbred population may also develop into a race, as it evolves separately from the rest of mankind and develops its own genetic profile.

These examples should caution us against using “reproductively isolated group”, or “partially inbred extended family” as synonyms for race.

Link One

Link Two

I cannot agree with everything he writes.  I disagree with his support of the Iraq War and his exaggerated view that most Arabs do not belong to the Mediterranean race because they are “non-white.”  But these two writings are sound and deserve respect.

The Link (2007)
This is not the first Sephardic Jew I have been made aware of who advocates this, believe it or not!

I do not believe the best way to improve relations between Ashkenazi Jews and the rest of the world is to deceive oneself. At some point the harsh reality has to be faced. Ever since the Bolshevik revolution was on the verge of taking power in Eastern Europe, these people have been despised. And when Jews quit Bolshevism for Zionism, it only increased hatred from Arabs. Even in America, the Ku Klux Klan officially adopted an anti-Semitic line – which it previously had not taken – in 1915, as the Bolsheviks rose and finally took power in 1917. These are the people who competed with Stalin for control over the Bolshevik movement and collaborated throughout Europe, resulting in both Hitler’s rise and their ejection from the Bolshevik party. Even Gypsies contributed to 1940’s Romanian pogroms against Ashkenazi Jews with the assistance of the Iron Guard (which was then banned), while Winston Churchill carefully chose his words to separate between “good and bad” Jews. Even Northeastern Slavs (subhumans to Hitler) such as Poles and Ukrainians disposed of some of these people.

Ashkenazi Jews are going to have to stop crying about persecution and start being more friendly to their neighbors. This hate does not come out of thin air. The only place Ashkenazi Jews are not hated is America, but that’s because Americans are generally well off and rich people and the means of communication are controlled by Jews.

A right-wing Jewish extremist has been disseminating calls for the assassination of leftists and Ashkenazim on Internet sites in Israel and abroad.

One film clip posted on YouTube, for instance, declares: “You are about to view a handful of leftist Ashkenazim that Hitler and Eichmann did not manage to incinerate. Before we begin, please remember: 90 percent of the moderate left are Ashkenazim!! 100 percent of the extreme left are Ashkenazim!!”

Next comes a picture of President Shimon Peres with the caption: “The murderer!” It is followed by pictures of Benjamin Netanyahu, Yossi Beilin and other politicians.

The clip concludes: “Now, after you have seen these unclean Ashkenazim, how degraded the Ashkenazi race is, and what a pity it is that Hitler and Eichmann did not finish off the Ashkenazim, I ask of you: Search for information on Google about Stiven Malik; there ‘the document’ awaits you.”

The document in question is also full of incitement to violence: “If only we, too, could finish what Hitler began by destroying all the Ashkenazim, the descendants of the Jews who betrayed Germany.”

Supportive comments have been posted on the Stiven Malik forum on the Israeli portal 2all; the forum has received thousands of visitors in recent month. Malik’s anti-Ashkenazi incitement can also be found on the Israeli portals Tapuz and goop.co.il and on sites such as fresh.co.il.

A Haaretz investigation has concluded that “Malik” is a fictitious name used by a right-wing extremist who was once affiliated with Baruch Marzel’s Jewish Front party, but was later expelled from it.

After Haaretz approached the relevant Israeli portals, some of Malik’s writings were removed. Tapuz said it had given the material to the police, and Peres’s office said it had given it to the Shin Bet security service. YouTube had not responded by press time.

Arthur Kemp vs Dienekes:

Dienekes attacks Arthur Kemp
Arthur Kemp Responds
Dienekes Responds

Anon vs racial reality:

Anon vs Racial Reality
Racial Reality Responds

Dienekes may be scientifically correct about race mixing, except the problem is that demographically whites are getting small enough that they will not be able to absorb other races.  He is also correct that interbreeding often does not occur even when close proximity occurs.  That said, I would not encourage hybridization on a massive level because at some point it could be irreversible if the birth rates are not strong enough.

For this fight in general, Dienekes is upholding the scientific line and Arthur Kemp the bullshit white nationalist revisionist line.  When Anon attacked Racial Reality, I thought it might just be an isolated incident, but not anymore. The whole website is full of crap!

I think the Italian Racial Reality has a pro-Mediterranean view of the world and so does the Greek Dienekes, but they at least try to base their views off of science.  This is more than could be said about the Brit Arthur Kemp or the German Anon.  I do not have any animosity for Arthur Kemp or Anon and have never interacted with them in any way, however they are either propagandists or people desperately in need of an education.  I cannot blame them if they are propagandist.  Every great dictator is!

Unlike the self-hating meds on the website “stirpes” which recently announced it is closing, as far as I can tell, Dienekes and Racial Reality do not have an inferiority complex and they do not prostitute themselves to white nationalist ideology. Ted Sallis is another example of a Southern European quack who denies the existence of both the Caucasian race and the Nordic subtype. Racial Reality and Dienekes are good Mediterraneans! So is the poster “Crimson Guard” on anthroscape. These people admit that Europe genetically links to the populations across the Mediterranean sea, even if in neolithic and paleolithic times.

Join the anthropology forums post on the blogs:
Forum Biodiversity
Anthrocivitas
Anthroscape
Racial Reality Blog
Dienekes Anthropology Blog

note to the poster “racial awareness” : you’ll enjoy that there is women bashing in this post!
The link

Russian nation was created by Russian climate and Russian blood.

Contrary to common misconception, Russians living on territory of Russian Federation are not of Slavic blood. The ancient inhabitants of Kiev’s principate were Slavic people, that’s true. When Moscow principality was created a few centuries later in the 14th century, its population was overwhelmingly Urgo-Finns. Descendants of Kiev’s genealogical tree, their princes were originally of Slavic blood. But when Kiev’s armies moved north with their small troops, they conquered enormous vast variety of Finnish tribes who lived on enormous territory of European Russia. Only aristocrats of Russia were originally Slavs. Simple folk were descendants of Finns. That is why it is practically no different between “Chuvash” and “Finn.” And that is why Serbs are so different from Russians. Because Serbs are Slavs.

Russians are a depressive tribe because of centuries they were living in shadows of moisty forests. Russians are as unhappy with alcohol as Finns are.

So, forget about Slavs. When you will adopt my vision of Russian history, and of Russians, you will understand who Russians are.

I am the best Russian writer, but I am forced to confess that I hate Russian language. Russian words are painfully long, they remind me of naked slimy worms. You know, those pink awful creatures that you can see on some hot summer night on path you walk. Worms get out of soil to copulate under the moonlight. Russian words are copulating on my table every day and night. I am looking at them with hate and I am screaming. I am gnashing my teeth. Why should put “icheskaya” to the end of “social” in “Social Republic?” Seven letters I am adding for what fuck? Fucking “icheskaya!” Hysterical, hystericheskii laugh goes out of me when I am imaging those fucking Urgo-Finns in their shadowy forests. They move in slow motion, they take their time. Why wasn’t I born in a clear lucid language dealing in “Achtung!” and “Shnell?” And when I think that Russians are only a handful of 142 million readers, it’s really depressing for a writer.

The so called “Russian Soul” can be also explained by origins of the Russian people. Proverbial slowness of Finns (”hot finish lads!”) can be seen as phenomenon of Russian soul. Enigmatical Russian Soul is simply Russian man, uncertain, slow to decide, hesitating, never sure of itself, never sure of its own decision. Forest man with a milky skin, with thin blond hair. Not a Slav, but a Finn, Finn, Finn! And don’t accuse me of racism. Happily we have Turks and all sorts of Mongols amongst us. But the sick from alcoholism urban Russian Europeans are descendants of native Urgo-Finns and their tribes. They have shadowy mysterious souls because for hundred generations their ancestors were living by the river banks in the forests. They like to get drunk and to weep. Of too many trees, of too much of river’s water the Russian Soul is created.

Then, of course, we live in a terrible climate. We have eight months of winter and only four of summer. This summer, however, can be called a “summer” only such on condition that you have never travelled abroad. The lack of sunshine is chronic on the Russia’s territory. Everything is explained by its climate and the Urgo-Finn blood. Even more, the blood is explained by the climate. It moves slowly because of the freeze. No sunshine makes our kids look sad. When I was young, I thought almost everyday why “we Slavs” (I thought we were Slavic people) living in such an unhuman, uncomfortable climate? Why we didn’t move out of that terrible territory? However, I had tried to move. Our national ideas for centuries was to move south. We fought First World War to capture the the straights of Bosphorus and Dardanelles. We didn’t get it, alas. (Before that, in January of 1878, we were some kilometers from Istanbul-Constantinople before English bastards intervened.) Russian man carries all weight of his climate on itself. My deepest belief is that Russia should swallow Kazakhstan territory if we want our children to have sunshine.

Russian women are very, very bad. The worst of all. Russian women is like the Russian Government. Most Russian women at least are good looking when they are in their twenties. Some Russian women are gorgeously beautiful. But they are bad. They are treacherous because they have no moral principles. Christian faith was eliminated during existence of the Soviet Union so nobody taught Russian women morals. No such discipline was taught in Soviet schools. Russian woman hates man because she is envying him. She wants to be as brutal and stupid as him, she wants to lay on a divan doing nothing as man does, but she has less possibilities. Russian woman is disastrous, relationships with her destined to be tragedy. There is no way that you will end happily. You must subjugate her. If not, she will subjugate you. On both occasions, you will lose. Don’t forget that abortions and divorces were permitted even in Stalin’s Russia, so our country educated women as bitches. Millions of bitches walking our streets. I am absolutely and positively on the side of Muslim strict code of behavior for women. Their system of separation of sexes if effective and healthy.

Russian Government is bloody beast eating human flesh. It is deeply medieval in its principle conceptions. Russian Government strongly believed that Russians are subjects of Russian Government, that they are its property, that Russians should be physically punished for not showing proper respect for its Government. European Governments behave cruelly towards foreign populations, towards Yugoslavs or toward Iraqis. But Russian Government represses its own citizens. Russian Government never said one honest word. Blatant lies, we, citizens, hear from Government. They terrorize us.

Their instrument are police, brutal and unhuman, just millions of scoundrels dressed in grey uniforms. And judges: archaic men and women with terrible medieval faces and black souls under their judges clothes.

As you understand, my view of Russia is macabre, like Lovecraft’s work. I hope country will change soon, I am working for it. Then I will look at my country through rosy tinted glasses. Just wait.

Interesting. This may explain why Russians have tiny traces of Mongoloid blood (but not as much as Finns do).

It is well documented that Ashkenazi Jews (the focus of this post) are a mix between Near Easterners and Europeans. Nobody denies this but people with an agenda.  It is well documented that Near Easterners and Europeans are a single race when compared to non-Whites and South Asians! In fact not just Near Easterners, but Middle Easterners in general.

But Greeks and Southern Europeans are similar to Middle Easterners on BOTH sides – paternal and maternal – while Ashkenazi Jews have European blood pumped in through their maternal line. MtDNA proves this but so do recent autosomal studies.  Jon Entine, a man I have read since being a little teenager, agrees with me in the book Abraham’s Children!

There are two explanations for this.  Firstly, some people suggest that at one point of history, Jewishness was transferred by the father instead of the Mother and that the definition was modified later in history.  Karaite Jews determine Jewishness this way.  Secondly, conversions may have been involved.

The key factor in my argument is that Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans can be distinguished, and distinguished enough that in some ways hybrid Jews can slip between them genetically!  Graphs indicate that the European blood that Ashkenazi Jews have is Northern, not Southern.  In a nutshell, we now have graphs which show that Ashkenazi Jews have more northern European blood than Southern Europeans do!

(The genetic variation is tracked on two different axis lines – vertical and horizontal.  The vertical line is divided into units which are twice the size numerically as the horizontal line’s units.)

Horizontally, Jews are clustering around the fringe of Europe and towards the near east. Vertically, Jews are with Northern Europeans.  So while Jews may have Middle Eastern origins, they’ve mixed enough that in some ways their genome goes off in a completely different direction.  Ashkenazi Jews are endogenous, but only in intervals.  In certain periods of history, there has been mixing.  In addition, it should be noted for the sake of clarity that even Near Easterners are Caucasian Mediterraneans.

In calculating genetic distance, we have to add both the horizontal and vertical distance.  When making that calculation, Ashkenazi Jews are “beating” Greeks and Italians!  ADD BOTH THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DISTANCE FOR THE GREEKS AND THE ITALIANS!

I can’t wait to see the self-hating Mediterraneans piss themselves over this one!

Anthroscape : the forum which helped provide information
Occidental Dissent
The Occidental Observer
Information about “Anon”
Anon’s Website

The link

The functional importance of the roughly 98% of mammalian genomes not corresponding to protein coding sequences remains largely undetermined1. Here we show that some large-scale deletions of the non-coding DNA referred to as gene deserts2, 3, 4 can be well tolerated by an organism. We deleted two large non-coding intervals, 1,511 kilobases and 845 kilobases in length, from the mouse genome. Viable mice homozygous for the deletions were generated and were indistinguishable from wild-type littermates with regard to morphology, reproductive fitness, growth, longevity and a variety of parameters assaying general homeostasis. Further detailed analysis of the expression of multiple genes bracketing the deletions revealed only minor expression differences in homozygous deletion and wild-type mice. Together, the two deleted segments harbour 1,243 non-coding sequences conserved between humans and rodents (more than 100 base pairs, 70% identity). Some of the deleted sequences might encode for functions unidentified in our screen; nonetheless, these studies further support the existence of potentially ‘disposable DNA’ in the genomes of mammals.

This is proof that a large amount of DNA in modern organisms is either “junk,” performing functions that are too insignificant to recognize, or unactivated and stored away for future use. In my opinion, it’s probably not being used at all, it’s probably junk, because I believe in the theory of evolution which would make it logical for neutral mutations to continue to exist and have no pragmatic affect.

For creationists, the existence of this junk dna presents a serious problem to their argument.

It also presents a serious problem for people who try to define race based on tiny markers found in populations as opposed to a combination of physical traits and ancestry.

On the right we have devoutly religious people and they worship YAWEH. On the left we have people who are religious but instead of worshiping YAWEH, they worship racial diversity.

Oh how I’d love to purge both the left and the right and bring an entirely new mentality to America!

I reject noridicsm, or the idea that all Caucasoids were nordic, until they mixed with Negroid slaves. While I reject this, I still think the concept of a Mediterranean people is valid.

Many people point out that all Europeans share a few mutations that non-Europeans do not share and consider the argument settled. If they really studied haplogroups of the Y Chromosome and Mitochondrial DNA, they’d learn how inconsequential and randomized this is, but I digress. To them, there is no Mediterranean race, but only Europeans and non-European Caucasoids. They are wrong.

I am going to oversimplify things here, but let’s imagine an original Caucasoid type that exists in the Middle East and then moves to Europe. The populations develop a few random mutations that can be used to identify genetic differences, but still share a genetic link and phenotype.

So we have Middle Eastern Mediterraneans, and European Mediterraneans, but they are both Mediterraneans.

Now imagine that depigmented Caucasoids spawn out of European Mediterraneans due to the climate and sexual selection. Lighter skin Caucasoids.

Well no duh, if you test the DNA, the newer Europeans are going to show some links with the older Europeans. But this does not in any way refute the fact that there is a Mediterranean race, and that all Caucasoids come from that foundation. The fact that all Europeans share a few mutations doesn’t refute the fact that some Europeans have the physical appearance of older types of Caucasoids. There is of course phenotype variation if you get away from the Mediterranean region in the Middle East. A Saudi doesn’t look quite like a Syrian, and an Iranian doesn’t look quite like a Lebanese person.

I should note that Southern Europeans who attempt to involve themselves in neo-nazi circles are some of the most annoying people I’ve ever met. They have such an inferiority complex (Constantin Von Hoffmeister agrees with me).

Compared to the 2000 Census, there is a major improvement in the way Spanish speaking people are classified. And the 2000 census was correct to argue for a Western Eurasian race in terms of Linnaeus style taxonomy.

Hispanic people are not a race. I’ve been saying that they aren’t a race since 2005. Even Mexicans aren’t a race, but they are sometimes of mixed race. Mestizos are different from Spaniards, but even Mestizos are not a race but a mixture of races.

Spanish people (like Romans, Greeks, Syrians and the Lebanese) are members of a darker “Mediterranean” branch of the Caucasoid race. Spaniards are not northern Europeans, but they are clearly Caucasoids as much as Romans are. South Americans often (but not always) are mixed with Indian blood, but do not have any racial traits that they developed on their own. Mexican immigration is a major problem. But the Census happens to be right.

In addition, the Census is correct to identify the majority of North Africans and Middle Easterners as Caucasians. Please understand that I am sophisticated enough to argue for reduced immigration and still recognize that a Caucasian race obviously exists and that all are tightly linked.

Seriously, the main difference between Northern Europeans and other Caucasians is skin color. That’s not a very big difference. And I do not have a Mediterranean appearance myself and still realize this.