.

Archive for the ‘Marxist-Leninism’ Category

More on Antisemitism

Saturday, April 21st, 2012

A good point came up during Yesterday’s radio program.

Marxists may criticize Zionism and Jewish institutions, but the reason they are not anti-semites is that they see the Jewish Question as an applied example of a greater question of class warfare. From the eyes of a Marxist, Jews are not puppets who have controlled the world, but only people who have adapted to the material conditions that were handed to them (albeit, by allying with the Anglo-American bourgeoisie since 1948).

You may question this saying perhaps that the support for Black Civil rights was a proletariat cause and that many Jews supported the civil rights movement (but it would have happened without them). By 1960, the bourgeoisie had taken an anti-racist line because it realized that to promote racialist policies could cause non-whites to support the revolutionary class. By the time the civil rights movement happened, the idea of “liberating” Blacks was no longer a cause that only the working class movements supported.

I repeat this frequently because it has to be understood. True Marxists do not defend the behavior of reactionary Jews, but true Marxists also disagree with the interpretation of history that argues that Jews are more important than the class struggle and material conditions they live in.

The fact that some of the big organized Jews may act like they run the country does not mean they actually do. Every once and a while, Abraham Foxman gets a stroke of luck and the ruling class supports the same cause he does. Then he acts like the ADL is making the difference and the clowns on the message forums use it as “evidence.” I guess the fan waving the pom pom in the stadium caused the opposing team to win the championship.

The bottom line is that an ideology is nothing if it is not based on real world economics. The reason some of the ideas that Jews promote catch on is not because they are Jewish ideas but becasue they are popular ideas in relation to the conditions of the society that they are being dispensed into. Economics and pragmatic applications are everything and if you do not understand that you understand nothing.

Class Conflict and Identity Politics

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

I reached a huge milestone in my understanding of the world when I realized that issues of identity politics are simply used to advance material goals. This applies as much to liberal Americans who trumpet “freedom and demoracy” and use it to invade countries as it does to National Socialists and Zionists who hide behind identity politics as well in a more explicit fashion. It applied to Christopher Columbus when he invaded countries for “Christianity” but really wanted Gold (nod to Howard Zinn) and it applied to Muhammad as well who clearly invented the the Koran based on millennial outdated myths (the Torah and Gospels) to gain influence over the people of Mecca and Medina.

Historically, why was Slavery supported? To advance Southern agrarian economics!

Why was Slavery opposed? To support Yankee imperialist industrial economics!

Why did Hitler obsess over Jews? To create a false racial theory (“aryan” and “semite” are linguistic terms) so that he could explain the economic depression, send the Germans to war (military industrial complex) and take over Polish land and then argue that the Jews were responsible for the war because they were “controlling” (lol) America and Britain (Poland’s allies) and crashed the economy to begin with.

Why did Britain and America oppose Germany? Aside from self-defense (Pearl Harbor bombing, the proximity of Britain to Germany), the Americans and British wanted to advance capitalist imperialism in a way which was more eloquent than German Nazism. Pragmatically, this is why Israel became propped after 1948! A zig-zag by an opposing capitalist power to support Imperialism by using Jews as the useful idiots instead of using them as the scapegoat!

Why has the ruling class in America rejected racialism? First of all, labor (non-whites gained economic strength), but secondly the Cold War because the ruling class realized that if it did not drop its racialism, then non-whites would revoke their alliance to the bourgeois class and Marxism would appeal instead. Besides, there are a host of ideologies available that include non-Whites which could attract them if America continued to support racialist policies. Just as antisemitism caused Jews to side (temporarily) with the Soviets against the Tzar, racialism could cause non-Whites to abandon American politics. It’s interesting that as soon as Jews had an opportunity to join the bourgeois class, many of them abandoned proletarian politics and switched to Zionist-American politics! As scumbag “Prak Stal” wrote, “use the latter then kick it away” (I don’t plagiarize he only invents that).

Why is there mass immigration, outsourcing of jobs? Again, economics!

People who believe that “moral principles” guide racial policy are idiots. Internet “white race spokespeople” who speak of the “rights” of races to survive and liberals who speak of the “rights” of minorities are mistaken. Under capitalism nobody has any rights, but simply privileges which are granted based on both present and outdated material conditions but hidden behind bullshit ideology. The cold truth is that I will be more honest. Socialism does not believe the “bourgeiouse” has any rights! When you realize the sham of human rights activism, you realize that society is latent with racial double standards because of capitalism primarily, rather than Catholicism or organized Judaism (any resemblance is coincidential). “Human rights” are simply tools used to rally segments of population behind propaganda. The Media does not care about the truth when it under-reports Black Crime (I like thugs) and Judicial system does not see Black or White, it sees Green (dollar bill). “All men are created equal” did not always mean Black men but still emotionally this stirred many American revolutionaries against the British Imperialists. “Human rights” are a propaganda tool, whether used by American colonial Whites (but not Blacks) or used by a biased Media that makes stupid narratives around crime cases to make it appear as if “white supremacists” are frequently attacking Blacks when data shows otherwise.

Another comment. Have you ever seen Abraham Foxman’s salary? Norman Finkelstein (the most skilled writer on the Zionist question) explains the money politics behind victim whoring very well!

The people who I fought with on forums are idiotic morons who are living in a false world in which identity politics are legitimate instead of covers for material politics. They believe “The Jews” and Nazis actually were/are sincere in their identity politics and not simply using them to exploit the stupid. Hell, even Jim Giles made fun of the “white money movement” (note that Hunter Wallace is no longer part of it).

The Economy and Lowball Job Offers

Monday, March 19th, 2012

Link to City Data

Above is a good debate on city data forum about the recession-influenced economic environment, lowball job offers and the interests of employers and employees. You can see comments that indicate class struggle.

The problem with this is that it will hurt the employers in the long run and either they don’t realize this, or they do but only care about short term savings.

You can lowball a candidate, and they might accept it for financial reasons, but it can almost be guaranteed, that once they find a new position or the market gets better, they will leave for a better opportunity. Why spend the time and money to bring someone on and train them, just for them to leave in less than a year? Most people don’t come up to speed until 3-6 months later. And once they leave, more time and money is spent on recruiting and hiring again. This might be fine if you were hiring entry level anyway and don’t expect people to stay long, but if your hiring experienced people, especially for senior or experienced roles, and try to lowball them with entry level pay, then personally, it will hurt the employer more than anyone else.

My friend’s company did that a few times and it has already backfired. For one position, they were hiring an experienced financial analyst. After about 3 months of interviews, they finally found someone who everyone liked and thought would be a perfect fit. When they made her an offer, they lowballed her with the salary – $5K less than her old job, and well below what they originated budgeted for. The hiring manager said she was not working so tried to take advantage of it. She wound up turning down the offer and accepted another position that paid her the same as her previous salary. So they lost out on a candidate everyone liked to save on a few thousand dollars that they had a budget for anyway – and had to start new interviews all over again.

—–

Yes, its happening all over the US, and like the others have stated, the employers that are taking advantage of the employees at this time, will hurt. Employees will leave, or demand higher pay. Within a year the $15 hour jobs will be $20, and those that took them will either get that raise, or leave, and when they leave, their replacement will want that amount, plus the employer will lose the time that has been invested in the previous employee, as well as the time it took to interview. I know it sucks right now, I wouldn’t look at a job offer below $20 per hour a year ago, now, there’s hardly any out there. I go to an interview and talk with other candidates in the lobby that are applying for jobs at $40k per year, when last year they were making $70 and $80k. When the jobs open up, and they will, those higher dollar people will disappear, leaving a big gap in the workforce. Employers are going to want people to come and work for them and expect loyalty and trust when we as the workers of America, remember the way we are being treated right now. This recession has brought out the true colors of a lot of business people which won’t be soon forgotten.

—–

Do you think though that this economy of crap will bring down overall wages across the board? If people are willing to work for peanuts just to put food on the table, it will make a lot of jobs that once paid well just above minimum wage.

—-

Its seem the salaries of the early eighties has come to the years of 2000+…who would of guess it ….just above minimum wage ….low ball wages.

—-

I know that I have actually seen some wages advertised that would be lower than my unemployment check after taxes. I want to work, but do not want to work for less than my unemployment check. (Comment by metal gear : Now the conservatards can blame unemployment benefits)

—-

employers taking advantage i understand, american innate hatred of unions that i dont get. do people that post on this on CDF think the government the law and HR are going to protect and defend them?

—-

The problem with this is that it will hurt the employers in the long run and either they don’t realize this, or they do but only care about short term savings.

—-

I think that is true of many large US companies. The only thing that seems to matter is the next quarter…

rolleyes.gif

—-

An upper manager in a major US corporation that I once worked for advised me that employees are not assets; they are expeditures. (He was not being cruel here, just trying to warn me of future events.)

Changed my whole outlook.

—-

Yes. The jobs that are gone aren’t coming back and salaries will drop as a result.

—-

Very true.

Companies have done everything they can to make sure everyone (cept the CEO) is expendable.

Artice on Juche, Mao, Stalin and America

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

The article included is very well written. I agree with every single point and it would be pointless to comment much because I essentially would repeat the article. The author brought up many points that are important but often overlooked and tied them together.

Originally posted in the North American Juche-Songun Ideas Study Group

  • There is much ignorance among Americans of where Juche is situated on the political spectrum, even amongst Communists very few understand the Juche positions on various important matters such as the role of Stalin, the Sino-Soviet split, post-1976 China, anti-imperialism in the Third World etc….and so this article will try to address the subject of Juche’s position within the international communist movement in brief.
  • The Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung began his political career first and foremost as a Marxist-Leninist, he studied, admired and followed the ideas of Marx, Lenin and Stalin as the sole way for oppressed peoples to achieve liberation. Juche was created originally as a Korean application of ML to their own conditions much as Maoism began as an application of ML to China. Looking at the period pre-death of Stalin in 1953, Juche and Maoism were nearly identical, not a shock as China and Korea were both backward, feudal, colonial societies, in that both shared the concept of a transition state before socialism (new/national democracy) the innovation of a revolutionary peasantry, the necessity of people’s war to achieve revolution, the need for patriotism and defence of national integrity, self-reliance in the struggle and not depending on foreign parties or nations, and upholding the USSR as the first and leading socialist nation under Comrade Stalin.
  • After the passing of Comrade Stalin and the rise to power of the revisionist clique, Kim Il Sung and the DPRK stood with China and all other anti-revisionist forces in opposing Khruschov’s betrayal of socialism, his abandonment of proletarian dictatorship, his peaceful-coexistence nonsense rejection of class war, and his attempts to dominate and lord over other socialist nations.To this day the DPRK preserves the great memory of Joseph Stalin and considers the fall of the USSR to be a result of revisionism.
  • However, beginning circa 1966, China and Korea began to diverge widely. Although both nations opposed the USSR as a revisionist nation, the Juche belief that each nation’s party has final say over their own nation’s matters led the Koreans to consider that the ultimate responsibly of defeating Russian revisionism rested solely upon the shoes of the Russian people alone. For geopolitical reasons Korea needed to remain allied to Russia to oppose the still menacing US imperialists who occupied the southern half of their nation; Korea’s line can be summed up then as opposition to Soviet revisionism domestically but support for the USSR internationally against imperialism. Mao and China took a different view, viewing the USSR as an enemy nation equal to the US and hence began to have strike with the Koreans who had remained Russian allies. Looking back on all this, one can clearly see that the Korean line was correct. While the revisionists did sell out their country ultimately to imperialism, from the point of view of class struggle the primary contradiction always was between the proletariat and capitalism with the US as the main capitalist power; any contradiction with the USSR was then secondary to the global anti-US struggle. Mao’s line of equal opposition to the US and Russia isolated him at first and led to his eventual reconciliation with US imperialism in the 1970s and his support for imperialist puppets who murdered communists in Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East.
  • Furthermore, Kim Il Sung opposed China’s Cultural Revolution. While the Koreans do in fact accept Mao’s premise that a bourgeoisie can arise within a revolutionary Party holding state power, and hence the necessity of a strong ideological mass-movement to counter it as well as enforcing that the Party cadre are never isolated from the people and are made to work with them, Korea was not in a position (due to the ever present threat of the resumption of the Korean War by the US) to throw itself into mass internal upheaval the way China did and it viewed the Chinese effort as premature due to the need to build a united society for defence against imperialist invasions. In this, Kim Il Sung’s line was akin to those of Liu Shaoqi or Peng Dehui in China. The Koreans viewed some of the actions of the Chinese Red Guards as veering towards ultra-leftism and anarchism because of the lack of Party-led discipline in China at this time; in turn some Chinese began attacking the DPRK and calling for its’ overthrow. Relations were quite bad between China and Korea for a couple of years in the late 60s but ultimately cooler heads in China, led by Mao to his credit, suppressed the extremists and relations were friendly once again and remained so throughout the final period of Mao’s life.
  • With the mutual opposition to both rightist Soviet revisionism and leftist Maoism, Juche can thus be seen as a centrist ideology much as Stalin was also a centrist between Trotsky and Bukharin. During the 60s and 70s Kim Il Sung began promoting Juche as the correct ideology for revolution, as it was based on national self-reliance a Juche nation would not become entrapped by social imperialism nor would it abandon the global anti-imperialist fight. As only the people of a nation can determine what the revolutionary idea will be for that nation, Juche Korea never attempted to dictate to others in the manner that Russia and China did, and Korea thus built great relations with nationalist-socialist leaders such as Nasser in Egypt, Kadhafi in Libya, the Ba’ath party in Syria and Iraq, and the Islamic revolution led by Imam Khomeini in Iran, seeing all these forces as the genuine expression of the people’s revolutionary will.
  • Now to discuss post-Mao China and the emergence of Dengist “market socialism”, the Koreans oppose Dengism in their country and refuse to “open up”, but as with everything else see Dengism as a matter for the Chinese communist party to resolve and continue to have good friendly relations with China. In several official publications, the DPRK has referred to China as revisionist and would obviously prefer that China returns to the socialist path, however they are understanding of the fact that Dengism arose due to the low level of productive forces within China and the need for development. China need not have adopted markets, had it gone on the self-reliant way or improved relations with the USSR, but again that is a matter for the Chinese people to deal with by themselves.
  • As Juche-idea followers, it is our duty to support all nations that are truly independent of imperialism, are contra-USA, and are ruled by a government that reflects the national culture and tradition as well as the people’s wishes.

Why Holocaust Denial is Reactionary

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

Failing to acknowledge the holocaust as a source of class conflict, even if the antagonisms became misdirected towards the land of Palestine, is categorically unmarxist. If one denies the holocaust, nine times out of ten the goal is to claim that Jews are “making it up.” Not only is a source of class struggle suppressed (Jews were powerless during the event, even if they had wealth five years earlier), but a scapegoat is created. Jews then become blamed for something (and probably included into a bigger package, blamed for everything) instead of history unmasked.

Likewise, like Fidel Castro, it is necessary for the greater working class to realize this if the working class wants to maximize its ability to debate the ruling class. If you deny the holocaust, or apologize for the nazis, you aid the Israelis because any reasonable listener will (reasonably) assume that you have a Jewish fetish and that your opposition to Israel has no merit. But if you acknowledge the holocaust and then oppose Israel in theoretical terms, realizing the justified emotions involved by the survivors and sons/daughters of survivors, you clear yourself of that baggage and get the chance to debate against Israel instead of against Jews.

For the record, I do not believe Ahmadinejad intended to really deny the holocaust. I believe he was calling attention to the issue of Israel and Palestine and simply asking questions. But reactionaries, particularly “neo-nazis,” frequently do deny the holocaust outright in a manner much different from Ahmadinejad. They are of no use to us and should be condemned. While I do not believe Ahmadinejad falls into this category, I do believe Castro was correct to bring this issue to Ahmadinejad’s attention (Castro “called him out.”)

Response to Constantin Von Hoffmeister

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

CVH asked me some questions.

I decided to answer in audio.

An Exchange about American Imperialism and Zionism

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

The link
Above contains a good exchange between me and another poster on politicsforum. I tie Zionism to US imperialism and capitalism, oppose the expansion of capital, all while condemning Hitler and Nazism at the same time. I show a differentiation between Kevin Macdonald style anti-Zionism and Free Media Productions style anti-Zionism.

Metal Gear : Israel is wrong because it is an imperialist country which collaborates with another capitalist imperialist country, America. While Jews were hurt by an imperialist named Adolf Hitler, it does not follow that Zionism is the correct ideology.

Chmmr : Pray tell, how exactly is Israel imperialistic? Where exactly is this vast empire that it governs? Colonies in faraway lands?

Metal Gear : The capitalist sphere of influence expands by adding Palestine to its influence under the name of Israel.

While Israelis are “racist” and their racism does contradict capitalism, they are seen as far more mailable to the interests of capitalism (America leading the surge) than their Islamic counterparts.

Until I became a Marxist, I was flirting with Zionism as an ideology. When you learn the patterns of imperialism and capital, you can notice these patterns and see that the same patterns which apply to US imperialism in Vietnam and Iraq also apply to Israel. It is just that Jews, having suffered a holocaust, became willing collaborators with US imperialism and afraid of totalitarian regimes causing an embrace of neo-liberalism and capitalism. To say this does not reinforce theories of Antisemitism.

Revleft 2

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

After stirring up revleft, I followed Spark, Mazdak and Besoshvilli to be the 4th lyceumite who was booted off of that forum. I thought I had a reasonable argument but these people don’t listen to ideology, they just chant slogans about racism and capitalism. They don’t actually understand Karl Marx.

Anyways, revleft 2 has been invented along with “revforum.” I will join both and encourage others to join.

Here is a thread about it.

First Free Media Productions Track

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

The Song Stages has been put together. I did not add the skit yet but just the song.

Free Media Productions has invented a new genre. It is subversive Political rap. I would not call it gangster rap (ice-t), I would not call it horrorcore (insane clown posse), I would not call it party rap (vanilla ice), I would not call it rap metal (limp bizkit) or rap rock (kid rock) or comedy rap (Eminem).

click here to download

A False Dilemma

Monday, January 9th, 2012

Modern day posters on the internet often believe that there is a choice between two choices: Being a “neo-con” and being a Judeo-obsessive.

I am a race realist. That means I believe that race should be approached with logic, not political tact (ass kissing) or emotion. However, most Judeo-obsessives are not merely race realists; they are reactionary racists. They insist on labeling Jews as a foreign entity and they argue that America is politically correct and defensive of Israel because Jews control America. They then use the Jewish question to distract people from the class question (here and here).

They say that one has a choice; accept their viewpoints or you are a neo-con!

A neo-con, in my opinion, is a supporter of US imperialism. One does not have to support US imperialism to disagree with the so-called “wn” view on Jews. I believe the Caucasian race is a legitimate category biologically. It includes Jews, non-Jewish Europeans and in fact includes many western Asians as well (Arabs, Iranians, etc.). As far as Jews being genetically programmed into degeneracy, I do not believe that either. I consider myself White and I don’t consider Jews alien (plus race is not everything, I have Black and Asians comrades). Yet I still oppose the imperialistic policies of the US and Israeli Governments. I have written on this matter before.

Truth be told, Abraham Foxman (the “example” of Jewish hypocrisy) plays identity politics just as aggressively as David Duke does. The crazy wnists and the crazy zionist-imperialists reinforce each other with their paranoid stupidity and victim whoring. The wn clowns say “the Jews” control the world. The ADL lobbies to prevent White people from gaining information that they are entitled to, such as crimes committed by non-Whites and so forth. Yet even though the ADL is run by a hypocritical leader, I would never argue that Abraham Foxman is responsible for the White race’s predicament. The real problem is capitalism.

I am neither a neo-con nor a neo-nazi. I guess the dilemma put forth by both sides is a false dilemma. I am such a counter-example to this dilemma.

edit : Most people with a scientific socialist analysis, like Marx, reason that religion is reactionary and that each religion has specific reactionary characteristics, but as much as the supporters of US-Israeli imperialism would like to say so, being against Judaism is not the same thing as reactionary style Third Reich antisemitism. People of Jewish ancestry are my brothers. Judaism is only as real as peoples imaginations that either believe in it or believe “the Jews” control the world.


SEO Powered By SEOPressor