Editorials » Political Theory

More on my Personal Opinion of a Marxist-Islamic Alliance

Metal Gear — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:02:34 +0000

Aside from whether it is desirable to ally Muslims with Marxists, separately from that question, there is the question of the capability of such an alliance to actually work and not among just a few internet posters, but among the masses. Personally, I do not think it is possible to continue such an alliance as soon as America is weakened and Islam is stronger. Until that point the alliance could probably work, but with high tension. Without the work of a skilled dictator, it is hard to see the uneducated masses keeping such an alliance alive. If a dictator endorses a position on religion, whether atheistic like Stalin or Islamic like the Taliban, then the alliance automatically crumbles. Regimes that repress atheists in the name of Islam cannot be supported by any atheists long term, and regimes that repress religion in the name of atheism (like Stalin’s) cannot be supported long term by the religious or those who pose as religious.

I learned when trying to discuss politics with Kahanists that people who merge politics with religion (often they are faking their religion) tend not to reciprocate support from secular people. There are many people who are essentially secular in their viewpoints, but they pretend to be religious to achieve some political gain. These people, being hypocrites, can never be trusted. For instance, the Croatian Ustaše leaders attempted to incorporate Catholic hierarchy into their ruling order as a political ideology. To them religion was political, not a natural belief system. To these people, religion is not just a philosophy or a conviction, but a cover for an ambitious rise to power which uses adherence to the religion in a discriminatory manner. Someone who openly advocates atheism strongly would have trouble gaining any influence, because the hypocrites monitor their own reputations and do not want to be questioned by the masses. If the hypocrites were shown to be liars, they fear they would lose their influence. To the extent such a thing as Islamo-Facism exists (vs. real Islam), it will never ally with openly secular people because to do so would cause status anxieties. These people fear being unmasked as illegitimate interlopers of a religion. It would be like Hitler allying with Jews. He would never do it because people would then question if he really was a Nazi.

Then there are people who believe their religion the same way the average person believes the sky is blue. These people are mystics as opposed to scholars usually and do not view themselves as being political. A true Muslim believes he is going to heaven, believes he is following the koran, and believes his views are right. But an Islamo-fascist uses religion as a means of separating “us” from “them” to gain power politically. Legitimate Muslims who believe their religion as a matter of truth and falsehood (as opposed to hypocrites who are pretending to be religious) can at least be taken at face value, but I think if Marxists are truly Marxists and not closet infiltrators, their secular view will ultimately make the alliance crumble among the masses of anything but extremely moderate Muslims.

An argument against anti-revisionism

Metal Gear — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 06:05:34 +0000

The anti-revisionist ideology holds that Marx and Lenin should be taken as literally as possible.

The problem with this approach is that it ignores class independent ideology. Let’s imagine we had a bunch of proletarian Nazis. And we gave them more wealth and power. There’s no guarantee that their views will shift as they gain the means to fight the bourgeois. They may very well become the bourgeois. One bourgeois exists, but another enters. Or they may become national enemies, even if not class enemies. It’s a very big risk to support ideological opponents under the guise that once they gain material wealth, they will cease their opposition and/or correct their viewpoints.

I believe in some cases, indoctrination and ideology are more important than class.

National Bolshevist Heroes 1- Chandra Bose

Metal Gear — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:33:15 +0000

The link
Here is an interesting thread on pofo about an Indian man with a solid world view.

“1. The party will stand for the interests of the masses, that is, of the peasants, workers, etc., and not for the vested interests, that is, the landlords, capitalists and money-lending classes.
“2. It will stand for the complete political and economic liberation of the Indian people.
“3. It will stand for a Federal Government for India as the ultimate goal, but will believe in a strong Central Government with dictatorial powers for some years to come, in order to put India on her feet.
“4. It will believe in a sound system of state-planning for the reorganization of the agricultural and industrial life of the country.
“5. It will seek to build up a new social structure on the basis of the village communities of the past, that were ruled by the village “Panch” and will strive to break down the existing social barriers like caste.
“6. It will seek to establish a new monetary and credit system in the light of the theories and the experiments that have been and are current in the modern world.
“7. It will seek to abolish landlordism and introduce a uniform land-tenure system for the whole of India.
“8. It will not stand for a democracy in the Mid-Victorian sense of the term, but will believe in government by a strong party bound together by military discipline, as the only means of holding India together and preventing a chaos, when Indians are free and are thrown entirely on their own resources.
“9. It will not restrict itself to a campaign inside India but will resort to international propaganda also, in order to strengthen India’s case for liberty, and will attempt to utilize the existing international organizations.
“10. It will endeavor to unite all the radical organizations under a national executive so that whenever any action is taken, there will be simultaneous activity on many fronts.”

Good Saloth Sar Video

Metal Gear — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:55:50 +0000

It is interesting that before teaming up with the former Prince Sihanouk, Pol Pot used to hate him. This reminds me of the Lyceum. This, however, is a bit more serious than web words! Early on, Pol Pot fought with Sihanouk, but was willing to adapt his alliances when it became necessary to do so.

I understand that some of the comments by viewers are very “one-sided,” but in general the video is pretty good. It shows that Pol Pot was focused but very secretive and determined. He was calculating, but appeared very gentle. He worked his way from the bottom to the top. He was sold out by the Vietnamese. I didn’t know that. That’s why he hated the Vietnamese. Cambodia was sacrificed to France when other Southeast Asian countries collaborated for Independence.

It noted that he adopted some aspects of Marx, but was really not a hardliner “anti-revisionist” Marxist. In truth he was more of a progressive nationalistic type.

His rejection of urbanization is important too. Mao was similar in his approach though for Mao it was pragmatic. For Pol Pot it was a matter of principle.

What do you think? Was Pol Pot himself a criminal, or is he the ultimate victim of American, Soviet, Vietnamese and French imperialism?

Noam Chomsky defends Pol Pot. Pol Pot may have saved more people than he killed. Nobody said anything negative during the Cold War. It was only after Russia fell, when China became the next “big Satan,” that the “Maoist” Pol Pot was demonized by America.

On Marx, Marxism, Capitalism and Globalization

Metal Gear — Mon, 03 May 2010 04:39:17 +0000

First of all what was thought by Marx is not always thought by Marxists. And what is thought by Marxists was not always thought by Marx. Marx said he was not a Marxist, but that is beside the point. While Marx and Marxists viewed globalism as inevitable, they did not explicitly view “ethnic replacement” and “free movement” as inevitable. Only Trotsky viewed “ethnic mixing” as an important Communist goal.

Globalism means spreading revolution. It does not mean free movement.

Hardcore capitalism however requires free movement. Therefore, aside from the Trotskyites, the Jewish Bolsheviks are preferable to the liberal capitalists.

Trotsky and Zionism

Free Media Productions Staff — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:14:56 +0000

Giovanni Gentile (founder of Fascism) admired Karl Marx

Metal Gear — Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:23:53 +0000

The Link
It is my opinion that genuine fascism is influenced by Marxism but aims to unify the nation and avoid class struggle instead of advocating the class struggle. But it is still a class conscious ideology. Nazism is not really fascism but just racialism that is very unscientific.

Giovanni Gentile (1875-1944) described himself as “the philosopher of Fascism.” He ghostwrote A Doctrine of Fascism (1930) for his country’s prime minister and dictator, Benito Mussolini.

Philosophically he drew from Kant, Hegel and Marx — system builders. He had some admiration for Nietzsche, and he had a romantic view of historic leaders of Italian nationalism.

He had been an academic. the Chairman of the Department of Philosophy at Palermo University from 1907 to 1914 and later at the University of Pisa. In 1923 he accepted Mussolini’s offer of the post of Minister of Education.

Gentile admired Marx, but he and his fellow fascists were opposed to class struggle. Their nationalism embodied a unified patriotic devotion to the state. He and fellow fascists viewed Italy as a single organic entity and unifying force that bound people together by their ancestry. Mussolini, fascism’s great leader, said:

For us the nation is not just territory but something spiritual… A nation is great when it translates into reality the force of its spirit.

Gentile’s admiration for Marx can be compared to the youthful Adolf Hitler’s admiration for the socialist labor movement marching together in a seemingly endless file through the streets of Vienna. What Hitler admired was the labor movement’s mobilization for the sake of power. What Gentile admired in Marx was the unity of his system of thought, including its historicity. Gentile wanted to consider the fascist movement as progressive within a historical context.

Fascist philosophy held to the idea of struggle and conflict moving history forward, but rather than between classes it was between weak and strong nations. In The Origins and Doctrine of Fascism, Gentile wrote that “mankind only progresses through division, and progress is achieved through the clash and victory of one side over another”

The Fascists believed in a national rebirth and in a new fascist man, Uomo Fascista as Gentile called it. This is vaguely similar to Nietzsche’s Übermensch, which some have translated to Superman. But Gentile was misreading Nietzsche. In Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the protagonist contends that “man is something which ought to be overcome,” that apes are a laughingstock to man and that man would be a laughing stock for Übermensch. Meanwhile, in the minds of some people in the world, Mussolini and fascist men displaying their superiority through pompous displays, swagger, bullying and chest beatings were in appearance ape-like.

The Fascist philosophy held that fascism was filling the need for purpose in the world that would otherwise be absurd. The philosophy of Gentile stood against the positivist philosophy, the philosophy that limited authentic knowledge to that based on sense experience. Fascist philosophy, claimed Gentile, was not skeptical, nor agnostic, nor pessimistic, nor passively optimistic. Fascism, he claimed, was man engaged in a moral and intellectual struggle in an exercise of free will in the creation of a new world.

Giovanni Gentile would remain loyal to Mussolini until his own assassination in April 1944, eleven months before Musolini’s assassination.

An Intro to Juche

Free Media Productions Staff — Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:56:29 +0000

Watch in High-Definition!

In support of Marx but not “Marxism”

Metal Gear — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:15:31 +0000

Marx laid down a number of important hypotheses. Some of them were correct, others were incorrect, but at least he paved the way for more thought. Marx should not be viewed as “perfect” but in the same way that Plato or Socrates is viewed. To make an analogy, one does not have to be a Christian to praise the human being named Jesus of Nazareth that supposedly existed. One does not have to be a Buddhist to learn from reading philosophy of Buddhists.

Marx’s role in raising awareness of important issues should be appreciated by any self-respecting, enlightened and pragmatic person. He may have not scored on every shot, but at least someone got the rebound. Juche (North Korea’s ideology) may not be Marxism, but it owes some of its influence to Marx. Benito Mussolini was a Marxist before he developed into a fascist. Mao may have modified Marx to be more agrarian and idealistic, and adapted to Chinese characteristics, but still was influenced by Marx. The Ba’athists with which I converse see Marx as an influence but not the “seal of the prophets.”

Marx also hated oppressive religious fanatics (of any religion) and considered religion to opiate. I salute him on that stance too!

Unlike Islamic Fundamentalist Countries, Israel is honoring the Red Army

Metal Gear — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:39:37 +0000

The link
Just to play Devil’s advocate, as many of our “Communists” think that Islamic Fundamentalism is inherently more compatible with Marxism than Zionism, it should be pointed out that the Taliban and Iranian regime curse the Red Army whereas Israel praises it. Now you can say the material conditions make ideology unimportant, but it is still ironic.

It should be noted that the SECULAR Ba’athists were pro-USSR in their original conception, whereas the counterpart regime in Afghanistan was not. And that regime was a fundamentalist regime, but not the Taliban.

Israel will erect a memorial commemorating the Red Army’s crucial role in the victory over the Nazis, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told Russian Prime Minster Vladimir Putin at a photo opportunity before their meeting Tuesday.

Netanyahu said the gesture, which he intends to move forward, is in honor of the 65th anniversary of the victory over the Nazis later this year. This move comes amid growing concern in Russia that their role and sacrifice in the victory over Nazism is increasingly being underplayed.

Putin, saying that it was forbidden to forget the Nazi victims and that the Jews and the people of the former Soviet Union suffered more than anyone else at the hands of the Nazis, said he was currently in discussion with Moscow’s chief rabbi about the possibility of establishing a Holocaust museum in Moscow.

Netanyahu said he hoped the memorial would be erected before Putin’s next visit to Israel, expected with the year, and that at the same time the Russian prime minister could also take part in the ceremony in which Russia would formally take over control of the Sergei courtyard in central Jerusalem.

After saying that Israel and Russia would increase cooperation in a number of spheres, including technology, security and agriculture, Putin joked that he hoped the agricultural cooperation would add funds to Israel’s Agriculture Ministry so that it could quickly move out of its offices in the Sergei courtyard.

The Free Market is the American Religion

Metal Gear — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:26:05 +0000

The link
The reason America never fixes its problems is that it believes they will auto-correct. This article is the ideological foundation of authoritarianism. If you prefer to smear it, I guess you could call it “emergency dictatorship,” “capitalism in decay” or “fascism.” It is the idea that freedom and liberty “don’t work,” but the logical conclusion is that authority is needed to patch society. It is not really stressing class conflict or the need for the complete elimination of private property, and thus not really addressing the issue from a Marxist-Leninist standpoint but a corrective authoritarian standpoint.

It requires a religious belief in capitalism in order to keep trying to succeed against all odds, because otherwise it is easier to give up. After all, to succeed requires many failed attempts and/or a special networking connection, especially in this global economic meltdown. I can attest to the fact that most hardcore entrepreneurs truly believe these values.

WASHINGTON — The most popular religion in America isn’t Christianity, as most of us have been taught to believe. The most cherished belief system celebrates the principles of unfettered capitalism.

That misplaced faith in free markets was on display in this past Thursday’s health care summit, when — between sound bites and talking points — Republicans argued that “choice and competition” would largely resolve the country’s health care problems. That belief — that the arbitrary, confusing and consumer-unfriendly policies and practices that we euphemistically call a health care “system” can be transformed by relying on free market principles — is confounding.

Except for beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid and the Veterans Affairs system — all government-run insurance programs — those of us who have insurance are utterly reliant on the private market. That’s what got us into the mess we’re in.

The health care market simply doesn’t operate like the market for cars or computers or flat-screen TVs. Sony and Samsung make their profits by selling as many of their products as they can. Health insurance companies make their profits by selling as many of their products as they can and then trying very hard not to actually deliver them.

Try to imagine that you’re awaiting delivery of your brand-new 50-inch TV, for which you’ve already made a hefty down payment. But the company calls to tell you that you violated some obscure clause in your contract, so they’re not going to bring it! In the health insurance world, it’s called “rescission.” Insurers decide they won’t honor the contract because of some alleged violation by the policy-holder.

They do that to keep their fat profit margins. Health care giant Wellpoint has proposed substantial rate increases in the individual market (policies for individuals who don’t have employer-based insurance), not just in California but in several other states. In congressional testimony last week, WellPoint president Angela Braly said the company had to raise premiums because of soaring health care costs. But Wellpoint hardly seems to be hurting; it reported a profit last year of $4.7 billion.

California’s Wellpoint subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross, is not only proposing stunning rate hikes. The state’s insurance commissioner has announced that the company has also repeatedly violated state law by failing to pay medical claims on time and by misrepresenting policy provisions to consumers, according to the Los Angeles Times.

So, it seems, the company tells you that a policy offers broad coverage when they’re trying to get you to buy insurance. But when you need the coverage, you find out that the policy doesn’t offer broad coverage, after all. That helps explain why so many people, even with health insurance, go bankrupt after a costly illness.

Without stricter government oversight and regulation — which is the essence of the health care reform proposed by President Obama — health care costs will continue to soar while consumers get less and less. Obama’s proposals don’t represent a “government takeover,” as critics contend. The vast majority of Americans would still get their insurance in the private marketplace. But insurers would have to live by a different set of rules.

Vice President Joe Biden said it best at the summit: If Republicans agree that insurance reform is necessary, that health insurance companies should be prohibited from turning away consumers because of pre-existing conditions, that they should be prevented from enforcing lifetime caps on benefits, then the GOP must see the need for strict government regulation. You don’t get those changes in the “free market.”

And, unlike the choice of buying a computer or a car, you’d don’t really get to walk away from health insurance. If you do, you take your life into your hands. Having health insurance increases your chances of longevity.

Once upon a time, political leaders realized that all Americans needed access to electricity, and they stepped in to ensure that all households got that small miracle at reasonable rates — something that the “free market” could not provide. Americans need a similar intervention in health care now.

Iraq to reinstate 20,000 Saddam-era army personnel

Metal Gear — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:59:32 +0000

The Link
This is great news! The Ba’athist regime has been officially destroyed, but unofficially, former Ba’athists are regaining their influence. The secular Ba’athists work towards a great political system but are less extreme (in terms of nationalism and secularism) then the Social Nationalists of Syria. But pragmatically the Ba’athists have achieved more.

People like the Ba’athists are people who should be ruling over the Middle East. People who have a sense of identity, but are not religious zealots. Similar people should be ruling over Israel right now.

BAGHDAD —

Iraq on Friday announced the reinstatement of 20,000 former army officers who were dismissed after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, in a gesture toward healing sectarian resentment over the disbanding of Saddam Hussein’s military.

But the timing of the announcement raised suspicions that Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his allies were just currying votes in upcoming parliamentary election.

The skepticism underscored how bitter feelings have become between Iraq’s factions ahead of the March 7 vote. Many had hoped the vote would be a chance to move past the Shiite-Sunni divisions that have wracked Iraq since Saddam’s fall nearly seven years ago, but instead the mistrust between the two sides has become starker.

Al-Maliki is facing Sunni anger after a Shiite-led commission barred 440 candidates—mostly Sunnis—from running because of suspected ties to Saddam’s former ruling party.

In theory, the military reinstatements should be good news for Sunnis. The 2003 order by Iraq’s then-American governor L Paul Bremer to dissolve Saddam’s 400,000-strong army—the largest in the Middle East on the eve of the 2003 invasion—is widely seen as one of the factors that fueled Sunnis’ sense of alienation with the new Iraq from the very start.

Sunnis dominated Saddam’s regime, and many top military officers came from the community. Jobless and angry, some from the old army took their expertise to the Sunni insurgency that broke out in the summer of 2003, seeking an income for their families or revenge against the Americans and their Iraqi allies. The disbanding, along with the looting of the army’s bases and depots across much of Iraq, is widely blamed for the tortuously slow pace of standing, equipping and training the country’s new army.

Over past years, thousands of officers from the disbanded army have trickled back to service in an ongoing process of reintegration. Friday’s announcement that 20,000 were being reinstated was the largest known single batch of returnees.

Defense Ministry Spokesman Mohammed al-Askari denied that the announcement was linked to the March 7 election for a 325-seat legislature, insisting that it was made when funding for the 20,000 positions became available.

“This measure has nothing to do with elections, rather it is related to budget allocations,” he said.

A Defense Ministry statement said the rehired personnel would be reinstated as of Sunday, but a senior Iraqi military official said the process of absorbing so many could take weeks and maybe months to complete.

The official said a systematic process to reinstate Saddam-era army personnel has been ongoing for months, with a ministry committee screening officers and noncommissioned officers for ties to Saddam’s regime or involvement in atrocities or war crimes.

He said reinstatements were strictly based on the army’s present requirements and mainly benefited officers from the rank of colonel down to noncommissioned officers. U.S. commanders have in the past pointed out that Iraq’s new army, which is at least 300,000-strong, desperately needed mid-ranking and experienced noncommssioned officers.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Critics, however, said the sudden return of their jobs might influence the votes of the reinstated personnel.

“No doubt, this move is related to the elections and it aims at gaining votes,” said Maysoun al-Damlouji, a candidate from a secular block led by former prime minister Ayad Allawi, a fierce critic of al-Maliki.

The United States hopes a transparent and credible election will bolster national reconciliation efforts and pave the way for its combat forces to go home by the end of August and the rest by next year’s end.

Regardless of the motive, reinstating the large group of officers would go some way toward helping reconciliation. Al-Maliki has raised Sunni resentment with his relentless denouncements of Baathists in Iraqi politics. But at the same time, he has shown some flexibility on the issue when it comes to the military.

Al-Maliki’s Shiite-dominated government has already reinstated many Sunni officers as top commanders in the new army. It also waived “de-Baathification” rules and reinstated generals—Sunnis and Shiites—who once held senior positions in Saddam’s ruling party.

Analyst Nabil Salim, a Baghdad University political science professor, attributed Friday’s announcement to political and election considerations, but also saw it as a boost for the U.S.-backed Iraqi security forces as they fight insurgents.

“It is a good step to provide the new army with badly needed expertise,” he said.

What to do with officials from the Baath and former army officers has been a key source of tension for postwar Iraq.

Hundreds of thousands, including army personnel, were purged from jobs at the government and security forces under a controversial program conceived by Bremer’s Coalition Provisional Authority—the U.S. occupation government.

Many were allowed to return to government service in 2008. But the issue remains a source of friction, especially after the election ban, ordered by a committee led by two Shiite candidates believed to have ties to Iran.

One of the banned candidates, prominent Sunni lawmaker Saleh al-Mutlaq, pulled his party out of the election in protest, but he reversed the decision on Thursday. The decision effectively lifts the lingering threat that minority Sunnis would boycott the vote.

In yet another twist Friday, the spokesman of the Shiite-led political vetting committee that drafted the blacklist, Mudhafar al-Batat, said the panel would file a lawsuit against al-Mutlaq for his alleged involvement in attacks and killings carried out by insurgent groups linked to the Baath party.

Al-Mutlaq has repeatedly denied any links to the insurgency and says he quit the Baath party in the 1970s

Moscow was marching on Stalin’s Birthday!

Free Media Productions Staff — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:41:39 +0000

Our friends at the North Star Compass published these photographs taken from the celebrations of the 130th Birthday of Josef Stalin on Dec. 21, 2009 (from the current issue of NSC).

On December 21, 2009 – the 130th Birthday of J.V. Stalin, people gathered on the Red Square in Moscow to celebrate this great event in the history of all mankind. Then came representatives from different parties and citizens from all walks of life.

First came the patriotic forces from the AUCPB, coming to the grave of Stalin and laid flowers and held a small meeting. After that the representatives of the CPRF and RCU of Youth, Trudovaya Rossia and many other parties and multitude of people came to pay respect to Stalin with flowers and wreaths.

Even though the authorities tried to stop some people, the multitude was just too much for the present regime to stop. The columns of people grew longer and longer and it brought back memories as to how it was during Soviet times.

There was a never-ending laying of flowers and wreaths to Stalin.

The people kept coming in greater numbers as never before since the demise of the Soviet Union.

Red Square from one end to the other had people waiting in line.

Soviet War Veterans, decorated with medals, paid their respect to Generalissimo Stalin.


Putin-Medvedev police started to hold back the Muscovites, but the people kept coming to pay respect to Stalin.

The Implications of Right Wing Technocracy

Metal Gear — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:19:39 +0000

For the purpose of clarity, I am specifying a few key points. The goal is to explain a worldview in detail rather than using buzzwords.

Key visionary points:

1) “Up to date” views on religion. Perhaps tolerance and collaboration but certainly not agreement with precepts that are clearly refuted by modern science.

2) “Up to date” views on race. An acknowledgment of human biodiversity but rejection of unscientific theories. “Racial science” but not bigotry. “Race realism.”

3) Integration of technology into society, as opposed to using technology as a means to deconstruct the concept of nationality. Integration, not radical globalization.

4) A realization that capitalism can implode without authoritarianism. Technology helps authority to gain more control over the market for national self-interest.

5) Not only should governments use technology to keep their people loyal, but inversely, the people should use technology to keep their governments loyal.

6) Population control ideally avoiding abortion.

7) “Up to date” views on ideology. No following Marx, Mussolini, Thomas Jefferson, Muhammad, Jefferson Davis, Moses or Adolf Hitler word for word. It is the year 2010 now.

Ancestral mountain produced brilliant commander of Songun

FMP News — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:37:27 +0000

From the Korean Friendship Association

There are many noted mountains in the world. There are mountains boasting about height and kaleidoscopic view. However, the south Korean people are proud of Mt. Baekdu.

It attracts the eye of the public not only mystery of the mountain, indomitable spirit, appearance, thick forest, diversified natural phenomenon, unfathomable Lake Chon, but because leader Kim Jong Il was born there and leads the Korean nation to prosperity.

Mt. Baekdu is a noted one well known to the world people. It is famous not because of only its height and lake on its summit.

Mt. Baekdu is a time-honored one where Kim Jong Il was born. He was born in the mountain when the anti-Japanese armed struggle was waged and cultivated matchless courage and extraordinary ambition. Therefore, the Mt. Baekdu shows its appearance throughout the world and the august name of the leader shines along with the mountain. The Korean people call Mt. Baekdu the native place of their heart.

The Bright Star of Mt. Baekdu the Korean people admired in the past is towering high as the sun leading the struggle for national reunification and the way for humankind. Mt. Baekdu that produced the Bright Star is the native home of the Korean nation.

The sun of Mt. Baekdu is leader Kim Jong Il.

Every peaks of Mt. Baekdu are fraught with his ideal and high aims and valleys are filled with his courage and wisdom. Mt. Baekdu is the mountain of leader Kim Jong Il.

Having Kim Jong Il, a great man born of Heaven, in high esteem, the Korean people and humankind are blessed with leaders century after century. He is the sun, as he possessed at the high level with light, heat and attraction, attributes of the sun.

The Korean people are confident about a reunified and prosperous nation as long as they are led by him.

It is the greatest fortune for the Korean people to have Kim Jong Il as the sun of the nation, who frustrates the challenges of the imperialist allied forces to demonstrate national dignity throughout the world with his matchless pluck and far-sightedness.

Mt. Baekdu is the sacred place of the nation that the Korean nation boasts to the world. From time immemorial, a great man is born in a famous place.

Kim Jong Il, who was born in Mt. Baekdu, is a great man produced by the Heaven.

He started his life in Mt. Baekdu, listening gunshot as a lullaby and cultivated courage and wisdom of a brilliant commander under generals of Mt. Baekdu. He overcame unprecedented difficulties in grave period with pluck of Mt. Baekdu.

It is his spirit and pluck that north Korea defends the national dignity and makes efforts to build a thriving nation, frustrating the vicious moves and military threat of the allied forces of imperialist.

As it is hard to expect the dawn without the sun, the realization of reunification encouraging the nation with hope and confidence is inconceivable without an outstanding leader of the nation.

The dawn of reunification and national prosperity will break at Mt. Baekdu.

Discrimination against the old is justified

Metal Gear — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:50:06 +0000

Enough of this politically correct bullshit.

Younger predominately male workers need to stop waiting at the back of the line (we’ve waited long enough, how long are we supposed to wait), and really start to discriminate against older workers wherever we have the power to do so. It is the older generation, this baby boomer generation of screwups, who ruined the economy, and it is the older generation who imposes flawed ideology on the younger the generation. The older bourgeoisie useless parasites can shut their mouths about age discrimination, and realize how unfairly good they have it. They can shut up about how hard they worked to get to where they are, and realize that it was easy to succeed until they screwed everything up. The blatant nepotism! The preference of age over skill! The desire to hire a worker solely because he/she is more experienced, when he/she may be an idiot. They run up deficits, they deconstruct the ethnic identity of nations, they outsource jobs, they start imperialistic wars for liberal capitalism, they flood the working class with more immigrant competition and they think they are clever with their two party system.

(note that this article is merely artistic and I don’t really advocate violence)
Death to the bourgeoisie! Exterminate them. Imprison them. Kick them. Spit on them. Throw rocks at them. Hell piss on them. Throw them into volcanoes and then clap when the volcanoes erupt. Make them suffocate on their dollar bills.

Purging the Paranoid

Metal Gear — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:35:24 +0000

These points made by Nick Griffin, and quoted by Lawrence Auster, are really quite relevant. It is an error to turn against Israel just because a crowd of crazy people who are rejected both by the JDL and Israel display paranoid personality disorder, DSM IV. “The nazis are out to get me.” The Marx quotations are valid, as are the points about Monarchs employing Jews so they can hide behind the title wave of dissent from the masses. I suspect similar tactics may be used by modern capitalist rulers.

It would be pleasurable to purge paranoids like Chaim Ben Pesach from the Zionist movement, but I just realized it’s not necessary. It has already occurred. The JDL has rejected him and Israel has banned him. Perhaps the JDL and Israel are neo-nazi organizations, and Rick Rubin was the Fuhrer. Allen-T was the SS Stormtrooper and EagleEye the Polish-Ukrainian collaborator.

I wonder if Kahanists would consider Lawrence Auster to be a neo-nazi. After all, his conversion to Christianity must be an attempt to genocide the Jewish people spiritually.

The better move is not to turn against Zionism, but to purge the Zionist movement of its undesirable mental defectives. The Zionist movement should move towards national bolshevism and integral corporatist nationalism, and away from Taliban style religiosity.

Khmer Rouge as model dictatorship for the Middle East Nations

Metal Gear — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:37:43 +0000

This is just a “theory” and not a call to action!

A dictatorship modeled off of Pol Pot’s khmer rouge could really rewrite the religious culture of the middle east, and then allow it to progress technologically after its original period of purification.

And don’t forget that pol pot was a nationalist!

Social Nationalist Comrades in Syria Point out Blair’s plan to attack Saddam pre-911

Metal Gear — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:23:43 +0000

The Translated Link from Arabic

Agencies – Media sources said that former Prime Minister Tony Blair lied to the investigation committee on the Iraq war when he claimed that attention to topple former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein began after the attacks atheist ten of September. And removed the newspaper “The Independent” British unveiling of the document did not receive the Commission of Inquiry into the Iraq war, confirms that the government of Tony Blair made secret plans to drum up support for the establishment of an internal coup against Saddam Hussein two years before the invasion of Iraq. The newspaper “The Independent” The British Foreign Office officials drafted a plan called “contract with the people,” suggested to the dissidents in Iraq that toppling Saddam would receive support from Britain, also pledged to provide aid and debt cancellation of oil contracts and the provision of commercial transactions as soon as the ouster The newspaper “has been the completion of the plan, titled” Confidential – for the eyes of the British and U.S. “in the June 11, 2001, and approved by the cabinet of ministers.” The document said Britain would “want to deal with Iraq that respects the rights of its people and live in peace with its neighbors and abide by international law and the right of the Iraqi people to live in a society based on rule of law, free from repression, torture and arbitrary arrest, and that respects human rights, freedom and prosperity the economy. The document said “those who wish to be published a call for change in Iraq deserve our support. We look forward to the day when Iraq who is due to join the international community, will receive a new system to reschedule debt and aid from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund aid package and trade of the European Union.” Mr Blair said during his testimony before the commission last week that serious attention to the overthrow of Saddam breed only after ten atheist attacks of September, which changed from “a risk”. For his part, “said Ed Duffy, spokesman for the Liberal Democrats in foreign affairs, said the document questioned the validity of the certificate made by Blair should have been published before hearing his testimony on Friday. “The plan to support the Iraqis who seek to topple Saddam may be less harmful, and that was without a doubt the most legitimate what happened. However, it appears that Blair had always intended to change the system since the early and before the atheist of September.” “It seems, however, that veil of secrecy was lifted from the documents is crucial, which stop an obstacle to question Blair and other people.” In addition, newspaper “The Guardian” The Commission of Inquiry Celkot Blair will call again to make further submissions before it. She said Blair would be questioned in public and in secret after the committee expressed concern that his testimony on the legality of the invasion are contrary to those made by the former British Attorney General Lord Goldsmith.

This article focuses on Blair, but it is clear that Bush was trying to downplay the Afghanistan war, and switch to Iraq, even though a stronger case can be made against Afghanistan than against Iraq. Iraq is secular and never attacked USA. It was back stabbed. Afghanistan is theocratic and could be accused of Al-Qaeda collaboration. Yet Bush wanted to get the focus off of Afghanistan and onto Iraq.

The motives are ulterior! Profit and gain!

A live translation of the Ba’ath and Social Nationalist party Websites!

Metal Gear — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:32:57 +0000

Ba’athist link
Social Nationalist link
Excellent!

Review: Glenn Beck’s ‘Revolutionary Holocaust’

Free Media Productions Staff — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:03:56 +0000

From the Red Phoenix, official organ of the American Party of Labor

Part I of VI: Beck’s Countless Lies about America & the Founding Fathers

By Marcus Winter, Farabundo Morazán and Ismail LaLanne

On January 22nd 2010, another hardened reactionary tried to attack the history of leftism and Marxism and (surprise) managed to bring nothing new to the table at all. Shock jock Glenn Beck, an admitted alcoholic and former cocaine addict, has made a career out of appealing to the most lunatic fringe of the right-wing. Even so, this week he finally managed to outdo himself, even after the time he said Obama was “a racist” and had a “deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.” Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free or Die begins oddly—with white X-Files font letters against a crackling static background. What this has to do with or why this is the least bit appropriate for the subject matter Beck tackles is anyone’s guess. As we shall see though, this is symbolic for the entire presentation, which, while clever, is the same hodgepodge of anti-communist views that we have all seen and heard a thousand times before.

A good question for Glenn Beck: why is such radical anti-communism necessary today if communism is discredited, dead, and buried? If communism is supposedly dead in the water, a footnote of history, and so on, and if capitalism is truly the greatest system, then why is it that we are facing a wave of anti-communist hysteria not seen since the Cold War? Mr. Beck, it might do you well to remember that hysteria and desperation are signs of weakness…and liars.

No matter how hard he tries, Glenn Beck cannot sell his line about how “this story has never been told.” Horror stories about communism have been told since before communists ever came to power in the first place. The opening of the secret Soviet archives actually reveals that these claims were in fact ridiculously exaggerated, not worse, than previously claimed.

So, what are his intentions here? Many things all at once—among them licking the boots of the bourgeoisie and re-packaging old and debunked lies. We shall tackle them one by one using our own sources and information. The complete transcript of Beck’s program is available here until further notice: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583732,00.html.

Because of the length of his program, we have decided to break this presentation up into several parts. For right now, we will content ourselves with refuting the introduction to his program.
We invite you to stay tuned for a little series of our own.

Beck’s Thesis
Glenn Beck’s allegedly “groundbreaking” exposé of “progressives,” whom he conveniently lumps together, is by no means new or groundbreaking at all. Revolutionary Holocaust seeks to establish a link between Joseph Stalin and communism on one side, and Adolf Hitler and Nazism on the other. While doing this it also seeks to talk about the reign of Mao Zedong in China, along with a segment about liberal icon Che Guevara.
This same “thesis” of fascism and communism being almost exactly the same or at least sharing fundamental similarities, has been repeated for us endlessly since we were kids. For Beck to champion this as a “new and groundbreaking” idea is either foolish or stunningly arrogant. It has been the dominant narrative shoved down our throats since the publication of The Origins of Totalitarianism in 1951 by Hannah Arendt. For a closer look at this laughable “theory,” look here: http://theredphoenix.wordpress.com/2009/09…otalitarianism/

Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, & Slave-Owning Freedom
The video begins with Glenn Beck praising the United States of America and its associated American Dream. “The story of America,” he pines, staring into the camera with his intellectual glasses on, “is really one of self-reliance and optimism, and profound faith.” He continues to milk this image for all its worth, bringing up the merits of the US Constitution and the Founding Fathers.

Glenn Beck has willfully ignored the history of the American Revolution. The spirit of the American Founding Fathers is only a myth and not a reality.

First, the Constitution of the United States was not set up by “the” people or any sort of popular democracy, but by financial autocrats. White males with property were the only ones allowed to vote under the system that men such as George Washington (the richest man in America), James Madison (owned enormous slave plantations), John Hancock (a rich merchant), Benjamin Franklin (a wealthy printer) and others aimed to set up. Of the 55 men who gathered to write the Constitution in 1787, most were lawyers and men of enormous wealth, making their fortunes in landowning, slave trading, manufacturing or shipping. Half loaned money out for interest, 40 held government bonds.
Regarding the writing of the Constitution:
“The manufacturers needed protective tariffs; the moneylenders wanted to stop the use of paper money to pay off debts; the land speculators wanted protection as they invaded Indian lands; slaveowners needed federals security against slave revolts and runaways; bondholders wanted a government able to raise money by nationwide taxation, to pay off those bonds” (1).

Governments are not neutral. They reflect the economic interests of the dominant class, expressed in America as men such as the Founding Fathers. The Constitution protects “life, liberty, or property” and little else in reality. Women, Blacks, Indians and poor whites were not mentioned, but the defense of private property was.
The clause about the “freedom of speech” was soon enough violated, as it is today, by clauses such as the Sedition Act of 1789, which was a response to the French and Irish Revolutions. It forbid under law the practice of writing or saying anything “false, scandalous and malicious” against the United States government, the Congress or the President. It is not immediately apparent that anyone’s “liberty” should be left to a government run by the rich and powerful.

Despite this, Beck says that “[…] those seeking a different path than the ones the founders settled on realized the only way to really defeat the Constitution was for the people to stop reading it.” He then insists that the Constitution, through its supposed system of check and balances, “kept dogs at bay” for 200 years. Despite this Utopian dream, the Founding Fathers were not men seeking a “balance” in society, and certainly didn’t believe that all men were created equal. If they wanted any sort of balance, it was between the wealthy, and not between such groups as Indians and whites, blacks and whites, men and women, boss and worker, or rich and poor, slave and slaveowner, and certainly not property owner and the propertyless.

Next Article
In the next part of the series, we shall see how Glenn Beck uses the story of Nazi Germany and WWII to further his own ends, and ends up whitewashing Nazi crimes in order to attack the USSR.

Sources:
1) Zinn, Howard. Peoples’ History of the United States, page 91.

Pol Pot wasn’t Really a literal Marxist-Leninist!

Metal Gear — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:04:49 +0000

The Link
(I apologize, but I have to link to the pedophora here. This is not an endorsement!)

Here is an interesting post about Pol Pot and how he was really a Khmer nationalist and not a Communist. He adopted some Marxist rhetoric but followed his own line. And he sided more with Mao than with USSR. USSR of course had backed off from its Stalinist line, but still Maoism is strongly adapted to Chinese characteristics and quite different from Russian Bolshevism.

I already knew this, but it adds some extra angles to the discussion.

Hail the National Bolsheviks

Metal Gear — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:15:00 +0000

The link

Words for the Faithful

Free Media Productions Staff — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:22:55 +0000

Fold your little hands,

Bow your little head,

Think for five minutes

On Stalin.

J.V. Stalin is the brilliant leader and teacher of the Party,

The great strategist of the socialist revolution.

He is implacable in facing the enemies of socialism,

Absolutely true to principle.

He is the union of clear revolutionary perspective,

And clarity of goal in all His activities,

Combining them with extraordinary firmness and persistence.

The name Stalin is the symbol of the moral and political unity of the working class.

Liberating Arabs from Theocracy

Metal Gear — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:51:40 +0000

The Kahanist approach of opposing all Arabs is incorrect. Kahanists may have common enemies but they are only useful to an extent.

Kahanism is not the right path to fight Islamic extremism.

The neo-con path is not the right path either. Liberal democracy is not the right path when confronted with theological threats.

A third way is the real option.

Patriotardation – Religious Motivations

Metal Gear — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:22:47 +0000

On the right we have devoutly religious people and they worship YAWEH. On the left we have people who are religious but instead of worshiping YAWEH, they worship racial diversity.

Oh how I’d love to purge both the left and the right and bring an entirely new mentality to America!

Dispose of the Ruling Class – Jew or Gentile

Metal Gear — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:33:43 +0000

I want Hasidic Jews on my side and reject ant-Semitic views. But I don’t care how many pro-Establishment capitalist Jews do get “purged” (to say it non-violently) if they resist attempts to break up the capitalist power structure and replace it with a corporatist authoritarian power structure. All people who sympathize with the current system can metaphorically hang from a tree, even if they are Jews. I’m not advocating violence, just being frank about what I think about liberal capitalism.

The working class must not turn to egalitarianism but to authoritarian nationalism.

The Great Dream of White Proletarian Liberation

John Paul Cupp — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:48:17 +0000

Revolutionaries are dreamers and must always remain dreamers or they become borderline suicidal, uncontrollably angry and can’t even function marginally in the world. Having had the secular religious experience in our hearts, we can never possibly go back, because the People are our god and the Revolution is our path to the heavenly prospect of national, proletarian, and racial liberation. We must keep the deep feelings of youth in our hearts, but also become wise with age and experience. Always knowing that we are ready to find martyrdom at the hands of the Zionist Occupied Government, we must become scientific and materialist dreamers, not idealist or Utopian dreamers, for we live in an evolutionary and dialectical world.

Imagine a racial communist super-State comprising all of Europe and Russia and stretching across the reclaimed Siberian Land Bridge Project into White North America and includes Australia, New Zealand, Chile and Argentina in its project. Bloodline shall supersede geographical boundaries. This shall be the greatest civilizationational accomplishment in the entire history of the world. We are talking about the total victory of White Power over the conspiracy for our genocide, more than just racialism, but true socialism, and the rebirth of the neighborhood and family again.

Only within the racial communist super-state within a vast regionalist and ethno-nationalist framework and an organic ethnic local character can our people be saved and find their truly greatest era. Nationalism will only die when it is outmoded by racialism, and even then nationalism is an intricate part of our framework, not rootless cosmopolitanism. Our project to Pan-Africanism, Pan-Arabism, the Bolivarian project, is a brother in a common trench, but it goes deeper than theirs and reflects our true potential and the vanguard role which Darwinism demands of our people who constitute the biological aristocracy of world history.

For now we must address the miserable state of existence our people wallow in. We must painfully internalize the pain of knowing that as things stand now the White race may not even exist in years to come. We must feel the troubles and the brokenness of the middle aged crisis and the nihilistic teenager, the single mother and the white man down the street who just lost his job.

More than that we need to be beacons of light and hope. My own European-American nation already knows they are fucked, double fucked and then kicked in the head just for fun. They may not have some deeply advanced political analysis of how this is happening, but we don’t need to be doomsday prophesiers fullfilling a self-prophesying picture of defeat. We already have enough defeat. We need VISIONARIES.

The fact is the White race is NOT going to be exterminated and neither are we going to wind up being permantly ruined financially either, no matter how damn miserable things get. We haven’t survived since at least the Ice Ages and built some of the greatest civilizations the world has ever known just to go the way of the dodobird, and it isn’t going to happen as a result of Zionism, liberalism, finance capital or “globalization”, a vulgar euphenism for imperialism, today either.

In the end our people will fight!

Getting away from the areas closest to Hollyweird and Jew York and into the heartland, our masses own guns more than any other citizenry in the world per capita except north Korea. ZOG isn’t going to take our guns away, because the gun was brought into our psychology as small children learning the first and second amendment in school as if memorizing and idealizing bible versus. Our people still have some level of strong family life even though everything from meth to poverty to a lack of committment from men for our women and children is really blowing it for us big time. Unlike Jews, our people work for their money. They still know that it is important to have a self-reliant economy, community and healthy Teutonic work ethic and Celtic sense of identity. Even Lenin in his day admired our people’s powerful work ethic. Not only are we brilliant and creative, but we have the drive, muscle and determination to do something truly fanatastic. Things seem so aweful for us because we really are such a gifted and incredible people and anything but the best, especially the wallowing backwardsness of the era, is completely intolerable for our spirit. Drink can’t take that feeling away nor drugs nor finding a healthy partner who loves us to fill such void. The void comes from the need to freely express our intrensic nature for creative development, and hyper-alienation of the hour can only be eliminated with the new connect, the renassiance.

The redneck hates the intellectuals who betrayed him and hates his own organic intellectualism. Actually, this is true of the vast majority of just regular good ole’ all-American working people. Our people now think they are stupid, glorify at times the lowest common denominator of mass culture and have little hope in their hearts. If they had the hope they would be as brave as any Palestinian human bomb. You can see it in their eyes. You feel it when you go on a fishing trip or watch people drink coffee in the breakroom at work. You here it in the middle of the third quarter of a boring football game when the score is 24-7 and talk turns back to reality and not the images of distraction on the television screen. Maybe we can get some sort of healing going between nerds and rednecks, or all sorts of sub-cultural “groups” whose identity will eventually become meaningless in the new society anyways since we are the same people.

Our people aren’t going to become Nazis and they aren’t going to build the Bolshevik Revolution either. Our people are going to reclaim the neighborhood, and we need the trust of those who don’t trust fancy talk and only would be willing to work with those they learn to admire over a long period of time, leaders who either are organic or at least go out of their way to be as organic as possible to our conditions today. Our Lenin is going to be wearing a flannel shirt and blue jeans with a baseball cap. Maybe he worked at Dairy Queen when he was 16 and use to have a nice construction job making $20 an hour until that fell apart, or she is going to have concerns about the future of her children and sees beyond the phoney patriotism for the real patriotism of a mother for her cubs, watches her man become less of a man in his heart because he can’t provide the level of economic comfort he once did or thinks the family deserves.

We absolutely need violent extremism, because ZOG isn’t coming down without weapons and ammunition, but it has to be at the heart and soul of our people. It needs to be able to read the direction our people are going in without becoming too depressed when our people still cling to all sorts of self-defeating ideas. Violent extremism needs to have a dialectical compass that will do the best it can to find what is useful in our people, something that provides a dynamism and gets people to feel they aren’t part of some political group, but a LIBERATION STRUGGLE.

We need the equivelant of “Allahu Akbar!” to racial national materialism, a scientific battle cry, but one with deep religious emotion.

Nothing starts automatically. Revolutions don’t come about because of spontaneous collapse of “the system” but because they are built and mature so that when conditions are ripe they can mature.

2010 has come, let’s each vow to take concrete steps towards building things on the ground, and yes we need the regular “activists” too, but let’s push for getting the bulwark of our people who aren’t in any sort of group at all and are instinctively distrustful of them. To do that we must reject politics as usual and push for an uncompromising battle cry of liberation without being sectarian and splitting hairs over stupid ass secondary differances, many of which the people may eventually agree with us on through persuasion, anyways.

Let us each brainstorm in the coming weeks ideas for what we each are going to do, even if it is just some meetings and get togethers as a first start, to actually build something on the ground. Ask yourself how you are going to get those pissed off people with radical ideas that just float back into mainstream society into our National Front. We have to build things, even small ones, because it provides the mutual support against alienation at the very least, and has unlimited upwards potential beyond just that.

Long live the White race!

Long live the communist revolution!

Let us vow to die in the trenches of combat before ever even considering the thought of surrendering our European-American Nation!

…And a Happy New Year

Free Media Productions Staff — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:41:38 +0000

Arab Ba’athism : Secular Liberation

Metal Gear — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:44:50 +0000

This piece is directly inspired by Constantin Von Hoffmeister’s : “Jewish Bolshevism, European Liberation.” It involves both modifications and original thoughts. It is a “remix.”

Mr. Hussein is a strong advocate of progress under the banner of secularism and a united Arab destiny. Mr. Hussein believes that a dictatorial government that force-feeds modernization is a shortcut to progress. He is convinced that such an approach will catapult the backward Arab world, starting with Iraq, into the next century.
-New York Times

The Ba’athist movment was and is clearly run by mainly Caucasoid Arabs (of course there is some racial variation), of Mediterranean appearance in Syria and of partial Iranid mixture in Iraq, who claim religious beliefs from Christianity, to Islam, to atheism, to even Judaism. It was a Jewish mother who convinced Saddam Hussein’s mother not to abort him. While many Muslims participate, an important point in their worldview is the separation of church and state. Ba’thists enthusiastically embrace secularism and technological progress and oppose Sharia law. In addition, the Iraqi Ba’athists embraced the Soviet Union, logically becoming allies of third positionists as nationalists who are conscious of the dangers of capitalism. The Ba’thist Arabs were not religious fanatics but progressive Human Beings. “American” imperialists targeted the Ba’athists not because they were a theological threat, but out of Corporate greed. There was no link between Al-Qaeda and Ba’athism, so the war was fought under false pretenses.

Arab Ba’thists strongly resisted and continue to resist a global capitalist structure that not only keeps them enslaved but also the majority of the world. Hence, Arab Ba’thists and their American, European and Israeli Third Positionist brothers should work actively together to smash imperialistic ideologies like capitalism, Shia fundamentalism, Sunni fundamentalism and mainstream Torah Zionism (secular Zionism is okay) wherever possible! HAIL the heroic Ba’athists! Only those who do not understand the material falsehoods of Abrahamic theology do not appreciate the hard work that they did for the betterment of progressive thinking. The accomplishments of the Arab Ba’athists should be remembered by any self-respecting race realist and anti-capitalist nationalist.

While the Middle East, North Africa and Near East are now enslaved by a reactionary religion, at one point Arabs were major contributors to paganism and technical progress. Saddam Hussein set out to progress his people scientifically at the expense of religion in the same way that Stalin did! The regime in Israel which the Ba’thists opposed was nothing but a puppet for American interests. America stabbed Saddam Hussein in the back, and logically he had to respond with defiance. But this does not mean that Saddam Hussein was fixated on killing Jews. Being a secular man, I firmly believe that Saddam Hussein was open minded enough to embrace the right Israel if it wasn’t aligned against his interests behind America.

How do Clerics view the Ba’athists? As traitors to Islam who need to be decapitated!

HAIL the Ba’athist Arabs! Good fascists most of them… HAIL the ideology and the pragmatic results of its applications!

Some Arabs supported the Ba’thist Revolution to liberate the Arabs from the possibility of encroaching Sharia Law while others chose to side with the non-Arab South Asians who worship an Arabian religion in Iran. The Ba’thist Arabs that sacrificed their lives to aid the destruction of Sharia law and liberal capitalism were spiritually connected to Europeans and secular Israelis that fought for the same goal. It is absolutely correct to distinguish between good Arabs and bad Arabs. It is retarded to throw all Arabs into the same pot, declaring them enemies of progressive civilization. After all, historical evidence suggests otherwise. Besides, many Arabs were and are similar to Europeans, both culturally and racially. All were pagan and now all are ruled by Abraham’s creed (Christianity, Judaism and Islam come from Abraham)! Physically, Bashar al-Assad is the president of Syria, and he is DEFINITELY Mediterranean in appearance, similar to a person in Southern Europe. Is Saddam Hussein non-White? No. Is Ralph Nader non-White? No. Is Steve Jobbs non-White? No.

Arabs as a group are not the enemy. Massive immigration of Arabs into Europe, and Islamic imperialism are the enemy, but not Arabs in a physical sense just because they are Arabs. Theocratic nuts are the enemy. Failing to realize the genetic link between Europe and the Middle East is anthropology for a crippled mind. A lot of Arabs look Mediterranean in appearance, a few are actually blondish, and a few have a particular “Arabid” type which is still Caucasoid. There are, however, negroids who live in Arab countries and have mixed, and they should not be confused with the indigenous Arabs. In the case of Iraq, Iranian admixture is present (Persians are not Arabs). There is variation in phenotype internal to the Arab linguistic group just like there is variation in phenotype internal to the Hispanic linguistic group, Soviet Geographical group and American geographical group. Nevertheless the majority of Arabs are Caucasoid, with some variation in appearance from the Peninsula to the Gulf to the fertile crescent.

Islam is a reactionary religion. Iraq was a secular state and therefore indefinitely more progressive than the Islamic “republics” surrounding it. Most Arabs in Iraq opposed sharia law while other Muslims are religious fanatics. Why a socialist should support religious fanatics instead of rational secularists is beyond me. Ba’thism is a beacon of communitarianism. This is why it is necessary that Arabs orient themselves towards either Ba’thism or Social Nationalism (another secular party in Syria) instead of towards a capitalist liberalist AmeriKa or Sharia law. Social nationalists fringe movements and mainstream Ba’thist movements are trying to push Arabs in that direction. Only modernism can guarantee communitarian stability in the Middle East, if necessary by force. After all, it has been conclusively proven that hardcore Muslims are incapable of uniting themselves, for whatever cause. Muslims are by nature tribal and factional but Saddam Hussein brought many people together under his rule. Ba’athists are more industrious than theocrats as well. This is why Iraq remained a techno-progressive labor nation while Muslim nations reverted to their medieval (and natural) state of tribal and nomadic desert communities. While Saddam looked towards the future, Muslims longed to live in the past.

Iraq was a race realist tribal state which is superior to a liberal state. If Iraq was only a liberal state, it would have been defeated by Islam. But since Ba’athists are of a different mindset than Theocrats, Iraq adamantly resisted Iran. This is a good thing. Actually, to civilize the Middle East, Iraq was correct to invade Iran and Ku’wait. The effects of reactionary imperialism could be erased with progressive imperialism. Of course, for this to happen, Iraq needed the support of America, which backstabbed it, and could have benefited from a Euro-Siberian Empire.

East Germans Lost Very Much in 1989

Free Media Productions Staff — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:34:34 +0000

From Northstar Compass (Nov./Dec. 2009 ed).

By BRUNIDE LA MOTTE
Guardian newspaper
UK Nov/ 8/09

On November 9, 1989 when the Berlin Wall came down I realized that German unification would soon follow, which it did a year later. That meant the end of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), the country in which I was born, grew up, gave birth to my two children, gained my Doctorate and enjoyed a fulfilling job as a lecturer at Potsdam University. The union brought wealth for some, but it also brought social breakdown, widespread unemployment, blacklisting, a crass materialism and an “elbow society” as well as demonisation of the country I lived in and helped shape it. Despite some advantages, for most it was more a disaster than a celebratory event.

Here are just two. My best friend, a foreign languages teacher, lost her job and was then blacklisted because, at the time the wall fell, she was teaching at the GDR Law College. She wasn’t a member of the Party or a political activist. After much searching she managed to find a job helping students who were excluded from school, because their parents were working in the GDR Government.

My brother who has a PhD in Philosophy of Science, lost his research job at the GDR Academy of Sciences, and ever since has only been able to find odd low-paying temporary jobs.

After the Wall was torn down more than 85% of industrial enterprises were sold to private firms in West Germany. More than 1.7 million of hectares of agricultural and forest lands were sold off and 80% of agricultural workers lost their jobs.

In 1990 the GDR economy plunged into bankruptcy when the hasty “currency union” was imposed by the West. The results were that the GDR export products rose in price by 450% overnight and were no longer competitive and thus the West gained more markets at the expense of GDR and the working people who became unemployed on a massive scale.

In the GDR everyone had a home, a guaranteed job, health care and all benefits that the socialist GDR gave to the people. After the unification close to 3,000,000 claims by non-GDR citizens were made on the GDR citizens’ homes! Most of the GDR citizens lost their homes to West Germans that were abetted by the West. Scores of GDR citizens committed suicide when they were evicted from their homes that they and their children grew up in.

That’s the price of the forced reunification and the sell off by traitors like Gorbachev and others!

Dismantling the logic of Judeo-Obsessives

Metal Gear — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:19:35 +0000

It’s common knowledge that the internet (with its anonymous nature) is filled with people who are obsessed with Jews and endlessly abuse those who promote opposing viewpoints. Encountering such people, I have always found them illogical and debated them. I have withstood the most blatant abuse from peers over my refusal to allow myself to be manipulated by the illogical and ridiculous behavior of anti-Semites. Just look at arguewitheveryone forums, discuss anything forums or any website. Jews are always a frequent topic. I’m sick of the topic and I’m killing all the birds with one stone, making this my knock out blow and linking to it in my forum signature.

Racialist Anti-Semitism
The basic logic behind the hardcore anti-Semite who operates under a racialist platform is that Jews are responsible for “white genocide” (mass immigration, liberalism, Third World and Black criminality) therefore Jews should be exterminated to save the white race. Black nationalist anti-Semitism is a little more logical than white racialism, as it hates Jews as Whites. But white nationalists are about the most retarded people I’ve ever seen on the internet.

I won’t even talk morally. I’ll debunk this argument logically.

Jews do not control people’s minds. For every Jew that supports the status quo, they do not force gentiles to follow along. Jews are irrelevant without the support of Gentiles in a liberal Democratic system. There is no dictatorship in America. The responsibility to resist liberalism lies on the white gentile majority, not the Jews! When Jews say “jump,” the rest of the society does not have to say “how high?”

Crazy people point out that Jews have promoted lies and falsehoods and think they have won the argument. The fact that Jews are disproportionately involved in promoting programs that are formed in egalitarian obsession is forgivable if similar-minded crazy Jew haters have always existed as they always have. Yes I’m advocating a double standard. Historically, racial awareness has been perverted by anti-Semitic lunatics who are more interested in Jews than human biology. Jewish anti-racists are more innocent than other anti-racists, because of the historical anti-Jewish nature of racialism. It’s an unnecessary obsession that only rednecks advocate and can be corrected with a more refined version of racialism. Also consider that other groups, such as Irish Catholics, have been very active in anti-racist ideological activism.

Some Jews may know they are lying, some may be naive, some may be scared, some may not even consider their Jewishness to be important, but it doesn’t matter. Crazy people have always existed and focused on Jews, so Jewish behavior is forgivable. The double standard is logical. The Jews are not “advocating a genocide.” All of America is complicit. Most of these people do not even understand liberal capitalism!

Jews as non-Whites
Note : I have to clarify that I’m referring to the majority of Jews for this argument. There are of course individual Jews of every racial makeup imaginable. But I’m talking about the majority of Jews.

There is the argument that Jews are non-Whites but only an ignorant redneck unschooled in the very definition of race would deny that Europeans, Jews and in fact many Middle Eastern and North African populations belong to the same race with Ashkenazi Jews usually clustering around Armenians, Georgians and Turks and ranging in phenotype. Eurasia is a single continent! These crazy people actually believe that because Jewish Caucasoids and European Caucasoids lived in different continents for part of history, they are no longer the same race!

The same Northern Middle Eastern basic “type” which formed the original European peoples is closely related to the Jews who later randomly mixed with Europeans in controlled quantities. Phenotype internal to the Caucasoid race is more about sexual selection (with the climate playing a roll) than common ancestry. Hence Jews look “different” in Northern and Southern Europe, even if they are linked by some ancestry. Likewise, Gentile Mediterraneans in both Southern Europe and the Near East look similar because of the climate. Blondism and blue eyes have existed since the birth of the Caucasoid race, but have only become more common in environments which encourage it. As noted above, Some Jews who are genetically clearly Jewish look Northern European.

Typology is outdated and most reasonable people know that mutations in DNA often are unrelated to phenotype. The Basques and Finns prove this, as while they frequently show greater genetic distance from Europe than Jews do (at least by Y Chromosome), Basques still look like Spaniards and Finns still look like Northern Europeans. But Biblical Jews and Ashkenazi Jews are both clearly of the same race of Europeans, as are Berbers and a good amount of Arabs. Jews can be “distinguished” from other nationalities. But guess what, each nationality can also be distinguished as can individuals on a genetic level. You can be distinguished from your mother and father. It applies to other races too. Chinese and Japanese can be distinguished.

Orthodox Jews may grow beards like Amish people and Arabs while wearing hats, but biologically, they are white. Period.

Anti-Zionist Anti-semitism
It’s funny to watch people jump on a moral high horse on the issue of Zionism while falsely pretending to be communists, atheists and racialists. People claim to reject abstract morality then oppose Zionism on humanitarian grounds! What a joke! I hope the Zionists expose the barbaric nature of Sharia law so that something can be done to rectify it!

“Material conditions” cause you to oppose Zionism. Bullshit, Islam is a feudal religion.

Christian and Muslim Anti-Semitism
Jews have contributed to the world theologically. Now I’m an atheist but I respect the winner. A group of people who invented an Abrahamic religion (Judeo-Christian-Islam) that has taken the world by storm deserve credit. The religion may be flawed, but it’s ideas have shaped the world. Now Anton Lavey, another ethnic Jew, is coming to destroy the Abrahamic religion that has outlived its usefulness. Christian and Islamic “anti-Semites” are plagiarists who stole their religion from Jews. Enough said.

Marxism
Marxist anti-Semitism is retarded. Even though Trotsky may have been treasonous, Marx (an ethnic Jew) provided the original foundation for Communism and Jews in massive numbers supported the revolution. The redneck crowd may say that this justifies a right wing Anti-Semitism, but it does not. However evil Lenin may have been (the only Communist leader with any Jewish ancestry, 1/4), the Tzars were more evil. However crazy Communism is, liberal Democracy is more crazy. Only third position authoritarianism can correct.

Atheistic Anti-Semitism
Jews may have founded the Abrahamic religion, but the most crazy and fanatical adherents are rarely Jews and Judaism by nature does not seek to impose itself on others by killing those who won’t support it. Jews are not a threat to atheists, and many people born Jewish become atheists. The same cannot be said about Islam. The Jewish contributions to the sciences is obvious.

I have dismantled basically every argument in this post. I’ve killed many birds with one stone and will link to this article permanently.

Happy 130th Birthday Comrade Stalin!

Free Media Productions Staff — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:32:06 +0000

December 21, 2009 marks the occasion of the 130th anniversary of the birth of Ioseb Besarionis dze Jugashvili.

Free Media Productions would like to take this opportunity to wish a very Happy 130th Birthday to the late General Secretary, Josef Stalin!

Let us commemorate this day as a tribute to him! Long Live the Great Leader and Teacher of the Socialist Motherland!

Blame Abrahamic Religion

Metal Gear — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:44:53 +0000

Philosophies like Judaism, Christianity and Islam to the extent they are against the materialistic conclusions of both racialism and Marxism. While racialists and Marxists have elements of their thought process grounded in materialism, nationalism recognizes the nature of reality and uses it to strive for ideals.

There is a difference between Torah “Zionism” and supporting Jewish self-determination under the philosophy of secular nationalism. A Torah Zionist can be an ally to the extent they reconcile their views, but secularists are more likely to ally. Perhaps Jews and Arabs (many of which are racially Caucasoid, but that’s not the point) could even work together in the name of a Third Positionist ideology that focused less on religion.

Socialist Jurisprudence

Free Media Productions Staff — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:31:05 +0000

In his monumental legal work on the science of jurisprudence in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), entitled The Law of the Soviet State (1948), Comrade Andrei Vyshinsky (Procurator-General of the Soviet Union, Deputy People’s Commissar of Foreign Affairs and later Minister of Foreign Affairs), reaffirmed the Marxist-Leninist concept of the law:

Law is the totality (a) of the rules of conduct, expressing the will of the dominant class and established in legal order, and (b) of customs and rules of community life sanctioned by state authority – their application being guaranteed by the compulsive force of the state in order to guard, secure, and develop social relationships and social orders advantageous and agreeable to the dominant class.

This simple thesis and observation was not new to Vyshinsky, but an objective characteristic of all legal systems, dating back to even the most primitive and ancient forms of historical jurisprudence.

But the difference between bourgeois jurisprudence and socialist legality is not only the necessary transition of state authority from one dominant class to the other (from bourgeoisie to proletariat), but is distinctively marked by the unity of theory and praxis. Unlike bourgeois “Constitutionalism,” as seen in Western liberal capitalist democratic states, the legal system of the Soviet Union was exemplified by this normative and descriptive cohesion. The most demonstrative evidence exists in the lack of so-called “Constitutional protections” that reflect vague or abstract principles whose validity exists beyond the realm of the material world, but a real-life reflection of the existing conditions prevalent in Soviet social relations.

Proceedings in 1945 trial of Polish nationalist-military conspirators

The above characteristic serves as the fundamental basis for the social, economic and political transformation of jurisprudence from capitalism to socialism; further evidence to socialist jurisprudence as the most progressive, scientific and fundamentally correct application of the law to have ever existed in history.

100 Jahre Enver Hoxha!

Free Media Productions Staff — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:19:14 +0000

Wage, Labor and Profit

Free Media Productions Staff — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:19:58 +0000

It’s common knowledge that within the system of private ownership of the means of production, profit is derived from the exploitation of the working class. Those who own the instruments of production pay their workers less than their value of labor, thus, the surplus extracted is what’s known as “profit.”

But coinciding with this basic characteristic of parasitic capitalism, is the active efforts by the bourgeoisie to increase the amount of profit extracted from workers – by lowering wages – even $1 per hour.

The following example was recently published in the November 2009 edition of the North Star Compass:

If a capitalist pays his workers just $1 less per hour – let’s say $10 instead of $11 – which doesn’t seem to be such a great difference – but, based on one year amounting to 2,000 hours, the employer takes $2,000 from the pocket of each employee and puts it into his own pocket.

If he employs 100 workers, his profit amounts to $200,000. If his company employs 1,000 workers, his handsome profit amounts to $2,000,000. per year – and so forth and so on.

Using all sorts of tax deductions allowed by the Government, he would pay less than $300,000 in taxes, which will leave him with a handsome profit of over $4,800,000.

It is very simple to understand! The ONLY way the rich get richer is by the poor getting poorer!

On the term “Stalinism”

Free Media Productions Staff — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:59:33 +0000

We’ve received a few questions from readers inquiring about the use of the term “Stalinism.”

J.V. Stalin

As a matter of historical fact, this term was never used by Josef Stalin himself, as he considered himself an ardent student of Marx, Engels and Lenin – in effect, a “Marxist-Leninist.”

The term itself was coined by one of Stalin’s closest and most loyal associates and comrades-in-arms, Lazar Kaganovich. Comrade Kaganovich communicated that “Stalinism” constituted a higher theoretical level in the application of Marxist-Leninist principles as evidenced in the unprecedented achievements of the Soviet Union.

While never in “official” use within the Soviet Union, the term did enjoy an impressive amount of publicity within the Soviet press – including its employment in editorials, news reports and other media.

That being said, the term was hijacked by anti-Soviet parties, most notably the followers of the renegade Leon Trotsky, as a pejorative, with the propagandistic intention of portraying Stalin’s application of Marxism-Leninism as somehow distinct (read heretical) from “orthodox” Marxism-Leninism.

These groundless accusations notwithstanding, there’s absolutely no principled contradistinction between “Stalinism” and “Marxism-Leninism,” as both employ the basic foundations of the dialectical materialist method in accordance with objective of establishing scientific socialism.

That’s also not to say that Stalin didn’t incorporate serious theoretical contributions to Marxist-Leninist thought, including his insights into Marxism and the National Question, the aggravation of class-struggle within socialism and a very important dialectical assessment of Marxism and linguistics.

Eastern Europe crippled under worldwide capitalist crisis

Free Media Productions Staff — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:26:34 +0000

The latest crisis to befall worldwide capitalism has left its mark all over the globe; however, the most notable examples of outright resistance to the capitalist wage-labor system, and all its innate failures, has been most prominent among the agitated working classes of Eastern Europe.

Following the 1989 counter-revolution by the revisionist General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), Mikhail Gorbachev, which brought about the political dissolution of the Soviet Union and later the reversion of socialism to capitalism throughout Eastern Europe, systematic privatization of the means of production almost immediately resulted in the chaotic social transformation that have yet to be resolved, even 20 years thereafter.

Though some degree of stability was achieved in a few select states, the socio-economic consequences of the worldwide capitalist crisis that began in 2007 have revitalized Eastern Europe’s revolutionary proletariat – the most advanced social class in history – into taking direct, collective action against the ruling classes marked with a characteristic increase in sentiments favorable towards the re-socialization of the means of productions.

The most “hailed” private economies of the former Soviet and socialist bloc, including Poland, Latvia and the Ukraine, have now become plagued with economic instability and that have made them profoundly unattractive to foreign capital. Latvia, for instance, is on the brink of seeing a 20 per cent reduction in its gross national product. The former Ukrainian SSR, which was once hailed as a bastion of Western capital investment, has now seen its economic growth curbed back to pre-2003 levels. And Poland, whose regime is the most virulently reactionary of all the former socialist states, is now considered a major risk for defaulting on national debts.

The revolutionary transformation of the oppressed working peoples of Eastern Europe has not gone unnoticed by the ruling class regime, where in many cases unfathomable laws banning the public display of symbols associated with the labor and communist movement (such as the sickle and hammer, or the five-pointed red star). Such policies demonstrate the ruling classes’ growing anxiety over the rising threat of open insurrection against the self-destructive policies of the capitalist wage-labor system and all its insufferable calamities.

Support Islamism and Pan-Arabism!

John Paul Cupp — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:53:15 +0000

The only thing that deeply scares the Zionist Occupied Government enemy regime more than the proletarian shouts of “White Power!” as bullets fly through the streets is the monotheistic affirmation by a heroic and Jihadic Mujahid of “Allahu Akbar!” Hence any conscious European-American, including the Christians, must uphold and understand the need for critical unity against the common hated enemy of humanity – the Jews – and against the extermination of either of our peoples.

I speak here of White Power, not so much as a chauvinistic, divisive, and predatory project aligned with imperialism, but an all-encompassing civilizational project belonging to the popular classes of European-Americans stemming from their deep brokenness and desire for self-determination, one constituting the path and national constants by which any of our revolutionary patriots must travel if seeking to place our people on the solid footings of the resistance option.

The Arab brother or sister in his or her psychology does not recognize the existence of race, genetics, and bloodline in the formation of national identity today, but what they must understand is that our people’s racialism in their nationalism, like that of Garveyism amongst the Africans, is a progressive racialism that simply demonstrates the incompatibility of linear universal definitions of a nation.

Michel Aflaq, even during his Christian years, demonstrated persuasively the centrality of Islam in the make up of Arabism and the formation and expansion of the Arab nation, and hence developing a three-dimensional view of the Arab nation and bonds of the Ummah stemming from the progressive formation of the Caliphate, including its positive effects on Christians and other non-Muslims. This too is a serious error according to dogmatic Western Marxists and cosmopolitan leftists. Hence, we need to speak of the need for the self-determination of peoples, rather than pretending such peoples formed along five common points, and build real true fighting solidarity with one another.

While the Arab and Muslim will launch the immediate complaint about “racism,” and I do not dispute that our people are full of reactionary and chauvinistic social roles, I plead for them to understand that our people are consistently fed by the Jews and cosmopolitan leftists illusions that they are the only nationality in world history to have developed an advanced civilization that lacks a right to self-determination and must suffer and die needlessly. This brainwashing comes as a total assault on the dignity of our people and a direct provocation to push our people towards the camp of conservative and reactionary forces. The problem is intensified by the lack any real significant revolutionary anti-imperialist project capable of correcting our people’s reactionary social roles and ideas, and also capable of demonstrating a love for a our people, a truly proletariat platform, and the demonstrated ability to seize power.

You Arabs have your qualms with the Iranian Safawid for having overstepped their borders and for having decided to play an opportunist role against the Jihad of beloved Iraq and fellow Islamic brother Afghanistan (and who is frankly for us our Aryan cousin!), but you never put into question that there is an Iranian people or contend that Iranian people should be exterminated rather than simply have their hegemony fought and self-determination exercised solely in their natural borders. Indeed, most peoples have had problems with their neighbors over the years. This is true also of the Turks, and indeed only filth of the Zionist entity is treated to the scorn of unconditional non-recognition, and this for the very survival and unification of your nation and the liberation of al-Quds.

For us the problem is greater. First, there is the very real attempt by the Jews and their lackeys on the Western “left” to foment hatred by the world’s people for the White race and the European-American in particular. They claim such attempts at forming anti-White hatred and White self-hatred are not an deliberate platform of promoting globalism, but supposedly because of an eternal grudge because of the policies of colonialism and imperialism. The super-majority of our popular class had absolutely no control over these polices. Indeed, many occurred so many centuries before the birth of anyone living today that it would be idiotic to assign blame to anyone.

The European-Americans, like many peoples today, and indeed much of the White race, at least throughout much of Western Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand plays a largely reactionary and unbearable social role, but this does not deny a very real and ancient Jewish conspiracy to either subjugate or destroy us alongside many other brotherly national, racial, and spiritual groups.

The Zionist assaults center on 1948 Palestine and on affirming the Arab character, but on a global and historical level it does NOT end there, and it didn’t begin there either.
Just to read the Old Testament, the Jews have been committing genocide since their very inception, and according to the Babylonian Talmud they want to exterminate Christians, believe Jesus of is boiling in semen, and wish to rule over the goyim. One may note correctly that today’s Jews are the descendants of the Khazar Kingdom and not the people of the Old Testament, but what is significant is that such people subjectively identify by this vulgarity and base their “spirituality” and supposed “national” mythos around it.

Today the Jews who for centuries persecuted Christians and were justly crushed and regularly defeated and exiled have turned the Western Church in a brothel of cannibalism, that is to say a Synagogue of Christ-killers and national nihilist speculators in the name of the Jesus they martyred. Martin Luther’s wise instructions calling on Christians to exile Jews, burn down their synagogues, business and homes, and even kill them if necessary have been ignored and covered up with disastrous consequences for the popular masses of the world.

Now Islam stands beside nationalism in a war of attrition against a globalist enemy led by Jews and Zionist America.

While I espouse socialism and even communism, I cannot in good conscience and without feeling like a traitor to my people and the revolution, but denounce the Western “Left” and most “socialists and communists” for their cosmopolitanism and opportunism.

The right-wing anti-Zionists and White Nationalist camp have HUGE flaws at times. Some are so stupid they think the real enemy are African-Americans who seek self-determination or that we should support Z.O.G. soldiers killing freedom fighter who are resisting a common enemy.
This, however, is not the case for all White Nationalists and “patriotic” forces who if not White Nationalist in name are in content. Some groups cheered the September 11th attacks. Some groups reject the Zionist entity’s right to exist. Some even support attacks on US troops and know that this whole thing is going to come down to needing the maximum amount of unity possible to bring down the Jews and American regime and that we need each other.

My colleague Kevin Walsh and I who started the European-American Socialist Front (EASPF) have such lines and openly support national liberation struggles, the socialist bloc, and advocate self-determination for the Black and White nations alike in the present day United States. When we interact with the European-American streets and White nationalism as a whole, we are finding little pockets here or there that may not get published or openly noticed, but who understand that the paleo-conservativism of the old school White Nationalism isn’t going to cut it, and are beginning to see the need for patriots of all over the world to have international solidarity with each other against a common enemy.

Likewise one can think of a million Arabs, Muslims, and groups and people from traditionally Islamic countries who are traitors, opportunists, or if genuine are retarded, sectarian, or foolish. That doesn’t mean we should dump the whole of Arabia and the Ummah down the drain. It means that ALL people have to undergo ideological struggle to build and maintain the resistance option. My people have a lot to learn, but we also have a lot to offer.

We have so many elements who worship the system and are slaves to the Jews, but like the Islamic psychology we value martyrdom amongst our “fringe” elements. Look at the number of domestic bombings and internal military attacks (i.e. Timothy McVeigh and “The Order”) against the system as well as the amount of presidential and other political assassinations my people have achieved. Just this week a young European-American appears to have wanted to assassinate Barack Obama, and contrary to the liberal politically correct Zionist distortions that this is just racism, the brother supposedly joked or taunted about getting Bush the little or how someone should get him.
It’s just simply that we are in the center of imperialism. People who deep down hope Iraq kicks Z.O.G. America’s ass aren’t going to often say so. Furthermore, lots and lots of my people alongside African-Americans and others would be willing to take on an enemy if they believed in the probability of victory.

It’s OUR job build the path of hope, to build the united front.

Now is not the time for splitting hairs. We don’t have to all agree. A racialist pagan and a racial nihilist Salafi jihadi may not share much in common on a day to day level, but if they both hate the Jews and the American government, if they both understand the need for collective action to ensure the destiny and greatness of one’s own nationality and the stability and prosperity of the world, then WE HAVE THE MAKINGS FOR A UNITED FRONT AGAINST THE JEWS AND THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

Let us march in solidarity, in the spirit of love we each feel for our heritage and people, and in such spirit let us unite to destroy the common hated enemies of us all!

“Third Positionist” is too broad a term

Metal Gear — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:21:38 +0000

I am gaining an increasing disdain for clerical fascism, nazism, traditionalism and anything that does not understand the industrial-bureaucratic nature of dictatorship. The most profitable lie of the Soviets is that Fascism and Nazism were indistinguishable. Fascism is worth rehabilitating, as it is basically strengthening the state to correct the problems caused by liberalism and true capitalism. Unlike simple traditionalism, it intends to permanently strengthen the state. In other words, not just long enough to fight revolutionaries, but permanently. Nazism and Clerical fascism are based on myths. While far less evil than Nazism, and certainly more of an ally to rational thinking people, even Torah Zionism is based on myths. Revisionist Zionism is not, however.

I think for the purpose of defining movements that correct class warfare via nationalism, the term is adequate but otherwise it is overly broad. I’ll still continue to use it to categorize posts though. There is a big difference between using a state to discourage class warfare, which is fascism, and using genocides in a misguided attempt to remove class conflict, which is Croatian Nationalism and Nazism. One method actually works and the other doesn’t. One method is actually an ideology and the other is just prejudice disguised as ideology.

This is not a denial of race; I believe in race but I don’t think Neo-Nazis are good anthropologists and I don’t think it should be central to every single political question. I would venture to say that liberals would still consider me a racist, even though I am a more general right wing authoritarian. I do not support any massive immigration. If the massive immigration came from the Ukraine into Russia or Vice-versa, I’d still oppose it. Not to mention, I don’t think neo-nazis and their supporters know what they are talking about when it comes to human biodiversity, but even so, race should not be the answer to every political question. Yes I oppose aggressive globalization done in the name of “modernization” as a way to troll society. Liberal globalists take us for idiots. But this is not the same thing as basing all politics off of race.

The European-American National Liberation Struggle

John Paul Cupp — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:07:23 +0000

If you ask me if I am a patriot, as a Communist and son of the nation, my obligation and honor would be to affirm a resounding “Yes!” However, telling our people the truth, when they roll around in their own feces and then rejoice of salvation and pride, is my supreme duty both as a patriot and a proletarian internationalist.

The Zionist-controlled American government is the most evil and reactionary government the modern world has ever seen. In collusion with globalist stooges and petty imperialists, the Jews have demonstrated an evil conspiracy of death and destruction. Contrary to conventional wisdom, our own people aren’t so far down the totem pole from the Palestinians in this sinister plot for the subjugation of all nations.

Hence, while our people in the US don’t need to be excessively disparaged and demoralized as done by Western “leftists,” they do play a whole series of reactionary social roles and cling to a whole series of opportunistic self-defeating tenets deeply embedded in their psychology. Getting to the root of this destruction takes precedence above and beyond pragmatism and political expediency.

The lines of the “left” and right promoted to our people are treasonously criminal and will get us nowhere. Racial and national nihilism, anti-family degeneracy, and anti-moral lines fomented by the “left” on behalf of their Jewish and globalist masters break down the solidarity of our working class, and promote cosmopolitanism, Zionism and imperialism. Likewise, the rightist, “traditionalist,” and so-called “patriotic” crowd’s promotion of so-called “American Nationalism,” this satanic anti-Christian cult of Judeo- “Christianity,” and the spreading of illusions that paleo-conservativism is a viable alternative to neo-conservativism, are all criminal plots leading to the physical extermination of millions upon millions of people.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front (EASPF), has an extensive amount of material combating the anti-White, philo-Semitic, and cosmopolitan lines of the contemporary “left.” Hence, I wish to devote this article to combating reactionary ideas and behavior on the Right which stem from our people and are the very heart and soul of our people’s humiliating self-defeat today.

First, we shall take on the myth that this greedy and bloodthirsty banker’s prison house of nations, America, is any sort of real country and one to which our patriotism should attach itself. Second, we shall analyze the origins and consequences of Judeo-“Christianity,” and demonstrate conclusively that whatever one personally thinks of genuine Christianity, is not a form of Christianity at all, but rather violently contrary to it. Third, we shall analyze the origins and scope of conservativism within the United States, and the relationship between paleo-conservativism which openly promotes US imperialism and neo-conservatism invented by Jewish Trotskites which dominates the leading quarters of imperialism today, to show that while objectively anti-imperialist at times, paleo-conservativism ultimately fails as a program of liberation. We shall throughout this piece demonstrate the role of the Jewish enemy, and the particular conspiracy they hatched long ago to exterminate our people and subjugate all the peoples of the world while destroying their distinct ways of life. Lastly, we shall affirm the call for total war and resistance by our people towards both international solidarity and the formation of the liberated European-American Democratic People’s Republic, one ideally to carry forward with socialist construction.

America is the enemy of our people and the world

The now deceased White Separatist guerrilla fighter turned resistance detainee David Lane, whose “14 words” were to become the bedrock of a quasi-national democratic line among White Nationalists, whatever other major differences I have with him, made clear that America is our enemy.

“Determined to destroy the integrity of races, nations and cultures for the Zionist New World Order, The Red, White, and Blue traveling man’s murder machine has been an engine of holocaust, genocide, and death unmatched in human history.

But still the CRAP wraps logic five times around a crooked tree to proclaim themselves “American Patriots” who support “Our Boys” as they bomb helpless nations into the Stone Age and blow tens of thousands or millions of women and children into tiny fragments. Always looking for someone else to blame, the CRAP screams, it’s the Jews, it’s the Jews. Well I’d be the last to deny that the media is dominated by Jews who have an agenda of world domination and of extinction for White Aryans.” — Excerpt from “C.R.A.P. Christian Right-wing American Patriots.”

Indeed, while we must condemn and oppose the Jews and Zionists, Lane’s self-criticism of our people who come from such quarters is completely on the mark, and in this case he was referring to Christian Right-wing American Patriots as “CRAP”. One could go much further in condemning pro-Americanism from amongst our people, because even the more mediocre trends within our genuinely nationalist and anti-globalist quarters are a tiny fraction of the overall European-American populace. Most of our people have no problem whatever, not only with the mass-murder and subjugation of peoples, with the government and ruling classes who perform such crimes against our people and the world, or even with the Jews. Hence, fierce ideological struggle is the first order of the day.

The same GI mercenary goons occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, may death and suffering be upon them, are the very army that will be mass-murdering our people in the streets in the event a genuine revolutionary struggle stems from them. Supposedly “anti-government” rednecks and Southern Nationalists usually whine to no end about “terrorism” and “supporting the troops,” and yet were a Confederate Army or any other anti-government formation by our people to be created, this same government would be calling them “terrorists,” and it would be US troops and police who work to destroy them.

How can this possibly be White Power when the enemy multicultural hellhole bombs hapless Serbia, that is a White Aryan traditionally Christian people and the last truly great European-descended force of resistance, and destroys what was then the last revolutionary unitary project of White Europe, i.e. Yugoslavia? Tomislav Sunic and those like him who invent the existence of a “communist threat” to justify race treason and aiding imperialism in turning brother against brother must rejected.

Can we really believe the Cold War was a good thing? It was Zionism and Jewish finance capital that acted as the shock force for world imperialism in bringing down the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was no more Jewish and Zionist at that point than a Palestinian human bomb, having long since purged the eternal enemy from Soviet and Eastern European power. Can we really believe pointing missiles and nuclear bombs at our White brothers and sisters in Europe because they liberated themselves from finance capital is a form of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the world? Would our people have benefited from White European-descended peoples dropping nuclear weapons on one another? Can we really believe this was even about communism, and not rather a conspiracy of aggression against our continental mother’s womb, just as this same enemy targeted Germany for annihilation by fire twice and has done to our brothers and sisters throughout Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East? I mean just look today and we see Russia isn’t run by Communists, but yet ZOG America’s ruling classes are still bound and determined to provoke another Cold War, crying to no end against the heroic liberation of brotherly South Ossetia and Abkhazia from ZOG Georgia and placing military instillations all over Europe against Moscow.

“Supporting our troops” means asking the Jews and globalists to mass-murder and subjugate both the world and ourselves with their lackeys. Every enemy who falls today at the hands of the Mujahadeen in Iraq and Afghanistan is a common victory for the truly patriotic forces from among our people. Let us “support the troops” only when they refuse the orders of the imperialist ZOG regime, march away from Iraq westward towards Tel Aviv, when they switch sides and turn their guns the other way, and particularly when they atone for their crimes by blowing up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Otherwise, may death and demise be upon them!

Equally, anyone carrying a badge is an enemy and deserves to be killed when attacking our people or anyone. You tell me, all you idiots who cry and whine when Blacks taunt and praise the killing of “the pigs” in their songs, who brought down Ruby Ridge and Waco with arms? Who is the armed wing of the Zionist Occupation Government? Who is spying on us, beating and imprisoning demonstrators, and every step of the way works to infiltrate and sabotage any hopes for our national liberation? Snitching and cop-calling are NOT “patriotic;” the pigs are not our friends!

Of course, I support some Black, Red Indian or Puerto Rican radical that is blowing their brains out. The only question is: WHY AREN’T OUR PEOPLE WILLING TO DO THE EXACT SAME THING WHEN THESE LACKIES OF ZOG COME MARCHING INTO OUR HOMES AND COMMUNITIES HELLBENT ON SUBJUGATING US AND MASS-MURDERING OUR POPULAR CLASSES AND POLITICAL DISSIDENTS?!

An example that I always bring up is the case of my colleague Kevin Walsh, who was felonized after having an armed standoff with government agents attempting to unjustly detain him. People reacted to the case as if he were “nuts.” Yet, many would completely support the very same case if he were in some exotic-sounding “Third World” country far removed from their comfort zones. What, we aren’t suppose to defend ourselves with arms when the enemy is trying to destroy us? Is that really so “extreme” or are our sensibilities so self-defeating and extremely brainwashed that we wind up thinking surrender and humiliation are acceptable?

Yet, the paradigm goes much deeper than being against the government of America. America itself doesn’t have a legitimate right to exist, is again I repeat, A BANKER’S PRISONHOUSE OF NATIONS AND NOT A NATION IN AND OF ITSELF. It is a project directly aligned with the Zionist entity, one more repressive than any other in modern history that will eventually lead to our extermination. Our nation is NOT America. Our hearts and heritage, raped and ravaged by the Zionist multicultural enemy countless times, must for our survival lie with the continental European mother’s womb of our people. In short, we’re White European-descended Aryans who formed a nationality with a common bloodline, language and heritage who require territorial imperatives for our ethnic survival, but we are NOT Americans. To be more exact, call us European-Americans if so long as in so doing we are defining a Eurocentric people and civilization and not a cosmopolitan anti-national project defined by the Red, White and Jew. Delinking our identity from Europe is a Zionist plot to rob of us of our Aryan soul and identity, and rather promote the existence an illusionary “American race” where the Africans, Red Indians, and others perish beside us on an altar of money-worship.

America is itself a concept of immigration and therefore anti-national. From the idiocy of our ancestors fleeing the continental mother’s womb instead of working to make their homeland a better place, to bombing and attempting to break down the ethnic character of the peoples of the world who resist globalism, to spreading such destruction against the various peoples residing in the United States who over the course of centuries each developed unique cultures and heritages with the genocidal use of “open borders” today, America is a dance with death. Hence, to be a nationalist, to believe in nationalism, and even to be an internationalist in the correct context, is to be anti-American and is to delink ourselves from America. The only thing that will ever be White and truly Eurocentric about America are the nihilism and rotting corpses of our people.

American Nationalism is objectively anti-nationalist globalism, for the destruction of the national unit, the great black hole, clearly lacks an ethnic character and patriotic dimension. In practical terms, American Nationalism today is just simply rednecks becoming Jewish and a mass support base for military aggression, globalism and consumerism. Such “nationalism” is our enemy. It cannot logically be construed to mean the patriotic love of our people and working to preserve and enrich what makes us unique.

It’s not only those followers of Marcus Garvey or Puerto Rican freedom fighters for whom the task of delinking from America stands as a sacred patriotic objective. White Power, when correctly defined, ultimately wants both separation from and death to America. Indeed, “White Power, Death to America!”

While our people are very different from both the Arabs and the Koreans, and hence have their own particular road to national liberation, the best models existing today, and worthy of careful study, admiration, and solidarity by our people are those of north Korea and the Iraqi Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party.

Both projects, while guided by scientific socialism, took a far more thorough-going analysis of nationalism than pretending it to be something harmful to the unity of the popular classes or international solidarity, both realizing that nations are more than something which arose as product of capitalist development which will or should “whither away” as socialist construction intensifies. Both projects also defend the principle that to be a good internationalist one should first be a good patriot and that the nation alone decides the course of its struggle as masters of one’s own destiny and revolution.

Equally relevant for us, both projects are guided by a mother party capable of unifying the people though ideological struggle and developing a monolithic and organic ideology in the course of rooting out opportunism and erroneous ideas and behaviors. Like the eventuality of our own struggle against the Jews and American regime, both celebrate the central role of armed struggle and used their unique heritages to build a modern people-first civilizational project. In this regard, one finds leader Kim Jong Il’s On Correctly Understanding Nationalism and On Preserving the Juche Character and National Character of the Revolution and Construction extremely relevant and creatively applicable to our own struggle once liberated from ethnic chauvinism and pro-imperialist illusions.For our people, we call for preserving our ethnic character and heritage without pretending that the platform of the dominant White nationalist paradigm or the old Confederate regime are somehow capable of liberating us. We call for European-American motherland defense equipped with class analysis and a proletarian internationalist outlook as the guiding lens in these Zionized and pro-American times of defeat and despair.

Our nationalism must be a progressive nationalism, which while working to defend our blood and ethnic character against cosmopolitanism, is ultimately part of the global front to preserve the existence of nations and social liberation of the world’s popular classes in general.

Judeo-“Christianity” is our enemy

The historical accuracy of the Bible and the question of the existence of Jesus is not relevant to our struggles today. In practical terms, Christianity is today a two millennia old religious and political force in the world with a large number of adherents. With all due respect to the Pagans and non-religious from among our people, Christianity is simply a reality. While I to detest many of its political uses today and also recognize its origins as something distinctly foreign and Semitic, Christianity is an organic White Eurocentric expression from our people today. It is important, even for those like myself who are atheists, to recognize that Christianity has become a part of our people, and that many true Christians are our comrades today.

Hence, we must always hold a place at the table for all of our Christian brothers and sisters who work for social justice and the advancement and upliftment of our people. In criticizing Judeo-“Christianity,” I do not attack these people or the religion of our ancestors, nor am I attempting to discourage our people from practicing true Christianity. Rather, I attack a political poison masking itself in the image our people, but one that is inherently contrary to their best interests and that cannot be construed as being genuinely “Bible-based” anyways.

One should not be surprised that the Christian Jew was ultimately to submit before the Jewish Jew in the power struggle over domination of finance capital. Talmudism, on both a secular and religious level, being far more handcrafted at the art of subversion and sabotage and the Jews themselves raised in such a manner and spirit, than their Christian counterparts turned lackeys, and logically meaning the domination of Jewish Judaism over “Christian” Judaism. Our Christian population will either find alternative paths ranging from Islam, Buddhism and paganism to simply becoming atheists and agnostics or else they will need to reclaim the revolutionary potential of their creed as many have already done. However, Judeo-“Christianity” is unredeemable and shall be annihilated.

Judeo-“Christianity” presents the false notion that Jewish values are also Christian values and that the Zionist entity is part of the will of God in fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. It is treason to true Christianity, because it perverts Christian values and promotes attacks on real Christians in Palestine and elsewhere in the Arab world. “Love your neighbor as yourself” becomes “defraud and exploit your neighbor and physically attack him if he resists or even objects too much.” The teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin are far closer to the teachings of Christ than any of this predatory Judaeo-“Christian” gutter religion.

Paleo-Conservativism: an infantile disorder

Paleo-conservativism is the general trends of conservativism prior to neo-conservativism. It’s espousers, to varying degrees essentially believe in what one would consider “traditional American values” prior to the particularly Jewish/Trotskite/fanatically interventionist-oriented takeover of both the Republican Party and American nationalist thought. Essentially, while at times objectively anti-imperialist, they’re just whining because White Judeo-“Christian” quarters fail to dominate the leading quarters of imperialist finance capital and policy decisions on domestic and foreign affairs and essentially have the same idiotic attachment to the “American

Dream” as do their neo-conservative rivals. However, they detest America’s globalist role today while glossing over the fact that a whole series of reactionary ideas and behaviors they oppose are the ideological basis for the forming of America and were always tactics and strategies used by the enemy government.

The United States didn’t become imperialistic and hell bent for world domination when it became essentially Jewish. Becoming Jewish just made the problem a whole lot worse. We can trace clear back to wars of aggression against the Red Indians, to support for the Jewish-led slave trade in both the North and South, to the war of aggression against Dixie, and to America’s subversive decision to become an imperialist power clear back to 1898 and the aggression against the Philippines, Cuba and Puerto Rico, while claiming to be their friend and brother against Spanish colonialism.

Miscegenation didn’t begin with Neo-conservatives. Not only were enslaving Africans and mass murdering Red Indians morally wrong and inexcusable, though the meaning, relevance and scope of such actions has become greatly distorted, but they led us to lose our unique European identity by blood and culture for a false and enemy American one, as much as it did to those it colonized. Chinese immigrants, like their Irish counterparts – our brothers today, were brought in on a large scale by those who adhered to the will of the “Founding Fathers” as a source of cheap and easily exploited labor. This can hardly be seen as wanting to preserve our ethnic character.

The fact is, our “Founding Fathers,” without exception, were all garbage, who hailed an anti-national project where people were advised to abandon their ethnic character and nationalist-class struggle for the merchant’s pipe dream of America. Any true White Nationalist is not a paleo-conservative and should hate America’s founding leaders and ideology as much as leftists and peoples oppressed by White World colonialism.

Paleo-conservatives often play an anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist social role at a time when our culture, like those of the entire world, is being rapidly eroded, but they do so from a distorted and defeatist worldview that lacks class analysis, honest historical basis or a path forward. Our duty as patriots must not be to make the impossible return to the origins of our demise before the onslaught of liberalism and globalism, but to build a revolutionary path forward.

Build the European-American National Democratic Front and People’s War!

The illusions must smashed. The American regime, dominated by International Zionism but criminal in its own right, is our arch-enemy and ethnic catastrophe. Here we affirm that as ZOG is standing in the way of our national liberation and behaving as a violent anti-nationalist and anti-popular classes menace around the world by force of arms, armed struggle is the primary mode and necessity for our people’s survival, territorial imperative and the formation of a liberated and independent European-American Democratic People’s Republic. Without undue bravado nor illusions, we call upon our best and brightest sons and daughters to build and enhance the European-American people’s mass struggle, prerequisite for our war of national liberation, with total commitment and selflessness.

We must join hands with the “Axis of Resistance” constituting those groups and lands around the world combating imperialism and the Jews. Primarily this includes the Mujahadeen in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan and Somalia, and the People’s Wars in the Philippines and Colombia. It also constitutes the friendly peoples of Korea, Cuba, Russia, Serbia, Venezuela, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, China, Pakistan and India, Belarus, Myanmar, Sudan, Zimbabwe and others. In so doing, being masters of our own destiny, such solidarity is not a manifestation of flunkies. Hence, such solidarity should not be without mutual autonomy or criticism, but as a genuinely organic expression of solidarity among patriots against a common enemy regardless of ethnic and ideological differences.

The current rejectionist tactics of more advanced White Nationalist groups, namely “lone wolf actions,” anti-regime armed standoffs and “terrorism” are not without extremely positive and effective attributes in light of the absolute necessity of military operations and the lack of a revolutionary mass line and political-military apparatus capable of currently defeating the American regime and the Jews. They are not an end in and of themselves however. Our people must launch a successful guerrilla war capable of galvanizing the political arena and mobilizing the masses of our European-American people or we may well perish.

Our revolutionary struggle for liberation is not a “Race War,” and the designs of International Zionism for such fratricide between ourselves and the Black nation, as espoused by certain myopic and sectarian forces only serves to undermine our struggle and resistance. We also call for the formation of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the United States and African-descended peoples and others based on mutual respect of ethnic identity, brotherhood and friendship, and resistance to a common threat. Any ethnic contradictions between ourselves and Black people and others must be secondary to a recognition of the need for class solidarity and the need for all peoples to correct a whole series of idiotic social roles and ideas, though rejecting of assimilation and racial nihilism. We must ultimately unite in a political-military showdown towards defeating Jewish power, promoting the resistance of peoples outside the US territorial boundaries on the frontlines against globalism, overthrowing the regime, and defending the self-determination and ethnic character of peoples.

Furthermore, we laud the heroic acts of resistance which occurred on September 11^th, 2001 and welcome international combat volunteers, who also recognize in the American regime and the Jews a common enemy of their people and who are currently more advanced politically, spiritually, and militarily to combat them. At a time of total globalist onslaught we cannot pretend that our national borders exist in any coherent and natural sense anyways. This being the case, we respect the calls made by various Jihad organizations for opening up the field of combat both in the United States and the Zionist entity, rather than considering these to be acts of aggression against our people as proponents of the “war on terror” erroneously do.

Many forces conducting solidarity activities, building the movement against war, anti-Zionists, advocates of self-determination and anti-government agitators caution against raising the alarm bells with support of violent resistance to the Jews and regime, promotion of “terrorism” and the call for destroying the United States. Such people would argue that the actual conditions for successfully conducting People’s War currently do not exist or even that “terrorism” is universally immoral and counterproductive. They point out that this is potentially useful for demonizing more “legitimate” organizations, mass-appeal aboveground political work and single issue causes. It’s also true when they argue that this carries with it immense security risks and that the super-majority of people are deeply turned off by such an approach.

Yet, we cannot possibly forsake the revolution for political breadcrumbs or pragmatism. The necessity of armed nationalist-class struggle ranks as the singular greatest imperative both for the survival and liberation of my European-American people and for the final defeat of imperialism and Zionism around the world, i.e. for the national liberation of all peoples as the victory of international proletarian nationalism over cosmopolitanism, Americanism and globalism.

First, as is the duty of all people, I am affirming here the call for the self-determination and liberation of my people as a sacred principle and inalienable right, regardless of calls for moderation. At a time White people are being slated for destruction and demise, with all due respect, moderation and restraint are off the table. Secondly, one has to seriously question if anti-globalist forces within the misnomered “Western World,” unlike their counterparts in the equally misnomered “Third World,” are actually achieving anything at all. This leads to honestly assessing the state of defeat and duress, and presents clearly the centrality of revolutionary dynamism and correct ideology if we are going to tip the balance of power in our favor. Third, again I berate the proponents of dogmatic humanism and moralism for their degenerate blanket condemnations of the truly liberating brutality of resistance terror. The reality is we are fighting an enemy who lacks principles, chivalry or dignity. The idea of rules of engagement becomes a Talmudic length saga, rather than merely stressing the need for focusing attacks on the enemy more so than on our own popular classes (with the exception of the Zionist entity). This has become chains around the arms of our people and objectively enables reactionary anti-human terror of aggression a billion fold more barbaric than collateral damage caused by resistance actions, for it is such resistance actions that help to partially blunt the enemy’s aggression. Lastly, everything I have said about America, that it does not have a right to exist and will ultimately destroy our own just as it has so many others, is completely true. Hence, my position rests on its own merits.

The European-American “left,” unlike their counterparts throughout Eastern Europe, Asia, Arabia, Africa, Turkey and Latin America, overwhelming lack any real national dimension, red meat-eating instinct, willingness and thirst for combat, anti-Judaism and anti-Zionism in their psychology, and even are generally not opposed to globalism and imperialism. They have become chattel slaves, effeminate pacifists and the most loathing and distracted of shabbos goyim and ethnic nihilists. We struggle so that one day the best and brightest of our sons and daughters on the left join the ranks of proletarian Aryan combatant fighters, wishing defeat for the poisons of the New Left and Old Left alike.

Now looking honestly, my brothers and sisters on the right and those still embedded with a sense of salvation and ethnic survival, are not without the many fatal flaws I have mentioned in this appeal. May it be that ideological struggle and the blood of our martyrs cleanses our people, strengthens them, aids their contributions to overall global cause, and finds our people surviving and flourishing. Our greatest threat is apathy, our greatest freedom painful self-criticism, myself included.

We are facing the eventuality of the complete breakdown of imperialist finance capital. The imperialist system of the regime, aside from spreading the ills of multiculturalism, produced a parasitic economy unable to stand. Arise and destroy it with arms!

Glory to the European-American proletarian nation, hail to the White race!

Long live the resistance option, death to our enemies!

On the Need for Nationalist and anti-Jewish Ideological Struggle amongst Communists and Western Leftists

John Paul Cupp — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:52:34 +0000

In today’s post-Soviet world, with the exception of those nations where Communists seized state power and developed patriotic models of building socialism, to call oneself a “Communist” today is to be a fifth column agent for Zionism, liberalism, social democracy, defeatism, cosmopolitanism, international Jewry, and imperialist globalization.

Those of us who love our Communist identity, who love the working class of our nation and want to preserve our ethnic character and believe in international solidarity with the popular masses of other countries fighting against Zionism and imperialism, have a profound obligation to tell the truth and struggle to rectify this embarrassing and humiliating situation. This is true no matter how many times we ourselves are accused of espousing “racism,” “xenophobia,” “national chauvinism,” “anti-Semitism,” “White Supremacism” or “Islamo-fascism,” and even “anti-Communism.” As a revolutionary principle, the popular classes struggle together as a national unit to build the revolution. This patriotic class struggle forms proletarian internationalism not based upon wanting to destroy nations and form a “Communist International,” but by the bonds of solidarity and cooperation between patriots of one land with another. The leading forces behind the United States and imperialism worldwide, which struggles to break down the ethnic character of people, are overwhelmingly Jewish.

21^st Century Communism is National Communism, not dogmatic “anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism,” not liberal identity politics and definitely not national nihilism and Jew-loving self-hatred. European-American National Communism isn’t chauvinistic nor the metaphysics of Hitlerite National Socialism, but it will coordinate with our kindred in the White Power national democratic front and other peoples on its own terms. It also will not fall for the trap of “anti-racism” and “anti-fascism” or whatever Jewish and nihilist conspiracy is hatched to prevent us from closing ranks with our kindred, regardless of whether or not they are currently anti-communist.

While we admire Stalin’s leadership during the Soviet-led struggle against Operation Barbarossa, we cannot possibly deny that many good points existed early on in the German revolution of 1933, and that very real limitations existed in the Communist movement, namely Jew-loving illusions and national nihilism. Further, we argue that Adolf Hitler has become the greatest sacred cow of the entire world, a sacred cow that needs to be correctly deconstructed because it stands in the way of our liberation and of movements of national release against globalism throughout the world.

We also will not deny that the dominant White Nationalist movement, regardless of our internal disagreements and its limitations, is not without many positive features. We defend “Europe for the Europeans” and opposition to “open borders” when Arabs and others ask us to “tone it down a notch,” because White people have a right to self-determination as much as Palestinians and Iraqis. Within the United States, multiculturalism is nothing more than a codeword for Zionist-driven cosmopolitanism and nihilistic death for which all of us are ultimately victims. We refuse to differentiate between Jews and Zionists, because it cannot possibly be argued that this lie has any logical benefit for our struggle or the overall struggle against imperialism. We do not deny the existence of races or the centrality of ethno-nationalism as the only genuine form of nationalism today, but merely state that such questions are the internal matter of other peoples and oppose genuine ethnic chauvinism while equally lambasting calls of denunciation against true nationalism when it is slandered by the forces of “political correctness.” Lastly, like all White Nationalists in the US, we love White people, are proudly Eurocentric and openly quarrel with the dominant leftist paradigm that pretends European-Americans are not an oppressed nation today with a right to self-determination.

Our communism is not an attempted subversion of the people through chameleon tactics. We have no hidden agenda, because our goals are public knowledge. Our call for socialism, anti-imperialism and anti-Zionism and the liberation of White people through a coordinated national democratic front is an open and steady call. Our political alliances are honest alliances, regardless of real differences, based on an understanding of needing unified collective White European-American action and eventually coordination with other people to bring down the American regime and Jewish power worldwide. We are not rightists with the rightists and leftists with the leftists, though we do speak to each in ways to which they can relate. We are patriotic communists at all times.

Unlike other group identities formed around religion or based on national identity (without conceding that the Jews constitute a nation), the very act of being a Jew is hostile to the world and without redeeming value. We admire Lenin, but he was wrong on this. Almost no real “Jewish proletariat” exists to be differentiated from the Jewish bourgeoisie, because Jews are lazy predatory creatures who close ranks around a common goal of world domination and economic slavery. We do need to condemn White globalists and others who are power holders in imperialist finance capital and the conspiracy to destroy nation states and think in terms of class analysis, but it is very important to understand that the leading quarters of imperialism and the true power structure of the United States are all Jews and that the entire Jewish community closes ranks with this threat to liberty.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front, calls on honest elements of the White European-descended left to correct their mistakes on the national question and the Jewish problem and join ranks for a nation liberation struggle to come. We call on White European-descended rightists to understand that while the dominant Western leftist political movements are Judaic assaults on the dignity of the white race, that not all of us are without great love for and pride in our people, and we do want a unified front to preserve our identity and promote our liberation. We address our allies outside the realm of our kindred as friends and comrades, but we do not allow that they should possibly dictate the terms of our mass line. We argue that natural differences always will exist between the mass lines of completely different people, but that this should not stand in the way of amiable relations and collective solidarity against a common threat.

Imperialism, not White solidarity, is the real enemy of humanity!

Pyongyang Corée du Nord, point de vue

Lenin1917 — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:22:03 +0000

Pyongyang Corée du Nord, point de vue

This is a much higher audio and video quality version of this video (Pyongyang Views) than the November 29, 2009 version.

*Raw street sounds, no music added.

Upgraded video viewable : here

On Racial Communism

John Paul Cupp — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:49 +0000

Racial communism is the highest stage of communist theory and practice for our people. It is an emerging ideology which seeks to produce the epic works for guiding our future generations to come while defeating the anti-White genocidal conspiracy by raising our people to the level of combatant fighters and successfully engaging in protracted armed struggle. It is a terroristic specter which haunts the lying misanthropic leftists who laugh joyously at the embarrassing state of defeat in which our people wallow. Racial communism prophetically promises them that the “favor” will be returned by a thousand fold when we achieve state power and butcher them en masse through great purges if they fail to correct their treasonous behavior. It stands in diametric opposition to attachment to the enemy liberal Zionist project called “America,” Cold War nonsense and the individualism of the far right, libertarians and paleoconservatives. However, racial communism as a product of collective cells organic to our European-American body also understands that our movement for racial, national and social liberation, even our working class vanguard today, is confused and often among these very same people. Minus ardent conservatives and integrationists, at least some of these types of people still want to be White, which is more than we can say for most of the left. Hence, even during fierce ideological struggle we treat our brothers and sisters differently than we treat anti-White enemies.

Vladimir Lenin was completely correct to call “left-wing communism” the “infantile disorder” that it is in his famous work. On the other extreme, David Lane was correct to affirm that “Christian Right-wing American Patriots” are “C.R.A.P.” in his famous work. While I doubt these two gentlemen would have liked each other very much, they both made real contributions to the kind of synthesis we need today in building a revolutionary European-American nationalistic anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist front, one that is both anti-capitalist and racially aware. Both of these great men understood the centrality of armed revolution, and it is none other than armed revolution which will act as a sort of antiseptic, cleaning our people’s deep wounds and nurturing our collective body and its cells.

“Neither left nor right” makes a certain point in today’s Western context because the “left” is completely cosmopolitan and an avowed enemy of our people, while the right seems lost in nostalgia for archaic, conservative and opportunistic ideas and social roles. However, I think it would be more correct to put my organiztion, the European-American Socialist People’s Front (EASPF), in the camp of leftism. This of course presupposes that unlike the infantilism of “left-wing communism,” EASPF is the guiding lens of “right-wing communism,” a national-racial revolutionary working class calling. In this sense, we are genuinely leftists because we are for socialism and anti-imperialism, but to the right of the infantile enemies, because we are patriots waving the red flag rather than open enemies of our own people’s right to self-determination. We are communists standing for the truest form of anti-revisionist communism among our people: White Power as a communist ideology.

Because the bulk of nationalistic Whites in the Western world belong to the far right or libertarian camps, they lack a tangible path forward and fail to see the contradictions that are brewing within the left, dominated as it is by the cosmopolitan infantile ones. Dialectically, the New Left “picked up a rock and dropped it on its own feet” to paraphrase basic pre-Cultural Revolution Maoist concepts. In becoming so vain and arrogant in their hatred of anything White and even openly holding working class Whites in deep contempt, they have essentially handed us a rope with which to hang them. In this spirit we call on the young leftists as they are being beaten in the streets by ZOG’s police to reconsider their positions and approach while maintaining their zeal for struggle.

One finds more and more average working class and middle class rednecks starting to see through capitalism for what it is, without the illusions that existed during the Cold War. White college students who grew up with blue collar parents are beginning to secretly hold their own dogmatic leftist “comrades” in contempt for their racial sectarianism, for this retarded idea that a “White working class doesn’t exist” or that it is “a racist oppressor.” Indeed, race treason isn’t loyalty to humanity, it’s betrayal of one’s own people. You can’t build the people’s revolution without loving them or by betraying them. This is exactly why cosmopolitan and anti-White misleaders promote such lines. In fact, the Zionist media had a virtual blackout on the militaristic aggression the police had in handling anarchist-leaning youth condemning the G20 summit in Pittsburgh recently. Despite the silly anti-White lines these young kids have, most of our supposedly “reactionary” poor workers when discovering reliable news of such events would like to have seen the anarchists send the government’s agents to hell for daring to attack them or any other citizen standing up for basic rights. As another example worth citing, a young European-American fresh out of ZOG’s imperialist military aggression came home and shot two cops dead recently not far from where I live. What if we mixed the spirit of the ex-GI cop-killer on the right and the young anarchists on the left together while calling on all our people to adopt more effective strategies and ideology for total resistance?

Watching African-Americans mindlessly line up in droves behind Barack Obama, simply because he is Black, even though he’s fanatically imperialistic and destroying the economy for all races and nationalities, has caused many people to reassess if Whites are the only ones who have to correct many foolish notions and behaviors. The idea that ZOG America is “AmeriKKKa,” as the New Left claims, doesn’t seem fitting in an environment where the symbolic leader of imperialism isn’t White and where transnational finance capital isn’t dominated by European-America Southerners. Certainly, if the Ku Klux Klan or other radical White paleoconservatives were the ruling elite today, our country wouldn’t have the idiotic pro-immigration stance that it does.

Now the contradictions are brewing. What seems small is a crack destined to shatter the moribund New Left and send them into the dustbin of history should we play our cards correctly. In such a way we could form and enhance a real true revolutionary White working class movement and develop the anti-capitalist and nationalist-racialist revolution. It’s time for real answers and real action. We need more theoretical debate and discussion, but more than that we need mass work, party building and the stockpiling of weapons and ammunition.

We must continue to encourage the leftist youth to rally under the red flag of socialism, and show them that our Confederate battle flag, a symbol of European-American ethno-nationalist resistance today more so than narrow regionalism or loyalty to an antiquated political system, is also a red-colored flag. We need a people’s war, and we also need a race war against Jewish Supremacy, regardless of whether Jews are a real race or not, since they are attacking us because our racial and national identity threatens their hegemonic goals. So then let us build a people’s war against the enemy regime and finance capital. Let us also build a war for ethnic survival, though not one needlessly attacking other oppressed nationalities, particularly innocent popular class African-Americans, as many of my brothers and sisters on the the far right foolishly espouse. We need racial and national liberation, but we also need class struggle. Both the best of the right and the best of the left make complete sense and are useful sources of inspiration. We also should discard what is unusable or reactionary from them, especially libertarian hangups both sadly seem to share.

Our numbers are small, but things are turning in our favor. People who tuned out only a few years ago are now tuning in to our message today. This is because deep down our masses know the economy isn’t coming back. They also painfully understand that we are dying spiritually, culturally and even in a physical sense as an organic ethnic being. Despite often “going through the motions” or not having a workable solution, our people painfully know that they are oppressed. We simply lack the infrastructure and mass media that the enemy holds, or even the amount of media dogmatic rightist and leftist groups have. For all that, we can build a revolution when the young rebel leftist kids fighting the system with infantile behavior and ideas correct many of those mistakes and the rest of our people, whom conservative “Judeo-Christians” and the military industrial complex work hard to subvert, correct many of theirs as well. Then we could theoretically join hands in a shooting war, a mature resistance struggle with an understanding that victory will not be won without the righteous blood of our people as martyrs.

Imagine the deep healing that will come over our people at such a point. With numbers, proper leadership, organizational structure, mass movements, and especially armed resistance, what was today our saddest and most depressing moment can be followed by the greatest moment in the history of our people. The chains that shackles would then be smashed and our creative potential would become seemingly endless. This is to say nothing of what a return to the concept of family and neighborhood would bring, something which can only come when we destroy capitalism and build socialism and communism according to our own national and racial realities.

Our people are deeply yearning for something today. One senses that in whatever quarters they should happen to venture. Unfortunately the feeling of just what they are yearning for and how to achieve it has yet to come over them. That only means our work as revolutionaries must intensify.

Hail victory!

Victory of Socialism is Inevitable

Free Media Productions Staff — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:06:09 +0000

Korean Central News Agency

Pyongyang, November 29 (KCNA) — It is inevitability of history and a law governing the development of history that humankind advances toward socialism, says Rodong Sinmun Sunday in a signed article.

The socialist society develops thanks to the inexhaustible creative power of the popular masses who are armed with high ideological consciousness and united as one, the article notes, and goes on:

The drive for remolding people and their thought so as to strengthen the driving force of the revolution and steadily boost their role was pushed forward ahead of other work under the wise leadership of the Workers’ Party of Korea. As a result, socialism in the DPRK has been fortified as an invincible fortress standing whatever storm and stress, demonstrating its might all over the world.

The Songun era is the era of great change in which the driving force of the revolution has unprecedentedly grown stronger and the cause of socialism developed onto a new higher stage.

The DPRK has put forward the People’s Army stronger than any other social group in terms of revolutionary character, the sense of organization and combat capacity as the core unit of the Juche revolutionary force. Herein lies the source of the invincibility and might of Korean-style socialism.

Socialist society is the most advantageous and advanced one embodying the popular masses’ intrinsic nature and desire for independence. It is also genuine society for the people as their political and economic life as well as ideological and cultural one are in full bloom as required by man’s intrinsic desire to live and develop independently.

The advantages and vitality of socialism have been clearly proved by the reality in the DPRK which has brought about in a short span of historical time great socio-economic changes. It is impossible for capitalism to do so even though they would have taken it hundreds of years.

Socialism in the DPRK is the most advantageous one centered on the popular masses.

The essential character and advantages of Korean-style socialism lie in that it successfully embodies the immortal Juche idea in order to ensure that the popular masses are put forward as the master of everything in the society and everything of the society serves the people and independence of the people is most firmly defended and realized.

The reality in which Korean-style socialism centred on the popular masses is firmly defended and wins victory after victory goes to prove the validity and the tremendous vitality of the Songun leadership, the Songun politics of the Workers’ Party of Korea.

The cause of socialism is sure to emerge victorious as there is the Songun politics, example of the independent politics, politics under socialism in the present times and the most powerful weapon.

Big Joe (a serial killer) on the real victims

Metal Gear — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:12:58 +0000

According to Joseph Duncan, an active serial killer at the time he wrote this, the founding fathers were sex offenders and criminals are victims. The resident Marxist-Leninists who contribute their angle to this blog should love this guy. After all, this is class conflict.
http://fifthnail.blogspot.com/2004/01/610-pm-i-just-updated-this-blog.php

I just updated this blog template to show the Fifthnail image. I’m working on a web site that I hope will be a voice for oppressed “criminals.” I’m not sticking up for their crimes; I’m sticking up for the human being inside, and trying to get people to see that punishing a scapegoat does only creates more vicitms, mostly innocent ones. I believe—I know—there are no bad people in this world, just people who do bad things. I was one once. I was ignorant. Now I know better, and the only reason I do is because I am not a bad person at heart. I care about people, and my only solace is in knowing that if I had understood how I was hurting my victim I would not have done it. Our society needs to understand this. You take any criminal, even the worst, and underneath all the crappy thinking is a battered and tortured heart that cares. I’ve lived and loved these people, murderers, rapists, child molesters, you name it. Every one of them is a human and a victim of their own messed up thinking. Every one of them is capable of remorse. Even if most hide from their remorse by denying it, or by burying it in the rage they feel toward society for denying their existence as a worthwhile human being. And now instead of confirming their existence society is denying it in the worst way yet. By requiring them to register, and directly implying that they are not valuable human beings, but instead they are monsters that must be watched closely and tolerated only because some long dead person wrote (for some long forgotten reason) that they have rights. How soon we forget that the Fathers of this country were criminals, even sex offenders by today’s standards. Study your history people; it’s all there waiting to be repeated.

On ideology

Metal Gear — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:19:19 +0000

Marx thought that ideology was a belief system that kept people from acting in their own economic self-interest. He considered religion to be a part of this.

I believe, however, that ideology is something which helps man to overcome nature. In that way, techno-fascism is the opposite of marxism. Religion is a perversion of ideology.

Lenin speaks!

Lenin1917 — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:40:42 +0000

Colorized film footage of great revolutionary leader and Bolshevik
ideologist Vladimir Lenin, with a rare recording of a speech he
made during the Russian Civil War 1918 – 1922.

The speech is as follows:

“Comrade (Red Army) soldiers! The capitalists of England, America and France are waging a war against Russia. They are taking revenge on the Soviet Peasants & Workers’ Republic for her [Republic's] overthrowing the power of landlords and capitalists and set the example for all the peoples of the world.

With money and munitions, the capitalists of England, France and America support Russian landlords, who are marshalling their armies from Siberia, Don River, and Northern Caususus against the Soviets, seeking to restore the power of the Tsar, of the landlords, of capitalists.
No, this will NEVER happen! The Red Army has unified itself, it has arisen and started chasing the landlords’ armies and the White Guards’ officers away from the Volga, took back Riga, took back virtually all of Ukraine; it approaches Odessa and Rostov.”

*Video and above text courtesy of wagnerian1979.

Techno-fascism explained Philosophically

Metal Gear — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:26:01 +0000

Some people remark that I do not really have an ideology, but just a collection of prejudices. That I act on intuition but could never explain my logic. I admit to not explaining myself well enough.

My worldview has a fundamental building block in the same way that a house may be made of a certain material:
1) I think that man is born a natural animal.
2) I think man must overcome nature for civilian society.
3) fanatical devotion to ideals is required to overcome nature
Part 1 is realism. Part 2 is idealism. Part 3 is means for the second to overcome the first. I believe strongly in setting goals and reaching them.

I acknowledge the existence of nature, but think man can master nature. Hitler had the opposite view and ridiculed the idea that man should overcome nature while Marx believed strongly in material determinism. Religious people believe in unscientific determinism. But I believe man can and should conquer nature.

I believe creating group identification systems – classes, nations, social constructs, gender awareness, race awareness etc. is good rather than bad. Liberalism intentionally trolls the groups which hold society in existence to ruin society, though some liberals believe they are decent people. Part of overcoming nature is group consciousness. Marxists are for using existing classes to destroy society, not for intentionally creating and preserving classes. Hitlerites think that group identification occurs automatically. I do not, I think it has to be programmed, which is rooted in my belief that man must overcome nature. Society can be engineered for improvement, but whoever dictates society must know what he/she is doing. I understand man thinks individualistically, but think man can be made to operate collectively through ideological agreement (Preferable) or through bribery (not as effective).

Because I believe man must overcome nature, I believe that man should create a social contract to preserve order between nations and individuals. But I believe that the contract has its limitations and therefore perpetual peace is not possible or desirable. There is some level of global group identification – we are all humans – but I think we should be broken up into smaller groups too – races, tribes, language groups, sexes etc. That means there are separate nations and separate social contracts. To argue for globalization is like arguing against modularity. The populations of earth should be breakable into smaller pieces. One would not design a house without modularity, and earthly society should not be designed without modularity.

In order to overcome nature, man must first acknowledge nature. Religion is a perversion of this process, a problem for techno-progression and competition for the state worship which I advocate due to the social contract. Man must totally worship collectivism if man wants to overcome individualism. Ideology is a transforming force, but religion is a perversion of ideology which replaces the truth with falsehoods. Man can be programmed (depending on intelligence and open-mindedness), but religion abuses the concept.

Because of all of this, I gravitate towards the bureaucratic state and think that it should be used to push people into nationalism. I believe in big government, but because I am a realist and a conqueror, I believe individual initiative and competition should be an important part of that government. Currency should exist, but Government should be harassing you like big brother. In other words, you can start your own business, but you better use it for the good of the state, not the bad of the state. And the state will watch you.