In terms of what he said, he is actually correct.  I do not really care, because William Pierce is as important to me as Tiger Woods or the next worker at Duncan Donuts.  Nevertheless, William Pierce would hate basically every internet “white nationalist” that exists today.

If you are reading this over the internet and consider yourself a white nationalist, then William Pierce probably would have hated you.

Berianidze / Besoshvili owns the domain freemediaproductions.info

I control the hosting of the website.

Besoshvili basically runs the news portion of the website.

I basically control the tech behind the website.

We differ ideologically, but because we divided the power, there is strong assurance that we will tolerate ideological differentiation. The smart design of free media productions has prevented a giant ideology war.

The top 3 percent of the world’s population holds more wealth than the lower 97 percent. Comments on blogs and forums are similar. A small group of “hardcore” commentators repeatedly comment on websites with feedback, whereas the majority of people do not comment frequently.

It is easy to be manipulated by a small audience. The creators of FMP were people who were disliked by the “bar regulars” who comment on extremist forums. The creators decided to target the other 97% of the population rather than the “hardcore user.”

We did this by technologically designing the site to focus more on web design, blogging and news than on a forum. The target is google and a wide audience rather than the steady but small community which we never got along with well anyways.

If you are wondering why I have aggressively taken positions (notably on Islam) which clearly contradict the other members, you can credit the blue ocean mindset. I care very little about pleasing hardcore users, and care much more about spreading my message to a broader audience.

The stats show that we are succeeding. Each month more UNIQUE views come in. The amount of comments do not really reflect this. Analogously, Jupiter has a very small core, but is a very big planet. Quite frankly the only real choice we had when we launched this website was to abandon the “frequent commentator” user base. Even for extremists, we were too controversial. The fact of the matter is we’ve actually succeeded in building a new (though more silent) audience in a way that we would not have if we did not switch our strategy to trying to stand out rather than fit in. Part of standing out is angering the status quo thus sacrificing important people but opening the doors to people who otherwise wouldn’t notice.

You can call it selling out. In my opinion, we were always sneered at by the “elite bar regulars” so we don’t feel guilty.

Link to News Room

After inspecting and visiting with workers at a smeltering plant inside the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), General Secretary Kim Jong Il of the Korean Workers’ Party (KWP) called for a “renovation” in information technology in order to develop the country’s strength as a technological power.

August 27 – General Secretary Kim Jong Il of the Korean Workers’ Party called for an “information technology renovation” in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), according to the official Rodong Sinmum daily journal.

General Secretary Kim’s comments came after visiting the May 11 Smeltery plant, according to DPRK state media. While touring the plan, Kim advised workers to improve technology in production process in order to increase overall productivity.

The development of a strong, powerful and technologically advanced nation has been the cornerstone of Kim Jong Il’s revolutionary Songun policies. Earlier this week, Kim Jong Il reaffirmed that the future of the DPRK lied inextricably with its ability to establish itself as a “powerful nation” against the threats of US imperialism and hostile foreign enemies in puppet “south” Korea and militarist Japan.

The link to the news room shows clearly that Kim Jong Il, like Stalin and Mao, set a goal of utilizing the non-existence of capitalist inefficiency to quickly modernize a country, and that North Korea talks about being a “strong nation against imperialism.” This is devastating for the clowns who continue to insist that nationalism and modern Communism are irreconcilable. It looks like a major Communist Party just vindicated me on two points.

“People in any organization are always attached to the obsolete – the things that should have worked but did not, the things that once were productive and no longer are.” – Peter Drucker

He who is futuristic and progressive cannot reconcile with conservatives who are stuck in the past. The most diligent problem solvers are constantly analyzing and measuring the world, and making alterations to their approaches based on their findings. Conservatives define success or failure by how closely a given politician’s ideolgical line matches the line of past figures.  Pragmatic people judge actions based on their consequences, not based on their ideological consistancy.  Conservatives always talk about the founding fathers in America. But the founding fathers were revolutionaries, not conservatives. What is now “in the box” thinking was once “out of the box” and opposed to the ruling order of the Britsh monarchy. Those who are interested in being on the cutting edge have a difficult time reconciling with those who are stuck in the past.

Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t.

Readers, reflect on the above quotation. People who expose what is wrong with society are better than people who slip under the radar. And it is “ordinary” liberals who slip under the radar as opposed to militant organizations and criminals. We must support the organizations that expose the cover of liberalism. For example, If Catholics organize as Catholics to support illegal immigration, it is superior to individuals slipping under the radar. Problems must be defined, measured and analyzed before they can be improved and controlled. The more militant and open the liberalism, the better it is for those who want to control it. The stronger groups like the ADL, Catholic Church, Protestant Churches, Republicans, Democrats and Major Corporations lobby for liberal causes, the more easy it is to expose those causes. Therefore the ADL, Catholic Church, Protestant Churches, Republicans and Democrats should be supported but with malicious intent to the causes they promote.

This philosophy is very Machiavellian, but anything that “exaggerates” liberalism is good for those who oppose it. The short term hurt the exaggeration causes will be rectified when more people howl back with anger.

Enough writing exists discussing “ideology.” It is time to describe reality.

Get Flash to see this player.

Leonard Lake’s Operation Miranda like Dave Koresh’s Davidian Siege proves that force dictates the identity of the ruling order. While Lake and Koresh had control over territory, they were in charge. I am not necessarily endorsing Lake or Koresh, but proving a point. The American regime re-asserted its authority by force. Force rules everything. Until domestic law enforcement changed the scenario, the rules of the order were temporarily irrelevant. The world is ruled by relative ethics. Human rights and divine power rule nothing. The world is ruled by laws of force, not universal standards of ethics.

I believe there is such a thing as moral reasoning if one is possesses aptitude in philosophical thought, but clearly force defines the order of society. Unlike the fairly tales, “good” does not always beat “evil.”

The revealing of digital dirt may scare many bloggers and activists, but it should not. What is worse than losing a job or lead over political discrimination is being hired by an asshole which uses social networking websites to stalk your activities off of the job. Any potential boss who cares about your blogging is an employer you do not want to work for. Any employer who views your content and eliminates himself/herself as your potential boss should be applauded in a social Darwinist sense. By discriminating against you for your views and activism, the individual allows you to find a better “fit” instead of bringing you into the fold only to reveal a manipulative personality later. It is better to find the right employer from the beginning than to settle for the wrong one, and then learn that he/she is not a decent person.  I happen to know someone who was fired for what was written on Linkedin.  Less than two-three months later, the company is being sold to a bigger one.  Obviously the social network stalking was indicative of mismanagement and employers who did not know how to run their own company. Only inferior companies run by circle jerk bosses stalk their employers. Good companies do not. Good employees do not talk about their employers in inappropriate places, but good employers know their boundaries too.

Do your research; the total amount of business per square mile in America is astounding, even inside the recession. The only reason that digital dirt is a threat is because of the recession and now employers are picky. In a good economy, for every employer who cares, there are ten decent employers who are not hypocrites. For every employer who “writes you off” due to your viewpoints, there is one that will favor you as an out-of-the-box thinker with creativity. This is particularly true if you prove that you have good tech skills. We really do have a conspiracy of elites and most people indeed are decent enough, afraid enough, indifferent enough or in agreement enough to not care. Simply put, most people do behave like backstabbing politicians and special interest lobbies do.  Most people do not behave like internet cowards do either.

In the recession, indeed opportunities are limited and I can see why people would be stuck working for an asshole who stalks their social networking, and want to cover it up. I can see why the recession could turn employers into assholes and I can see why some people would want to work for an asshole just to make ends meet. Even though the recession complicates matters, if you really do your research, enough business still exists that you hopefully can find a good match with an employer. I feel empathy for those who are less lucky and end up either unemployed or the victims of stalking due to the convergence of the recession and what they have written online.

I used to fear the consequences of “being outed” but now I really do not care. The kind of guy who sits around looking for digital dirt and “punishes” people economically for it is exactly the kind of guy you want to avoid. If digital dirt weeds out the weak, then perhaps we should create more of it and care less what others think about it. If it wasn’t for the recession, I would openly declare that I completely do not care.

I am becoming extremely suspicious of bloggers and forum activists who destroy resistance against the status quo with two methods:

1-They claim to be “extremists” but then act like total morons.
2-They attack the idea of “extremism” and encourage “moderate” views to “appeal to a wider audience.”

The first group of people may be legitimate morons or they may be faking it.  Some are probably convinced of their viewpoints but most are obvious infiltrators.

The second group, if not faking it, needs to study some business theory and realize that it is impossible to survive by imitating Democrats and Republicans when you do not even have .0000001% of their capital and marketing power.  The only way to “stand out” is to be an extremist.

Additionally it is extremists who form the regimes, then gradualists who debate within the regimes.  Gradualists rarely accomplish anything.  The American revolutionaries who “conservatives” worship indeed were extremists.

Later, I will write about how to deal with these phony political dissidents.

We are over a year old and still have not softened our message, diluted our style or sold out to appeal to a more “moderate” audience.  We still continue to be “real,” slamming the phony keyboard commandos by comparison.  Previous “projects” have failed to find a niche and folded early.  It looks like the differentiation strategy of side-stepping the conventional wisdom and appealing to entirely revolutionary target markets has found us a niche.  FMP avoids the conventional path on purpose to dodge the repetitiveness of the internet.  Previous projects were overshadowed imitations that said “me too.”  FMP aims to say “I’ll zig while the world zags.”

Get used to us, as we are only looking forwards not backwards.