I understand that some of the comments by viewers are very “one-sided,” but in general the video is pretty good. It shows that Pol Pot was focused but very secretive and determined. He was calculating, but appeared very gentle. He worked his way from the bottom to the top. He was sold out by the Vietnamese. I didn’t know that. That’s why he hated the Vietnamese. Cambodia was sacrificed to France when other Southeast Asian countries collaborated for Independence.

It noted that he adopted some aspects of Marx, but was really not a hardliner “anti-revisionist” Marxist. In truth he was more of a progressive nationalistic type.

His rejection of urbanization is important too. Mao was similar in his approach though for Mao it was pragmatic. For Pol Pot it was a matter of principle.

What do you think? Was Pol Pot himself a criminal, or is he the ultimate victim of American, Soviet, Vietnamese and French imperialism?

Noam Chomsky defends Pol Pot. Pol Pot may have saved more people than he killed. Nobody said anything negative during the Cold War. It was only after Russia fell, when China became the next “big Satan,” that the “Maoist” Pol Pot was demonized by America.

One basic problem, Mr. Beinart said, is that the Zionist movement has become increasingly conservative politically. “For several decades,” he writes, “the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door, and now, to their horror, they are finding that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.”

I do not like liberals, but who can blame them? The “Zionist movement” is nothing but a play pin where babies cry about being persecuted. It is the handicap parking space of the Caucasian world. It is not a legitimate socialist or nationalist movement.

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) – A radical cleric called Saturday for the creation of a “Greater Iran” that would rule over the entire Middle East and Central Asia, in an event that he said would herald the coming of Islam’s expected messiah.

Ayatollah Mohammad Bagher Kharrazi said the creation of what he calls an Islamic United States is a central aim of the political party he leads called Hezbollah, or Party of God, and that he hoped to make it a reality if they win the next presidential election.

Kharrazi’s comments reveal the thinking of a growing number of hard-liners in Iran, many of whom have become more radical during the postelection political crisis and the international standoff over the country’s nuclear program. Kharrazi, however, is not highly influential in Iran’s clerical hierarchy and his views do not represent those of the current government.

Kharrazi’s comments were published Saturday in his newspaper, Hezbollah.

He said he envisioned a Greater Iran that would stretch from Afghanistan to Israel, bringing about the destruction of the Jewish state.

He also said its formation would be a prelude to the reappearance of the Mahdi, a revered ninth-century saint known as the Hidden Imam, whom Muslims believe will reappear before judgment day to end tyranny and promote justice in the world.

“The Islamic United States will be an introduction to the formation of the global village of the oppressed and that will be a prelude to the single global rule of the Mahdi,” the Hezbollah newspaper quoted him as saying.

Besides Israel, he said the union would also destroy Shiite Iran’s other regional adversaries, whom he called “cancerous tumors.” He singled out secular Arab nationalists such as members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party in Iraq, as well as followers of the austere version of Sunni Islam practiced primarily in Saudi Arabia that is known as Wahabism.

Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Arab nations have watched Iran’s growing regional clout with deep concern.

The growing voice of hard-liners like Kharrazi has deepened worries even if it appears unlikely such a divisive figure would win the 2013 presidential election.

Still, even President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Thursday that he expects the government which follows his to be “ten times more revolutionary.”

Globalism means spreading revolution. It does not mean free movement.

Hardcore capitalism however requires free movement. Therefore, aside from the Trotskyites, the Jewish Bolsheviks are preferable to the liberal capitalists.

Marx’s role in raising awareness of important issues should be appreciated by any self-respecting, enlightened and pragmatic person. He may have not scored on every shot, but at least someone got the rebound. Juche (North Korea’s ideology) may not be Marxism, but it owes some of its influence to Marx. Benito Mussolini was a Marxist before he developed into a fascist. Mao may have modified Marx to be more agrarian and idealistic, and adapted to Chinese characteristics, but still was influenced by Marx. The Ba’athists with which I converse see Marx as an influence but not the “seal of the prophets.”

Marx also hated oppressive religious fanatics (of any religion) and considered religion to opiate. I salute him on that stance too!

It would be pleasurable to purge paranoids like Chaim Ben Pesach from the Zionist movement, but I just realized it’s not necessary. It has already occurred. The JDL has rejected him and Israel has banned him. Perhaps the JDL and Israel are neo-nazi organizations, and Rick Rubin was the Fuhrer. Allen-T was the SS Stormtrooper and EagleEye the Polish-Ukrainian collaborator.

I wonder if Kahanists would consider Lawrence Auster to be a neo-nazi. After all, his conversion to Christianity must be an attempt to genocide the Jewish people spiritually.

The better move is not to turn against Zionism, but to purge the Zionist movement of its undesirable mental defectives. The Zionist movement should move towards national bolshevism and integral corporatist nationalism, and away from Taliban style religiosity.

A dictatorship modeled off of Pol Pot’s khmer rouge could really rewrite the religious culture of the middle east, and then allow it to progress technologically after its original period of purification.

And don’t forget that pol pot was a nationalist!

Here is an interesting post about Pol Pot and how he was really a Khmer nationalist and not a Communist. He adopted some Marxist rhetoric but followed his own line. And he sided more with Mao than with USSR. USSR of course had backed off from its Stalinist line, but still Maoism is strongly adapted to Chinese characteristics and quite different from Russian Bolshevism.

I already knew this, but it adds some extra angles to the discussion.

Imagine a racial communist super-State comprising all of Europe and Russia and stretching across the reclaimed Siberian Land Bridge Project into White North America and includes Australia, New Zealand, Chile and Argentina in its project. Bloodline shall supersede  geographical boundaries. This shall be the greatest civilizationational accomplishment in the entire history of the world. We are talking about the total victory of White Power over the conspiracy for our genocide, more than just racialism, but true socialism, and the rebirth of the neighborhood and family again.

Only within the racial communist super-state within a vast regionalist and ethno-nationalist framework and an organic ethnic local character can our people be saved and find their truly greatest era. Nationalism will only die  when it is outmoded by racialism, and even then nationalism is an intricate part of our framework, not rootless cosmopolitanism. Our project to Pan-Africanism, Pan-Arabism, the Bolivarian project, is a brother in a common trench, but it goes deeper than theirs and reflects our true potential and the vanguard role which Darwinism demands of our people who constitute the biological aristocracy of world history.

For now we must address the miserable state of existence our people wallow in. We must painfully internalize the pain of knowing that as things stand now the White race may not even exist in years to come. We must feel the troubles and the brokenness of the middle aged crisis and the nihilistic teenager, the single mother and the white man down the street who just lost his job.

More than that we need to be beacons of light and hope. My own European-American nation already knows they are fucked, double fucked and then kicked in the head just for fun. They may not have some deeply advanced political analysis of how this is happening, but we don’t need to be doomsday prophesiers fullfilling a self-prophesying picture of defeat. We already have enough defeat. We need VISIONARIES.

The fact is the White race is NOT going to be exterminated and neither are we going to wind up being permantly ruined financially either, no matter how damn miserable things get. We haven’t survived since at least the Ice Ages and built some of the greatest civilizations the world has ever known just to go the way of the dodobird, and it isn’t going to happen as a result of Zionism, liberalism, finance capital or “globalization”, a vulgar euphenism for imperialism, today either.

In the end our people will fight!

Getting away from the areas closest to Hollyweird and Jew York and into the heartland, our masses own guns more than any other citizenry in the world per capita except north Korea. ZOG isn’t going to take our guns away, because the gun was brought into our psychology as small children learning the first and second amendment in school as if memorizing and idealizing bible versus. Our people still have some level of strong family life even though everything from meth to poverty to a lack of committment from men for our women and children is really blowing it for us big time. Unlike Jews, our people work for their money. They still know that it is important to have a self-reliant economy, community and healthy Teutonic work ethic and Celtic sense of identity. Even Lenin in his day admired our people’s powerful work ethic. Not only are we brilliant and creative, but we have the drive, muscle and determination to do something truly fanatastic. Things seem so aweful for us because we really are such a gifted and incredible people and anything but the best, especially the wallowing backwardsness of the era, is completely intolerable for our spirit. Drink can’t take that feeling away nor drugs nor finding a healthy partner who loves us to fill such void. The void comes from the need to freely express our intrensic nature for creative development, and hyper-alienation of the hour can only be eliminated with the new connect, the renassiance.

The redneck hates the intellectuals who betrayed him and hates his own organic intellectualism. Actually, this is true of the vast majority of just regular good ole’ all-American working people. Our people now think they are stupid, glorify at times the lowest common denominator of mass culture and have little hope in their hearts. If they had the hope they would be as brave as any Palestinian human bomb. You can see it in their eyes. You feel it when you go on a fishing trip or watch people drink coffee in the breakroom at work. You here it in the middle of the third quarter of a boring football game when the score is 24-7 and talk turns back to reality and not the images of distraction on the television screen. Maybe we can get some sort of healing going between nerds and rednecks, or all sorts of sub-cultural “groups” whose identity will eventually become meaningless in the new society anyways since we are the same people.

Our people aren’t going to become Nazis and they aren’t going to build the Bolshevik Revolution either. Our people are going to reclaim the neighborhood, and we need the trust of those who don’t trust fancy talk and only would be willing to work with those they learn to admire over a long period of time, leaders who either are organic or at least go out of their way to be as organic as possible to our conditions today. Our Lenin is going to be wearing a flannel shirt and blue jeans with a baseball cap. Maybe he worked at Dairy Queen when he was 16 and use to have a nice construction job making $20 an hour until that fell apart, or she is going to have concerns about the future of her children and sees beyond the phoney patriotism for the real patriotism of a mother for her cubs, watches her man become less of a man in his heart because he can’t provide the level of economic comfort he once did or thinks the family deserves.

We absolutely need violent extremism, because ZOG isn’t coming down without weapons and ammunition, but it has to be at the heart and soul of our people. It needs to be able to read the direction our people are going in without becoming too depressed when our people still cling to all sorts of self-defeating ideas. Violent extremism needs to have a dialectical compass that will do the best it can to find what is useful in our people, something that provides a dynamism and gets people to feel they aren’t part of some political group, but a LIBERATION STRUGGLE.

We need the equivelant of “Allahu Akbar!” to racial national materialism, a scientific battle cry, but one with deep religious emotion.

Nothing starts automatically. Revolutions don’t come about because of spontaneous collapse of “the system” but because they are built and mature so that when conditions are ripe they can mature.

2010 has come, let’s each vow to take concrete steps towards building things on the ground, and yes we need the regular “activists” too, but let’s push for getting the bulwark of our people who aren’t in any sort of group at all and are instinctively distrustful of them. To do that we must reject politics as usual and push for an uncompromising battle cry of liberation without being sectarian and splitting hairs over stupid ass secondary differances, many of which the people may eventually agree with us on through persuasion, anyways.

Let us each brainstorm in the coming weeks ideas for what we each are going to do, even if it is just some meetings and get togethers as a first start, to actually build something on the ground. Ask yourself how you are going to get those pissed off people with radical ideas that just float back into mainstream society into our National Front. We have to build things, even small ones, because it provides the mutual support against alienation at the very least, and has unlimited upwards potential beyond just that.

Long live the White race!

Long live the communist revolution!

Let us vow to die in the trenches of combat before ever even considering the thought of surrendering our European-American Nation!

Mr. Hussein is a strong advocate of progress under the banner of secularism and a united Arab destiny. Mr. Hussein believes that a dictatorial government that force-feeds modernization is a shortcut to progress. He is convinced that such an approach will catapult the backward Arab world, starting with Iraq, into the next century.
-New York Times

The Ba’athist movment was and is clearly run by mainly Caucasoid Arabs (of course there is some racial variation), of Mediterranean appearance in Syria and of partial Iranid mixture in Iraq, who claim religious beliefs from Christianity, to Islam, to atheism, to even Judaism. It was a Jewish mother who convinced Saddam Hussein’s mother not to abort him. While many Muslims participate, an important point in their worldview is the separation of church and state. Ba’thists enthusiastically embrace secularism and technological progress and oppose Sharia law. In addition, the Iraqi Ba’athists embraced the Soviet Union, logically becoming allies of third positionists as nationalists who are conscious of the dangers of capitalism. The Ba’thist Arabs were not religious fanatics but progressive Human Beings. “American” imperialists targeted the Ba’athists not because they were a theological threat, but out of Corporate greed. There was no link between Al-Qaeda and Ba’athism, so the war was fought under false pretenses.

Arab Ba’thists strongly resisted and continue to resist a global capitalist structure that not only keeps them enslaved but also the majority of the world. Hence, Arab Ba’thists and their American, European and Israeli Third Positionist brothers should work actively together to smash imperialistic ideologies like capitalism, Shia fundamentalism, Sunni fundamentalism and mainstream Torah Zionism (secular Zionism is okay) wherever possible! HAIL the heroic Ba’athists! Only those who do not understand the material falsehoods of Abrahamic theology do not appreciate the hard work that they did for the betterment of progressive thinking. The accomplishments of the Arab Ba’athists should be remembered by any self-respecting race realist and anti-capitalist nationalist.

While the Middle East, North Africa and Near East are now enslaved by a reactionary religion, at one point Arabs were major contributors to paganism and technical progress. Saddam Hussein set out to progress his people scientifically at the expense of religion in the same way that Stalin did!  The regime in Israel which the Ba’thists opposed was nothing but a puppet for American interests.  America stabbed Saddam Hussein in the back, and logically he had to respond with defiance.  But this does not mean that Saddam Hussein was fixated on killing Jews.  Being a secular man, I firmly believe that Saddam Hussein was open minded enough to embrace the right Israel if it wasn’t aligned against his interests behind America.

How do Clerics view the Ba’athists? As traitors to Islam who need to be decapitated!

HAIL the Ba’athist Arabs! Good fascists most of them… HAIL the ideology and the pragmatic results of its applications!

Some Arabs supported the Ba’thist Revolution to liberate the Arabs from the possibility of encroaching Sharia Law while others chose to side with the non-Arab South Asians who worship an Arabian religion in Iran.  The Ba’thist Arabs that sacrificed their lives to aid the destruction of Sharia law and liberal capitalism were spiritually connected to Europeans and secular Israelis that fought for the same goal.  It is absolutely correct to distinguish between good Arabs and bad Arabs. It is retarded to throw all Arabs into the same pot, declaring them enemies of progressive civilization. After all, historical evidence suggests otherwise. Besides, many Arabs were and are similar to Europeans, both culturally and racially.  All were pagan and now all are ruled by Abraham’s creed (Christianity, Judaism and Islam come from Abraham)! Physically, Bashar al-Assad is the president of Syria, and he is DEFINITELY Mediterranean in appearance, similar to a person in Southern Europe. Is Saddam Hussein non-White? No. Is Ralph Nader non-White? No. Is Steve Jobbs non-White? No.

Arabs as a group are not the enemy.  Massive immigration of Arabs into Europe, and Islamic imperialism are the enemy, but not Arabs in a physical sense just because they are Arabs. Theocratic nuts are the enemy. Failing to realize the genetic link between Europe and the Middle East is anthropology for a crippled mind. A lot of Arabs look Mediterranean in appearance, a few are actually blondish, and a few have a particular “Arabid” type which is still Caucasoid. There are, however, negroids who live in Arab countries and have mixed, and they should not be confused with the indigenous Arabs. In the case of Iraq, Iranian admixture is present (Persians are not Arabs).  There is variation in phenotype internal to the Arab linguistic group just like there is variation in phenotype internal to the Hispanic linguistic group, Soviet Geographical group and American geographical group.  Nevertheless the majority of Arabs are Caucasoid, with some variation in appearance from the Peninsula to the Gulf to the fertile crescent.

Islam is a reactionary religion. Iraq was a secular state and therefore indefinitely more progressive than the Islamic “republics” surrounding it. Most Arabs in Iraq opposed sharia law while other Muslims are religious fanatics. Why a socialist should support religious fanatics instead of rational secularists is beyond me. Ba’thism is a beacon of communitarianism. This is why it is necessary that Arabs orient themselves towards either Ba’thism or Social Nationalism (another secular party in Syria) instead of towards a capitalist liberalist AmeriKa or Sharia law. Social nationalists fringe movements and mainstream Ba’thist movements are trying to push Arabs in that direction. Only modernism can guarantee communitarian stability in the Middle East, if necessary by force. After all, it has been conclusively proven that hardcore Muslims are incapable of uniting themselves, for whatever cause. Muslims are by nature tribal and factional but Saddam Hussein brought many people together under his rule. Ba’athists are more industrious than theocrats as well. This is why Iraq remained a techno-progressive labor nation while Muslim nations reverted to their medieval (and natural) state of tribal and nomadic desert communities. While Saddam looked towards the future, Muslims longed to live in the past.

Iraq was a race realist tribal state which is superior to a liberal state. If Iraq was only a liberal state, it would have been defeated by Islam. But since Ba’athists are of a different mindset than Theocrats, Iraq adamantly resisted Iran. This is a good thing. Actually, to civilize the Middle East, Iraq was correct to invade Iran and Ku’wait. The effects of reactionary imperialism could be erased with progressive imperialism. Of course, for this to happen, Iraq needed the support of America, which backstabbed it, and could have benefited from a Euro-Siberian Empire.

There is a difference between Torah “Zionism” and supporting Jewish self-determination under the philosophy of secular nationalism. A Torah Zionist can be an ally to the extent they reconcile their views, but secularists are more likely to ally. Perhaps Jews and Arabs (many of which are racially Caucasoid, but that’s not the point) could even work together in the name of a Third Positionist ideology that focused less on religion.

During WWII, the hatred aimed at Jews shifted to Germans. Everyone hated Germans. Americans put Germans in concentration camps. Mussolini tried everything he could not to ally with Hitler. Poles and Soviets mass expelled Germans after WWII, leading to millions of deaths.

Now, everyone hates Muslims. And the secular Arab Nationalists hate the extreme Muslims.

Jews are Yesterday’s issue. Germans are too. Muslims are today’s issue! Any nationalist who can’t see that is an idiot or a subversive.

I speak here of White Power, not so much as a chauvinistic, divisive, and predatory project aligned with imperialism, but an all-encompassing civilizational project belonging to the popular classes of European-Americans stemming from their deep brokenness and desire for self-determination, one constituting the path and national constants by which any of our revolutionary patriots must travel if seeking to place our people on the solid footings of the resistance option.

The Zionist-controlled American government is the most evil and reactionary government the modern world has ever seen. In collusion with globalist stooges and petty imperialists, the Jews have demonstrated an evil conspiracy of death and destruction. Contrary to conventional wisdom, our own people aren’t so far down the totem pole from the Palestinians in this sinister plot for the subjugation of all nations.

Hence, while our people in the US don’t need to be excessively disparaged and demoralized as done by Western “leftists,” they do play a whole series of reactionary social roles and cling to a whole series of opportunistic self-defeating tenets deeply embedded in their psychology. Getting to the root of this destruction takes precedence above and beyond pragmatism and political expediency.

The lines of the “left” and right promoted to our people are treasonously criminal and will get us nowhere. Racial and national nihilism, anti-family degeneracy, and anti-moral lines fomented by the “left” on behalf of their Jewish and globalist masters break down the solidarity of our working class, and promote cosmopolitanism, Zionism and imperialism. Likewise, the rightist, “traditionalist,” and so-called “patriotic” crowd’s promotion of so-called “American Nationalism,” this satanic anti-Christian cult of Judeo- “Christianity,” and the spreading of illusions that paleo-conservativism is a viable alternative to neo-conservativism, are all criminal plots leading to the physical extermination of millions upon millions of people.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front (EASPF), has an extensive amount of material combating the anti-White, philo-Semitic, and cosmopolitan lines of the contemporary “left.” Hence, I wish to  devote this article to combating reactionary ideas and behavior on the Right which stem from our people and are the very heart and soul of our people’s humiliating self-defeat today.

First, we shall take on the myth that this greedy and bloodthirsty banker’s prison house of nations, America, is any sort of real country and one to which our patriotism should attach itself. Second, we shall analyze the origins and consequences of Judeo-“Christianity,” and demonstrate conclusively that whatever one personally thinks of genuine Christianity, is not a form of Christianity at all, but rather violently contrary to it. Third, we shall analyze the origins and scope of conservativism within the United States, and the relationship between paleo-conservativism which openly promotes US imperialism and neo-conservatism invented by Jewish Trotskites which dominates the leading quarters of imperialism today, to show that while objectively anti-imperialist at times, paleo-conservativism ultimately fails as a program of liberation. We shall throughout this piece demonstrate the role of the Jewish enemy, and the particular conspiracy they hatched long ago to exterminate our people and subjugate all the peoples of the world while destroying their distinct ways of life. Lastly, we shall affirm the call for total war and resistance by our people towards both international solidarity and the formation of the liberated European-American Democratic People’s Republic, one ideally to carry forward with socialist construction.

America is the enemy of our people and the world

The now deceased White Separatist guerrilla fighter turned resistance detainee David Lane, whose “14 words” were to become the bedrock of a quasi-national democratic line among White Nationalists, whatever other major differences I have with him, made clear that America is our enemy.

“Determined to destroy the integrity of races, nations and cultures for the Zionist New World Order, The Red, White, and Blue traveling man’s murder machine has been an engine of holocaust, genocide, and death unmatched in human history.

But still the CRAP wraps logic five times around a crooked tree to proclaim themselves “American Patriots” who support “Our Boys” as they bomb helpless nations into the Stone Age and blow tens of thousands or millions of women and children into tiny fragments. Always looking for someone else to blame, the CRAP screams, it’s the Jews, it’s the Jews. Well I’d be the last to deny that the media is dominated by Jews who have an agenda of world domination and of extinction for White Aryans.” — Excerpt from “C.R.A.P. Christian Right-wing American Patriots.”

Indeed, while we must condemn and oppose the Jews and Zionists, Lane’s self-criticism of our people who come from such quarters is completely on the mark, and in this case he was referring to Christian Right-wing American Patriots as “CRAP”. One could go much further in condemning pro-Americanism from amongst our people, because even the more mediocre trends within our genuinely nationalist and anti-globalist quarters are a tiny fraction of the overall European-American populace. Most of our people have no problem whatever, not only with the mass-murder and subjugation of peoples, with the government and ruling classes who perform such crimes against our people and the world, or even with the Jews. Hence, fierce ideological struggle is the first order of the day.

The same GI mercenary goons occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, may death and suffering be upon them, are the very army that will be mass-murdering our people in the streets in the event a genuine revolutionary struggle stems from them. Supposedly “anti-government” rednecks and Southern Nationalists usually whine to no end about “terrorism” and “supporting the troops,” and yet were a Confederate Army or any other anti-government formation by our people to be created, this same government would be calling them “terrorists,” and it would be US troops and police who work to destroy them.

How can this possibly be White Power when the enemy multicultural hellhole bombs hapless Serbia, that is a White Aryan traditionally Christian people and the last truly great European-descended force of resistance, and destroys what was then the last revolutionary unitary project of White Europe, i.e. Yugoslavia? Tomislav Sunic and those like him who invent the existence of a “communist threat” to justify race treason and aiding imperialism in turning brother against brother must rejected.

Can we really believe the Cold War was a good thing? It was Zionism and Jewish finance capital that acted as the shock force for world imperialism in bringing down the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was no more Jewish and Zionist at that point than a Palestinian human bomb, having long since purged the eternal enemy from Soviet and Eastern European power. Can we really believe pointing missiles and nuclear bombs at our White brothers and sisters in Europe because they liberated themselves from finance capital is a form of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the world? Would our people have benefited from White European-descended peoples dropping nuclear weapons on one another? Can we really believe this was even about communism, and not rather a conspiracy of aggression against our continental mother’s womb, just as this same enemy targeted Germany for annihilation by fire twice and has done to our brothers and sisters throughout Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East? I mean just look today and we see Russia isn’t run by Communists, but yet ZOG America’s ruling classes are still bound and determined to provoke another Cold War, crying to no end against the heroic liberation of brotherly South Ossetia and Abkhazia from ZOG Georgia and placing military instillations all over Europe against Moscow.

“Supporting our troops” means asking the Jews and globalists to mass-murder and subjugate both the world and ourselves with their lackeys. Every enemy who falls today at the hands of the Mujahadeen in Iraq and Afghanistan is a common victory for the truly patriotic forces from among our people. Let us “support the troops” only when they refuse the orders of the imperialist ZOG regime, march away from Iraq westward towards Tel Aviv, when they switch sides and turn their guns the other way, and particularly when they atone for their crimes by blowing up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Otherwise, may death and demise be upon them!

Equally, anyone carrying a badge is an enemy and deserves to be killed when attacking our people or anyone. You tell me, all you idiots who cry and whine when Blacks taunt and praise the killing of “the pigs” in their songs, who brought down Ruby Ridge and Waco with arms? Who is the armed wing of the Zionist Occupation Government? Who is spying on us, beating and imprisoning demonstrators, and every step of the way works to infiltrate and sabotage any hopes for our national liberation? Snitching and cop-calling are NOT “patriotic;” the pigs are not our friends!

Of course, I support some Black, Red Indian or Puerto Rican radical that is blowing their brains out. The only question is: WHY AREN’T OUR PEOPLE WILLING TO DO THE EXACT SAME THING WHEN THESE LACKIES OF ZOG COME MARCHING INTO OUR HOMES AND COMMUNITIES HELLBENT ON SUBJUGATING US AND MASS-MURDERING OUR POPULAR CLASSES AND POLITICAL DISSIDENTS?!

An example that I always bring up is the case of my colleague Kevin Walsh, who was felonized after having an armed standoff with government agents attempting to unjustly detain him. People reacted to the case as if he were “nuts.” Yet, many would completely support the very same case if he were in some exotic-sounding “Third World” country far removed from their comfort zones. What, we aren’t suppose to defend ourselves with arms when the enemy is trying to destroy us? Is that really so “extreme” or are our sensibilities so self-defeating and extremely brainwashed that we wind up thinking surrender and humiliation are acceptable?

Yet, the paradigm goes much deeper than being against the government of America. America itself doesn’t have a legitimate right to exist, is again I repeat, A BANKER’S PRISONHOUSE OF NATIONS AND NOT A NATION IN AND OF ITSELF. It is a project directly aligned with the Zionist entity, one more repressive than any other in modern history that will eventually lead to our extermination. Our nation is NOT America. Our hearts and heritage, raped and ravaged by the Zionist multicultural enemy countless times, must for our survival lie with the continental European mother’s womb of our people. In short, we’re White European-descended Aryans who formed a nationality with a common bloodline, language and heritage who require territorial imperatives for our ethnic survival, but we are NOT Americans. To be more exact, call us European-Americans if so long as in so doing we are defining a Eurocentric people and civilization and not a cosmopolitan anti-national project defined by the Red, White and Jew. Delinking our identity from Europe is a Zionist plot to rob of us of our Aryan soul and identity, and rather promote the existence an illusionary “American race” where the Africans, Red Indians, and others perish beside us on an altar of money-worship.

America is itself a concept of immigration and therefore anti-national. From the idiocy of our ancestors fleeing the continental mother’s womb instead of working to make their homeland a better place, to bombing and attempting to break down the ethnic character of the peoples of the world who resist globalism, to spreading such destruction against the various peoples residing in the United States who over the course of centuries each developed unique cultures and heritages with the genocidal use of “open borders” today, America is a dance with death. Hence, to be a nationalist, to believe in nationalism, and even to be an internationalist in the correct context, is to be anti-American and is to delink ourselves from America. The only thing that will ever be White and truly Eurocentric about America are the nihilism and rotting corpses of our people.

American Nationalism is objectively anti-nationalist globalism, for the destruction of the national unit, the great black hole, clearly lacks an ethnic character and patriotic dimension. In practical terms, American Nationalism today is just simply rednecks becoming Jewish and a mass support base for military aggression, globalism and consumerism. Such “nationalism” is our enemy. It cannot logically be construed to mean the patriotic love of our people and working to preserve and enrich what makes us unique.

It’s not only those followers of Marcus Garvey or Puerto Rican freedom fighters for whom the task of delinking from America stands as a sacred patriotic objective. White Power, when correctly defined, ultimately wants both separation from and death to America. Indeed, “White Power, Death to America!”

While our people are very different from both the Arabs and the Koreans, and hence have their own particular road to national liberation, the best models existing today, and worthy of careful study, admiration, and solidarity by our people are those of north Korea and the Iraqi Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party.

Both projects, while guided by scientific socialism, took a far more thorough-going analysis of nationalism than pretending it to be something harmful to the unity of the popular classes or international solidarity, both realizing that nations are more than something which arose as product of capitalist development which will or should “whither away” as socialist construction intensifies. Both projects also defend the principle that to be a good internationalist one should first be a good patriot and that the nation alone decides the course of its struggle as masters of one’s own destiny and revolution.

Equally relevant for us, both projects are guided by a mother party capable of unifying the people though ideological struggle and developing a monolithic and organic ideology in the course of rooting out opportunism and erroneous ideas and behaviors. Like the eventuality of our own struggle against the Jews and American regime, both celebrate the central role of armed struggle and used their unique heritages to build a modern people-first civilizational project. In this regard, one finds leader Kim Jong Il’s On Correctly Understanding Nationalism and On Preserving the Juche Character and National Character of the Revolution and Construction extremely relevant and creatively applicable to our own struggle once liberated from ethnic chauvinism and pro-imperialist illusions.For our people, we call for preserving our ethnic character and heritage without pretending that the platform of the dominant White nationalist paradigm or the old Confederate regime are somehow capable of liberating us. We call for European-American motherland defense equipped with class analysis and a proletarian internationalist outlook as the guiding lens in these Zionized and pro-American times of defeat and despair.

Our nationalism must be a progressive nationalism, which while working to defend our blood and ethnic character against cosmopolitanism, is ultimately part of the global front to preserve the existence of nations and social liberation of the world’s popular classes in general.

Judeo-“Christianity” is our enemy

The historical accuracy of the Bible and the question of the existence of Jesus is not relevant to our struggles today. In practical terms, Christianity is today a two millennia old religious and political force in the world with a large number of adherents. With all due respect to the Pagans and non-religious from among our people, Christianity is simply a reality. While I to detest many of its political uses today and also recognize its origins as something distinctly foreign and Semitic, Christianity is an organic White Eurocentric expression from our people today. It is important, even for those like myself who are atheists, to recognize that Christianity has become a part of our people, and that many true Christians are our comrades today.

Hence, we must always hold a place at the table for all of our Christian brothers and sisters who work for social justice and the advancement and upliftment of our people. In criticizing Judeo-“Christianity,” I do not attack these people or the religion of our ancestors, nor am I attempting to discourage our people from practicing true Christianity. Rather, I attack a political poison masking itself in the image our people, but one that is inherently contrary to their best interests and that cannot be construed as being genuinely “Bible-based” anyways.

One should not be surprised that the Christian Jew was ultimately to submit before the Jewish Jew in the power struggle over domination of finance capital. Talmudism, on both a secular and religious level, being far more handcrafted at the art of subversion and sabotage and the Jews themselves raised in such a manner and spirit, than their Christian counterparts turned lackeys, and logically meaning the domination of Jewish Judaism over “Christian” Judaism. Our Christian population will either find alternative paths ranging from Islam, Buddhism and paganism to simply becoming atheists and agnostics or else they will need to reclaim the revolutionary potential of their creed as many have already done. However, Judeo-“Christianity” is unredeemable and shall be annihilated.

Judeo-“Christianity” presents the false notion that Jewish values are also Christian values and that the Zionist entity is part of the will of God in fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. It is treason to true Christianity, because it perverts Christian values and promotes attacks on real Christians in Palestine and elsewhere in the Arab world. “Love your neighbor as yourself” becomes “defraud and exploit your neighbor and physically attack him if he resists or even objects too much.” The teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin are far closer to the teachings of Christ than any of this predatory Judaeo-“Christian” gutter religion.

Paleo-Conservativism: an infantile disorder

Paleo-conservativism is the general trends of conservativism prior to neo-conservativism. It’s espousers, to varying degrees essentially believe in what one would consider “traditional American values” prior to the particularly Jewish/Trotskite/fanatically interventionist-oriented takeover of both the Republican Party and American nationalist thought. Essentially, while at times objectively anti-imperialist, they’re just whining because White Judeo-“Christian” quarters fail to dominate the leading quarters of imperialist finance capital and policy decisions on domestic and foreign affairs and essentially have the same idiotic attachment to the “American

Dream” as do their neo-conservative rivals. However, they detest America’s globalist role today while glossing over the fact that a whole series of reactionary ideas and behaviors they oppose are the ideological basis for the forming of America and were always tactics and strategies used by the enemy government.

The United States didn’t become imperialistic and hell bent for world domination when it became essentially Jewish. Becoming Jewish just made the problem a whole lot worse. We can trace clear back to wars of aggression against the Red Indians, to support for the Jewish-led slave trade in both the North and South, to the war of aggression against Dixie, and to America’s subversive decision to become an imperialist power clear back to 1898 and the aggression against the Philippines, Cuba and Puerto Rico, while claiming to be their friend and brother against Spanish colonialism.

Miscegenation didn’t begin with Neo-conservatives. Not only were enslaving Africans and mass murdering Red Indians morally wrong and inexcusable, though the meaning, relevance and scope of such actions has become greatly distorted, but they led us to lose our unique European identity by blood and culture for a false and enemy American one, as much as it did to those it colonized. Chinese immigrants, like their Irish counterparts – our brothers today, were brought in on a large scale by those who adhered to the will of the “Founding Fathers” as a source of cheap and easily exploited labor. This can hardly be seen as wanting to preserve our ethnic character.

The fact is, our “Founding Fathers,” without exception, were all garbage, who hailed an anti-national project where people were advised to abandon their ethnic character and nationalist-class struggle for the merchant’s pipe dream of America. Any true White Nationalist is not a paleo-conservative and should hate America’s founding leaders and ideology as much as leftists and peoples oppressed by White World colonialism.

Paleo-conservatives often play an anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist social role at a time when our culture, like those of the entire world, is being rapidly eroded, but they do so from a distorted and defeatist worldview that lacks class analysis, honest historical basis or a path forward. Our duty as patriots must not be to make the impossible return to the origins of our demise before the onslaught of liberalism and globalism, but to build a revolutionary path forward.

Build the European-American National Democratic Front and People’s War!

The illusions must smashed. The American regime, dominated by International Zionism but criminal in its own right, is our arch-enemy and ethnic catastrophe. Here we affirm that as ZOG is standing in the way of our national liberation and behaving as a violent anti-nationalist and anti-popular classes menace around the world by force of arms, armed struggle is the primary mode and necessity for our people’s survival, territorial imperative and the formation of a liberated and independent European-American Democratic People’s Republic. Without undue bravado nor illusions, we call upon our best and brightest sons and daughters to build and enhance the European-American people’s mass struggle, prerequisite for our war of national liberation, with total commitment and selflessness.

We must join hands with the “Axis of Resistance” constituting those groups and lands around the world combating imperialism and the Jews. Primarily this includes the Mujahadeen in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan and Somalia, and the People’s Wars in the Philippines and Colombia. It also constitutes the friendly peoples of Korea, Cuba, Russia, Serbia, Venezuela, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, China, Pakistan and India, Belarus, Myanmar, Sudan, Zimbabwe and others. In so doing, being masters of our own destiny, such solidarity is not a manifestation of flunkies. Hence, such solidarity should not be without mutual autonomy or criticism, but as a genuinely organic expression of solidarity among patriots against a common enemy regardless of ethnic and ideological differences.

The current rejectionist tactics of more advanced White Nationalist groups, namely “lone wolf actions,” anti-regime armed standoffs and “terrorism” are not without extremely positive and effective attributes in light of the absolute necessity of military operations and the lack of a revolutionary mass line and political-military apparatus capable of currently defeating the American regime and the Jews. They are not an end in and of themselves however. Our people must launch a successful guerrilla war capable of galvanizing the political arena and mobilizing the masses of our European-American people or we may well perish.

Our revolutionary struggle for liberation is not a “Race War,” and the designs of International Zionism for such fratricide between ourselves and the Black nation, as espoused by certain myopic and sectarian forces only serves to undermine our struggle and resistance. We also call for the formation of solidarity between European-descended peoples of the United States and African-descended peoples and others based on mutual respect of ethnic identity, brotherhood and friendship, and resistance to a common threat. Any ethnic contradictions between ourselves and Black people and others must be secondary to a recognition of the need for class solidarity and the need for all peoples to correct a whole series of idiotic social roles and ideas, though rejecting of assimilation and racial nihilism. We must ultimately unite in a political-military showdown towards defeating Jewish power, promoting the resistance of peoples outside the US territorial boundaries on the frontlines against globalism, overthrowing the regime, and defending the self-determination and ethnic character of peoples.

Furthermore, we laud the heroic acts of resistance which occurred on September 11^th, 2001 and welcome international combat volunteers, who also recognize in the American regime and the Jews a common enemy of their people and who are currently more advanced politically, spiritually, and militarily to combat them. At a time of total globalist onslaught we cannot pretend that our national borders exist in any coherent and natural sense anyways. This being the case, we respect the calls made by various Jihad organizations for opening up the field of combat both in the United States and the Zionist entity, rather than considering these to be acts of aggression against our people as proponents of the “war on terror” erroneously do.

Many forces conducting solidarity activities, building the movement against war, anti-Zionists, advocates of self-determination and anti-government agitators caution against raising the alarm bells with support of violent resistance to the Jews and regime, promotion of “terrorism” and the call for destroying the United States. Such people would argue that the actual conditions for successfully conducting People’s War currently do not exist or even that “terrorism” is universally immoral and counterproductive. They point out that this is potentially useful for demonizing more “legitimate” organizations, mass-appeal aboveground political work and single issue causes. It’s also true when they argue that this carries with it immense security risks and that the super-majority of people are deeply turned off by such an approach.

Yet, we cannot possibly forsake the revolution for political breadcrumbs or pragmatism. The necessity of armed nationalist-class struggle ranks as the singular greatest imperative both for the survival and liberation of my European-American people and for the final defeat of imperialism and Zionism around the world, i.e. for the national liberation of all peoples as the victory of international proletarian nationalism over cosmopolitanism, Americanism and globalism.

First, as is the duty of all people, I am affirming here the call for the self-determination and liberation of my people as a sacred principle and inalienable right, regardless of calls for moderation. At a time White people are being slated for destruction and demise, with all due respect, moderation and restraint are off the table. Secondly, one has to seriously question if anti-globalist forces within the misnomered “Western World,” unlike their counterparts in the equally misnomered “Third World,” are actually achieving anything at all. This leads to honestly assessing the state of defeat and duress, and presents clearly the centrality of revolutionary dynamism and correct ideology if we are going to tip the balance of power in our favor. Third, again I berate the proponents of dogmatic humanism and moralism for their degenerate blanket condemnations of the truly liberating brutality of resistance terror. The reality is we are fighting an enemy who lacks principles, chivalry or dignity. The idea of rules of engagement becomes a Talmudic length saga, rather than merely stressing the need for focusing attacks on the enemy more so than on our own popular classes (with the exception of the Zionist entity). This has become chains around the arms of our people and objectively enables reactionary anti-human terror of aggression a billion fold more barbaric than collateral damage caused by resistance actions, for it is such resistance actions that help to partially blunt the enemy’s aggression. Lastly, everything I have said about America, that it does not have a right to exist and will ultimately destroy our own just as it has so many others, is completely true. Hence, my position rests on its own merits.

The European-American “left,” unlike their counterparts throughout Eastern Europe, Asia, Arabia, Africa, Turkey and Latin America, overwhelming lack any real national dimension, red meat-eating instinct, willingness and thirst for combat, anti-Judaism and anti-Zionism in their psychology, and even are generally not opposed to globalism and imperialism. They have become chattel slaves, effeminate pacifists and the most loathing and distracted of shabbos goyim and ethnic nihilists. We struggle so that one day the best and brightest of our sons and daughters on the left join the ranks of proletarian Aryan combatant fighters, wishing defeat for the poisons of the New Left and Old Left alike.

Now looking honestly, my brothers and sisters on the right and those still embedded with a sense of salvation and ethnic survival, are not without the many fatal flaws I have mentioned in this appeal. May it be that ideological struggle and the blood of our martyrs cleanses our people, strengthens them, aids their contributions to overall global cause, and finds our people surviving and flourishing. Our greatest threat is apathy, our greatest freedom painful self-criticism, myself included.

We are facing the eventuality of the complete breakdown of imperialist finance capital. The imperialist system of the regime, aside from spreading the ills of multiculturalism, produced a parasitic economy unable to stand. Arise and destroy it with arms!

Glory to the European-American proletarian nation, hail to the White race!

Long live the resistance option, death to our enemies!

Those of us who love our Communist identity, who love the working class of our nation and want to preserve our ethnic character and believe in international solidarity with the popular masses of other countries fighting against Zionism and imperialism, have a profound obligation to tell the truth and struggle to rectify this embarrassing and humiliating situation. This is true no matter how many times we ourselves are accused of espousing “racism,” “xenophobia,” “national chauvinism,” “anti-Semitism,” “White Supremacism” or “Islamo-fascism,” and even “anti-Communism.” As a revolutionary principle, the popular classes struggle together as a national unit to build the revolution. This patriotic class struggle forms proletarian internationalism not based upon wanting to destroy nations and form a “Communist International,” but by the bonds of solidarity and cooperation between patriots of one land with another. The leading forces behind the United States and imperialism worldwide, which struggles to break down the ethnic character of people, are overwhelmingly Jewish.

21^st Century Communism is National Communism, not dogmatic “anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism,” not liberal identity politics and definitely not national nihilism and Jew-loving self-hatred. European-American National Communism isn’t chauvinistic nor the metaphysics of Hitlerite National Socialism, but it will coordinate with our kindred in the White Power national democratic front and other peoples on its own terms. It also will not fall for the trap of “anti-racism” and “anti-fascism” or whatever Jewish and nihilist conspiracy is hatched to prevent us from closing ranks with our kindred, regardless of whether or not they are currently anti-communist.

While we admire Stalin’s leadership during the Soviet-led struggle against Operation Barbarossa, we cannot possibly deny that many good points existed early on in the German revolution of 1933, and that very real limitations existed in the Communist movement, namely Jew-loving illusions and national nihilism. Further, we argue that Adolf Hitler has become the greatest sacred cow of the entire world, a sacred cow that needs to be correctly deconstructed because it stands in the way of our liberation and of movements of national release against globalism throughout the world.

We also will not deny that the dominant White Nationalist movement, regardless of our internal disagreements and its limitations, is not without many positive features. We defend “Europe for the Europeans” and opposition to “open borders” when Arabs and others ask us to “tone it down a notch,” because White people have a right to self-determination as much as Palestinians and Iraqis. Within the United States, multiculturalism is nothing more than a codeword for Zionist-driven cosmopolitanism and nihilistic death for which all of us are ultimately victims. We refuse to differentiate between Jews and Zionists, because it cannot possibly be argued that this lie has any logical benefit for our struggle or the overall struggle against imperialism. We do not deny the existence of races or the centrality of ethno-nationalism as the only genuine form of nationalism today, but merely state that such questions are the internal matter of other peoples and oppose genuine ethnic chauvinism while equally lambasting calls of denunciation against true nationalism when it is slandered by the forces of “political correctness.” Lastly, like all White Nationalists in the US, we love White people, are proudly Eurocentric and openly quarrel with the dominant leftist paradigm that pretends European-Americans are not an oppressed nation today with a right to self-determination.

Our communism is not an attempted subversion of the people through chameleon tactics. We have no hidden agenda, because our goals are public knowledge. Our call for socialism, anti-imperialism and anti-Zionism and the liberation of White people through a coordinated national democratic front is an open and steady call. Our political alliances are honest alliances, regardless of real differences, based on an understanding of needing unified collective White European-American action and eventually coordination with other people to bring down the American regime and Jewish power worldwide. We are not rightists with the rightists and leftists with the leftists, though we do speak to each in ways to which they can relate. We are patriotic communists at all times.

Unlike other group identities formed around religion or based on national identity (without conceding that the Jews constitute a nation), the very act of being a Jew is hostile to the world and without redeeming value. We admire Lenin, but he was wrong on this. Almost no real “Jewish proletariat” exists to be differentiated from the Jewish bourgeoisie, because Jews are lazy predatory creatures who close ranks around a common goal of world domination and economic slavery. We do need to condemn White globalists and others who are power holders in imperialist finance capital and the conspiracy to destroy nation states and think in terms of class analysis, but it is very important to understand that the leading quarters of imperialism and the true power structure of the United States are all Jews and that the entire Jewish community closes ranks with this threat to liberty.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front, calls on honest elements of the White European-descended left to correct their mistakes on the national question and the Jewish problem and join ranks for a nation liberation struggle to come. We call on White European-descended rightists to understand that while the dominant Western leftist political movements are Judaic assaults on the dignity of the white race, that not all of us are without great love for and pride in our people, and we do want a unified front to preserve our identity and promote our liberation. We address our allies outside the realm of our kindred as friends and comrades, but we do not allow that they should possibly dictate the terms of our mass line. We argue that natural differences always will exist between the mass lines of completely different people, but that this should not stand in the way of amiable relations and collective solidarity against a common threat.

Imperialism, not White solidarity, is the real enemy of humanity!

How long until we start to commit acts that they’ll never forget? This is not a call to violence, to all the subversives who read this, but a purely introspective question. At what point is enough really enough?

Why fight for the preservation of ideological systems which hate infidels and continue to thumb their nose at science? Unlike the Iraqi Ba’athists, Theocratic Muslims believe in permanent revolution just as strongly as Leon Trotsky but are not advocating socialism but Islam. If you are an idealist like me, it is saddening that the middle east can’t fight American imperialism with anything but religious fundamentalism. In some ways, I believe the victim is responsible for the rape, to put it crudely.

If the world is divided between two theological viewpoints, secularism and Islam, and only one can exist, then sympathizing with the other is self-destructive. If someone has to be supreme, then it is better America than Iran or Afghanistan. Let it be made clear that if many of these regimes had the military strength to dominate, they would take advantage of it. It is only for material reasons that America dominates. But America is not more evil than Islam.

Yes we are ruled by disgusting liberalism. Nobody denies that. Yes our leaders are corrupt. But that does not mean that I sympathize with every single enemy America has.

When the car gets stuck in the mud, the government must be there to get the car out.

The link

WASHINGTON — Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd on Tuesday called for sweeping new government powers to prevent another economic collapse, protect consumers and dismantle failing institutions.

Dodd’s 1,100 page-draft would strip the Federal Reserve and other regulators of their powers to regulate banks and hand that job to a single agency. The bill also would take away the Fed’s ability to monitor credit cards and mortgages and establish a new “Consumer Financial Protection Agency.”

The bill, inspired by last year’s financial meltdown, will minimize “economic turmoil and protect(ing) the interest of taxpayers,” the Connecticut Democrat wrote.

An advance copy of the legislation was obtained by The Associated Press.

President Barack Obama has demanded that Congress rewrite the federal regulations governing Wall Street to close legal loopholes and prevent the kind of fraud and abuse that fed the crisis.

Dodd’s proposal was expected to gain broad support among Democrats, but Republicans haven’t signed on.

Among the top points of contention is Dodd’s desire to create a new agency to protect consumers taking out home loans or using credit cards against predatory lending and surprise interest rate hikes.

Republicans counter that creating another bureaucracy will make business harder for banks and limit the availability of credit.

The Senate Banking Committee was expected to review the legislation next week, paving the way for a floor vote by early next year.

The House was already on track with its own proposal. Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said he expects a floor vote in December.

Dodd’s plan differs slightly from Frank’s bill and the administration’s proposal in that it would do more to scale back the powers of the Federal Reserve, which many lawmakers blame for the economic crisis.

For example, Frank has proposed that the Fed be in charge of enforcing tougher regulations on large and influential financial firms so that they don’t grow “too big to fail.” A council of regulators would monitor these firms and make recommendations.

Under Dodd’s bill, the Fed would have less reach. An “agency for financial stability,” managed by a board that includes Fed representation would enforce new rules and dismantle complex financial firms if they threaten the broader economy.

Both the House and Senate bills would likely put limits on the Fed’s ability to provide emergency loans and eliminate its oversight of consumer protections.

Also unlike the House bill, Dodd’s proposal would establish a single federal regulator for banks called the “Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration.”

The single regulator would get rid of two existing federal bank regulators — the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. It also would strip the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation of its oversight of state banks and the Fed in their supervisory powers of bank holding companies.

Dodd has said consolidated oversight is needed to prevent banks from shopping around for an agency that will impose the least amount of oversight.

Quite frankly, it is time for populists to do a little more than talk about opposing the regime. If there is no light at the end of the tunnel, then populists should start to organize not against a particular party but against the entire power structure.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/06/news/economy/jobs_october/

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The nation’s unemployment rate rose above 10% for the first time since 1983 in October, a much worse jump than expected as employers continued to trim jobs from payrolls.

The reading, reported by the government Friday, is a sign of the continued weakness in the labor market even though the economy grew in the third quarter following the longest and deepest downturn since the Great Depression.

The government reported that the unemployment rate spiked to 10.2%, up from 9.8% in September. It is the highest that this rate has been since April 1983. Economists had forecast an increase to 9.9%.

There was also a net loss of 190,000 jobs in October, according to the Labor Department, an improvement from a revised estimate of 219,000 job losses in September. However, economists surveyed by Briefing.com had forecast a loss of only 175,000 jobs in October. This was the 22nd straight month of job losses.

“The only good news is the number of layoffs are dropping off, but those who are laid off still aren’t finding jobs,” said David Wyss, chief economist with Standard & Poor’s.

The jump in the unemployment rate was driven up by a large drop in the number of people who describe themselves as self-employed, as well as the number of teenagers who have jobs. The unemployment rate for teenagers in the labor force soared to 27.6%, up 1.8 percentage points and hitting a third straight record high.

Both teen workers and the self-employed are not captured very well in the government’s separate survey of employers that is used to calculate the number of people on U.S. payrolls. That explains much of the disconnect between fewer job losses overall and the much worse unemployment rate.

The rise in unemployment was not spread evenly across the population. For those with college degrees, the unemployment rate fell to 4.7% from 4.9% in September, as the unemployment rate for those in management, professional, and related occupations slipped to 4.7% from 5.2%.

But the unemployment rate for production jobs, such as factory workers, jumped to 14.5% from 14.1%. The jobless rate for workers in construction, maintenance or natural resources industries such as mining rose to 15.5% from 14.3%.
0:00 /3:08Real unemployment really bad

“There’s a real mismatch between the unemployed people out there compared to what job openings are available,” said John Silvia, chief economist with Wells Fargo Securities. He said construction workers who lost a job when the housing bubble burst don’t have the skills to compete for jobs in sectors that are hiring, such as health care and technology.

Government efforts to end job losses have had limited effects, although the Obama administration estimated last month that 640,000 jobs were created or saved by the federal stimulus package passed earlier this year. But that’s modest compared to the 7.3 million jobs that have been lost since the start of 2008.

Christina Romer, chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, said the steady decline in monthly job losses since earlier this year is a hopeful sign for the economy.

But she acknowledged there’s still significant pain for those looking for work. “Having the unemployment rate reach double-digits is a stark reminder of how much work remains to be done before American families see the job gains and reduced unemployment that they need and deserve,” she said.

Friday’s report comes one day after Congress voted overwhelmingly to extend unemployment benefits by up to 20 weeks. There are now a record 5.6 million people who have been unemployed for six months or longer, as the average time an unemployed person has been out of a job hit 26.9 weeks.

Prior to this report, most economists had believed that the unemployment rate would keep rising and that job losses would continue into next year. But the jump in unemployment in October took it to levels worse than what many previously had expected to be the peak.

According to a survey of top forecasters by the National Association of Business Economics last month, the consensus estimate among economists was that unemployment would hit a high of 10% in the final three months of this year and the first quarter of 2010.

The five economists with the most bearish forecasts had expected unemployment to rise to 10.2% in the fourth quarter of this year before hitting 10.5% in the first half of next year.

Wyss is one of those economists who had projected an unemployment rate of 10.5% in the middle of next year. He said Friday’s report may force him to raise his worst case estimate.

“Some things aren’t playing out the way I expected them to,” he said. “There’s just no good news in this report.”

But others said they see some early signs of life for the labor market. Sung Won Sohn, economics professor at California State University Channel Islands, noted that the biggest increase in temporary employees in two years took place in October.

Employers typically bring in workers on a temporary basis before deciding to make more permanent hires. As such, he expects gains in payrolls by next spring.

“Despite the gloomy job picture, there are some encouraging signs,” he said.

My race realist stance goes hand in hand with my techno-fascist view of the world. Science must destroy political correctness as quickly as it destroys religion. The power structures in America and the world must be altered for this to take place. I smell Stalinist purges in the future. The techno-nationalist bureaucracy will change the entire world. New scientific study will make old views obsolete. Liberalism, Paleoconservatism, White Nationalism and Hitlerlism are the past but the future will re-examine and improve.

I am for expelling all immigrants from Europe. As for European Muslims, such as Albanians, Bosniaks, etc., they do not usually wear veil.

Then again, the problem will presents just with Islamic tourists, students and visitors, and I think they have all the right to dress according to their uses. Fascism protects and upholds tradition.

It is clear that the face must be unveiled on request for identification.

Spengler’s Apprentice

I think that’s really a stunning idea; just ejecting all immigrants outright. But it does raise an interesting question: many Europeans travel and live in nations other than their home nation, would intra-European immigration be met with the same stringent policy as foreign immigration into Europe? I for one think it should; Poles have no place in Ireland, nor do Spaniards have any place in Germany, nor do Ukrainians belong in Italy.

CaesarPrinceps

I agree with you.

I am not a White Nationalist, who agrees to savage White immigration. Why should I have 2 millions Russians in Italy???

One thing is study and work sojourns, which are fine. I am planning myself to study six month in Germany and three years in France.
Another is eradicating people and planting them in other cultures they do not belong with.

It is true, that in some case it is different, because we are speaking of similar people which can assimilate easily. e.g. France had absorbed during XX century some millions Portuguese, Spaniards and Italians, whereas there is easier assimilation between Germans and Dutch or Danes and Norwegians or Ukrainians and Belarusians, but this should be more the exception than the rule.

Flash

White Nationalism is founded by con artists actually. Don Black and David Duke don’t seriously believe in racial seperation or white supremacism. All over the internet I have found numerous scams started by these two ‘White Nationalists’ where they basically stole millions from their followers. Even on their own website they beg for donations constantly. If you’re a high-ranking white n. member and refuse to donate, you get an insant ban.

Ocelot

I do believe that David Duke believes in recial segregation and white supremacism, after all, he was de Imperial Wizard/National Director of the KKK. But it can easily be that he frauds white nationalists on the internet.

I don’t know much about Don Black, and I actually don’t care about him. He appeals to me as an uncharismatic fraud (where Duke still has some credibility in my eyes).

What disturbes me about Duke is that he is allying with Muslim-extremists throughout the middle-east to keep grip of his anti-semetic ideals. Because in this day and age, the white nationalists do best to ally with Israel (if they have to ally with one of the two) to defend their western homelands from Islamisation.

I think it depends on the approach one takes; in my opinion Duke is more of a “sophisticated” WN than a skin-head type, so his concern is not the coloured peoples who “pose a threat” to the white population, but the Jews. I won’t call it anti-Semitism par excellence, since he is siding with Semites in allying with Mohammedans but it is indeed the bourgeois anti-Semitism of the last century which casts the Jews in the role of evil internationalist millionaires whose sole goal is to hold the world firmly in their grip no matter the means. Duke may not be as much of a charlatan as Black is, but he’s just as much of a waste.

I really agree with many of the points made about identifying the differences between Europeans and opposing retarded anti-Semitism. I don’t know that I would go so far as to demand all immigrants are expelled, but I would definitely demand that the concept of citizenship isn’t confused with that of nationhood.

I don’t mean to single out David Duke or Don Black; they just happened to become the topic of the thread and are relevant to white nationalism.

The decaying corpses of Nazi traitors signals a change in history.
The fiery light of national liberation explodes for occidental glory.
Buildings hasten to fall in harmonic rhythm, story by story.
The Third Reich dismantled in gory haste,
For the viability and stability of the white race.
Germans, Jews and Slavs rejoice.
The Reich will capitulate in disgrace.

Hitler is to blame
For neo-liberalism’s reign.

The scapegoat has changed, and the Nazis have become the Jews.
Ideology rearranged. Only an idiot would refuse to chose.
HAIL the Fire Bombing of Dresden!
Hail the New Nationalism!

Hitler ruined fascism, even if it was an imperfect ideology to start with. He wasn’t even a true fascist but everyone thinks he was. And Mussolini can be blamed for throwing his hat behind Hitler, even though greed (as opposed to ideology) was the clear motivation for that. Hitler and Mussolini were as different as Night and Day, but Mussolini got too greedy.

Pragmatically, “morally” and logically, this is the way to go. Portray Hitler as a deviant oppositionist the way Trotskyites and Stalinists do to each other.

Powerful technocratic state governments are imposing their ideology brutally against reactionaries (oppositional religious and political groups) while making populist appeals to progressives (secular) people. Notice that the division is based on religion and ideology; not based on class. People who use religion or ideology to slow down technological progress are the scapegoat, not the bourgeois as whole. Religious people who are moderate enough to embrace science may survive the purge, but “fundamentalists” who call for counter-revolution are definitely and without apology getting purged. If business interests oppose technocracy, then they are suppressed too, but I anticipate that most opposition would come from religious movements rather than business movements (amish, muslims, catholics).

As a side effect of technocracy, human biodiversity studies become mainstream and discussion of race and ethnicity becomes politically correct. The term “progressive” is now a populist technocratic term, not a crazy liberal term or a term to indicate love for the third world. Progressive means nation-building, not globalization idiocy.

A confederate form of communication exists between the states. All politics is local but there is federal regulation. The state and federal governments are free to “turn up the dial” on authoritarianism at any point. At any given point, the Governments can act like a referee. At any given point, the Government can dictate things the way Hussein, Stalin or Mussolini would. The Government however allows market forces in some instances because they are “quicker.” It sets clear boundaries and reserves the right to crash the party at any point.

Information about Year Zero

1.Envisioned a return to agrarian society
2.Banned modern technology and tools
3.Attempted to create a “Year Zero,” the beginning of a new history
4.Thought that a return to the land would allow a new communist society to emerge
5.Once the people were “purified” and a new society formed, a return to technology would be possible.

The truth is that Pol Pot was NOT anti-technology in an Amish sense; he just understood its power and did not want it in the hands of status quo civilization. While his subjects were denied the basic liberties of life as they picked rice, he ran the camps using trucks and industrial equipment. He stored information of his prisoners in s-21 prison. That involves an information system even if it is not a computer. Pol pot himself was an intellectual and he knew the potency of techno-power and wanted to remove that potency from national opponents (the Vietnamese) and regime opponents.

As a historical matter, no ruler worked harder to remove the idea of religion off of the face of the planet than Pol Pot. Marx may have been a materialist, but only Pol Pot murdered people just for not being an atheist. This means that Pol Pot resembles the Utopian Socialists that Marx describes in the Manifesto; not the Leninist socialists. Marxist-Leninism is a movement of class conflict; but Pol Pot’s movement was a utopian movement. He set up ideological litmus tests, and purged those who did not fit the litmus tests. That’s utopianism. That’s using ideology rather than class antagonisms as the basis of a movement. That’s what Pol Pot did in general.

A strong argument can be made that Stalin’s socialism in one country was a matter of pragmatism; not a matter of nationalism. Pol Pot was different. He was a nationalistic Maoist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics

In Keynes’s theory, there are some micro-level actions of individuals and firms that can lead to aggregate macroeconomic outcomes in which the economy operates below its potential output and growth. Some classical economists had believed in Say’s Law, that supply creates its own demand, so that a “general glut” would therefore be impossible. Keynes contended that aggregate demand for goods might be insufficient during economic downturns, leading to unnecessarily high unemployment and losses of potential output. Keynes argued that government policies could be used to increase aggregate demand, thus increasing economic activity and reducing unemployment and deflation.

Keynes argued that the solution to depression was to stimulate the economy (“inducement to invest”) through some combination of two approaches: a reduction in interest rates and government investment in infrastructure. Investment by government injects income, which results in more spending in the general economy, which in turn stimulates more production and investment involving still more income and spending and so forth. The initial stimulation starts a cascade of events, whose total increase in economic activity is a multiple of the original investment.[3]

What Keynes argues is that the Government should act like a Referee, blowing the whistle in downturns and increasing its influence to counteract selfishness and stupidity and get the economy going again by calculated macroeconomic action.  When microeconomic individualistic choices “work,” then let them work.  But as soon as they collectively start to diverge from the interests of the nation, then the public sector (without a profit motive) must play referee.  I always had some interest in Keynes, but now I am 100% sold after the recession. Supporting free markets is just idiotic. You can’t have idealism (reduced unemployment, a strong middle class) without economic oversight and law enforcement.  Even Marxist regimes in name like the Chinese regime (in reality it has Maoist foundations) concede that in many cases markets are more efficient than the Government.  To argue completely against markets is to argue that the economy should move at the pace of a snail.  But to argue against Government is to not understand how microeconomic and national macroeconomic forces can diverge, and how Government has to bring them back together.  Obama actually has this right.

Keynes is not known for viewpoints on technology, but a long term view I have on economics is that spending must be forced on technology so that the economy can grow its way out of scarcity.  This requires a totalitarian effort; especially against religious sects who may feel threatened by having technocracy thrown in their face.  That’s their problem.

As we saw last year, the great globalization of IT seems to have peaked. After booming from 2004 to 2006, offshore IT outsourcing leveled off the past couple of years, even among the largest companies (DeMers, 26). – InformationWeek Print Magazine

I can observe this myself. I see major Corporations insourcing because they are realizing the realities of culture and heritage. I have no delusions that globalization will end, but the second guessing is starting. Not only have I observed this, not only has InformationWeek observed this, but very respectable PHD level analysts I know have observed it. Insourcing is a victory for populism and a victory against exploitative wages that harm the third world as much as the first.  It is a victory for those who believe that the third world needs to build its own infrastructure instead of relying on the infrastructure of America.  Culture, reliability, locality, knowledge of a local business process and heritage matter, even when global ideologues pretend they do not.  Technocratic attitudes must reconcile with nationalism to defeat the delusion that one size fits all.

Works Cited

DeMers, Kevin. “Tech Specialist: Unified Communications.” InformationWeek 14 Sept. 2009: 26. Print. ]]> http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/09/20/populist-attitudes-are-resurging-with-american-technology-jobs/feed/ 3 http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/09/19/protectionism-and-the-downturn-a-case-study-of-populism/ http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/2009/09/19/protectionism-and-the-downturn-a-case-study-of-populism/#comments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:36:07 +0000 Metal Gear http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Editorials/?p=1819 Contained below is an article about a report that outlines the fact that public anger increased in the economic downturn. It demonstrates that populist-leaning sentiments are harder to control in a downturn. Note that Barack Obama, who pretends to be a populist standing for change, is arguing against protectionism and for globalization at all costs. I am not opposed to trade across the board. I think Honda makes the best hybrid cars and Nintendo and Sony kill Microsoft in video games. The problem is that free market ideologues do not merely support trade; they worship it to the point of arguing against all regulation. To put it lightly, words like “caution, calculation, respect, empathy and ethics” are not part of the vocabulary of a globalist ideologue. Their whole world view is based on global capitalism, and nothing else matters. They lack idealism just as much as Marx lacked idealism. And in practice, the regimes of Libertarianism have advanced globalism more aggressively than the regimes of Marxism. Therefore wise nationalists argue that capitalism is worse than Marxism, except in the possible case of Trotskyism.
The Article

WASHINGTON — The world’s major powers are repeatedly breaking their pledges not to erect trade barriers, and there’s no sign the “protectionist juggernaut” will ease as countries recover from the global downturn, an influential monitoring organization said Friday.

Since first taking a no-protectionism vow at a summit meeting last November, the world’s 20 major economies have been responsible for as many as 121 “blatantly protectionist” measures, with 134 more in the pipeline, said Global Trade Alert, a monitoring service overseen by the London-based Centre for Economic Policy Research and supported by the World Bank and other international organizations.

The findings, bound to come up at next week’s Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh, follow a report earlier in the week by the Geneva-based World Trade Organization that cited “continued slippage toward more trade restricting and distorting policies” by the U.S. and its major trading partners.

“The real economy may now be shrinking at a slower rate, and a recovery may be in view, but unemployment will continue to rise for some time to come. Pressures to protect jobs at home will grow and governments will find these pressures difficult to resist,” said the new report.

“The protectionist juggernaut shows no sign of slowing down,” it said.

At a meeting last November in Washington to chart a joint strategy for combatting the worst global economic downturn in decades, leaders of the 20 largest industrial and developing economies pledged to refrain from erecting new barriers to trade and investment or imposing new export restrictions. They renewed the pledge in April in London.

A U.S.-China dispute that erupted last weekend over Chinese tires and American chicken exports is just the latest example of how hard it has been for leaders to live up to that pledge.

Trade warfare is widely blamed for prolonging and expanding the Great Depression. And while the trade-distorting protectionist measures in the current downturn haven’t risen to the level of those of the 1930s, they have caused “pain across large sections of the world economy” and could thwart recovery if allowed to continue, said the Global Trade Alert report.

The G-20 leaders at their Pittsburgh meeting should “drain the protectionist pipeline — and don’t refill it,” said Simon Evenett, an economics professor at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland and the principal author of the report.

Although the major powers have promised to work collectively to confront the downturn, some analysts suggest the fact that things appear to be getting better may be easing the pressure to work together on solutions as national self-interest reasserts itself. That includes a desire to protect battered home industries from overseas competition as governments look toward the day when they can dial back stimulus measures such as extra government spending and low interest rates.

President Barack Obama has pledged to avoid “self-defeating protectionism” in continuing the effort to get the U.S. and other major world economies back on their feet.

Mike Froman, a White House adviser on international economics, said there’s no doubt that since the London meeting in April “the situation has changed dramatically” in terms of the global economic outlook. “Then people thought we were perhaps on the edge of depression. And now I think we’re debating the pace of recovery,” he said.

Steps taken by the United States widely seen by other nations as protectionist include “Buy American” provisions in the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus package, restrictions keeping Mexican trucks off most U.S. roads and provisions of auto bailouts requiring vehicles benefiting from the program to be built in the United States.

China has funneled its extensive stimulus spending to Chinese-only companies and enterprises. Russia plans sweeping tariff increases. Japan is taking steps that will further restrict food imports. And South Africa is changing its purchasing rules to favor domestic producers.

The U.S. continues to press its claim that European countries subsidize Airbus, winning a preliminary ruling from a WTO panel earlier this month. European countries have counterclaimed that the Pentagon and NASA are effectively subsidizing rival aircraft manufacturer Boeing, with a ruling expected early next year.

Steven Schrage, who has held senior economic positions in the Bush administration, said the biggest challenge facing the leaders in Pittsburgh may be to avoid “the mistakes of other downturns.”

In the 1930s, world powers including Britain and the United States “walked away from global responsibilities, and ultimately the situation got much worse,” said Schrage, an international business analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The G-20 includes Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, Britain and the United States. The European Union, represented by its rotating presidency and the European Central Bank, is the 20th member.

Juche theory is a type of Marxism ideology, but it is built upon the deification and mystification of Kim Il-sung (1912-1994). Its religious or pseudo-religious characteristics distinguish Juche ideology from all other forms of Marxism, including Marx-Leninism of the former Soviet Union, European Neo-Marxism, Maoism, and even Stalinism. Juche ideology characterizes Kim as the “eternal head of state,” a Messianic liberator of humankind, and describes North Korea as a chosen nation, and North Koreans as a chosen people who have a mission to liberate the world. While fear and terror are used to externally dominate the masses in a totalitarian state, Juche Ideology is a tool for the internal domination of their minds (known as hegemony).

The North Korean government admits that Juche addresses questions previously considered in classical Marxism, but distances itself from and even repudiates aspects of this political philosophy. The official position is that Juche is a completely new ideology created by Kim Il-sung, who does not depend on the Marxist classics.

In 1972, in response to the Sino-Soviet split, Juche replaced Marxism-Leninism in the revised North Korean constitution as the official state ideology.

The North Korean government does make some reference to the pre-Stalin internationalists, Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, and Vladimir Lenin, as creditable leaders of the socialist movement in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, before the advent of Juche. But the writings of classical Marxism are generally forbidden for lay readers in North Korea. One of the premises of classical Marxist international socialism is that the workers of the world have no nation. Juche is tailored to the national peculiarities of North Korea, and to the task of creating socialism in a hostile environment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juche
Also Juche focuses on IDEAS whereas strict Marxism focuses on MATERIALISM! The IDEA of progressive nationalism and self-reliance, not the material class conflict of Marxism.

1. The people must have independence (chajusong) in thought and politics, economic self-sufficiency, and self-reliance in defense.
2. Policy must reflect the will and aspirations of the masses and employ them fully in revolution and construction.
3. Methods of revolution and construction must be suitable to the situation of the country.
4. The most important work of revolution and construction is molding people ideologically as communists and mobilizing them to constructive action.

Looks like IDEAS and GOALS to me; not talk of materialism and class conflict. Frankly it resembles Communitarian populism.

After the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea’s greatest economic benefactor, all reference to Marxism-Leninism was dropped in the revised 1998 constitution. But Marxist-Leninist phraseology remains in occasional use, for example, socialism and communism.

This validates my previous post, in which I argued that not all Communists and Socialists are Marxist-Leninists. Many envision some of the destinations that Marx mentioned, but not his pathways to get to the destinations.

After inspecting and visiting with workers at a smeltering plant inside the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), General Secretary Kim Jong Il of the Korean Workers’ Party (KWP) called for a “renovation” in information technology in order to develop the country’s strength as a technological power.

August 27 – General Secretary Kim Jong Il of the Korean Workers’ Party called for an “information technology renovation” in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), according to the official Rodong Sinmum daily journal.

General Secretary Kim’s comments came after visiting the May 11 Smeltery plant, according to DPRK state media. While touring the plan, Kim advised workers to improve technology in production process in order to increase overall productivity.

The development of a strong, powerful and technologically advanced nation has been the cornerstone of Kim Jong Il’s revolutionary Songun policies. Earlier this week, Kim Jong Il reaffirmed that the future of the DPRK lied inextricably with its ability to establish itself as a “powerful nation” against the threats of US imperialism and hostile foreign enemies in puppet “south” Korea and militarist Japan.

The link to the news room shows clearly that Kim Jong Il, like Stalin and Mao, set a goal of utilizing the non-existence of capitalist inefficiency to quickly modernize a country, and that North Korea talks about being a “strong nation against imperialism.” This is devastating for the clowns who continue to insist that nationalism and modern Communism are irreconcilable. It looks like a major Communist Party just vindicated me on two points.

Marxist-Leninist

A Marxist-Leninist supports Lenin’s interpretations of Marx’s views. Important points including rejecting idealism for materialism and believing in transitional stages – feudalism to capitalism to socialism to communism. A Marxist-Leninist is more than a Socialist or a Communist, but a conductor of transition through the alleged spectrum of feudalism to communism. They support advancing society from one stage to the next rather than merely attacking capitalism. Capitalism is favored over feudalism but not over Socialism or Communism.  Marxist-Leninists therefore support multiple Governmental forms depending on what “order” a given society is in the given stages.

Socialist

A person who looks out for the working class and rejects the “right to private property.” Marxist-Leninism supports Socialism as a transitional stage, but one can be a Socialist without being a Marxist-Leninist. If one rejects the concept of Socialism as merely a means to an end- a transition from Capitalism to create the conditions for Communism – but still supports a society similar to what Marx described as Socialism, then they are a non-Marxist Socialist.

Communist

A person who supports a society in which the state has withered away.  The state is no longer needed for the exchange of the means of productions.  Most Communists are Marxist-Leninists who view Communism as the final transitional stage, but this is not always the case. The Juche regime in North Korea envisions Marx’s final destination of Communism; but not his “roadmap” to arrive there. North Korea considers itself to be Communist but not Marxist-Leninist (officially). This means that they support the society Marx described, but do not support his methodology of bringing it to reality.

Objectively speaking, I support utilizing both socialistic and market infrastructures at the whim of an authoritarian model which contingently determines what is best for its people. I do not think the state will dissolve into Communism, nor do I think that would be a good thing. This is populism.

Definition of Populism : A political ideology that emphasizes government’s role as an agent of the common man, the worker, and the farmer, in struggles against concentrated wealth and power. Historically in the United States, “populist” describes any political movement having popular backing which is also perceived to be acting in the interests of ordinary people rather than elites.

http://www.laits.utexas.edu/gov310/IPOM/glossary.html
Populists believe that government should be modified to serve national interests against potentially corrupt elites. Populists do not argue for the non-existence of Government like anarchists or the destruction of authority in class warfare like Marxists.  In addition, they are not entirely centered around material theories.  A populist is for making the Government more powerful in a national sense as a watchdog so that capitalist forces do not exceed nationalism in importance.

If any foreign minister begins to defend to the death a “peace conference,” you can be sure his government has already placed its orders for new battleships and airplanes. – Josef Stalin

Democrats and Republicans call people who oppose imperialism extremists. Is not the status quo position of imperialism an extreme position by ethical standards, even if it is popular? They call nationalists racists. Is not imperialism more derogatory to foreigners than nationalism? “Extremist” Nationalists and Marxist-Leninists who oppose imperialism are compared to Nazis. Real regimes of North Korea, Iraq and Iran are compared to the WWII axis? If anyone is behaving like Hitler in foreign policy, it is America! I do not excuse Islamic fundamentalism but it is a lesser imperialism compared to America’s greater imperialism.

Almost everyone who organizes against racism is a racist. E.G., moot stormfront’s icare rss thread. It is uniquely critical of European indigenous peoples and nothing else. Where is the criticism of institutional racism within countries outside of Europe? What about minorities who have an axe to grind against the majority populations in Europe.

Anyone who organizes to fight racism, fight extremism, fight bigotry, is almost always a bigot themselves. True individualists are busy getting a job, working and living their life. The most extreme bigotry is not found in the ranks of “right wingers” but in the establishment organizations which claim to fight racism, nazism, terrorism and extremism.

Nevertheless, additional evidence has surfaced to back what the scholars already thought.

Germans and Poles are laying ghosts of World War II to rest this week — more than 2,000 of them.
At a ceremony Friday, they will rebury the bones that were discovered last fall in a mass grave at the foot of this northern Polish city’s medieval castle, setting aside the grievances that linger from the war and often bedevil relations between the two countries.
But the uncertainties about who the dead were and who killed them may never be resolved. All that authorities can say with some assuredness is that they were probably German civilians who died in the ferocious final months of the war, in a city with a shared Polish-German past that dates back more than 700 years.
Poland and Germany are at peace today — fellow democracies in the 27-nation European Union. But the war still shadows the relationship. They argue, often bitterly, over war damages, past suffering, and the rights of an estimated 3 million ethnic Germans expelled as Poland headed into a future as a Soviet communist satellite.
Yet the grisly find by red-brick Malbork Castle seems to have drawn hearts and minds together. Polish authorities have handled the discovery with sensitivity, neither side has voiced recriminations, and discussions on where to rebury them have reached a cordial, mutually agreed conclusion.
“These were innocent people and they should be treated with respect, and have a proper burial,” said Marian Kempka, a 56-year-old Polish man visiting the Malbork cemetery where the remains were temporarily stored.
The first bones were found in October by construction workers digging foundations for a five-star hotel by the Castle, a tourist attraction and UNESCO World Heritage site. But it took three months for the magnitude of the grave to become clear. While construction of the 175-room hotel was moved to an adjacent plot, an exhumation was ordered by Polish authorities.
Workers spent six months gently working through wet sand to amass the bones of some 2,120 men, women and children. But they found no documents, clothes or personal belongings, save for a child’s pair of glasses. There also are no known witnesses to the burial.
Forensic experts and anthropologists moved in, and the evidence “indicates it is most probable that these are German civilians who died in early 1945, in February or March,” says Maciej Schulz, a prosecutor at Polish state-funded Institute of National Remembrance, who investigated the mass grave.
The supposition is that they were buried in a shell crater after artillery fire demolished buildings, and that because there is no mention of the grave in Polish or German documents, it must have been filled with bodies between March and mid-May, when Soviet forces held the city, he said.
Moreover, it was Red Army practice to clean up cities it entered by dumping stripped bodies into bomb craters, Schulz said.
The few existing witnesses from Malbork talk of many bodies lying in the city at the time.
Bodo Rueckert, whose German family had to leave the town at the end of the war and who now heads an association of Malbork expellees, speculates they may have been killed by Poles seeking revenge for their suffering under six years of German occupation.
But Georg Fritz, an official with an organization that represents the small German minority in Malbork, believes most were German civilians who were killed in the crossfire or died of cold, hunger and disease during the harsh winter and the long Soviet siege of early 1945.
Schulz, the Polish official, shares this view, stressing that fewer than one percent of the skulls bear bullet wounds.
DNA testing would have been too complex and costly for so many remains, he said.
Prosecutors are still digging for clues in Polish archives and have asked Russian archivists to search their files, but say no reply has been received.
Meanwhile Rueckert says he has had many calls from people who say, “Now I know where my grandpa or grandma is, under there.”
Many of them may have been among the 3,000 people who couldn’t find room aboard the last train out of Malbork when Germany ordered its citizens to flee the advancing Soviet army, said Piotr Szwedowski, a city spokesman.
“Maybe they are lying here,” he said.
German records list by name more than 2,600 Malbork Germans as dead and another 1,800 missing — men, women and children; civilians and soldiers, according to Rueckert.
After the Wehrmacht fled March 8 and until late May when the Soviet-backed Polish administration took control, the city was almost empty of civilians.
Then it began to fill up again, this time with Poles who had been expelled from their homes in eastern territories that Poland lost to the Soviet Union after the war.
Among the earliest arrivals was 10-year-old Tadeusz Bronowski, whose family settled into a small house in mid-May. The boy spent much of his time roaming the streets in search of food.
“I remember German prisoners in torn uniforms, guarded by Russian soldiers, driving around the city in an old truck and collecting the decaying bodies from the streets,” Bronowski, now a 74-year-old retired architect, recalled. He said he saw no more than 300 bodies in total, all German or Soviet soldiers. The bodies, he says, were dumped at the foot of the castle hill.
“That was no sight for children,” he said.
Fritz believes the cleanup unit stripped the bodies and burned the clothes to head off typhoid fever and that soldiers looted their valuables.
He said the grave showed traces of lime, which is used to hasten decomposition.
Moreover, some skulls found at the top of the heap had bullet holes, suggesting they may have been German POWs executed by the Soviets once their work was done.
“They did it in such a way that no one knew about it for 60 years,” Fritz said. “It’s a great mystery.”
By Polish-German agreement, the remains are being transported 200 miles to the Polish town of Stare Czarnowo, which has one of Poland’s 13 cemeteries for German soldiers. They will be buried 20 to a coffin in one or two mass graves, and Catholic and Protestant services will be held, Szwedowski, the city spokesman, said.
Former Malbork residents and relatives of Germans who went missing in the city during the war are to attend.
Each year newly discovered war graves yield some 4,000 bodies for these cemeteries, according to the government’s Council for Protecting Monuments of Struggle and Martyrdom.
Sept. 1 is the 70th anniversary of the war that began with the invasion of Poland by Germany from the west, and two weeks later by its then Soviet ally from the east. More than 6 million of Poland’s citizens were killed, the Nazis’ worst concentration camps were built on its soil, cultural treasures and industry were destroyed and some 85 percent of Warsaw, the capital, was razed.
Fritz stresses the respect and compassion the Poles are showing for the Malbork find.
“When you think of all those Polish families that lost their loved ones in the war, they are sure to understand the suffering connected to the grave. They are familiar with such tragedies.”

Bad Philosemites are pro-establishment. They attempt to defend Jews from anti-Semitic criticisms, over-reach and end up looking like morons. These are the type of people who downplay the existence of Jewish influence instead of pointing out its merits. These are the people who respond to anti-Semitic comments with comments like “Jews are not responsible for Communism.” “Jews are not really destructive to America.” Good Philosemites hail the Jewish liberators. Bad Philosemites deny they exist in their attempts to refute anti-Semites!

All people who attempt to defend Jews are not equal in this approach. We need more good Philosemitism and less bad Philosemitism.

edit : Germany deserved nation wrecking because Hitler could have created a left-right synthesis but instead became so Jew/Slav crazed that he ruined it and invaded USSR. HAIL the Jews who helped to destroy Hitler.

A Third Positionist is a person who is aware of international forces such as imperialism, Marxist-Leninism and global capitalism, and believes these forces must be kept in check to enable nationalism. There are different strategies – National Bolshevism, National Anarchism, State Corporatism, Ba’athism, Progressive Zionism and (unfortunately) Nazism etc., but all are aware of the forces of globalism and not completely subservient to the forces of globalism.  Not all nationalists are Third Positionists.  A nationalist can be a traditionalist and a conservative who is unaware of or indfferent to the sophisticated issues which I mentioned, and they would not qualify.

Third positionists are not like Marxist-Leninist internationalists in that they usually view political matters as internal and national. Marxists believe in organizing an international Communist Party and using it to take over the world where material conditions enable. Third Positionists often are pan-nationalists who tolerate ideological differentiation to the point where it can co-exist.  Marxist-Leninists have a very strict stance on materialism as compared to idealism, but Third Positionists vary depending on the Third Positionist ideology.

Most Third Positionists reject the concepts of “left” and “right” created in American politics as silly and juvenile.

Third Positionists disagree on how they think their revolutions will take place. Just as there are revisionists (not to use the term in a derogatory sense) and literalists in the Marxist world, not all Third Positionists agree on the methods to take power. I believe the entire political system will have be dispensed of but am open to being proved wrong.

To say that nationalism is bad is like saying that the human hand is bad because sometimes it is used to hurt people. – Lawrence Auster

Nationalism is not imperialism. Genghis Khan was an internationalist; Winston Churchill was a nationalist. The argument that nationalists cannot collaborate with other governments and are destined for bloodshed is not very deep. The argument that therefore nationalism should not exist at all is delusional. We can end violence by being more progressive, not more international. Nationalism does not have to be associated with reactionary conservatism. Agents of globalism such as Christianity, Islam, “Democracy” and Marxism without a doubt have shed blood. Trotsky vs. Stalin! Soviets vs. Islamic Fundamentalism! Muslims vs. Buddhists vs. Christians vs. Corporate Zionists! Bush vs. Afghanistan! Blood has been shed in the name of globalism, so why the fear of nationalism? Internationalism is not unconditionally more progressive than nationalism.

If we argue that nationalism can cause human suffering to other nations and to internationalists, it is a weak argument because nationalism can be more progressive as we improve as humans, and because internationalism is equally capable of causing suffering.

”It’s too bad that stupidity isn’t painful. Ignorance is one thing, but our society thrives increasingly on stupidity. It depends on people going along with whatever they are told. The media promotes a cultivated stupidity as a posture that is not only acceptable but laudable.”

Stupidity should hurt. Liberalism should hurt. Putting full trust into the “democratic process” should hurt. Opposing cultural degeneracy but not the society that enables it should hurt. Worshiping free enterprise to the exclusion of all else should hurt. Being religious to the point of denying science should hurt. Denial of national characteristics should hurt and seeing Jews and Communists behind every tree should REALLY hurt. Denying the existence of human biodiversity should REALLY hurt and gerrymandering it into false categories should hurt just as much. Belief in equality between religions, ethnic groups, nationalities, sexes and individuals in general should hurt. Belief that gun control “makes you safe” should hurt.

Stupidity should be painful.

Ideologically, The Third Positionists should support these measures because they take society one step closer to a totalitarian state. The Marxist-Leninists should support them because the more anger and antagonism they produce, the better chance there could be for a revolution.

This is what I have to say about Cowards who hide behind the apparent “anonymous status” of the internet and abuse it. Hail totalitarianism and death to liberalism!

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07112009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/gag_the_internet__178749.htm

When it comes to the First Amendment, Team Obama believes in Global Chilling.

Cass Sunstein, a Harvard Law professor who has been appointed to a shadowy post that will grant him powers that are merely mind-boggling, explicitly supports using the courts to impose a “chilling effect” on speech that might hurt someone’s feelings. He thinks that the bloggers have been rampaging out of control and that new laws need to be written to corral them.

Advance copies of Sunstein’s new book, “On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, What Can Be Done,” have gone out to reviewers ahead of its September publication date, but considering the prominence with which Sunstein is about to be endowed, his worrying views are fair game now. Sunstein is President Obama’s choice to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. It’s the bland titles that should scare you the most.

“Although obscure,” reported the Wall Street Journal, “the post wields outsize power. It oversees regulations throughout the government, from the Environmental Protection Agency to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Obama aides have said the job will be crucial as the new administration overhauls financial-services regulations, attempts to pass universal health care and tries to forge a new approach to controlling emissions of greenhouse gases.”

Sunstein was appointed, no doubt, off the success of “Nudge,” his previous book, which suggests that government ought to gently force people to be better human beings.

Czar is too mild a world for what Sunstein is about to become. How about “regulator in chief”? How about “lawgiver”? He is Obama’s Obama.

In “On Rumors,” Sunstein reviews how views get cemented in one camp even when people are presented with persuasive evidence to the contrary. He worries that we are headed for a future in which “people’s beliefs are a product of social networks working as echo chambers in which false rumors spread like wildfire.” That future, though, is already here, according to Sunstein. “We hardly need to imagine a world, however, in which people and institutions are being harmed by the rapid spread of damaging falsehoods via the Internet,” he writes. “We live in that world. What might be done to reduce the harm?”

Sunstein questions the current libel standard – which requires proving “actual malice” against those who write about public figures, including celebrities. Mere “negligence” isn’t libelous, but Sunstein wonders, “Is it so important to provide breathing space for damaging falsehoods about entertainers?” Celeb rags, get ready to hire more lawyers.

There are many agents of globalism but capitalism in the free market form is the most substantial.  If a nation-state was created where markets are subordinate to ideological and nationalist interests, then the influence of agents of globalism would be crushed.  The ADL, Catholic Church, Democratic Party and Republican Party would have no influence if it was not for the capitalist system that sustains and enables them.

Read my posts about “state corporatism” and “third positionism” for an alternative model which is not materialist like Marxist-Leninism, but which controls individualistic and market impulses to channel them into collectivist needs.  In other words, a market force is okay if it lifts the state but it is bad if it undermines the state.  The market should not be free but synchronized with state and national interests for a check and balance.

Even though Third Positionism is not Marxist-Leninism, we have enough in common with good Marxists like Besoshvili that a left-right anti-capitalist synthesis is prudent.  McCarthyism is not in the interest of third positionism, as the current political conditions place liberalism as a much higher threat than Marxism.  We should not ally with Trotskyites but true Marxists who do not infuse Menshevik liberalism and opportunism into their ideology are our allies against liberalism.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/10/capitalism-and-white-racial-decline/

At The Occidental Quarterly, Michael O’Meara is saying a lot that I happen to agree with about America’s racial decline. It wasn’t a function of a small cabal of Jewish cultural Marxists associated with the Frankfurt School. The triumph of political correctness in the 1980s happened long after the Civil Rights Movement had realized its primary goals. The worship of “diversity” as a fundamental American value was unheard of before Judge Powell’s opinion in the Bakke case. Multiculturalism first emerged on the scene in the 1970s. Chalking up our racial demise to “diversity snobbery” is putting the cart before the horse.

Capitalism has always been one of the primary drivers of race replacement. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the internal logic of international markets (the profit motive) resulted in the dumping of hordes of negroes on America’s shores. The settlement of the West Indies was even more driven by these concerns. In the mid-nineteenth century, demand for cheap labor in the sparsely populated American West brought the first waves of Chinese immigrants to the United States. This experience was repeated with the Japanese in Hawaii (working on sugar plantations), Mexicans in the Southwest (who first came to work on the railroads), and the Great Migration of blacks to Northern cities (who came to work in wartime industries). The Immigration Act of 1924 specifically exempted Mexicans in order to appease Southwestern business interests.

The Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians, the Slavs, and the Jews all came in waves and settled throughout the American North. Most left their homelands for economic reasons. Many were attracted by the wages being offered by Northern industries at the time. Then as now, big business lobbied Congress for loose immigration laws. The indigenous Yankees soon dwindled to a minority throughout most of the Northeast. It was the push and pull of America’s capitalist economy that drove these demographic changes, not a vast Jewish conspiracy.

The fate of New England is now happening on a nationwide scale. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, and the Wall Street Journal are naturally the biggest boosters of open borders. The same fundamental forces are at work that have always been operative throughout American history. The only difference is that they are now met with less resistance than before.

Capitalism has eroded white racial consciousness in other insidious ways. During the Cold War, Americanism came to be identified with anti-communism. In order to score points for capitalism in the Third World, rightwing anti-communists like Dean Acheson adopted anti-racist rhetoric and began pushing for desegregation in the Jim Crow South. The most obvious example of this would be the Eisenhower administration’s response to the crisis in Little Rock with the Civil Rights Act of 1957. America’s elite ultimately cared more about the wealth and privilege they enjoyed under capitalism than the racial values inherited from their ancestors. And so, Truman and his postwar successors would go on to give their seal of legitimacy to Martin Luther King and his fellow radicals.

As the capitalist system evolved in the twentieth century, it became necessary to dispense with traditional values like thrift and prudence in order to sustain economic growth. The advertising industry began to take shape after the First World War. Americans were molded by its propaganda into thinking of themselves as consumers. An ethos of expressive individualism was encouraged that ultimately became severely corrosive of white ethnocentrism. It triumphed in the counterculture and eventually went on to dominate the cultural mainstream.

Suburbanization has allowed millions of Whites to avoid the costs of integration. Suburban living enables better off Whites to sing the praises of diversity while pushing it off on their poorer neighbors. White flight has acted for years as a release valve of racial tension. Why make a fuss about the status quo when you can simply pack up your bags and move off to another city or state?

As I said in a recent thread, the liberal democratic capitalist system is the meta cause of white racial decline. It chewed up Norman Rockwell’s America and spit out Barack Obama’s.

The answer to the question is obvious.  By engaging in imperialism, America gives Fundamentalist Muslims a chance to escape criticism.  Whenever a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, Marxists can blame the material conditions and argue that resistance is justified.  9/11 can be viewed as a manifestation of class struggle instead of primitive Jihad.  If Americans stopped being imperialists but Muslims continued to display similar behavior patterns, then that argument would be destroyed.  It would become obvious that the motivation is not “resistance to imperialism” but a clash in the standards of civilization.

Primitive ideology would be blamed for the relative lack of industrialization in the Middle East and aggressive behavior of individuals; not class consciousness and external conditions.   To advance the interests of the civilized world, I advocate an end to imperialism.  It would be easy to turn world opinion against religious fundamentalism if the cloak of imperialism was removed for justification.  In addition, as someone who opposes liberal democracy and its militant advancement, I am forced to side with Theocratic Islam as a lesser evil.  If America stopped its imperialism, I would no longer have to make this strategic decision.

Saddam Hussein was a futuristic and modern leader.  America removed him.  During the war with the Soviets, America supported Al-Qaeda which is now America’s number one enemy.  America enables Islamic fundamentalism and America’s imperialism in the minds of many justifies it.  It is in the long term interest of infidels to stop imperialism promptly.  Today America “beefs” with Iran and Afghanistan.  But America played a role in the success of both fundamentalist regimes.  Taking out Saddam Hussein increased the power of Iran (which is less extreme ideologically than Afghanistan), and supporting Bin Laden against USSR allowed the Taliban / Al-Qaeda alliance to rule Afghanistan.

If America had minded its own business, Afghanistan would have been Communist (at least for longer) and Iraq would still be Ba’athist. Iran would be contained, and had America not forced the Shah into power, perhaps the tension for Islamic revolution would not have been present. America enables Islamic fundamentalism and enables non-Muslims to justify it in the name of anti-Imperialism.

Just because the non-agression pact with Hitler and Mussolini failed, just because Hitler was a total moron, does not in my opinion mean that Marxists and intelligent Nationalists are natural enemies for eternity.  Plus Ukranian nationalists were hardly Utopian.  They were bourgeious.

Saddam Hussein is a good example of the ideal Third Positionist.  Zionism, the version we have today, is almost Western Capitalism and can hardly be viewed as being inline with anti-capitalist thought.  If it was it would be compared to Saddam Hussein favorably, but it is not.

The most conventional answer is that they can only reconcile to the extent that Marxist-Leninists are not materially capable of taking power.  However I do not intend to answer the question myself.

Those who think they are weakening Islamic Fundamentalism made the incorrect move to target Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein is proof that American imperialism can be resisted without excusing Zealot behavior. Arabs and South Asians should view Hussein, not the Taliban or Shias, as their model.

With regards to Saddam Hussein’s theocratic opponents (the Taliban, the Iranian regime etc.), the pragmatic part of my mind still supports the lesser evil against the imperialists, but the idealist part of my mind knows that these regimes are far from Utopia.  Saddam Hussein’s style of rule was much closer to utopia.

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/31/weekinreview/the-world-khomeini-vs-hussein-mideast-s-contenders-for-nasser-s-mantle.html?amp;sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

THE WORLD: Khomeini vs. Hussein; Mideast’s Contenders for Nasser’s Mantle

By YOUSSEF M. IBRAHIM
Published: July 31, 1988

A LITERARY essay published in the Middle East in 1952 created a stir among Arab intellectuals for its description of an empty cloak of leadership waiting to be placed on some hero somewhere in the vast, leaderless world of Islam.

Within months it had been claimed by Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. Over the next 18 years, his revolutionary zeal and strategies provoked the expulsion of the French from Algeria and the British from Egypt and Jordan, and the overthrow of pro-Western monarchies in Yemen and Iraq. His confrontation with the West introduced Soviet influence in the region, and was a major factor in the emergence of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the current of Arab nationalism that continues today.

Eventually, Nasser’s equally colossal failures caught up with him. Egypt’s crushing defeat at the hands of Israel in 1967 placed much Arab land under Israeli occupation and ended Egypt’s role as leader of the Arab world.

Nasser died in 1970, and since then many Middle Eastern leaders have tried in vain to grab the elusive cloak – among them, President Saddam Hussein of Iraq and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran.

It was largely their quests to impose their views on the region that led Iran and Iraq into war. It looked last week as if the war was winding down, with intense peace talks continuing at the United Nations. But after eight years of fighting, neither man has managed to claim that mantle of leadership.

Now 51 years old, Mr. Hussein is a strong advocate of progress under the banner of secularism and a united Arab destiny. Mr. Hussein believes that a dictatorial government that force-feeds modernization is a shortcut to progress. He is convinced that such an approach will catapult the backward Arab world, starting with Iraq, into the next century.

In a conversation a few years ago, Tarik Aziz, who is the Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and a friend of President Hussein, explained it this way: ”You must understand – our country is cutting through a lot of time. We can’t afford to go through 200 years or so until we have a ‘natural evolution’ from feudal to industrial to modern age, as Europe did to get to its golden age.

”We must push our people 200 years ahead and away from medieval, reactionary ideas, through education and discipline.” The accent, he said, was on push. Backward and Forward

Ayatollah Khomeini, the other contender for the role of pan-Islamic leader, is, at 88 years of age, a revolutionary who once called democracy the equivalent of prostitution.

His belief that the Middle East is dominated by foreign powers, that it has lost the right to define its own destiny and that it must shake away these chains does not differ much from the views of Mr. Hussein or other so-called progressive Middle Eastern leaders, including those of Algeria, Libya and Syria.

But the Ayatollah’s methods and ideological foundations are diametrically opposed to those of Mr. Hussein, and for that matter those of the whole Arab world he seeks to convert. And as the Iraqi leader is rushing impatiently forward in time, the Ayatollah is rushing backward.

”Khomeini tried the impossible task of rewriting history,” said Ahmad Bahaa-eldine, a columnist for the Egyptian daily Al Ahram who is also published in several other Arab dailies and is a friend of President Hussein.

”He wanted to rebuild the third Islamic state after those of the Prophet Mohammed 1,400 years ago and Imam Ali shortly afterward.”

”We are talking about reconstructing something that existed 14 centuries ago in the world of the 1980’s,” Mr. Bahaa-eldine continued.

”It is as though science, technology, the arts, literature, sociology, never came to add shades and colors to what used to be white and black in our perceptions. For most of us, the attraction of what Nasser did was that he tried to launch a modern revolution.”

In the Middle East, as in much of the third world, the search for dignity, independence, prosperity and freedom is still a search for a magic formula. Many Arab intellectuals argue that the formulas presented thus far -Arab socialism, Arab nationalism and the Ayatollah’s pan-Islamic nationalism – are proven failures.

”Today in our Middle East world the role of ideologies is shrinking,” said a senior Arab ambassador in Washington, D.C. ”This cloak of leadership does not belong to any single man anymore. The Middle East has a much better educated, wealthier, smarter population today.”

If they are looking for anything, he said, it is ”just democracy and a little respect for the individuals.”

That may not be soon in coming, at least not in Iraq or Iran, even if their war is about to end. Ayatollah Khomeini has called for a cease-fire so that the Islamic Government can devote itself to eradicating more internal enemies and consolidating his vision of 14th-century righteous Islamic rule.

Mr. Bahaa-eldine said Mr. Hussein also has strong views on the subjects of democracy and individual rights. He recalled a visit to Baghdad a few years ago in which he spent a spirited evening of talk with the President.

”I had argued that power is best held by persuasion,” Mr. Bahaa-eldine recalled. ”He would kid me that we ‘intellectuals’ know nothing about building nations.” Without the gun to force progress, Mr. Hussein argued, there would be no progress.

Later that night at his hotel, Mr. Bahaa-eldine said, an Iraqi guard appeared at the door with a velvet box. Inside was a revolver on which was engraved the inscription: ”With the compliments of Saddam.”

European Unity is a form of color conscious globalism.  True nationalists must approach the idea with skepticism.  Collaborative nationalism must be distinguished from white national denial.  If two ethnically variant European nationalists collaborate as nationalist first, then they are pan-nationalists.  If they collaborate as Europeans and not as nationalists, then they are Euro-liberals.  Pan-nationalism is ideologically sound but Euro-liberalism is anti-nationalist and must be opposed.  Down with the EU and down with using “Europeaness” to advocate open boarders to members of other European nations.

It seems that most people who want to define a “European” racial identity (as if this even makes sense anthropologically) aim to dissolve national borders within Europe and “unify” against non-Europeans.  Certainly this viewpoint is not a nationalist viewpoint.

New Nationalism, technnocratic
That’s the habbit
Call me an addict
Get a board to draw from scratch – on it.

Responsible technocracy is the way
Nationalism must follow it today,
Ignore the disrupters, who stray,
Reactionaries from the past cannot play.

We don’t need
to appeal to the past deeds.
Hitler is not the model
Foward looking, hand on the thottle.

Comparisons to Reich number three are absurd.
Contingency is the way, new ideologies must be heard.
Progressive nationalism is the vision.
Welcome to the third position.

Class conscious, we reject bourgeois lies.
Race and ethnicity analyzed
Through the eyes
Of the scientific mind.

Realism is the name
Of the game.
False theories of the past
Are labeled as lame.

Eye on the future.
Foot on the gas.
Forward motion to shoot for.
No looking back.

The proletarian force
Lead to nationalism.
Class antagonism
Is dissolved for a new course.

Revisionists we may be.
We do not seek to repeat history.
The future is the way.
All eyes watch, no delay.

Get your mind out of the past.
New ideologies are vast.
Critical thinking can cast
The chains off of your back.

Contingency, we analyze.
Every situation is new.
Old ideologies we vandalize.
The past is done and that is through.

Eye on the future.
Foot on the gas.
Forward motion to shoot for.
No looking back.

The next big thing,
Futuristic nationalists, let the bells ring.
Clinching and waving the fist,
as you get the jist.

Prepared for war, in any fashion to begin.
We will not follow the disruptor.
Clowns who claim to represent nationalism,
They won’t be interrupters.

Futuristic technocracy with a third position,
If you haven’t seen it you better listen.
Its implementation is a goal and a mission.
Get that straight, it is the vision.

Eye on the future.
Foot on the gas.
Forward motion to shoot for.
No looking back.

The human race is a construct. It is not real. Human population groups are too diverse to have any one destiny in common. The white race is a construct. It is not real. White peoples are too diverse to have any one destiny in common. Nations are the soil-based embodiments of ethnically homogeneous peoples. White nationalism is a globalization ideology and thus not real nationalism at all. Fascism and National Socialism were both imperialist ideologies. Real nationalism is the enemy of imperialism and globalization. Real nationalism is separatist and democratic. Real nationalism wants to break up large artificial structures (such as empires) and reestablish natural ethnic entities (such as nations).

Defining ethnic identity by continent instead of nationality (pan-Europeanism) is a form of bourgeois globalism.  Pan-nationalism recognizes the identity of the nation.  The true political incorrectness necessitates the rejection of nonscientific anthropological theories and replaces them with the blunt truth.  Most internet “racialist” egos do not understand the basics of nationalism.  Not to mention, few understand how capitalism harms nationalism.  Imperialism, including fascism and national socialism, has historically stood in the way of legitimate nationalism.  In practice, it has competed with nationalism for political power.  Now anti-nationalists confuse imperialism with nationalism (often intentionally).

I must point out that national socialism, however, is not fascism.  It is a form of racial equality for Germans whereas fascism acknowledges the superiority and inferiority of individuals.  As far as Zionism goes, my take on Zionism now is that it must reject Torah Judaism, imperialism and bourgeois nationalism and replace it with futuristic progressive nationalism.

From the May 29, 2009 edition of the America First hard copy newspaper:

The primary cause of this (America as we know it) is not a conspiracy of elites, which most probably exists, but the failure of the American people. The people have failed to stay within their moral limits, and to take sufficient interest in public policy matters. – Jonathan Hill

Hill goes on to write another article titled “Are we a nation of wimps?”

I have commented extensively about a conspiracy of American elites, most notably here and here.  However, I certainly do note the important point that the American reaction has been extremely feminine and passive.  I do agree that the average person to an extent is responsible for what the country has become, though the elites nevertheless are the most organized engineers of destruction.  Cowardice and greed and a host of other flaws are present and collectively must be rectified.