Now more than ever, America is deeply hated around the world, and many people have come to detest the opportunism of most of our population for their economist compromises with militarism. It is therefore important to understand who is to blame for tolerating and supporting US imperialism and to properly address how the problem should be addressed.

My position has always been that America is a banker’s prison house of nations without a right to exist. It should come down by force of arms with each people de-linking their ethnic identity from America as a prerequisite for building socialism and communism. When the people loudly procolaim, “ Death to America!,” we speak not of the needless mass killing of three hundred million people, but of the end to an oppressive and monstrous cosmopolitan Zionist project which brings ruin to White people as much as to Blacks, Red Indians, Mexican-Americans or Puerto Ricans. Even more so, it is also a direct threat of our total extermination! This is a line, incidentally understood in many advanced White nationalist quarters, for those who still believe the Zionist media nonsense about how White racialist forces inherently are so ultra-chauvinistic that they wind up being aligned with imperialism.

So then while we reject America as a concept, we cannot reject the fact that materially it obviously does exist. We all are currently thrown into this project which constitutes the center of world imperialism dominated by Jewish finance capital where most people hold self-defeating and deeply reactionary views that promote militarism or illusions about imperialism and Zionism.

The ultra-“left,” namely anarchists, sectarian Maoists, chauvinistic Black/African nationalists and racialists, eclectic New Leftists who unfortunately aren’t dead yet, and that broad cult of ignoring class analysis commonly know as “Third Worldists,” are correct to the extent that they blame the American people for tolerating US imperialist aggression, for taking opportunist lines out of populist feelings, and for putting up insignificant resistance to it. These forces lack an understanding of the socio-economic power structure and often replace anti-imperialism with anti-White sectarianism. However, they are basically correct that the American economy is parasitic for which the popular classes bear some degree of responsibility for tolerating and often supporting and attempting to benefit from it.

Now then, if we European-Americans, as exemplified by your average redneck, are to be ridiculed for our false patriotism today which heralds the bombing and destruction of peoples, what about the Mexican who receives citizenship in exchange for serving in the imperialist army’s wars of aggression? What about the millions of pathologically lazy proponents of “Aztlan” who pretend to advance Mexican-American interests even while they are really short-sidedly aligned with the very globalist forces who are breaking down the ethnic character of all the world’s people, including Mexican-Americans and Mexicans, and promoting the free flow of imperialist finance capital and super-profits on the graves of national boundaries? What about those who invent a metaphysical “poverty draft” to pretend that those from among their own ethnic group or social class aren’t equally traitors for actively participating in imperialist wars? What about Red Indians who honor those from amongst their people who died while combating the liberation fighters in Iraq on behalf of US imperialism and world Zionism? Should we honor these fallen scum as “heroes” against oppression or be any less enthusiastic about their deaths? What about the reality of the Black streets today who do not turn their hearts towards Shahid Malik elShabazz (Malcolm X) and The Right Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey, but are galvanized around the ultra-Zionist and imperialist lackey Barack Obama simply because he has a non-White continence, even as Obama‘s policies often mirror those of the most hawkish quarters of neo-conservativism, including neo-colonialist policies against Black people? Even Louis Farrakhan’s wing of the Nation of Islam and the leadership of the New Panthers sound like your typical PC Kosher Jewish liberal today.

The fact is that economism, which can vaguely be defined as attempting to win gains in the struggle for social emancipation and national self-determination through collusion with the imperialist power structure, is a crippling problem with deadly consequences today. White European-Americans are often deeply guilty of this, but so is virtually everyone in the United States to an equal or even greater degree. The lesson to be learned is that all of us need to stop being soft on opportunism, not that the White popular classes in North America and Europe are inherently evil if they reject assimilation and cosmopolitanism. Indeed, White assimilation ultimately works against the self-determination of everyone and is in the best interest of no one except the Jews, the imperialists and petty local tyrants from among the brotherly peoples of the world. Ultimately, the unity and independence of the world and whatever ethnic group we hold dear demands we wage a successful revolutionary struggle against imperialism and Zionism. Namely we need to destroy our Zionist and imperialist rulers in the United States and their power structure. It is vital that we understand that this cannot be achieved short of protracted guerrilla warfare against the US government and the Jews. Furthermore, it is both our internationalist duty and the realization of our true patriotic self-interest to actively support our brothers and sisters in foreign lands on the front lines against the enemy today, particularly as they undergo armed struggle.

All of our peoples can and must correct a whole series of reactionary social roles and ideas, but we also do not need to be excessively disparaged. We need to hold accountable and uplift one another and to organize the masses. Through the concerted efforts of all the peoples in North America, let us wage a heroic struggle against imperialism and Zionism!

Libertarianism is an unquestionable failure. The economy and country has been ripped to shambles by outsourcing, uncontrolled immigration, poor loan policy, greed and a government that enables it. Globalization has created a system where each country cannot be self-sufficient and political correctness has completely destroyed this country socially. If one country crashes, they all crash. The government “solution” of bailing out the same people who caused the recession is an unquestionable failure. Our system of economics is far behind computer networking, as good networks are designed to be fault tolerant but our economy is not. Only the people who screw things up get bailed out while other people never get a chance to even start their careers.

Americans should get more militant if the government doesn’t cooperate. We’ve had enough of being bounced between a facade of two similar parties like pinballs and we’re not going to waste our lives away decaying under this system. Both parties serve the same elite and both hate communitarian nationalism. We’re not as dumb as the government thinks we are. If there is no light at the end of the tunnel, you can count on anti-government action and feeling escalating.

Just kidding, he didn’t actually say that. But he’s basically saying what I’m saying, which is that a giant bureaucracy could allow for a national economic self-interest and prevent another meltdown.

When the car gets stuck in the mud, the government must be there to get the car out.

The link

WASHINGTON — Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd on Tuesday called for sweeping new government powers to prevent another economic collapse, protect consumers and dismantle failing institutions.

Dodd’s 1,100 page-draft would strip the Federal Reserve and other regulators of their powers to regulate banks and hand that job to a single agency. The bill also would take away the Fed’s ability to monitor credit cards and mortgages and establish a new “Consumer Financial Protection Agency.”

The bill, inspired by last year’s financial meltdown, will minimize “economic turmoil and protect(ing) the interest of taxpayers,” the Connecticut Democrat wrote.

An advance copy of the legislation was obtained by The Associated Press.

President Barack Obama has demanded that Congress rewrite the federal regulations governing Wall Street to close legal loopholes and prevent the kind of fraud and abuse that fed the crisis.

Dodd’s proposal was expected to gain broad support among Democrats, but Republicans haven’t signed on.

Among the top points of contention is Dodd’s desire to create a new agency to protect consumers taking out home loans or using credit cards against predatory lending and surprise interest rate hikes.

Republicans counter that creating another bureaucracy will make business harder for banks and limit the availability of credit.

The Senate Banking Committee was expected to review the legislation next week, paving the way for a floor vote by early next year.

The House was already on track with its own proposal. Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said he expects a floor vote in December.

Dodd’s plan differs slightly from Frank’s bill and the administration’s proposal in that it would do more to scale back the powers of the Federal Reserve, which many lawmakers blame for the economic crisis.

For example, Frank has proposed that the Fed be in charge of enforcing tougher regulations on large and influential financial firms so that they don’t grow “too big to fail.” A council of regulators would monitor these firms and make recommendations.

Under Dodd’s bill, the Fed would have less reach. An “agency for financial stability,” managed by a board that includes Fed representation would enforce new rules and dismantle complex financial firms if they threaten the broader economy.

Both the House and Senate bills would likely put limits on the Fed’s ability to provide emergency loans and eliminate its oversight of consumer protections.

Also unlike the House bill, Dodd’s proposal would establish a single federal regulator for banks called the “Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration.”

The single regulator would get rid of two existing federal bank regulators — the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. It also would strip the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation of its oversight of state banks and the Fed in their supervisory powers of bank holding companies.

Dodd has said consolidated oversight is needed to prevent banks from shopping around for an agency that will impose the least amount of oversight.

To quote a post I made in a secret place:

The only way to have populism is to make the state so strong that it can play referee against economic impulses that are not collectively beneficial. A strong state enables a national self-interest.

Imagine all the problems “fascism” could have prevented. With a strong state, there would be no global economic meltdown because the government would put the bankers in their place. If the bankers act against the interest of the state, they get the purge.

National socialists and white nationalists argue that the movement should all be for the race, and they don’t even know how to define the race. The race is nothing but a collection of genetic matter without the state. The state is everything and everything else is nothing. A cruel death to neo-liberalism!

Keep bailing out the biggest banks and corporations so that any jobs they create go overseas to India and China. Keep bailing out the people who caused the recession, the mismanages who will stuff their face with the money and use it to “maximize the profits of shareholders” rather than create jobs.

Quite frankly, it is time for populists to do a little more than talk about opposing the regime. If there is no light at the end of the tunnel, then populists should start to organize not against a particular party but against the entire power structure.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/06/news/economy/jobs_october/

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The nation’s unemployment rate rose above 10% for the first time since 1983 in October, a much worse jump than expected as employers continued to trim jobs from payrolls.

The reading, reported by the government Friday, is a sign of the continued weakness in the labor market even though the economy grew in the third quarter following the longest and deepest downturn since the Great Depression.

The government reported that the unemployment rate spiked to 10.2%, up from 9.8% in September. It is the highest that this rate has been since April 1983. Economists had forecast an increase to 9.9%.

There was also a net loss of 190,000 jobs in October, according to the Labor Department, an improvement from a revised estimate of 219,000 job losses in September. However, economists surveyed by Briefing.com had forecast a loss of only 175,000 jobs in October. This was the 22nd straight month of job losses.

“The only good news is the number of layoffs are dropping off, but those who are laid off still aren’t finding jobs,” said David Wyss, chief economist with Standard & Poor’s.

The jump in the unemployment rate was driven up by a large drop in the number of people who describe themselves as self-employed, as well as the number of teenagers who have jobs. The unemployment rate for teenagers in the labor force soared to 27.6%, up 1.8 percentage points and hitting a third straight record high.

Both teen workers and the self-employed are not captured very well in the government’s separate survey of employers that is used to calculate the number of people on U.S. payrolls. That explains much of the disconnect between fewer job losses overall and the much worse unemployment rate.

The rise in unemployment was not spread evenly across the population. For those with college degrees, the unemployment rate fell to 4.7% from 4.9% in September, as the unemployment rate for those in management, professional, and related occupations slipped to 4.7% from 5.2%.

But the unemployment rate for production jobs, such as factory workers, jumped to 14.5% from 14.1%. The jobless rate for workers in construction, maintenance or natural resources industries such as mining rose to 15.5% from 14.3%.
0:00 /3:08Real unemployment really bad

“There’s a real mismatch between the unemployed people out there compared to what job openings are available,” said John Silvia, chief economist with Wells Fargo Securities. He said construction workers who lost a job when the housing bubble burst don’t have the skills to compete for jobs in sectors that are hiring, such as health care and technology.

Government efforts to end job losses have had limited effects, although the Obama administration estimated last month that 640,000 jobs were created or saved by the federal stimulus package passed earlier this year. But that’s modest compared to the 7.3 million jobs that have been lost since the start of 2008.

Christina Romer, chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, said the steady decline in monthly job losses since earlier this year is a hopeful sign for the economy.

But she acknowledged there’s still significant pain for those looking for work. “Having the unemployment rate reach double-digits is a stark reminder of how much work remains to be done before American families see the job gains and reduced unemployment that they need and deserve,” she said.

Friday’s report comes one day after Congress voted overwhelmingly to extend unemployment benefits by up to 20 weeks. There are now a record 5.6 million people who have been unemployed for six months or longer, as the average time an unemployed person has been out of a job hit 26.9 weeks.

Prior to this report, most economists had believed that the unemployment rate would keep rising and that job losses would continue into next year. But the jump in unemployment in October took it to levels worse than what many previously had expected to be the peak.

According to a survey of top forecasters by the National Association of Business Economics last month, the consensus estimate among economists was that unemployment would hit a high of 10% in the final three months of this year and the first quarter of 2010.

The five economists with the most bearish forecasts had expected unemployment to rise to 10.2% in the fourth quarter of this year before hitting 10.5% in the first half of next year.

Wyss is one of those economists who had projected an unemployment rate of 10.5% in the middle of next year. He said Friday’s report may force him to raise his worst case estimate.

“Some things aren’t playing out the way I expected them to,” he said. “There’s just no good news in this report.”

But others said they see some early signs of life for the labor market. Sung Won Sohn, economics professor at California State University Channel Islands, noted that the biggest increase in temporary employees in two years took place in October.

Employers typically bring in workers on a temporary basis before deciding to make more permanent hires. As such, he expects gains in payrolls by next spring.

“Despite the gloomy job picture, there are some encouraging signs,” he said.

Let’s be clear, the problem with America succumbing to globalization is not a problem of international Jewry or some bizarre conspiracy theory, but the fact that we are a nation of pussies. When manufacturing and technology jobs are outsourced, what do we do? Bitch. Moan. Hell, we don’t even do that, we do nothing. When illegal immigrants walk over the boarder, what do we do? Nothing. We comfort and apologize for them and allow them to form political pressure groups and participate in our debates.  They should be thrown out on their asses (or worse). When Muslims declare Jihad on infidels, what do we do? We call Islam a religion of peace and build Democracies for them. What do we give to populations that commit disproportionate crime – affirmative action! When greedy bankers ruin the economy under the cover of liberalism and inclusion, and then bail themselves out, what do we do? Do we revolt? No. Do we demand nationalization? No. Do we straight up take over the government and rob those companies back for the American people? No. We stand around and hold our hands like pussies. Do we even leave the Democratic and Republican parties? No we take it up the rear and ask for more.

We are a nation of pussies and our men act like women. That is our problem. Not Zionists, zog or some other retarded theory.  We have a media which fires people for saying offensive comments.  In the days of the 1776 revolution, I can’t imagine that it took this much garbage to set the revolt in action. In the days of the Civil War, I can’t imagine that it took this much bullshit.

As the economy recovers, the job market weakens.  How long will it take for the American people to realize that they are being EXPLOITED while Wall Street is collecting the benefits?  How long until populists say “enough is enough” and take these people out of power?  That includes the media, major corporate leaders, and BOTH political parties.

Third Position Justice

Interesting Website. I will add it to the blog roll. It has well constructed political opinion and links to very good material about the global financial crisis.

The moral power of the exemplary person is the wind; that of the petty person is grass. When the wind blows over the grass, it will surely bend. – Confucious

Strike the Shepherd and the Sheep will Scatter – The 48 Laws of Power

Those who most successfully play the game of death – success in the free market, should not be blamed more heavily than the unlucky and weak. They may not be conscious allies, but they serve our inegalitarian interests. Analogously, Dennis Rodman cannot be blamed for the invention of basketball and gangster rapers cannot be blamed for the “harsh reality” of society or for profiting from the liberal capitalist system. Directly blaming the bankers and business men? Get real! The blame should be placed on George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Barack Obama and the architects of society…the politicians, the military, the constitution. NOT the businessmen who happen to be a bit more “crafty” than their opponents. Do not blame Wal-Mart. Blame Washington DC. Let the behavior of Wal-Mart (shipping jobs overseas for low pay) expose Washington DC.

Don’t hate the player who plays the game. Hate the game. Until the military force that controls society is altered, we all play the game. Yes we would like to switch from one set of rules to another set of rules, but do not be jealous and hypocritical. Reject the two party system. All energy and focus should be in redirecting society collectively away from the ruling order, instead of trying to rehabilitate and tweak the regime without the necessary adjustments.

Don’t hate the player. Hate the game. It is not morally or strategically justified to blame the player.

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=35812;article=46639;title=Iranmehr

Years ago, as the Cold War was coming to an end, I said to my fellow leaders around the globe: the world is on the cusp of great events, and in the face of new challenges all of us will have to change, you as well as we. For the most part, the reaction was polite but sceptical silence.

In recent years, I have often told listeners that I feel Americans need their own change – a perestroika, not like the one in my country, but an American perestroika – and the reaction has been markedly different. Halls filled with thousands of people have responded with applause.

First Gorbachev articulates the need for change. I agree, there is a need for a change. Much to the consternation of the Marxist-Leninists on this website, I believe USSR needed change too (but went too far). In his contingent historical time, Stalin advanced industrialization, but the conditions that existed while Stalin did no longer exist. Marx, while a good thinker for his time, is even further outdated than Stalin.

Our perestroika signalled the need for change in the Soviet Union, but it was not meant to suggest a capitulation to the US model. Today, the need for a more far-reaching perestroika – one for America and the world – has become clearer than ever.

Gorbachev here makes it clear that while he intended to revise the Marxist line, he did not intend to embrace the Reganite line.

But then came the economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, and it became clear that the new Western model was an illusion that benefited chiefly the very rich. Statistics show that the poor and the middle class saw little or no benefit from the economic growth of the past decades.

The model that emerged during the late 20th century has turned out to be unsustainable. It was based on a drive for super-profits and hyper-consumption for a few, on unrestrained exploitation of resources and on social and environmental irresponsibility.

This is very true. The economic crash definitely strengthened my position that in times of struggle, populism and authoritarianism are necessary. On some level, I have always admired authoritarian regimes, but now I swear by them.

But if all the proposed solutions and action now come down to a mere rebranding of the old system, we are bound to see another, perhaps even greater upheaval down the road. The current model does not need adjusting; it needs replacing. I have no ready-made prescriptions. But I am convinced that a new model will emerge, one that will emphasise public needs and public good, such as a cleaner environment, well-functioning infrastructure and public transport, sound education and health systems and affordable housing.

Gorbachev must be reading Free Media Productions!

The time has come to strike the right balance between the government and the market, for integrating social and environmental factors and demilitarising the economy. Washington will have to play a special role in this new perestroika, not just because the United States wields great economic, political and military power, but because America was the main architect, and America’s elite the main beneficiary, of the current world economic model. That model is now cracking and will, sooner or later, be replaced. That will be a complex and painful process for everyone, including the United States.

I couldn’t agree more!

Many people who oppose the status quo react with anger and passion when the allegedly destructive influence of Jews becomes obvious. These people think the America of 1776 can be rehabilitated and blame Jews for ruining it. They are wrong; the path to the future goes only forwards not backwards.  Material, ethnic, technological, global and ideological conditions place the old America beyond rehabilitation, however, a lengthy discussion of this is being avoided to keep the post on topic.

New York Jewish bankers and liberal ideologues should be supported for exposing the weaknesses of the capitalist system, even if they do not intend to. A strong dose of liberal idiocy is like a strong dose of bacteria; anti-bodies are produced. A more gradual dose of liberalism is like lead poisoning; when you notice it is too late. In a Machiavellian sense, they have proven how inferior the system is and how badly it needs to be replaced. Hail the Jewish subversives who expose the flaws of capitalism, liberalism and democracy! Third Positionists, Marxist-Leninists and all critical of Western Capitalism must mourn the loss of Saddam Hussein, but otherwise the most successful Jewish sociopaths should be applauded. Hail Madoff, Hail Abraham Foxman, Hail Chaim Ben Pesach, Hail the Jews who pretend to be anti-semites on Nazi websites.

EXPOSE THE FUNDAMENTAL WEAKNESS OF CAPITALISM. PUT IT ON THE RADAR! The more Jews manipulate the system, the more the weakness of the system becomes obvious. I applaud Jews for proving that the overthrow of capitalism is a prerequisite to a revival of nationalism and ridicule bourgeious nationalists who think removing Jews is sufficient.  Nationalism cannot exist with the current political system in place. The more obvious this is the fact, the better.