The latest realization I have had : The fact that neo-nazi types tend to set up forums that are marketed as “free speech” forums and then censor everyone who disagrees with them (while maintaining that they are free speech forums) and then launch vicious crusades against posters who leave (while masking it behind a “sense of humor”) and then cry like babies when they finally get what they have coming convinces me just how weak these people are. These people talk about survival of the fittest and free markets, but they hide behind their internet connections because they are weak. My guess is that the unemployment rate of people like this is higher than that of the “Blacks and Hispanics” they denigrate.
Archive for the ‘Cross-Bloging’ Category
A facebook “friend” of mine who goes by the name “Steel Bolts” has informed me that Eric Struch of the Workers World Party is spreading the message that I am an “anti-semite.”
There is some antisemitism on free media productions but I only tolerated it, I do not agree with it. Yes, Besoshvilli did appeal to some antisemitic themes in his videos against Trotsky. Yes, John Paul Cupp did openly advocate antisemitism.
I recruited Jews into this project as far back as 2008 but most of them did not want anything to do with it! Well I disagree with some of the content, I agreed long ago to tolerate ideological dissent with the other people who were involved in the project.
As for my own posts, I go out of my way to separate myself from antisemitism. I do not believe Jews are “ethnic enemies” who control America and who have DNA that causes them to fight like Zombies in night of the living dead. I do believe organized Jewish groups tend to support problematic political lines, but so do most people. In short, I am not anti-Jewish but anti-human (lol), anti-capitalist and anti-religion!
That said, I have really attacked Israel because even though I dislike the host (western capitalism) I believe the parasite (Israel) sucks off of that host. The only reason the West defends Israel is because Muslims would fight against capitalism more than Zionists do who leach off of it. If Israel had to fend for itself, it would have to treat the native Arabs differently. It can only get away with what it gets away with because Western Countries produce the wealth and hand it away and generally they want to trade money for political power to advance the imperialism of liberal capitalism.
I have gone out of my way to condemn antisemitism, but what other people write and make videos of, that is them, not me.
I understand that the person making these comments is a Trotskyite. I have always thought Trotsky was an embarrassment to Soviet Jewry. Yes he was good at war, but no, his ideas were not pragmatic, logical or Marxist. Without Trotsky, Hitler would have had a harder time scapegoating the Jews for his own money and power.
The classical Mediterranean race clearly exists in South Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Truth be told, Nordics are basically “depigmented Mediterraneans,” so by that extended definition, it also exists in Northern Europe. Both Nordics and Mediterraneans are part of the Mediterranean race “branch” and other Caucasoid groups like “Alpines” are closely related.
My view, which is influenced by parts of Dienekes, Caryleton Coon, Forum Biodiversity, anthroscape, wikipedia, google, cavilla-sforaza and all the different things I have gotten my hands on has produced MASSIVE CHIMPOUTS. When I “introduced” the idea of a Mediterranean race at Odessa Syndicate (it was replaced by Occidental Dissent, I no longer post there, just comment) and “the phora” (it no longer exists) and stumble inn (still in existence) MASSIVE CHIMPOUTS followed.
JW Holiday / Ted Sallis chimped out like a wannabe WN wop dago. “Der Socialist” chimped out. “1-800″ chimped out. Even the posters on Odessa Syndicate did not like the idea. And so I raise my middle finger in defiance, I still maintain that the concept of a Mediterranean race is a correct one.
The reason all these people chimped out is because they like to promote the idea of “European unity” but what the Mediterranean race proves is that many of the major changes in sub-racial characteristic happened in Europe. Nordics and Alpines mainly separated in Europe. What this also proves is that Arabs and North Africans are part of the same race as Europeans. This “hurt the feelings” of many race fakeist “white nationalist” posters. And I still maintain that I am right.
Saying “Italians are closer to Germans then they are to Syrians genetically” is like saying “Manhattan is closer to Brooklyn than it is to Bergen County New Jersey.” It may be true, but they are both pretty close and Manhattan clearly stands between Bergen County NJ and Brooklyn and all three are part of the same Metro Area.
So we can see why Italians and Southern Europeans often look like Arabs, because they are intermediates between Nordics and Arabs and the genes that happened to change were not related to pigmentation.
edit : by the way, the majority of people on anthroscape, forum biodiversity and biodiversity forum (now defunct) agree with what I have to say about racial classification ever since around late 2008. I made a few errors, but clearly I am seen as knowing what I am talking about.
I reached a huge milestone in my understanding of the world when I realized that issues of identity politics are simply used to advance material goals. This applies as much to liberal Americans who trumpet “freedom and demoracy” and use it to invade countries as it does to National Socialists and Zionists who hide behind identity politics as well in a more explicit fashion. It applied to Christopher Columbus when he invaded countries for “Christianity” but really wanted Gold (nod to Howard Zinn) and it applied to Muhammad as well who clearly invented the the Koran based on millennial outdated myths (the Torah and Gospels) to gain influence over the people of Mecca and Medina.
Historically, why was Slavery supported? To advance Southern agrarian economics!
Why was Slavery opposed? To support Yankee imperialist industrial economics!
Why did Hitler obsess over Jews? To create a false racial theory (“aryan” and “semite” are linguistic terms) so that he could explain the economic depression, send the Germans to war (military industrial complex) and take over Polish land and then argue that the Jews were responsible for the war because they were “controlling” (lol) America and Britain (Poland’s allies) and crashed the economy to begin with.
Why did Britain and America oppose Germany? Aside from self-defense (Pearl Harbor bombing, the proximity of Britain to Germany), the Americans and British wanted to advance capitalist imperialism in a way which was more eloquent than German Nazism. Pragmatically, this is why Israel became propped after 1948! A zig-zag by an opposing capitalist power to support Imperialism by using Jews as the useful idiots instead of using them as the scapegoat!
Why has the ruling class in America rejected racialism? First of all, labor (non-whites gained economic strength), but secondly the Cold War because the ruling class realized that if it did not drop its racialism, then non-whites would revoke their alliance to the bourgeois class and Marxism would appeal instead. Besides, there are a host of ideologies available that include non-Whites which could attract them if America continued to support racialist policies. Just as antisemitism caused Jews to side (temporarily) with the Soviets against the Tzar, racialism could cause non-Whites to abandon American politics. It’s interesting that as soon as Jews had an opportunity to join the bourgeois class, many of them abandoned proletarian politics and switched to Zionist-American politics! As scumbag “Prak Stal” wrote, “use the latter then kick it away” (I don’t plagiarize he only invents that).
Why is there mass immigration, outsourcing of jobs? Again, economics!
People who believe that “moral principles” guide racial policy are idiots. Internet “white race spokespeople” who speak of the “rights” of races to survive and liberals who speak of the “rights” of minorities are mistaken. Under capitalism nobody has any rights, but simply privileges which are granted based on both present and outdated material conditions but hidden behind bullshit ideology. The cold truth is that I will be more honest. Socialism does not believe the “bourgeiouse” has any rights! When you realize the sham of human rights activism, you realize that society is latent with racial double standards because of capitalism primarily, rather than Catholicism or organized Judaism (any resemblance is coincidential). “Human rights” are simply tools used to rally segments of population behind propaganda. The Media does not care about the truth when it under-reports Black Crime (I like thugs) and Judicial system does not see Black or White, it sees Green (dollar bill). “All men are created equal” did not always mean Black men but still emotionally this stirred many American revolutionaries against the British Imperialists. “Human rights” are a propaganda tool, whether used by American colonial Whites (but not Blacks) or used by a biased Media that makes stupid narratives around crime cases to make it appear as if “white supremacists” are frequently attacking Blacks when data shows otherwise.
Another comment. Have you ever seen Abraham Foxman’s salary? Norman Finkelstein (the most skilled writer on the Zionist question) explains the money politics behind victim whoring very well!
The people who I fought with on forums are idiotic morons who are living in a false world in which identity politics are legitimate instead of covers for material politics. They believe “The Jews” and Nazis actually were/are sincere in their identity politics and not simply using them to exploit the stupid. Hell, even Jim Giles made fun of the “white money movement” (note that Hunter Wallace is no longer part of it).
The article included is very well written. I agree with every single point and it would be pointless to comment much because I essentially would repeat the article. The author brought up many points that are important but often overlooked and tied them together.
Originally posted in the North American Juche-Songun Ideas Study Group
- There is much ignorance among Americans of where Juche is situated on the political spectrum, even amongst Communists very few understand the Juche positions on various important matters such as the role of Stalin, the Sino-Soviet split, post-1976 China, anti-imperialism in the Third World etc….and so this article will try to address the subject of Juche’s position within the international communist movement in brief.
- The Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung began his political career first and foremost as a Marxist-Leninist, he studied, admired and followed the ideas of Marx, Lenin and Stalin as the sole way for oppressed peoples to achieve liberation. Juche was created originally as a Korean application of ML to their own conditions much as Maoism began as an application of ML to China. Looking at the period pre-death of Stalin in 1953, Juche and Maoism were nearly identical, not a shock as China and Korea were both backward, feudal, colonial societies, in that both shared the concept of a transition state before socialism (new/national democracy) the innovation of a revolutionary peasantry, the necessity of people’s war to achieve revolution, the need for patriotism and defence of national integrity, self-reliance in the struggle and not depending on foreign parties or nations, and upholding the USSR as the first and leading socialist nation under Comrade Stalin.
- After the passing of Comrade Stalin and the rise to power of the revisionist clique, Kim Il Sung and the DPRK stood with China and all other anti-revisionist forces in opposing Khruschov’s betrayal of socialism, his abandonment of proletarian dictatorship, his peaceful-coexistence nonsense rejection of class war, and his attempts to dominate and lord over other socialist nations.To this day the DPRK preserves the great memory of Joseph Stalin and considers the fall of the USSR to be a result of revisionism.
- However, beginning circa 1966, China and Korea began to diverge widely. Although both nations opposed the USSR as a revisionist nation, the Juche belief that each nation’s party has final say over their own nation’s matters led the Koreans to consider that the ultimate responsibly of defeating Russian revisionism rested solely upon the shoes of the Russian people alone. For geopolitical reasons Korea needed to remain allied to Russia to oppose the still menacing US imperialists who occupied the southern half of their nation; Korea’s line can be summed up then as opposition to Soviet revisionism domestically but support for the USSR internationally against imperialism. Mao and China took a different view, viewing the USSR as an enemy nation equal to the US and hence began to have strike with the Koreans who had remained Russian allies. Looking back on all this, one can clearly see that the Korean line was correct. While the revisionists did sell out their country ultimately to imperialism, from the point of view of class struggle the primary contradiction always was between the proletariat and capitalism with the US as the main capitalist power; any contradiction with the USSR was then secondary to the global anti-US struggle. Mao’s line of equal opposition to the US and Russia isolated him at first and led to his eventual reconciliation with US imperialism in the 1970s and his support for imperialist puppets who murdered communists in Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East.
- Furthermore, Kim Il Sung opposed China’s Cultural Revolution. While the Koreans do in fact accept Mao’s premise that a bourgeoisie can arise within a revolutionary Party holding state power, and hence the necessity of a strong ideological mass-movement to counter it as well as enforcing that the Party cadre are never isolated from the people and are made to work with them, Korea was not in a position (due to the ever present threat of the resumption of the Korean War by the US) to throw itself into mass internal upheaval the way China did and it viewed the Chinese effort as premature due to the need to build a united society for defence against imperialist invasions. In this, Kim Il Sung’s line was akin to those of Liu Shaoqi or Peng Dehui in China. The Koreans viewed some of the actions of the Chinese Red Guards as veering towards ultra-leftism and anarchism because of the lack of Party-led discipline in China at this time; in turn some Chinese began attacking the DPRK and calling for its’ overthrow. Relations were quite bad between China and Korea for a couple of years in the late 60s but ultimately cooler heads in China, led by Mao to his credit, suppressed the extremists and relations were friendly once again and remained so throughout the final period of Mao’s life.
- With the mutual opposition to both rightist Soviet revisionism and leftist Maoism, Juche can thus be seen as a centrist ideology much as Stalin was also a centrist between Trotsky and Bukharin. During the 60s and 70s Kim Il Sung began promoting Juche as the correct ideology for revolution, as it was based on national self-reliance a Juche nation would not become entrapped by social imperialism nor would it abandon the global anti-imperialist fight. As only the people of a nation can determine what the revolutionary idea will be for that nation, Juche Korea never attempted to dictate to others in the manner that Russia and China did, and Korea thus built great relations with nationalist-socialist leaders such as Nasser in Egypt, Kadhafi in Libya, the Ba’ath party in Syria and Iraq, and the Islamic revolution led by Imam Khomeini in Iran, seeing all these forces as the genuine expression of the people’s revolutionary will.
- Now to discuss post-Mao China and the emergence of Dengist “market socialism”, the Koreans oppose Dengism in their country and refuse to “open up”, but as with everything else see Dengism as a matter for the Chinese communist party to resolve and continue to have good friendly relations with China. In several official publications, the DPRK has referred to China as revisionist and would obviously prefer that China returns to the socialist path, however they are understanding of the fact that Dengism arose due to the low level of productive forces within China and the need for development. China need not have adopted markets, had it gone on the self-reliant way or improved relations with the USSR, but again that is a matter for the Chinese people to deal with by themselves.
- As Juche-idea followers, it is our duty to support all nations that are truly independent of imperialism, are contra-USA, and are ruled by a government that reflects the national culture and tradition as well as the people’s wishes.
What we are attacking is the tendency for the “clown movement” forums to have a Jewish fetish. While Hunter and I differ in our specific takes on the Jewish question and overall philosophy, we can converge on the viewpoint that the “clown movement” takes a very annoying approach to the Jewish Question.
This is an interesting conversation because Hunter is perceived as a moderate on the question and I am critical of organized Judaism as a bourgeoisie society and collaborator with American neo-liberal capitalism, yet both of us still can see that the “clown movement” is in left field.
A very interesting article about the bible and biblical history vs. real history has been uncovered.
It is ironic, but according to the article, the majority of the descendants of biblical Israel actually converted to Islam. That would mean that the Palestinians are ethnically more Jewish than the European and Russian Jews who migrated to Israel after the holocaust. It appears that the majority of Zionists used to know this, but around the 1960′s engaged in a massive disinformation campaign to sweep it under the rug.
According to the article, while Jews lived around the Mediterranean, they used to proselytize and convert people to Judaism. The genetics do confirm this, as modern day Jews are closely related to Greeks, Italians and northwestern Arabs. Modern day Jews have some Russian and German blood, however not as much as one would expect based on the amount of time they lived there. At some point, Jews decided they would no longer try to convert people, although Judaism has always allowed converts who came independently without being recruited. However, what the article suggests is that Jews were not “kicked out of” Roman-ruled Palestine. It appears instead that Jews left to spread the religion around the Mediterranean Basin and the Jews who stayed around converted to Christianity and then Islam. The idea that Jews were “Kicked out” and are just “taking back” their land is a major precept of zionism, although it should not be. It appears to be false. It appears that local Jews merely switched religions and other Jews left to recruit. Even if Jews were kicked out, it does not mean that Palestinians should be displaced systematically today, but this article suggests they were not even kicked out.
The text also alleges that the book of Exodus is a giant lie.
Free Media Productions officially rejects Abrahamic history and theology and does not care if this offends practicing religious people. We are not an Islamic website and we are not a Mosaic website either. It should go without saying that a Marxist website by default critiques all religion just as Marx, Lenin and Stalin did.
The official “in writing” use policy on this website is that one must ask the individual author for permission to quote the author’s content.
However, if you are not on our bad side, we will unofficially tell you that you can reproduce our content with proper attribution and we are not out to get you. We need to officially say we require permission to prevent some websites from stealing our content that are particularly persistent and/or particularly low class.
These two websites, outright, will have copyright policy enforced if they steal our content.
We are telling them ahead of time that the answer to “can I use your content” is “no.”
These two websites will be required to ask the relevant author for permission if they desire to quote content.
If they do it without asking, we will enforce the policy.
For everyone else, you can pretty much (within reason) assume that if you simply stay on our good side, we will be willing to let you use our content. If an author decides to not grant you permission, free media productions will let you know about it, but that is most unlikely. If you are not one of the four websites, go ahead and use the content, and it should be noted that two of the websites listed are still able to ask for permission on a case by case basis. The other two websites flat out cannot ever quote our material, with or without attribution.
We used to have a very good page rank and we still have a pretty good page rank. It used to be that you could google “Jewish Bolshevism” and the first thing to come up would be a Constantin Von Hoffmeister article that praised the Jewish revolutionaries.
We fell because google changed its own formula. In addition some other websites have risen, though not enough to “close the gap.”
We do not whore ourselves to get more comments. This is a website, not a “free speech forum.” If you read a textbook, its success or failure is not determined by how many letters are written to the editor, nor how many authors are featured in the book for the point of appearing “bigger.”
The reason we rank ahead of others is that we do not whore ourselves and have ideas of what we want to achieve as opposed to taking the attitude that “any activity is activity.”