In 2007 however, as opposed to 2006, The pro-JTF posts were cool because at that time the JTF used to be cool, but all this talk about “white racialism” and “western civilization” is just a bunch of Republican non-sense. My views are increased in sophistication by several orders of magnitude, but really I realized that trying to frame views into a mainstream context is cowardly! In addition to being a coward’s move, trying to “go mainstream” does not get results!

I note a few recurring themes in the posts, but that was mainly because of the environment. If a pond is full of bass fish, then your line will catch bass fish. If a forum is full of people who enjoy talking about certain themes, then you’ll adapt to that. It’s hardly autistic as the clowns on stumble inn would suggest, and more that I was responding to the environment by discussing the same topics, of course with different viewpoints! Contrary to me being autistic, my ideological opponents were, as they latched onto old fashioned ideologies and defended them whereas I always look forwards and sideways, much to the consternation of others.

I note high levels of criticism of Catholicism and Paganism. And criticism of nationalities. I guess you can say the posts weren’t all boxed into one issue.

Younger predominately male workers need to stop waiting at the back of the line (we’ve waited long enough, how long are we supposed to wait), and really start to discriminate against older workers wherever we have the power to do so. It is the older generation, this baby boomer generation of screwups, who ruined the economy, and it is the older generation who imposes flawed ideology on the younger the generation. The older bourgeoisie useless parasites can shut their mouths about age discrimination, and realize how unfairly good they have it. They can shut up about how hard they worked to get to where they are, and realize that it was easy to succeed until they screwed everything up. The blatant nepotism! The preference of age over skill! The desire to hire a worker solely because he/she is more experienced, when he/she may be an idiot. They run up deficits, they deconstruct the ethnic identity of nations, they outsource jobs, they start imperialistic wars for liberal capitalism, they flood the working class with more immigrant competition and they think they are clever with their two party system.

(note that this article is merely artistic and I don’t really advocate violence)
Death to the bourgeoisie! Exterminate them. Imprison them. Kick them. Spit on them. Throw rocks at them. Hell piss on them. Throw them into volcanoes and then clap when the volcanoes erupt. Make them suffocate on their dollar bills.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT I THINK BOTH PARTIES ARE SCUM AND AM ONLY USING THIS JOKE TO MAKE A BROADER POINT!

Retarded funny untrue link

That is the basic difference between Aslan Maskhadov and me on the Islamic question.

Americans should get more militant if the government doesn’t cooperate. We’ve had enough of being bounced between a facade of two similar parties like pinballs and we’re not going to waste our lives away decaying under this system. Both parties serve the same elite and both hate communitarian nationalism. We’re not as dumb as the government thinks we are. If there is no light at the end of the tunnel, you can count on anti-government action and feeling escalating.

This model is challenged by a 2-D model which suggests that economic and social issues should be considered separately rather than in a package. A libertarian is neither left nor right, because he/she is libertarian on both economic AND social issues. A populist is neither left or right, because he/she is for regulation on BOTH economic and social issues. But even this is insufficient. A democratic socialist and a revolutionary communist would be placed on the same place in this spectrum, because both have similar aims. But other dimensions must be considered by those who are detail-oriented. This model is inadequate for even American politics, and certainly inadequate for world politics. The world is much more complex and I’m afraid that if you can’t figure this out, then I can’t explain it to you.

We must reject the idea that politics is one or two dimensional, and realize that it is multi-dimensional.

Over the first months of this year, the number of people who called themselves either Democrats or Republicans declined, while the number who called themselves independents surged ahead.

The number of Americans who trust President Obama to make the right decisions has fallen by roughly 17 percentage points. Obama’s job approval is down to about 50 percent. All presidents fall from their honeymoon highs, but in the history of polling, no newly elected American president has fallen this far this fast.

Fifty-nine percent of Americans now think the country is headed in the wrong direction.

Most Americans still admire Obama and want him to succeed. But if he doesn’t proceed in a manner consistent with the spirit of the nation and the times, voters will find a way to stop him.

America could really use more “out of the box” thinking. This, from my view, is good news. Even though Americans are turning libertarian and I am not libertarian, a change in direction means that Americans are realizing that something is wrong and needs replacement.

There’s no longer any left or right. There’s the system and the enemies of the system. The system is the liberal democracy that triumphed everywhere, that noxious, shit-colored weed. The enemies of the system — that’s who we are, extreme Communists, extreme nationalists.

This should sound familar. In my previous writing, I wrote:

What passes for “left and right” is simply two sides of the same liberal Democratic coin. The debate is framed in a deceptive fashion, where two very similar parties (Democratic and Republican) are seen as representatives of an entire “left/right” spectrum. The first reality is that both parties are basically the same, and neither represents the historic left or right. The second reality is that the terms are meaningless to begin with.

The terms left and right are obsolete, and we are beyond left and right. They are oversimplifications that originate from a smear system within American politics, and philosophically, the terms are baseless. They derive their meaning from American history and that alone, rather than any philosophical reasoning. As soon as somebody uses this terminology, it is a good indication that they are brainwashed by the liberal democratic status quo.

I commend anyone who can see through the oversimplified views related to the political spectrum that exists in modern discourse. Apparently it is not just America but Russia too and all of the neo-liberal world that is oversimplified. The first step in rejecting mainstream politics is rejecting the left-right spectrum. Rejecting the idea that Republicans and Democrats are positionable on that spectrum and rejecting the idea that dissident political movements fit on that spectrum. A Communist and a Nationalist who oppose the status quo have more in common with each other than either do with the “left or right” within the status quo. There is no “left and right.” There is an “us and them.”

The truth is that instead of viewing political thought through the nice compartmentalized boxes that the intellectually lazy would find comfortable, dissidents who envision the larger picture know that fully comprehending politics is about understanding details. Free Media Productions encourages its members and readers to be detail-oriented and sophisticated, and to reject simplistic ideology.

For full screen, click the bottom right button.

I haven’t converted this to youtube video format yet, because every inexpensive method I discovered would substantially downgrade the quality.  But it is here uploaded on our website.  It will probably eventually be created.

Hello, I am here speaking with free media productions and this time I am speaking on my own impulse. I want to talk about the two party system and how cleverly it is constructed to fool people who are not deep thinkers. I also want to encourage all those who agree with the following message to join “www.freemediaproductions.info” and get involved with the website. We cannot succeed in making change unless we stick to our principles, but those who truly share these principles should unite.

The truth is that the parties are more similar than different. Republicans call Democrats liberals, but Republicans are liberal too. Compared to Marxists, Fascists, Nazis, Islamic Fundamentalists, Kahanists, and Ba’athists, the Republicans are truly just as liberal the Democrats they smear. Republicans support a “free market,” if that isn’t liberalism, than I don’t know what is. And the Republicans and Democrats are equally committed to upholding the structures that maintain the American ideal, and frequently collude to stop the rise of third party opposition movements. The Republicans and Democrats in the Senate and House of Representatives also colluded to help Bush launch his Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The financial crysis that the two-party allies allowed to take place, in the name of “Freedom” and “Liberty,” is also indictive of the priorities of these parties. Rather than challenge the corrupt businessmen and questionably qualified buyers, the politically correct leadership allowed people to do what they please. And that is really what Democracy is. People doing what they want, not necessarily people doing what is beneficial for society. Yet with the failures of Democracy at home, arrogant “democratic / republican” American leaders feel they have a moral right to export it abroad. There is nothing “moral” about the American crusade in the middle east. A small group of powerful elites ruthlessly persue their intersts, and destroy the infrastructure of other nations, and then justify it in the name of a non-existant moral highground. I say non-existant because the “Democratic System” is just as corrosive at home as it is abroad.

Psychologically, the elites who rule America have cleverly designed a system in which the angers of dissent are improperly diverted towards the opposite party instead of the political process. Every 8 years or so, the balance of power shifts, and the American people feel their job is done. Intuitively the American people initially and rightfully get angry because of the system of world-wide exploitation, but then they feel at peace with themselves. After all, a new party is in power.

But it’s not really a new party. What the American people fail to realize is that the elites who manipulate them are playing a game of pinball, but the flippers on both side of the arcade machine are being controlled by the same power structure. Finance capitalism combined with political correctness to incite racial warfare is the truly dominant ideology in both parties. Obviously the people in power, though selfish and harmful, are intelligent. They know very well that their acts of corruption will anger people. But they control the resistance psychologically, by diverting the public opinion from one party to another. Just like professional wrestling, the two apparent opponents are actually cleverly manipulating the crowd, in an attempt to frame a box that binds constraints around what is acceptable discourse. By giving people two choices, the elites are then in a position to label anyone who sees through their plan as extremists. They point out to the public that their opposition could dissent in a more mainstream fashion. But that’s just part of the shell game played by the people who hold power in America. The manipulators in power convince the masses that their party swapping is a true sign of rebellious out of the box thinking. It is not, the masses are truly thinking inside the box. It’s just that the box is framed around two different parties. And anyone who TRULY thinks outside of the two-party box can be labeled as nuts, extremist, and insatiable. “When will these people every be satisfied,” is what the propagandists say to attack those who reject their system. Well, we will never be satisfied until the entire political process and governmental system is truly reformed, and a switch between nearly identical parties won’t achieve that.

Do I need to remind people that the Democratic party was originally labeled the “Democratic-Republican Party?” Then it switched its name and a new Republican Party was created. Many of us oppose the political system for different reasons, and many of us have different visions for the future. But I believe anyone who has the wisdom to understand the problem I am describing is a potential ally. We must think pragmatically and we must work together. All who oppose the status quo must work as a team to dismantle it. We know they are working as a team. If we don’t, we will lose. Please join the team effort at “www.freemediaproductions.info.” We encourage people to TRULY think outside of the box. Take off the chains and join us. The most misguided people are those who are angry but feel they can work within the system and reform it. We here know we must work outside of the system. Those who think they can debate their way to change, without fundamentally changing the way society actually works are misguided.

We must oppose the two party rule not only at the ballot box but in our every day lives. It is not sufficient merely to vote against the system, one must also evangelize his/her views and verbally criticize the system.