Younger predominately male workers need to stop waiting at the back of the line (we’ve waited long enough, how long are we supposed to wait), and really start to discriminate against older workers wherever we have the power to do so. It is the older generation, this baby boomer generation of screwups, who ruined the economy, and it is the older generation who imposes flawed ideology on the younger the generation. The older bourgeoisie useless parasites can shut their mouths about age discrimination, and realize how unfairly good they have it. They can shut up about how hard they worked to get to where they are, and realize that it was easy to succeed until they screwed everything up. The blatant nepotism! The preference of age over skill! The desire to hire a worker solely because he/she is more experienced, when he/she may be an idiot. They run up deficits, they deconstruct the ethnic identity of nations, they outsource jobs, they start imperialistic wars for liberal capitalism, they flood the working class with more immigrant competition and they think they are clever with their two party system.

(note that this article is merely artistic and I don’t really advocate violence)
Death to the bourgeoisie! Exterminate them. Imprison them. Kick them. Spit on them. Throw rocks at them. Hell piss on them. Throw them into volcanoes and then clap when the volcanoes erupt. Make them suffocate on their dollar bills.

Oh how I’d love to purge both the left and the right and bring an entirely new mentality to America!

It’s even dumb to fail to distinguish between members of families. Should I fail to note that Nero and his mother had different traits? Or are they all the same because they belong to the same family? Because Nero killed his mother, I would say there is a difference!

I officially reject and want nothing to do with racists who categorize people into groups and then hate people just because they belong to the groups. I “believe in race” but I’m also detail-oriented. Most of these clowns people don’t know jack shit about anthropology either. And believe it or not, there are a few “good” Black people. And I’ll attack any ethnic group I want to. If I want to attack Irish Catholics for example, I will, so shut up!

Analogously, If a 25 year old punches me in the face, I won’t hate all people who are 25 years old. Another analogy : even though I hate most women, I don’t hate “the good” women.

Racism is a bad idea. Realism is a good idea.

But realism is pretty cruel and politically incorrect.

Serial killers successfully lure “nice” victims into their own deaths all the time. America has all the power in the world, but is afraid of using it.

If I was running America, things would be “different” (if you know what I mean). I could even argue that I’m not part of White Guilt because I’m Eastern European and a Yankee.

Without guilt, the American empire could rule the world as a good fascist state. Yes it is multiracial, but so was the Roman empire. The American Empire should be race aware but not racially pure. The White race of course should survive as should other aspects of the empire, like Native Americans and Blacks.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT I THINK BOTH PARTIES ARE SCUM AND AM ONLY USING THIS JOKE TO MAKE A BROADER POINT!

Retarded funny untrue link

That is the basic difference between Aslan Maskhadov and me on the Islamic question.

Those of us who love our Communist identity, who love the working class of our nation and want to preserve our ethnic character and believe in international solidarity with the popular masses of other countries fighting against Zionism and imperialism, have a profound obligation to tell the truth and struggle to rectify this embarrassing and humiliating situation. This is true no matter how many times we ourselves are accused of espousing “racism,” “xenophobia,” “national chauvinism,” “anti-Semitism,” “White Supremacism” or “Islamo-fascism,” and even “anti-Communism.” As a revolutionary principle, the popular classes struggle together as a national unit to build the revolution. This patriotic class struggle forms proletarian internationalism not based upon wanting to destroy nations and form a “Communist International,” but by the bonds of solidarity and cooperation between patriots of one land with another. The leading forces behind the United States and imperialism worldwide, which struggles to break down the ethnic character of people, are overwhelmingly Jewish.

21^st Century Communism is National Communism, not dogmatic “anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism,” not liberal identity politics and definitely not national nihilism and Jew-loving self-hatred. European-American National Communism isn’t chauvinistic nor the metaphysics of Hitlerite National Socialism, but it will coordinate with our kindred in the White Power national democratic front and other peoples on its own terms. It also will not fall for the trap of “anti-racism” and “anti-fascism” or whatever Jewish and nihilist conspiracy is hatched to prevent us from closing ranks with our kindred, regardless of whether or not they are currently anti-communist.

While we admire Stalin’s leadership during the Soviet-led struggle against Operation Barbarossa, we cannot possibly deny that many good points existed early on in the German revolution of 1933, and that very real limitations existed in the Communist movement, namely Jew-loving illusions and national nihilism. Further, we argue that Adolf Hitler has become the greatest sacred cow of the entire world, a sacred cow that needs to be correctly deconstructed because it stands in the way of our liberation and of movements of national release against globalism throughout the world.

We also will not deny that the dominant White Nationalist movement, regardless of our internal disagreements and its limitations, is not without many positive features. We defend “Europe for the Europeans” and opposition to “open borders” when Arabs and others ask us to “tone it down a notch,” because White people have a right to self-determination as much as Palestinians and Iraqis. Within the United States, multiculturalism is nothing more than a codeword for Zionist-driven cosmopolitanism and nihilistic death for which all of us are ultimately victims. We refuse to differentiate between Jews and Zionists, because it cannot possibly be argued that this lie has any logical benefit for our struggle or the overall struggle against imperialism. We do not deny the existence of races or the centrality of ethno-nationalism as the only genuine form of nationalism today, but merely state that such questions are the internal matter of other peoples and oppose genuine ethnic chauvinism while equally lambasting calls of denunciation against true nationalism when it is slandered by the forces of “political correctness.” Lastly, like all White Nationalists in the US, we love White people, are proudly Eurocentric and openly quarrel with the dominant leftist paradigm that pretends European-Americans are not an oppressed nation today with a right to self-determination.

Our communism is not an attempted subversion of the people through chameleon tactics. We have no hidden agenda, because our goals are public knowledge. Our call for socialism, anti-imperialism and anti-Zionism and the liberation of White people through a coordinated national democratic front is an open and steady call. Our political alliances are honest alliances, regardless of real differences, based on an understanding of needing unified collective White European-American action and eventually coordination with other people to bring down the American regime and Jewish power worldwide. We are not rightists with the rightists and leftists with the leftists, though we do speak to each in ways to which they can relate. We are patriotic communists at all times.

Unlike other group identities formed around religion or based on national identity (without conceding that the Jews constitute a nation), the very act of being a Jew is hostile to the world and without redeeming value. We admire Lenin, but he was wrong on this. Almost no real “Jewish proletariat” exists to be differentiated from the Jewish bourgeoisie, because Jews are lazy predatory creatures who close ranks around a common goal of world domination and economic slavery. We do need to condemn White globalists and others who are power holders in imperialist finance capital and the conspiracy to destroy nation states and think in terms of class analysis, but it is very important to understand that the leading quarters of imperialism and the true power structure of the United States are all Jews and that the entire Jewish community closes ranks with this threat to liberty.

My organization, the European-American Socialist People’s Front, calls on honest elements of the White European-descended left to correct their mistakes on the national question and the Jewish problem and join ranks for a nation liberation struggle to come. We call on White European-descended rightists to understand that while the dominant Western leftist political movements are Judaic assaults on the dignity of the white race, that not all of us are without great love for and pride in our people, and we do want a unified front to preserve our identity and promote our liberation. We address our allies outside the realm of our kindred as friends and comrades, but we do not allow that they should possibly dictate the terms of our mass line. We argue that natural differences always will exist between the mass lines of completely different people, but that this should not stand in the way of amiable relations and collective solidarity against a common threat.

Imperialism, not White solidarity, is the real enemy of humanity!

Americans should get more militant if the government doesn’t cooperate. We’ve had enough of being bounced between a facade of two similar parties like pinballs and we’re not going to waste our lives away decaying under this system. Both parties serve the same elite and both hate communitarian nationalism. We’re not as dumb as the government thinks we are. If there is no light at the end of the tunnel, you can count on anti-government action and feeling escalating.

Political correctness is a gangrenous infection. My generation has submitted to a toxic diet of multiculturalism, identity politics, anti-Americanism and entitlement. The problem festered under the Bush administration. Despite 9/11, government at all levels refused to screen out jihadi-apologizing influences in our military, at the FBI, in prisons and even fire departments. Despite the bloody consequences of open borders, the Bush Pentagon allowed illegal aliens to enter the military. The grievance lobby has plied the Muslim jihadist-as-victim narrative for nearly a decade now.

This is a very good quote and it explains much of what is wrong with America.

Jonah Goldberg

He (Malik Hassan) demonstrated that being a trained psychiatrist provides no immunity to ancient hatreds and religious fanaticism, nor does psychiatric training provide much acuity in spotting such things in others. For example, the London Telegraph reports that, in what was supposed to be a medical lecture, Hasan instead gave an hour-long briefing on the Koran, explaining to colleagues at Walter Reed Army Medical Center that nonbelievers should be beheaded, have boiling oil poured down their throats, and be set on fire.

His fellow psychiatrists completely missed this “red flag” — a suddenly popular euphemism for incandescently obvious evidence this man had no place in the U.S. Army.

He proved how lacking our domestic security system is. According to ABC News, intelligence agencies were aware for months that Hasan had tried to contact al-Qaeda. His colleagues reportedly knew he sympathized with suicide bombings and attacks on U.S. troops abroad, and one colleague said Hasan was pleased by an attack on an Army recruiting office and suggested more of the same might be desirable. That’s treason, even if you’re a Muslim.
Which raises the most troubling revelation: For many people, the idea that he is a Muslim fanatic, motivated by other Muslim fanatics, was — at least initially — too terrible to contemplate. How else to explain the reflexive insistence after the attack that the real culprit was post-traumatic stress disorder? The fact that PTSD is usually diagnosed in people who’ve been through trauma (hence the “post”), and that Hasan had never seen combat, didn’t seem to matter much.

This is a perfect description of how liberals think.

The right opposition must stop being libertarian and start being authoritarian! Death to political correctness and neo-liberalism!

The next step is for the right to drop libertarianism for populism. Populism must prevail over the free market.

I guess the “Jewish Media Conspiracy” doesn’t explain everything, but of course I never was stupid enough to believe it.

Not striking first is like giving your opponent a head start. Nice guys really do finish last. This is a lesson I’ve learned on internet forums but also by observing the consequences of political correctness. People who try to play by the rules really do get shafted in the end. It is a fact of life.

“Maybe if we are nice to competitive ideologies, they will stop hating us.” Military build ups are the only solution. War is the answer if “how” is the question.

But the real answer is that conversions to Democracy are useless if they go against the interest of the state which won the victory.

“A diverse Army gives us strength”

“It would be a shame — as great a tragedy as this was — it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well”

13 dead is not a strength, and when we (Bureaucratic authoritarians) take over the country, you will see the real strength. We will show you how to deal with liberals and we will show you how to deal with people who question the state. And we will show you how to deal with people who support spreading liberalism and democracy around the world, instead of spreading crass techno-fascism.

My post on stupidity and Anton Lavey

What needs to be plotted is a way to create a society that punishes people for being stupid and rewards people for being intolerant. Some issues to consider may be how to indoctrinate children and how to structure the society. I’ll post about this more when I have more ideas.

The elite has been bailed out. The same elite that caused this situation has been bailed out. The economy recovers for investors, but not for everyone else.

Quite frankly, you will never get me back. I will always hate everything the ruling order that produced this situation stands for. I will always hate Democrats and Republicans and hate everything liberal. You will never get me back.
The Link

Bright, eager — and unwanted. While unemployment is ravaging just about every part of the global workforce, the most enduring harm is being done to young people who can’t grab onto the first rung of the career ladder.

Affected are a range of young people, from high school dropouts to college grads to newly minted lawyers and MBAs across the developed world from Britain to Japan. One indication: In the U.S., the unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds has climbed to more than 18 percent, from 13 percent a year ago.

For people just starting their careers, the damage may be deep and long-lasting, potentially creating a kind of “lost generation.” Studies suggest that an extended period of youthful joblessness can significantly depress lifetime income as people get stuck in jobs that are beneath their capabilities, or come to be seen by employers as damaged goods.

Equally important, employers are likely to suffer from the scarring of a generation. The freshness and vitality young people bring to the workplace is missing. Tomorrow’s would-be star employees are on the sidelines, deprived of experience and losing motivation. In Japan, which has been down this road since the early 1990s, workers who started their careers a decade or more ago and are now in their 30s account for 6 in 10 reported cases of depression, stress, and work-related mental disabilities, according to the Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development.

When today’s unemployed finally do get jobs in the recovery, many may be dissatisfied to be slotted below people who worked all along — especially if the newcomers spent their downtime getting more education, says Richard Thompson, vice-president for talent development at Adecco Group North America, which employs more than 300,000 people in temporary positions. Says Thompson: “You’re going to have multiple generations fighting for the jobs that are going to come back in the recovery.”

What’s more, the baby boom generation is counting on a productive young workforce to help fund retirement and health care. Instead, young people risk getting tracked into jobs that don’t pay as well, says Lisa B. Kahn of the Yale School of Management. That would mean lower tax payments for Social Security and Medicare.

Only 46 percent of people aged 16-24 had jobs in September, the lowest since the government began counting in 1948. The crisis is even hitting recent college graduates. “I’ve applied for a whole lot of restaurant jobs, but even those, nobody calls me back,” says Dan Schmitz, 25, a University of Wisconsin graduate with a bachelor’s degree in English who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y. “Every morning I wake up thinking today’s going to be the day I get a job. I’ve not had a job for months, and it’s getting really frustrating.”

Anxiety and fear
The case for action is strong. Governments should act now before the damage gets even worse, argues David G. Blanchflower, an economist at Dartmouth College who recently served on the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England. He’s not sure what will work, but he favors trying everything from subsidizing education and training to cutting minimum wages for young people and trainees. “It has to be now,” says Blanchflower. “It can’t be in two years’ time.”

Most analyses of youth employment focus on people aged 16 to 24, which includes everyone from high school dropouts to wet-behind-the-ears college grads. But in this era of rising educational requirements, some people don’t start their careers until their mid or late 20s — and these young college grads are taking it on the chin as well.

According to a BusinessWeek analysis, college graduates aged 22 to 27 have fared worse than their older educated peers during the downturn. Two years ago, 84.4 percent of young grads had jobs, only somewhat lower than the 86.8 percent figure for college graduates aged 28 to 50. Since then, the employment gap between the two groups has almost doubled.

Robert I. Sutton, author of “The No Asshole Rule,” a management book, says he’s seeing “more anxiety and fear” among his students at Stanford University. At Northwestern University Law School, at least three-quarters of students who graduated in May had their employment deferred, in some cases up to a year, says Bill Chamberlain, head of the school’s career center.

But the situation is most severe for job seekers who lack college diplomas and thus have fewer options. “My friends tell me: ‘Go fill this out. Go do that,’” says Charlie Black, 26, of Manhattan, who was out one recent weekend shopping for a Halloween costume for his 2-year-old daughter, Bree. Black has been a union extra in several TV shows and movies, and for a year he worked the overnight shift at an Abercrombie & Fitch store. Now, jobless for almost a year, he would be happy to work as a janitor. “But no jobs have been calling back,” says Black.

It seems strange at first blush that young people are the biggest victims of the current economic slump. One could easily imagine that companies in a recession would prefer to hire young people, who are cheap, and slough off older workers, who are expensive. But both employers and older workers are sitting tight, taking as few risks as possible in an uncertain environment. With no openings, employers are refusing even to look at the résumés of those on the outside looking in.

The sense of stasis in many Western countries is reminiscent of Japan, where talk of a lost generation has been around since as long ago as 1995. Some 3.1 million Japanese aged 25 to 34 work as temps or contract employees — up from 2 million 10 years ago, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Many Japanese blame the young people themselves, saying they are spoiled, alienated “freeters” — a term meaning job-hopping part-timers. But economist Souichi Ohta of Nagoya University argues that a big part of the problem is Japanese employers, who value long experience at their companies — which newcomers by definition don’t have.

Europe offers different lessons about what to avoid. In Spain, employers generally put older workers on long-term contracts that are hard to break. When demand slumps, they get rid of the younger workers, notes Alfredo Pastor, an economist at Spain’s IESE Business School and former Spanish Secretary of State for the Economy. That’s one reason Spain’s unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds is a sky-high 39 percent. The rate is 24 percent in France and 19 percent in Britain.

Economists in several countries have studied the damage such high unemployment can cause. Kahn of Yale found that graduating from college in a bad economy has a long-lasting negative effect on wages. For each percentage-point rise in the unemployment rate, those who graduated during the recession earned 6 percent to 7 percent less in their first year of employment than their more fortunate counterparts. Even 15 years out of school, the recession graduates earned 2.5 percent less than those who began working in more prosperous times.

Job programs for youth
What can be done? For one thing, companies should keep hiring young people even if they’re doing layoffs. That’s how General Electric operates, says Susan P. Peters, the company’s vice-president for executive development. She says GE learned from the mistake of its aviation business, which froze hiring and training during a downturn years ago and found its talent pipeline dry when business recovered. “We tell our businesses, ‘Tough, you have to hire,’” Peters says.

Free-market economists favor removing obstacles to employment of the young, such as high minimum wages. “The government in some ways is contributing to this problem,” says Kristen Lopez Eastlick, senior research analyst for the employer-backed Employment Policies Institute. She points out that the 40 percent hike in the federal minimum wage over the past two years made it less appealing to hire young workers. One possibility: Some U.S. states and European countries have enacted subminimum wages just for young people or people enrolled in apprenticeships.

More job training would help as well. In April the British government guaranteed that starting next January, all people under age 25 who have been unemployed for more than a year will have a job offer, training, or a paid workplace experience.

The U.S. has been slower to beef up job programs for the young, partly because of massive budget deficits. The Obama administration is again considering a plan proposed during the campaign to give $3,000 tax credits to employers for each new hire, although an administration spokesman says talks with Congress are only preliminary. An argument in favor of action: The current generation of young people is larger than the one that follows. Dartmouth’s Blanchflower points out that even if programs are left in place after the recession ends, they will serve fewer people and therefore become less costly.

One possible example for the U.S. to follow is Germany’s apprenticeship program, which guides young people from high school into skilled blue-collar jobs. Young-adult unemployment in Germany has risen less than in most other developed countries.

Young people have figured out how to avoid horrid blanks on their résumés. Enrollments are breaking records at such schools as Cincinnati State Technical & Community College and LaGuardia Community College in New York. With no job in sight, Shireen Rahjou, 23, of Boca Raton, Fla., is working toward a master’s degree in public relations. She recently landed a paid internship — O.K., not a job, but a foot in the door — at a PR firm in Miami.

With jobs scarce, Stanford’s Sutton says some of his students plan to start their own businesses. Schools should encourage that instead of churning out “passive regurgitators,” argues Kate McKeown, an adjunct professor of entrepreneurship at Fordham University’s College of Business Administration.

Meanwhile, though, the tide of youth unemployment keeps rising. “We’re seeing further deterioration,” says Stefano Scarpetta, who heads the employment-analysis division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development, a forum for rich countries.

The unemployment crisis among the young is not as dramatic as the financial crisis of a year ago. But it may turn out to have longer-lasting effects.

According to Thomas Hobbes, human life would be “nasty, brutish, and short” without political authority. In its absence, we would live in a state of nature, where we each have unlimited natural freedoms, including the “right to all things” and thus the freedom to harm all who threaten our own self-preservation; there would be an endless “war of all against all” (Bellum omnium contra omnes). To avoid this, free men establish political community i.e. civil society through a social contract in which each gain civil rights in return for subjecting himself to civil law or to political authority.

Alternatively, some have argued that we gain civil rights in return for accepting the obligation to respect and defend the rights of others, giving up some freedoms to do so; this alternative formulation of the duty arising from the social contract is often identified with arguments about military service.

What liberals do not understand is that the contract only works if it is mutual. If you tolerate people who want to kill you, then your tolerance causes your own death.

Openly intolerant political ideologies cannot be tolerated by groups with the stated aim of preserving peace. That is the contradiction of liberalism. In order to preserve peace, you have to support war against people who are against peace. In order to stop crime, you have to commit a state sanctioned crime against the criminal. But by declaring war on those who wish to destroy you, and supporting aggressive acts against criminals which limit freedom, you become more similar to your enemies. In order to defeat your enemies, you have to become more like them. If you are unwilling to fight, then the contract will crumble. The violent aggressor will gain power. The necessary response against a legitimate threat forces people who claim to defend peace to become violent. This contradiction applies not only to liberalism, but also to Marxism. Marxists claim to oppose imperialism, but construct their own form of red imperialism while arguing that it is necessary to stop imperialism. Other Marxists feel that Islam is an adequate substitute (which is another contradiction).

Mussolini (unlike Hitler) had this to say about peace:

Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity, quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace.

He was right for reasons I outlined above. If you want to stop political movements that are labeled intolerant, then you must counter their intolerance with your own intolerance. But then you’ve done what you’ve accused your enemies of doing. Peace is not possible to the extent people want to destroy it as the contract can be broken unilaterally, and peace is not desirable because it is not possible.

What we need to do is replace the ideals of tolerance with the ideals of strength. The idea of the social contract is filled with contradictions that require violating it to stop intolerance, but in a way that is itself intolerance. We should embrace intolerance and smash liberalism.

My race realist stance goes hand in hand with my techno-fascist view of the world. Science must destroy political correctness as quickly as it destroys religion. The power structures in America and the world must be altered for this to take place. I smell Stalinist purges in the future. The techno-nationalist bureaucracy will change the entire world. New scientific study will make old views obsolete. Liberalism, Paleoconservatism, White Nationalism and Hitlerlism are the past but the future will re-examine and improve.

Powerful technocratic state governments are imposing their ideology brutally against reactionaries (oppositional religious and political groups) while making populist appeals to progressives (secular) people. Notice that the division is based on religion and ideology; not based on class. People who use religion or ideology to slow down technological progress are the scapegoat, not the bourgeois as whole. Religious people who are moderate enough to embrace science may survive the purge, but “fundamentalists” who call for counter-revolution are definitely and without apology getting purged. If business interests oppose technocracy, then they are suppressed too, but I anticipate that most opposition would come from religious movements rather than business movements (amish, muslims, catholics).

As a side effect of technocracy, human biodiversity studies become mainstream and discussion of race and ethnicity becomes politically correct. The term “progressive” is now a populist technocratic term, not a crazy liberal term or a term to indicate love for the third world. Progressive means nation-building, not globalization idiocy.

A confederate form of communication exists between the states. All politics is local but there is federal regulation. The state and federal governments are free to “turn up the dial” on authoritarianism at any point. At any given point, the Governments can act like a referee. At any given point, the Government can dictate things the way Hussein, Stalin or Mussolini would. The Government however allows market forces in some instances because they are “quicker.” It sets clear boundaries and reserves the right to crash the party at any point.

I oppose contemporary America not because of her strength but because of her stupidity.  I have no love for the third world or the weak, nor do I adore Islamic Fundamentalism.  But I absolutely despise self-destructive behavior and America’s behavior IS self-destructive.   Things like 9/11 are easier to justify from a propaganda perspective when America acts the way that she does.  It isn’t that I love the weak and stupid, and therefore love the third world (like Marxists)…it is that I hate the weak and stupid and therefore hate modern American STUPID imperialism.

Anton Lavey (the founder of theistic Satanism) stated that stupidity should be painful.  He was right.  Being anti-imperialist does not mean I get a hard on for the third world and countries that fail themselves economically and culturally…it just means I think America is sinking to their level.  Perhaps egotistical and reactionary anti-imperialism is different from “leftist” and outdated anti-imperialism.

I do agree with his point that softening a message is pointless.  All that is written or spoken on a political subject will offend some people.  One cannot express views and simultaneously care if people are offended.  If I cared more about getting along than about expressing views, then free media productions never would have been created.  I agree with his anti-elitism too.  Powerful capitalist leaders do not serve national interests.  I agree that infidels should not “play dumb” to Islam and should be assertive and firm in combating Sharia style extremism.  In my opinion, Bush/Obama and their neo-con/neo-liberal supporters have made it more difficult to intelligently critique Islam without being written off as part of the establishment.

My only criticism is that he did not truly show the other side of the argument, which is that ideological opposition to imperialism drives Muslims into extremism.  In other words, Islamic fundamentalism can be a symptom of an alienated persona which originally fights a just cause.   On the other hand, many fundamentalists are in fact motivated by visionary and cultural tendencies rather than rebellion against the West.  Reducing all fundamentalism to resistance against imperialism is oversimplification.

I support those who resist imperialism, even if they do it under the banner of Islam.  But to the extent they become imperialists themselves (immigration, forcing sharia on non-Muslims), I do not continue to support Muslims.

When Soviets declared the existence of USSR, that did not solve their problems. Subsequently, a war against the Tsarist / Provisional Army erupted.

When America declared Independence, that was not the end of it. A war followed.

Saying that illegal immigration is not a crime does not solve anything. We can say that murder is not a crime. The murder problem would continue despite the rosy face.

The Afghanistan war, even though I no longer support it after learning more about imperialism, cannot be won by slogans and tough talk.

The Iraq War was not won when scumbag George W. Bush said “mission accomplished.”

“Racism” will not stop just because the ADL and SPLC try to legislate it away. Reverse racism will not go away until phony civil rights organizations realize that it actually exists.

Protests in Iran will not go silently into the night, no matter what the Government legislates or publicly displays.

What we have here is an article written by a Black race realist. I support the efforts of people of all races to critically attack the establishment with harsh reality and honesty.

Many people hoped that the election of a black President of the United States would mark our entering a “post-racial” era, when we could finally put some ugly aspects of our history behind us.

That was quite understandable. But it takes two to tango. Those of us who want to see racism on its way out need to realize that others benefit greatly from crying racism. They benefit politically, financially, and socially.

Barack Obama has been allied with such people for decades. He found it expedient to appeal to a wider electorate as a post-racial candidate, just as he has found it expedient to say a lot of other popular things — about campaign finance, about transparency in government, about not rushing legislation through Congress without having it first posted on the Internet long enough to be studied — all of which turned to be the direct opposite of what he has actually done after getting elected.

Those who were shocked at President Obama’s cheap shot at the Cambridge police for being “stupid” in arresting Henry Louis Gates (Metal Gear  : I agree with Obama on that point) must have been among those who let their wishes prevail over the obvious implications of Obama’s 20 years of association with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Anyone who can believe that Obama did not understand what the racist rants of Jeremiah Wright meant can believe anything.

With race — as with campaign finance, transparency, and the rest — Barack Obama knows what the public wants to hear, and that is what he has said. But his policies as president have been the opposite of his rhetoric, with race as with other issues.

As a state senator in Illinois, Obama pushed the “racial profiling” issue, so it is hardly surprising that he jumped to the conclusion that a policeman was engaging in racial profiling, when in fact the cop was investigating a report received from a neighbor that someone seemed to be breaking into the house that Professor Gates was renting in Cambridge.

For those who are interested in facts — and these obviously do not include President Obama — there has been a serious study of racial profiling in a book titled Are Cops Racist? by Heather Mac Donald. Her analysis of the data shows how this issue has long been distorted beyond recognition by politics.

The racial-profiling issue is a great vote-getter. And if it polarizes the society, that is a price that politicians are willing to pay in order to get votes. Academics who run black-studies departments, as Prof. Henry Louis Gates does, likewise have a vested interest in racial paranoia.

For “community organizers” as well, racial resentments are a stock in trade. President Obama’s background as a community organizer has received far too little attention, though it should have been a high-alert warning that this was no post-racial figure.

What does a community organizer do? What he does not do is organize a community. What he organizes are the resentments and paranoia within a community, directing those feelings against other communities, from whom either benefits or revenge are to be gotten, using whatever rhetoric or tactics will accomplish that purpose.

To think that someone who has spent years promoting grievance and polarization was going to bring us all together as president is a triumph of wishful thinking over reality.

Barack Obama’s past and his present tell the same story. His appointment of an attorney general who called America “a nation of cowards” for not dialoguing about race was a foretaste of what to expect from Eric Holder.

The way Attorney General Holder has refused to prosecute young black thugs who gathered at a voting site with menacing clubs, in blatant violation of federal laws against intimidating voters, speaks louder than any words from him or his president.

President Obama’s first nominee to the Supreme Court is, like Obama himself, someone with a background of years of affiliation with an organization dedicated to promoting racial resentments and a sense of racial entitlement.

An 18th-century philosopher said, “When I speak I put on a mask. When I act I am forced to take it off.” Barack Obama’s mask slipped for a moment last week but he quickly recovered, with the help of the media. But we should never forget what we saw.

I didn’t major in math, I majored in miracles – Mike Huckabee

States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic. – George W. Bush

YES WE CAN! – Barack Obama

Dinosaurs and humans walked the Earth at the same time – Sarah Palin

I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early. – Yogi Berra

I am so tired of people praising ignorance! American society needs to take off the chains of stupidity and establishment influence and come to terms with the harshness of reality.

Do your research; the total amount of business per square mile in America is astounding, even inside the recession. The only reason that digital dirt is a threat is because of the recession and now employers are picky. In a good economy, for every employer who cares, there are ten decent employers who are not hypocrites. For every employer who “writes you off” due to your viewpoints, there is one that will favor you as an out-of-the-box thinker with creativity. This is particularly true if you prove that you have good tech skills. We really do have a conspiracy of elites and most people indeed are decent enough, afraid enough, indifferent enough or in agreement enough to not care. Simply put, most people do behave like backstabbing politicians and special interest lobbies do.  Most people do not behave like internet cowards do either.

In the recession, indeed opportunities are limited and I can see why people would be stuck working for an asshole who stalks their social networking, and want to cover it up. I can see why the recession could turn employers into assholes and I can see why some people would want to work for an asshole just to make ends meet. Even though the recession complicates matters, if you really do your research, enough business still exists that you hopefully can find a good match with an employer. I feel empathy for those who are less lucky and end up either unemployed or the victims of stalking due to the convergence of the recession and what they have written online.

I used to fear the consequences of “being outed” but now I really do not care. The kind of guy who sits around looking for digital dirt and “punishes” people economically for it is exactly the kind of guy you want to avoid. If digital dirt weeds out the weak, then perhaps we should create more of it and care less what others think about it. If it wasn’t for the recession, I would openly declare that I completely do not care.

”It’s too bad that stupidity isn’t painful. Ignorance is one thing, but our society thrives increasingly on stupidity. It depends on people going along with whatever they are told. The media promotes a cultivated stupidity as a posture that is not only acceptable but laudable.”

Stupidity should hurt. Liberalism should hurt. Putting full trust into the “democratic process” should hurt. Opposing cultural degeneracy but not the society that enables it should hurt. Worshiping free enterprise to the exclusion of all else should hurt. Being religious to the point of denying science should hurt. Denial of national characteristics should hurt and seeing Jews and Communists behind every tree should REALLY hurt. Denying the existence of human biodiversity should REALLY hurt and gerrymandering it into false categories should hurt just as much. Belief in equality between religions, ethnic groups, nationalities, sexes and individuals in general should hurt. Belief that gun control “makes you safe” should hurt.

Stupidity should be painful.

New York Jewish bankers and liberal ideologues should be supported for exposing the weaknesses of the capitalist system, even if they do not intend to. A strong dose of liberal idiocy is like a strong dose of bacteria; anti-bodies are produced. A more gradual dose of liberalism is like lead poisoning; when you notice it is too late. In a Machiavellian sense, they have proven how inferior the system is and how badly it needs to be replaced. Hail the Jewish subversives who expose the flaws of capitalism, liberalism and democracy! Third Positionists, Marxist-Leninists and all critical of Western Capitalism must mourn the loss of Saddam Hussein, but otherwise the most successful Jewish sociopaths should be applauded. Hail Madoff, Hail Abraham Foxman, Hail Chaim Ben Pesach, Hail the Jews who pretend to be anti-semites on Nazi websites.

EXPOSE THE FUNDAMENTAL WEAKNESS OF CAPITALISM. PUT IT ON THE RADAR! The more Jews manipulate the system, the more the weakness of the system becomes obvious. I applaud Jews for proving that the overthrow of capitalism is a prerequisite to a revival of nationalism and ridicule bourgeious nationalists who think removing Jews is sufficient.  Nationalism cannot exist with the current political system in place. The more obvious this is the fact, the better.

There are many agents of globalism but capitalism in the free market form is the most substantial.  If a nation-state was created where markets are subordinate to ideological and nationalist interests, then the influence of agents of globalism would be crushed.  The ADL, Catholic Church, Democratic Party and Republican Party would have no influence if it was not for the capitalist system that sustains and enables them.

Read my posts about “state corporatism” and “third positionism” for an alternative model which is not materialist like Marxist-Leninism, but which controls individualistic and market impulses to channel them into collectivist needs.  In other words, a market force is okay if it lifts the state but it is bad if it undermines the state.  The market should not be free but synchronized with state and national interests for a check and balance.

Even though Third Positionism is not Marxist-Leninism, we have enough in common with good Marxists like Besoshvili that a left-right anti-capitalist synthesis is prudent.  McCarthyism is not in the interest of third positionism, as the current political conditions place liberalism as a much higher threat than Marxism.  We should not ally with Trotskyites but true Marxists who do not infuse Menshevik liberalism and opportunism into their ideology are our allies against liberalism.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/10/capitalism-and-white-racial-decline/

At The Occidental Quarterly, Michael O’Meara is saying a lot that I happen to agree with about America’s racial decline. It wasn’t a function of a small cabal of Jewish cultural Marxists associated with the Frankfurt School. The triumph of political correctness in the 1980s happened long after the Civil Rights Movement had realized its primary goals. The worship of “diversity” as a fundamental American value was unheard of before Judge Powell’s opinion in the Bakke case. Multiculturalism first emerged on the scene in the 1970s. Chalking up our racial demise to “diversity snobbery” is putting the cart before the horse.

Capitalism has always been one of the primary drivers of race replacement. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the internal logic of international markets (the profit motive) resulted in the dumping of hordes of negroes on America’s shores. The settlement of the West Indies was even more driven by these concerns. In the mid-nineteenth century, demand for cheap labor in the sparsely populated American West brought the first waves of Chinese immigrants to the United States. This experience was repeated with the Japanese in Hawaii (working on sugar plantations), Mexicans in the Southwest (who first came to work on the railroads), and the Great Migration of blacks to Northern cities (who came to work in wartime industries). The Immigration Act of 1924 specifically exempted Mexicans in order to appease Southwestern business interests.

The Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians, the Slavs, and the Jews all came in waves and settled throughout the American North. Most left their homelands for economic reasons. Many were attracted by the wages being offered by Northern industries at the time. Then as now, big business lobbied Congress for loose immigration laws. The indigenous Yankees soon dwindled to a minority throughout most of the Northeast. It was the push and pull of America’s capitalist economy that drove these demographic changes, not a vast Jewish conspiracy.

The fate of New England is now happening on a nationwide scale. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, and the Wall Street Journal are naturally the biggest boosters of open borders. The same fundamental forces are at work that have always been operative throughout American history. The only difference is that they are now met with less resistance than before.

Capitalism has eroded white racial consciousness in other insidious ways. During the Cold War, Americanism came to be identified with anti-communism. In order to score points for capitalism in the Third World, rightwing anti-communists like Dean Acheson adopted anti-racist rhetoric and began pushing for desegregation in the Jim Crow South. The most obvious example of this would be the Eisenhower administration’s response to the crisis in Little Rock with the Civil Rights Act of 1957. America’s elite ultimately cared more about the wealth and privilege they enjoyed under capitalism than the racial values inherited from their ancestors. And so, Truman and his postwar successors would go on to give their seal of legitimacy to Martin Luther King and his fellow radicals.

As the capitalist system evolved in the twentieth century, it became necessary to dispense with traditional values like thrift and prudence in order to sustain economic growth. The advertising industry began to take shape after the First World War. Americans were molded by its propaganda into thinking of themselves as consumers. An ethos of expressive individualism was encouraged that ultimately became severely corrosive of white ethnocentrism. It triumphed in the counterculture and eventually went on to dominate the cultural mainstream.

Suburbanization has allowed millions of Whites to avoid the costs of integration. Suburban living enables better off Whites to sing the praises of diversity while pushing it off on their poorer neighbors. White flight has acted for years as a release valve of racial tension. Why make a fuss about the status quo when you can simply pack up your bags and move off to another city or state?

As I said in a recent thread, the liberal democratic capitalist system is the meta cause of white racial decline. It chewed up Norman Rockwell’s America and spit out Barack Obama’s.

The answer to the question is obvious.  By engaging in imperialism, America gives Fundamentalist Muslims a chance to escape criticism.  Whenever a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, Marxists can blame the material conditions and argue that resistance is justified.  9/11 can be viewed as a manifestation of class struggle instead of primitive Jihad.  If Americans stopped being imperialists but Muslims continued to display similar behavior patterns, then that argument would be destroyed.  It would become obvious that the motivation is not “resistance to imperialism” but a clash in the standards of civilization.

Primitive ideology would be blamed for the relative lack of industrialization in the Middle East and aggressive behavior of individuals; not class consciousness and external conditions.   To advance the interests of the civilized world, I advocate an end to imperialism.  It would be easy to turn world opinion against religious fundamentalism if the cloak of imperialism was removed for justification.  In addition, as someone who opposes liberal democracy and its militant advancement, I am forced to side with Theocratic Islam as a lesser evil.  If America stopped its imperialism, I would no longer have to make this strategic decision.

Saddam Hussein was a futuristic and modern leader.  America removed him.  During the war with the Soviets, America supported Al-Qaeda which is now America’s number one enemy.  America enables Islamic fundamentalism and America’s imperialism in the minds of many justifies it.  It is in the long term interest of infidels to stop imperialism promptly.  Today America “beefs” with Iran and Afghanistan.  But America played a role in the success of both fundamentalist regimes.  Taking out Saddam Hussein increased the power of Iran (which is less extreme ideologically than Afghanistan), and supporting Bin Laden against USSR allowed the Taliban / Al-Qaeda alliance to rule Afghanistan.

If America had minded its own business, Afghanistan would have been Communist (at least for longer) and Iraq would still be Ba’athist. Iran would be contained, and had America not forced the Shah into power, perhaps the tension for Islamic revolution would not have been present. America enables Islamic fundamentalism and enables non-Muslims to justify it in the name of anti-Imperialism.