If the order, joseph paul franklin, the Confederacy and the KKK are the soldiers of the race war, then Dennis Rader, Ted Bundy and Gary Ridgway are soldiers in the war against feminism.
Apparently BTK had his own boot camp.
Women Hating is more acceptable than Race or Religion Hating. I have yet to see a militant civil rights organization lift a finger to bitch and moan about Dick Masterson.
Look at his popularity on facebook:
-This is the biggest one
The only person to bitch is Dr. Phil but the ADL and SPLC don’t say jack.
Attention Dick Masterson fans.
A person who wrote a women hating thesis is provoking much controversy in contemporary politics – and still polling ahead as population “gets tired” of hearing about it.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDU1OTU1OWQ0OWQ3OWVjYzUwYWJkN2ZiMWJmNmRhOGY=
As a writer, I am particularly known for giving sophisticated and detailed attention to ideological questions. Some people prefer the short route to the scenic route. My ideology can really be described by the Anton Lavey quotation below in a form that resonates better with those who prefer to keep it short.
”It’s too bad that stupidity isn’t painful. Ignorance is one thing, but our society thrives increasingly on stupidity. It depends on people going along with whatever they are told. The media promotes a cultivated stupidity as a posture that is not only acceptable but laudable.”
Stupidity should hurt. Liberalism should hurt. Putting full trust into the “democratic process” should hurt. Opposing cultural degeneracy but not the society that enables it should hurt. Worshiping free enterprise to the exclusion of all else should hurt. Being religious to the point of denying science should hurt. Denial of national characteristics should hurt and seeing Jews and Communists behind every tree should REALLY hurt. Denying the existence of human biodiversity should REALLY hurt and gerrymandering it into false categories should hurt just as much. Belief in equality between religions, ethnic groups, nationalities, sexes and individuals in general should hurt. Belief that gun control “makes you safe” should hurt.
Stupidity should be painful.
Several readers have commended Free Media Productions for its principled stance against opportunism and revisionism (in both its ultra-left and rightist formations). However, some have also asked us of “reactionary chauvinism” when it comes to the “sex question.”
According to some of these individuals, Free Media Productions is guilty of:
The final criticism came from an e-mail from one reader who asked us why we don’t use “non-chauvinist” vocabulary, such as “womyn, persyn and so on.”
We’ll gladly respond to these criticisms in due time. But we’d like to know what you think? Is FMP guilty of “reactionary” chauvinism? Feel free to leave a comment, or e-mail us your replies to freemediaproductions@gmail.com
People who are emotionally intelligent are capable of controlling and directing their own emotions and using deductive reasoning even in difficult situations. Statistics suggest that emotional intelligence actually matters more than IQ intelligence does in the business world. If this writing was more formal then I would quote a source, but the spirit of this post is casual so I’ll direct you to GOOGLE!
Deductive reasoning must prevail over emotion in debate. When one subtracts emotion from the debate, then the arguments put forth by imperialistic forces become very weak. The arguments of liberals become weak. The arguments of drama queens who troll websites become weak. When the debate sticks purely to reasoning, imperialist talking points are crushed.
The negative effect of emotion on debate can be seen not only on foreign policy but also whenever issues of race and ethnicity are discussed in America. The Duke Lacrosse “rape” and its coverage is a good example of emotion ruining the coverage of the facts due to feminism and minority rights advocacy. The Iraq War and weapons of mass destruction was another botched debate due to hysteria and fear!
Advocacy groups outside of mainstream politics are just as capable of being emotionally driven and illogical. FMP is moving the discussion away from emotion and towards logic.
When Besoshvili made a video against a female Trotskyite, many argued that it was misogynistic. I wanted to put this into perspective and show the difference between true misogyny and criticism of feminism.
Compare and take notes here…
As you can see, criticism of feminist movements does not automatically make one in line with the true women haters.
May 28 – The so-called “Communist” Party USA (©PUSA) published an article today in its Political Affairs magazine denouncing the recent underground nuclear test conducted by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).
In a shameful display of the ©PUSA’s unquestionable subservience to the ruling class, the author(s) of the piece (presumably speaking on behalf of the Party as a whole), borrowed rhetoric straight from the pages of liberal petty-bourgeois pacifism in an embarrassing display of American chauvinism, opportunism and revisionism. Rather than recognizing the DPRK’s fundamental need to develop defensive nuclear capabilities as the only means of preventing a full-scale assault by hostile foreign enemies, the ©PUSA claims it condemns all development of nuclear weapons programs:
We are resolutely opposed to the use or development of any nuclear weapons by any nation.
This is a categorically foolish position to take, considering that the hostile imperialist camp will unlikely be deterred by anything short of a country’s possession of nuclear warheads. Likewise, the fact that two of the most aggressive terrorist states in existence (the US and its proxy Zionist-Israel) possess more nuclear weapons than they could ever use only further justifies the intentions and ambitions of the DPRK.
It’s been widely known for years that the ©PUSA has been run by an elite leadership of aging revisionists, notably Sam Webb – who couldn’t’ even properly defend socialism when he was a guest on the Glenn Beck talk show. Being the opportunists that they are, the ©PUSA ineptly tried to mask its blatant revisionism with a contrived admission to the DPRK’s struggles with US imperialism, both past and present. Nonetheless, this insincere gesture is fundamentally meaningless when a self-described communist party becomes the mouthpiece of the Whitehouse.
But if there was ever any doubt as to whose line the ©PUSA towed, take a look at this excerpt:
Further, the results of the tests are in direct contradiction to the stated aims of battling imperialism. The general direction of the Obama administration’s foreign policy is at odds with that of any administration in the past 30 years, if not longer. While Obama has to navigate the political realities of the US, his administration has sought to reduce the nuclear threat, as well as the threat that the US poses to other, oppressed nations. Consequently, powerful sections of the U.S. ruling class have made their aim to derail the Obama administration altogether.
There’s no end to the errors committed in this one paragraph. Firstly, the ©PUSA would like us to believe that the Obama administration is progressive in its foreign policy, and should be supported against the “ultra-right” ruling class. These premises aren’t even un-Marxist, they’re borderline retarded and meant for consumption by the politically naïve who are innately attracted to the platform of the ©PUSA. Such statements of endorsement and flattery for the Obama administration is demonstrative of why nobody takes the ©PUSA seriously.