Archive for July, 2010

Debate on stance to take on Jews, Judeo-Obsessivism

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

The Forum Topic
The original BNP link is now dead.

Here is a nice link to a discussion on Jews and Zionism (most of it old) that rejects the echo chamber mentality. It should be noted that this “F Braun” would probably disagree with the statements he made back then if he were posting now. He has even gone as far as to praise the JDL! EKommando certainly is a man of his word, as he was dead set against meeting me in person, because of his interpretation of the “Jewish Question.”

On a note, I really think I’ve through dedication, realized the correct position on Jews. I Laugh at neo-Hitlerites and Judeo-Obessives (and I really mean it), but I also laugh at Biblical Zionists and phony secularists who appease the Biblical Zionists.

All of this can be seen in greater detail by actually reading the comments in the thread.

I hacked the phora on my own – Not under Anyone Else’s Command

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Link to newer thread

Link to real life identities of phora.net members

I’m getting rather tired of the insinuation that I was a “hired hitman” by Fade the Butcher to play a role in some retarded white nationalist power struggle.

I did it on my own and while I chose to involve other’s, I really didn’t need them.

I still to this day defend my actions and kindly ask you to fuck off if you disagree.

Harsh introspection vs. Comfort Thinking

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

I am about ready to give up on the masses because I think they suffer from comfort thinking. If something makes sense to them, if it feels comfortable, if it does not stir controversy, then they are willing to believe it.

I however subject my views to constant scrutiny and am always looking for ways to perfect them. I sense that the average person does not possess this trait and I question why I even try to reason with the average person. The average person would prefer to believe in what is comfortable rather than to believe in what can be proven with evidence. And the average person does not know the difference between this fantasy and reality. Sometimes it may be comforting to pretend that the truth isn’t real, but a problem materializes when the person does not realize that they are pretending. It may be comforting to pretend I am the CEO of WWE or descended from ancient Dinosaurs, but if I did, I would know that I am pretending! I would not start to actually BELIEVE it, but know that I am setting up a false comfort zone! I would continue to separate reality from fantasy. The masses cannot separate reality from fantasy.

Expecting people to think rationally is like expecting people to peacefully give up their religion (in masses) or expecting people who speak Ebonics to in masses speak English correctly. It isn’t going to happen!

Mussolini would prefer fifty thousand rifles to fifty thousand votes. I think he was right!

Americans are horribly uneducated on race

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

Just typing things into google and reading, if I didn’t know better, I would be tempted to say race is a social construct based on the diversity of comments. Everyone seems to write in their own view with no evidence to back it up at all.

The sad thing is that I know this is a result of the education system purposely not teaching people about anthropology. You learn about biology and white racism in high school, but not anthropology.

Liberalism is causing people to not know how to think!

I would think VNN and Stormfront are educated compared to some of the things I read.

New Website – The Satanic Reds

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

The link
I really really want to get in contact with these people for collaboration projects.

Cleaned/Cleaning up Disruptive Posts

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

Some of the posts I wrote in 2009 / early 2010 were intentionally provocative and disruptive for the point of driving traffic.

It worked, but now I am cleaning things up because I feel it is important to deliver the correct message.

Some posts were moved to the Johnny Gulag account, and others were edited.

More on my Personal Opinion of a Marxist-Islamic Alliance

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

Aside from whether it is desirable to ally Muslims with Marxists, separately from that question, there is the question of the capability of such an alliance to actually work and not among just a few internet posters, but among the masses. Personally, I do not think it is possible to continue such an alliance as soon as America is weakened and Islam is stronger. Until that point the alliance could probably work, but with high tension. Without the work of a skilled dictator, it is hard to see the uneducated masses keeping such an alliance alive. If a dictator endorses a position on religion, whether atheistic like Stalin or Islamic like the Taliban, then the alliance automatically crumbles. Regimes that repress atheists in the name of Islam cannot be supported by any atheists long term, and regimes that repress religion in the name of atheism (like Stalin’s) cannot be supported long term by the religious or those who pose as religious.

I learned when trying to discuss politics with Kahanists that people who merge politics with religion (often they are faking their religion) tend not to reciprocate support from secular people. There are many people who are essentially secular in their viewpoints, but they pretend to be religious to achieve some political gain. These people, being hypocrites, can never be trusted. For instance, the Croatian Ustaše leaders attempted to incorporate Catholic hierarchy into their ruling order as a political ideology. To them religion was political, not a natural belief system. To these people, religion is not just a philosophy or a conviction, but a cover for an ambitious rise to power which uses adherence to the religion in a discriminatory manner. Someone who openly advocates atheism strongly would have trouble gaining any influence, because the hypocrites monitor their own reputations and do not want to be questioned by the masses. If the hypocrites were shown to be liars, they fear they would lose their influence. To the extent such a thing as Islamo-Facism exists (vs. real Islam), it will never ally with openly secular people because to do so would cause status anxieties. These people fear being unmasked as illegitimate interlopers of a religion. It would be like Hitler allying with Jews. He would never do it because people would then question if he really was a Nazi.

Then there are people who believe their religion the same way the average person believes the sky is blue. These people are mystics as opposed to scholars usually and do not view themselves as being political. A true Muslim believes he is going to heaven, believes he is following the koran, and believes his views are right. But an Islamo-fascist uses religion as a means of separating “us” from “them” to gain power politically. Legitimate Muslims who believe their religion as a matter of truth and falsehood (as opposed to hypocrites who are pretending to be religious) can at least be taken at face value, but I think if Marxists are truly Marxists and not closet infiltrators, their secular view will ultimately make the alliance crumble among the masses of anything but extremely moderate Muslims.

Jared Taylor rejects the label “white nationalist” for “race realist” in interview

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

This move raises his standing on my ladder.
The link

Jared Taylor, current editor of the American Renaissance, denies the term “white nationalist” and explains why he is not a “white supremacist.” But, what this established journalist claims, is that he is a “race realist.” Taylor’s views have become an important piece of the race relations puzzle, and can often be found in studies, essays, newspapers (including the Washington Post) and books. Taylor has been called everything from a racist to a “true paragon of tolerance.” He takes a few moments to discuss with Jamie Hines what is a “race realist,” why there is no need for the civil rights battle, and what he thinks of President Barack Obama.

JH: I’ve read that you describe yourself as a “race realist.” What is a “race realist?”

JT: Race realism is rejection of the agreeable fantasies about race that have become orthodoxy since the 1960s. First, it is obvious that most people prefer the company of others of their own race. Forced integration therefore causes tension and resentment.

Second, race is an important element in individual and group identity, which means it is impossible to build a society in which race does not matter.

Third, people of different races build different societies. Blacks—wherever they are found in large numbers—establish communities with certain characteristics, and whites and others do the same.

Fourth, the combination of the first three factors means that racial diversity is a source of constant conflict. This is blindingly obvious, yet one of the requirements of respectability in this country is to pretend—and to repeat loudly at every opportunity—that diversity is a strength.

Fifth, the evidence is overwhelming that there is a substantial genetic contribution to well-established racial differences in average IQ. North East Asians living in America have higher incomes, better test scores, and more education than whites because they are, on average, smarter. Whites are smarter than Hispanics, who are smarter than blacks. It is vital to recognize this because otherwise “society” (meaning whites) is blamed for the failures of blacks and Hispanics.

Finally, race realism recognizes that whites have legitimate group interests just like everyone else.

JH: What are the legitimate group interests of whites?

JT: It is vital to eliminate the stark racial double standard that denies whites even have legitimate interests as a group. White pride or racial consciousness is considered “bigotry” or “hatred,” while any other kind of racial consciousness is considered to be a healthy form of ethnic self-esteem. This means every group in the country—except whites—is constantly pushing its collective interests, while whites are not allowed even to have interests as a group, much less work for them.

Some of the interests of whites are obvious. The first is not to be reduced to a minority. Most whites don’t want this but they dare not say so for fear of being accused of “hate.” Hispanics, on the other hand, are constantly rejoicing in their increased numbers and influence, and it is considered natural for them to look forward to eventually become a majority. Their gain is our loss, so why are they allowed to be happy about their gain but we are not allowed to resist our loss?

Whites have every right to prefer the kind of society that they create and to resist demographic shifts that are already changing their country in profound ways. Jews have a right to a Jewish state, and they keep it Jewish through selective immigration. Japanese have a right to a Japanese state and they keep it that way through restrictive immigration. Whites also, whether in North America or Europe, have the right to live in nations that reflect their culture and heritage.

Second, what is known as “affirmative action” is really discrimination against whites. If the kinds of preferences shown to blacks or Hispanics were shown to whites it would be a nation scandal, but because the victims are whites (and sometimes Asians) it is of no consequence. Whites must work to eliminate this while it is still possible to do so. When non-whites become majorities, they are likely to push for even more extensive racial preferences than the ones they enjoy today.

JH: Do you consider yourself a White Nationalist and/or a White Supremacist? Why or Why not?

JT: No. I don’t know what the term white nationalist is supposed to mean. White supremacists presumably want to rule other races, and race realists have no such desire. I believe people of every race should be free to pursue their own destinies, and this is impossible in societies in which they become minorities.

It should not be necessary to add that a concern for one’s own interests implies no hostility to others. Race realists understand that people of all races have the same rights: to preserve their culture and identity against any force that would dilute or replace it. One’s race is one’s extended family. Putting the interests of family before the interests of strangers is not hostility to strangers. One can become good friends with strangers but family comes first.

JH: After doing some research, I’ve found that your parents were “conventional liberals” who were missionaries in Japan. At what point, and why, did your views shift from what you seen at a younger age?

JT: I, too, was a conventional liberal until I was in my 30s. I preferred being a liberal. Liberals are happy to consider themselves morally superior to conservatives (and certainly to anyone who could be called a “racist,” whatever that means). Also, liberalism is the driving, majority ethos of the United States, and it is more comfortable to agree with the majority. I clung desperately to liberalism. It was the study of history and economics as well as extensive travel in Europe and Africa that finally ground away my liberal illusions.

JH: How do you feel about the election of the first black President?

JT: It was bound to happen eventually, given the collapse of the white majority. Until 1965, we had an immigration policy designed to keep the country majority white. Since that time, the white percentage has declined from about 88 percent to perhaps 62 percent. Do not forget: 55 percent of whites voted for Mr. Obama’s opponent. Twenty years ago, any candidate who got 55 percent of the white vote became president. Now, a majority of whites can vote for a candidate but his opponent may win. In this sense, because of demographic change, you could say that whites did not get the president they wanted. Why should whites encourage that kind of change?

As for Mr. Obama, he encourages the population shifts that are displacing whites. He has sued a state that simply wants to enforce the duly established immigration laws that the federal government refuses to enforce. He wants to give amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants, most of whom are non-white. In these respects, he is probably not much different from his main Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. However, even she would not have ordered the Justice Department to drop its voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panthers. This sort of thing is alienating whites.

JH: Describe the current state of race relations in America.

JT: Race is, and always will be, a serious social fault line in this country. Relative peace is maintained because whites tolerate “affirmative action” and massive non-white immigration. They do this because they are browbeaten and bamboozled into thinking it is wrong for whites to act in their own interests. This will not always be the case, and race relations will get worse as more and more whites begin to resist dispossession.

JH: What are your thoughts about people who say, “race doesn’t matter?”

JT: They are fools. Race obviously matters. Ninety percent of the churches in the United States are at least 80 percent one race. Is that an accident? Residential segregation is not much different from patterns in the 1950s. Why is that? The NAACP, the Urban League, the Congressional Black Congress, the National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and literally thousands of other groups and associations are based deliberately and specifically on race. Try telling their members race doesn’t matter.

It is almost exclusively white people who say race doesn’t matter, and this is because they are the only people who are required at least to pretend that it doesn’t matter. This, in turn, is because they are not allowed to have explicit racial interests of their own, and must deliberately close their eyes to the racial chauvinism of others lest they acknowledge this anti-white double standard.

JH: Do you believe that there is a need to fight for civil rights in America?

JT: What do you mean by “civil rights”? People of all races have the same legal rights in the United States, so the “civil rights” struggle was won long ago. Many blacks and Hispanics seem to think racial preferences for themselves are “civil rights” but they are actually a power grab at the expense of whites

Proud to have the scorn of wannabe neo-nazi scum!

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Link 1
Link 2

nah fuck you!

Long live the lyceum, the only true free speech forum to come out of the fight on the phora!

Long live the lyceum, the forum which was not responsible for starting the outing of personal identities. The forum which resorted to such measures as a response to abuses on the phora.

Long live the lyceum, the forum who’s support was truly multi-ideological and not simply a skinhead echo chamber.

Long live the lyceum! We are rough riders here and defend what is right, as opposed to being ashamed of it like “some other people.”

Lurking guest, if you, the reader, are too weak to agree with this, then long live not you.

*Kane is the analogous to the internet as Dennis Rodman is to the NBA. Everyone knows he’s good, but nobody wants to admit it.

Personal Disagreements with Anton Lavey

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Lavey preached indulgence instead of abstinence.

But I see Satan as a symbol of great strength and think a good Satanist should be able to practice abstinence. In some ways one indulges in life but one must be able to maintain control.

Lavey preached radical individualism.

But I think the individual should also be judged based on how they enhance the collective.

Here is my topic about it.

SEO Powered By SEOPressor