Archive for June, 2010

Would you have been a nazi test?

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The link
An interesting test. See how you do.

My results suggest that I would not have been a nazi.

Congratulations! You are not susceptible to brainwashing, your values and cares extend beyond the borders of your own country, and your Blind Patriotism does not reach unhealthy levels. If you had been German in the 30s, you would’ve left the country.

Conclusion: born and raised in Germany in the early 1930′s, you would not have been a Nazi.

Racial Bolshevism

Sunday, June 27th, 2010


by Constantin von Hoffmeister

“Behind the Doric columns of the ‘Pyatlyetki,’ the Five Year Plans, behind the rows of figures of the ‘Gosplan,’ there stretches not Asia, but another Europe: ‘the’ other Europe (in the sense in which America too is another Europe). The steel cupola of Marxism + Leninism + Stalinism (the gigantic dynamo of the U.S.S.R. according to Lenin’s formula: Soviet + electrification = Bolshevism) is not the mausoleum of Genghis Khan but – in the very sense that bourgeois folk find so distasteful – the ‘other’ Parthenon of Europe. ‘The Volga,’ says Pilnyak, ‘flows into the Caspian Sea.’ Yes, but it does not rise in Asia: it rises in Europe. It is a European river. The Thames, the Seine, the Potomac are its tributaries.”

Julius Evola is not a role model for people that are serious about preserving the White race. If one wants to save the White race, one needs to adopt a staunch materialist outlook. Only through the thorough application of materialist principles can Europe be saved. Materialism dictates that spirituality stems from matter. Both Evola’s and Francis Parker Yockey’s notion of a “spiritual race” is therefore a contradiction in itself since race is matter and not spirit. A race may possess a higher or lower degree of spirituality but this does not change its physical make-up. Spirituality is a direct result of the workings of the brain which in its turn is a part of an organism that varies according to the race it belongs to. What good does it do if various non-Europeans possess “Aryan attributes” (whatever that might be) but are incapable of passing these on through procreation without diluting the European gene pool? The notion of a “spiritual race” is an abstract and meaningless, if not downright hostile to European preservation efforts, concept. Therefore, Dr. HT Hansen (who wrote the introduction to Evola’s MEN AMONG THE RUINS) is right when he argues that Evola espouses a peculiar brand of anti-racism through his peculiar “racial” theories. Actually, Evola seems not interested in any kind of racist theories per se but more in formulating an unnecessarily obfuscating concept of aristocracy that uses race as a pretext but is really more concerned with essentially universalist matters of hierarchy. Evola is a universal humanist because his theories postulate that a “spiritual race” is open to all members of “humanity.” Lest we forget that this supposedly global community has already been discredited (because of its non-existence) by serious racist thinkers.

Finnish National Bolshevik (or maybe Racial Bolshevik would be more accurate) Kai Murros says, “One must understand the nation as a product of material forces in history – this is the cornerstone of the progressive nationalism and progressive socialism.” Murros is right when he argues that “progressive nationalism” (or racism) must be strictly materialist in its outlook. Only in this manner can any kind of historical success be achieved. After all, one has to remember that history itself is driven by the constant flux of dialectical materialism. Murros also argues that “[f]or practical reasons, metaphysics must always be subordinated to physics.” In a rude manner of speaking, mental masturbation should be secondary to real sex. One can theorize all one wants about the importance of “racial spirituality,” if the race does not produce children, then the race is doomed to die. Right now, fucking is more important than thinking. The luxury of metaphysics can only be afforded in a society that is content with itself and secure in its continuing existence.

Nature has no will. Man has will. Aryan man has the Faustian will. Paganism is a dead-end street. Being is the key, not believing and/or worshipping. The gods die when the race (that created them) dies. The gods are not eternal. Paganism was a temporary manifestation of the Race’s mood at a particular time. The Race willed Paganism into existence. It did not exist before it and is already dead while the Race still lives. The Race can be without ascribing its being to forces beyond itself. The solace of the Race today is science and not religion. Rockets will propel us to the place where the gods once lived. The gods will be replaced by us. Thor is dead, long live the Astronaut! While Thor once hurled lightning FROM the sky, we will propel like lightning INTO the sky.

Front Page Redesigned

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

Besoshvili/Berianidze and Daniel Shays have gotten on my case about the quality of the front page. I knew it needed some improvements too.

I finally stepped up. Check out The link.

Comrade Lindsay Interviewed

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

The link


Surf Serial America

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

A new youtube video I created.

Free Media Productions makes urban dictionary

Sunday, June 20th, 2010

The link

TechnoFascism was a word officially forged by _ _ of Free Media Productions, a third positionist site, that heavily rejects mainstream politics. Techno-Technocracy is a hypothetical form of government in which engineers, scientists, and other technical experts are in control of decision making in their respective fields. Fascism-Rule of the few. Sometimes can breed racism, and overt nationalism.
Technofascism would be a government ruled by technical, the smart, and the few.

It looks like this passed through moderation, even though I am sure the person who started this had bad intentions. They wanted to hurt employment opportunities, but it appears that the moderators like it and have cleaned it up a bit.

Free Media Productions Mission Statement Revised

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

Here is the recent draft.

Free Media Productions is not a philosophy-based website, even though many contributors express an interest in political philosophy and know that it is important. What binds us together is a goal – and that goal is to create an alternative media using various technological mediums which is free of business interests, political correctness, internet egos accompanied by typical forum drama on a solely vbulletin medium and invasion of privacy on a public social networking medium. While FMP tends to shy away from the centrist mainstream (i.e. liberalism), members are not tested for political philosophy and categorized based on their philosophy. We have a goal, and we work towards it.

Readers may notice a few tendencies that perhaps stand out a bit more than others, including a general antipathy towards liberalism, capitalism, globalism, imperialism and so forth. However, there are very few things that the staff will not tolerate, and we do our best to maintain a relatively open platform for discussion.

If you think you may be interested in contributing, click here.

The 600 club forum

Friday, June 18th, 2010

The link
Some of us may be trying to downplay our atheism for political alliances. I understand that, but for the rest of us, here is a hardcore website. This does not mean I box myself into the category of “lavey follower,” but it is worth looking at.

Can you handle it?

National Bolshevist Heroes 1- Chandra Bose

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

The link
Here is an interesting thread on pofo about an Indian man with a solid world view.

“1. The party will stand for the interests of the masses, that is, of the peasants, workers, etc., and not for the vested interests, that is, the landlords, capitalists and money-lending classes.
“2. It will stand for the complete political and economic liberation of the Indian people.
“3. It will stand for a Federal Government for India as the ultimate goal, but will believe in a strong Central Government with dictatorial powers for some years to come, in order to put India on her feet.
“4. It will believe in a sound system of state-planning for the reorganization of the agricultural and industrial life of the country.
“5. It will seek to build up a new social structure on the basis of the village communities of the past, that were ruled by the village “Panch” and will strive to break down the existing social barriers like caste.
“6. It will seek to establish a new monetary and credit system in the light of the theories and the experiments that have been and are current in the modern world.
“7. It will seek to abolish landlordism and introduce a uniform land-tenure system for the whole of India.
“8. It will not stand for a democracy in the Mid-Victorian sense of the term, but will believe in government by a strong party bound together by military discipline, as the only means of holding India together and preventing a chaos, when Indians are free and are thrown entirely on their own resources.
“9. It will not restrict itself to a campaign inside India but will resort to international propaganda also, in order to strengthen India’s case for liberty, and will attempt to utilize the existing international organizations.
“10. It will endeavor to unite all the radical organizations under a national executive so that whenever any action is taken, there will be simultaneous activity on many fronts.”

Good Saloth Sar Video

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

It is interesting that before teaming up with the former Prince Sihanouk, Pol Pot used to hate him. This reminds me of the Lyceum. This, however, is a bit more serious than web words! Early on, Pol Pot fought with Sihanouk, but was willing to adapt his alliances when it became necessary to do so.

I understand that some of the comments by viewers are very “one-sided,” but in general the video is pretty good. It shows that Pol Pot was focused but very secretive and determined. He was calculating, but appeared very gentle. He worked his way from the bottom to the top. He was sold out by the Vietnamese. I didn’t know that. That’s why he hated the Vietnamese. Cambodia was sacrificed to France when other Southeast Asian countries collaborated for Independence.

It noted that he adopted some aspects of Marx, but was really not a hardliner “anti-revisionist” Marxist. In truth he was more of a progressive nationalistic type.

His rejection of urbanization is important too. Mao was similar in his approach though for Mao it was pragmatic. For Pol Pot it was a matter of principle.

What do you think? Was Pol Pot himself a criminal, or is he the ultimate victim of American, Soviet, Vietnamese and French imperialism?

Noam Chomsky defends Pol Pot. Pol Pot may have saved more people than he killed. Nobody said anything negative during the Cold War. It was only after Russia fell, when China became the next “big Satan,” that the “Maoist” Pol Pot was demonized by America.

SEO Powered By SEOPressor