Archive for January, 2010

Review: Glenn Beck’s ‘Revolutionary Holocaust’

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

From the Red Phoenix, official organ of the American Party of Labor

Part I of VI: Beck’s Countless Lies about America & the Founding Fathers

By Marcus Winter, Farabundo Morazán and Ismail LaLanne

On January 22nd 2010, another hardened reactionary tried to attack the history of leftism and Marxism and (surprise) managed to bring nothing new to the table at all. Shock jock Glenn Beck, an admitted alcoholic and former cocaine addict, has made a career out of appealing to the most lunatic fringe of the right-wing. Even so, this week he finally managed to outdo himself, even after the time he said Obama was “a racist” and had a “deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.” Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free or Die begins oddly—with white X-Files font letters against a crackling static background. What this has to do with or why this is the least bit appropriate for the subject matter Beck tackles is anyone’s guess. As we shall see though, this is symbolic for the entire presentation, which, while clever, is the same hodgepodge of anti-communist views that we have all seen and heard a thousand times before.

A good question for Glenn Beck: why is such radical anti-communism necessary today if communism is discredited, dead, and buried? If communism is supposedly dead in the water, a footnote of history, and so on, and if capitalism is truly the greatest system, then why is it that we are facing a wave of anti-communist hysteria not seen since the Cold War? Mr. Beck, it might do you well to remember that hysteria and desperation are signs of weakness…and liars.

No matter how hard he tries, Glenn Beck cannot sell his line about how “this story has never been told.” Horror stories about communism have been told since before communists ever came to power in the first place. The opening of the secret Soviet archives actually reveals that these claims were in fact ridiculously exaggerated, not worse, than previously claimed.

So, what are his intentions here? Many things all at once—among them licking the boots of the bourgeoisie and re-packaging old and debunked lies. We shall tackle them one by one using our own sources and information. The complete transcript of Beck’s program is available here until further notice: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583732,00.html.

Because of the length of his program, we have decided to break this presentation up into several parts. For right now, we will content ourselves with refuting the introduction to his program.
We invite you to stay tuned for a little series of our own.

Beck’s Thesis
Glenn Beck’s allegedly “groundbreaking” exposé of “progressives,” whom he conveniently lumps together, is by no means new or groundbreaking at all. Revolutionary Holocaust seeks to establish a link between Joseph Stalin and communism on one side, and Adolf Hitler and Nazism on the other. While doing this it also seeks to talk about the reign of Mao Zedong in China, along with a segment about liberal icon Che Guevara.
This same “thesis” of fascism and communism being almost exactly the same or at least sharing fundamental similarities, has been repeated for us endlessly since we were kids. For Beck to champion this as a “new and groundbreaking” idea is either foolish or stunningly arrogant. It has been the dominant narrative shoved down our throats since the publication of The Origins of Totalitarianism in 1951 by Hannah Arendt. For a closer look at this laughable “theory,” look here: http://theredphoenix.wordpress.com/2009/09…otalitarianism/

Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, & Slave-Owning Freedom
The video begins with Glenn Beck praising the United States of America and its associated American Dream. “The story of America,” he pines, staring into the camera with his intellectual glasses on, “is really one of self-reliance and optimism, and profound faith.” He continues to milk this image for all its worth, bringing up the merits of the US Constitution and the Founding Fathers.

Glenn Beck has willfully ignored the history of the American Revolution. The spirit of the American Founding Fathers is only a myth and not a reality.

First, the Constitution of the United States was not set up by “the” people or any sort of popular democracy, but by financial autocrats. White males with property were the only ones allowed to vote under the system that men such as George Washington (the richest man in America), James Madison (owned enormous slave plantations), John Hancock (a rich merchant), Benjamin Franklin (a wealthy printer) and others aimed to set up. Of the 55 men who gathered to write the Constitution in 1787, most were lawyers and men of enormous wealth, making their fortunes in landowning, slave trading, manufacturing or shipping. Half loaned money out for interest, 40 held government bonds.
Regarding the writing of the Constitution:
“The manufacturers needed protective tariffs; the moneylenders wanted to stop the use of paper money to pay off debts; the land speculators wanted protection as they invaded Indian lands; slaveowners needed federals security against slave revolts and runaways; bondholders wanted a government able to raise money by nationwide taxation, to pay off those bonds” (1).

Governments are not neutral. They reflect the economic interests of the dominant class, expressed in America as men such as the Founding Fathers. The Constitution protects “life, liberty, or property” and little else in reality. Women, Blacks, Indians and poor whites were not mentioned, but the defense of private property was.
The clause about the “freedom of speech” was soon enough violated, as it is today, by clauses such as the Sedition Act of 1789, which was a response to the French and Irish Revolutions. It forbid under law the practice of writing or saying anything “false, scandalous and malicious” against the United States government, the Congress or the President. It is not immediately apparent that anyone’s “liberty” should be left to a government run by the rich and powerful.

Despite this, Beck says that “[…] those seeking a different path than the ones the founders settled on realized the only way to really defeat the Constitution was for the people to stop reading it.” He then insists that the Constitution, through its supposed system of check and balances, “kept dogs at bay” for 200 years. Despite this Utopian dream, the Founding Fathers were not men seeking a “balance” in society, and certainly didn’t believe that all men were created equal. If they wanted any sort of balance, it was between the wealthy, and not between such groups as Indians and whites, blacks and whites, men and women, boss and worker, or rich and poor, slave and slaveowner, and certainly not property owner and the propertyless.

Next Article
In the next part of the series, we shall see how Glenn Beck uses the story of Nazi Germany and WWII to further his own ends, and ends up whitewashing Nazi crimes in order to attack the USSR.

1) Zinn, Howard. Peoples’ History of the United States, page 91.

Pol Pot wasn’t Really a literal Marxist-Leninist!

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

The Link
(I apologize, but I have to link to the pedophora here. This is not an endorsement!)

Here is an interesting post about Pol Pot and how he was really a Khmer nationalist and not a Communist. He adopted some Marxist rhetoric but followed his own line. And he sided more with Mao than with USSR. USSR of course had backed off from its Stalinist line, but still Maoism is strongly adapted to Chinese characteristics and quite different from Russian Bolshevism.

I already knew this, but it adds some extra angles to the discussion.

Russians Deny Slavic Origin – Claim Finnish Origin

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

note to the poster “racial awareness” : you’ll enjoy that there is women bashing in this post!
The link

Russian nation was created by Russian climate and Russian blood.

Contrary to common misconception, Russians living on territory of Russian Federation are not of Slavic blood. The ancient inhabitants of Kiev’s principate were Slavic people, that’s true. When Moscow principality was created a few centuries later in the 14th century, its population was overwhelmingly Urgo-Finns. Descendants of Kiev’s genealogical tree, their princes were originally of Slavic blood. But when Kiev’s armies moved north with their small troops, they conquered enormous vast variety of Finnish tribes who lived on enormous territory of European Russia. Only aristocrats of Russia were originally Slavs. Simple folk were descendants of Finns. That is why it is practically no different between “Chuvash” and “Finn.” And that is why Serbs are so different from Russians. Because Serbs are Slavs.

Russians are a depressive tribe because of centuries they were living in shadows of moisty forests. Russians are as unhappy with alcohol as Finns are.

So, forget about Slavs. When you will adopt my vision of Russian history, and of Russians, you will understand who Russians are.

I am the best Russian writer, but I am forced to confess that I hate Russian language. Russian words are painfully long, they remind me of naked slimy worms. You know, those pink awful creatures that you can see on some hot summer night on path you walk. Worms get out of soil to copulate under the moonlight. Russian words are copulating on my table every day and night. I am looking at them with hate and I am screaming. I am gnashing my teeth. Why should put “icheskaya” to the end of “social” in “Social Republic?” Seven letters I am adding for what fuck? Fucking “icheskaya!” Hysterical, hystericheskii laugh goes out of me when I am imaging those fucking Urgo-Finns in their shadowy forests. They move in slow motion, they take their time. Why wasn’t I born in a clear lucid language dealing in “Achtung!” and “Shnell?” And when I think that Russians are only a handful of 142 million readers, it’s really depressing for a writer.

The so called “Russian Soul” can be also explained by origins of the Russian people. Proverbial slowness of Finns (”hot finish lads!”) can be seen as phenomenon of Russian soul. Enigmatical Russian Soul is simply Russian man, uncertain, slow to decide, hesitating, never sure of itself, never sure of its own decision. Forest man with a milky skin, with thin blond hair. Not a Slav, but a Finn, Finn, Finn! And don’t accuse me of racism. Happily we have Turks and all sorts of Mongols amongst us. But the sick from alcoholism urban Russian Europeans are descendants of native Urgo-Finns and their tribes. They have shadowy mysterious souls because for hundred generations their ancestors were living by the river banks in the forests. They like to get drunk and to weep. Of too many trees, of too much of river’s water the Russian Soul is created.

Then, of course, we live in a terrible climate. We have eight months of winter and only four of summer. This summer, however, can be called a “summer” only such on condition that you have never travelled abroad. The lack of sunshine is chronic on the Russia’s territory. Everything is explained by its climate and the Urgo-Finn blood. Even more, the blood is explained by the climate. It moves slowly because of the freeze. No sunshine makes our kids look sad. When I was young, I thought almost everyday why “we Slavs” (I thought we were Slavic people) living in such an unhuman, uncomfortable climate? Why we didn’t move out of that terrible territory? However, I had tried to move. Our national ideas for centuries was to move south. We fought First World War to capture the the straights of Bosphorus and Dardanelles. We didn’t get it, alas. (Before that, in January of 1878, we were some kilometers from Istanbul-Constantinople before English bastards intervened.) Russian man carries all weight of his climate on itself. My deepest belief is that Russia should swallow Kazakhstan territory if we want our children to have sunshine.

Russian women are very, very bad. The worst of all. Russian women is like the Russian Government. Most Russian women at least are good looking when they are in their twenties. Some Russian women are gorgeously beautiful. But they are bad. They are treacherous because they have no moral principles. Christian faith was eliminated during existence of the Soviet Union so nobody taught Russian women morals. No such discipline was taught in Soviet schools. Russian woman hates man because she is envying him. She wants to be as brutal and stupid as him, she wants to lay on a divan doing nothing as man does, but she has less possibilities. Russian woman is disastrous, relationships with her destined to be tragedy. There is no way that you will end happily. You must subjugate her. If not, she will subjugate you. On both occasions, you will lose. Don’t forget that abortions and divorces were permitted even in Stalin’s Russia, so our country educated women as bitches. Millions of bitches walking our streets. I am absolutely and positively on the side of Muslim strict code of behavior for women. Their system of separation of sexes if effective and healthy.

Russian Government is bloody beast eating human flesh. It is deeply medieval in its principle conceptions. Russian Government strongly believed that Russians are subjects of Russian Government, that they are its property, that Russians should be physically punished for not showing proper respect for its Government. European Governments behave cruelly towards foreign populations, towards Yugoslavs or toward Iraqis. But Russian Government represses its own citizens. Russian Government never said one honest word. Blatant lies, we, citizens, hear from Government. They terrorize us.

Their instrument are police, brutal and unhuman, just millions of scoundrels dressed in grey uniforms. And judges: archaic men and women with terrible medieval faces and black souls under their judges clothes.

As you understand, my view of Russia is macabre, like Lovecraft’s work. I hope country will change soon, I am working for it. Then I will look at my country through rosy tinted glasses. Just wait.

Interesting. This may explain why Russians have tiny traces of Mongoloid blood (but not as much as Finns do).

Hail the National Bolsheviks

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

The link

All Men are Whoremongers

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

The saying, “Every woman is a whore” is actually much more demeaning to the man who speaks it than it to women. By reducing woman to the lowest common denominator, the misogynist actually, only reveals his own crassness. He demonstrates, that in his own imagination, every woman must be inferior, because he cannot imagine the world being otherwise. Obviously, a whore, requires a whore-monger, and the whore-monger, is at the very least equal in the exchange, and often I would argue the superior participant. Therefore, if every woman is a whore, than every man is a whore-monger. This idea that women are selfish and money-grubbing, while men are somehow the sole guardians of love and honor is simply bullshit. When the hatred of women, rests on nothing more than an conflict of interests between the sexes, to declare one necessarily better than the other, without any regard to the context is simply illogical. Meaning, whatever anger an individual man might have towards women as a group, a great part of that anger comes from an internal fault which needs correction, rather that simply from the wickedness of woman.



Most Illogical

Most Illogical

Freedom isn’t Free

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Dear Metal Gear please post this,

The other posters here just don’t get it.  Freedom is not free.  Free market liberalism is based on “principles” rather than greed.  In other words free markets are about the liberation of the individual and not about the profit of corporations which are separate from the state.

If it was not for American imperialism, real Communists and real Fascists would have you all interned in camps.




(blood from slit wrists was found on the document)

A Post to Drive Burrhus, Anon, Ted Sallis and Hunter Wallace Insane

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

It is well documented that Ashkenazi Jews (the focus of this post) are a mix between Near Easterners and Europeans. Nobody denies this but people with an agenda.  It is well documented that Near Easterners and Europeans are a single race when compared to non-Whites and South Asians! In fact not just Near Easterners, but Middle Easterners in general.

But Greeks and Southern Europeans are similar to Middle Easterners on BOTH sides – paternal and maternal – while Ashkenazi Jews have European blood pumped in through their maternal line. MtDNA proves this but so do recent autosomal studies.  Jon Entine, a man I have read since being a little teenager, agrees with me in the book Abraham’s Children!

There are two explanations for this.  Firstly, some people suggest that at one point of history, Jewishness was transferred by the father instead of the Mother and that the definition was modified later in history.  Karaite Jews determine Jewishness this way.  Secondly, conversions may have been involved.

The key factor in my argument is that Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans can be distinguished, and distinguished enough that in some ways hybrid Jews can slip between them genetically!  Graphs indicate that the European blood that Ashkenazi Jews have is Northern, not Southern.  In a nutshell, we now have graphs which show that Ashkenazi Jews have more northern European blood than Southern Europeans do!

The Study

(The genetic variation is tracked on two different axis lines – vertical and horizontal.  The vertical line is divided into units which are twice the size numerically as the horizontal line’s units.)

Horizontally, Jews are clustering around the fringe of Europe and towards the near east. Vertically, Jews are with Northern Europeans.  So while Jews may have Middle Eastern origins, they’ve mixed enough that in some ways their genome goes off in a completely different direction.  Ashkenazi Jews are endogenous, but only in intervals.  In certain periods of history, there has been mixing.  In addition, it should be noted for the sake of clarity that even Near Easterners are Caucasian Mediterraneans.

In calculating genetic distance, we have to add both the horizontal and vertical distance.  When making that calculation, Ashkenazi Jews are “beating” Greeks and Italians!  ADD BOTH THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DISTANCE FOR THE GREEKS AND THE ITALIANS!

I can’t wait to see the self-hating Mediterraneans piss themselves over this one!

Anthroscape : the forum which helped provide information
Occidental Dissent
The Occidental Observer
Information about “Anon”
Anon’s Website

Words for the Faithful

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Fold your little hands,

Bow your little head,

Think for five minutes

On Stalin.

J.V. Stalin is the brilliant leader and teacher of the Party,

The great strategist of the socialist revolution.

He is implacable in facing the enemies of socialism,

Absolutely true to principle.

He is the union of clear revolutionary perspective,

And clarity of goal in all His activities,

Combining them with extraordinary firmness and persistence.

The name Stalin is the symbol of the moral and political unity of the working class.

Liberating Arabs from Theocracy

Monday, January 25th, 2010

The Kahanist approach of opposing all Arabs is incorrect. Kahanists may have common enemies but they are only useful to an extent.

Kahanism is not the right path to fight Islamic extremism.

The neo-con path is not the right path either. Liberal democracy is not the right path when confronted with theological threats.

A third way is the real option.

Shut up about “Hard Work”

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Everyone knows that lying, cheating, nepotism and butt kissing are what cause people who are far intellectually inferior to rise to the top in the liberal capitalism system. The only people who don’t realize this are the most self-deluded fools and their gold digger wives who sit all day in the kitchen.

Goldman Sachs…These dysgenic cowards should have been in the trade towers when they went down. Paying themselves benefits after they ruined the economy for everyone else. Nothing short of revolution will change the situation. Obama is as much a part of the system as Bush.

A tiny amount of globalists continue to serve their own interests instead of serving national interests.

It is not my generation that ruined the country but the previous generations. It is not my generation that is responsible for the unemployed state of the young but your generation. It isn’t me, it’s you. Shut the fuck up. You get to where you are because you lie, cheat and kiss ass. Then once you gain power, you immediately betray the national interests of America to globalize the economy.

Nothing short of mass executions and bloodshed will fix the question of liberal capitalists who control the American government. I wonder how big the bonuses will be in 2011.

SEO Powered By SEOPressor