.

“Third Positionist” is too broad a term

I am gaining an increasing disdain for clerical fascism, nazism, traditionalism and anything that does not understand the industrial-bureaucratic nature of dictatorship. The most profitable lie of the Soviets is that Fascism and Nazism were indistinguishable. Fascism is worth rehabilitating, as it is basically strengthening the state to correct the problems caused by liberalism and true capitalism. Unlike simple traditionalism, it intends to permanently strengthen the state. In other words, not just long enough to fight revolutionaries, but permanently. Nazism and Clerical fascism are based on myths. While far less evil than Nazism, and certainly more of an ally to rational thinking people, even Torah Zionism is based on myths. Revisionist Zionism is not, however.

I think for the purpose of defining movements that correct class warfare via nationalism, the term is adequate but otherwise it is overly broad. I’ll still continue to use it to categorize posts though. There is a big difference between using a state to discourage class warfare, which is fascism, and using genocides in a misguided attempt to remove class conflict, which is Croatian Nationalism and Nazism. One method actually works and the other doesn’t. One method is actually an ideology and the other is just prejudice disguised as ideology.

This is not a denial of race; I believe in race but I don’t think Neo-Nazis are good anthropologists and I don’t think it should be central to every single political question. I would venture to say that liberals would still consider me a racist, even though I am a more general right wing authoritarian. I do not support any massive immigration. If the massive immigration came from the Ukraine into Russia or Vice-versa, I’d still oppose it. Not to mention, I don’t think neo-nazis and their supporters know what they are talking about when it comes to human biodiversity, but even so, race should not be the answer to every political question. Yes I oppose aggressive globalization done in the name of “modernization” as a way to troll society. Liberal globalists take us for idiots. But this is not the same thing as basing all politics off of race.

Metal Gear @ December 5, 2009


3 Responses to ““Third Positionist” is too broad a term”

  1. Lt. James Cyril Mendhip Toller Says:

    fuh fuh foo foo fuh foo

  2. FistoftheNorthStar Says:

    Okay what is the new terms for the answers.

  3. Metal Gear Says:

    techno-fascism is my the specific name I gave my worldview.

Leave a Reply