The wordings are exactly the same as the talmud where it says a man can marry a 6 year old and consummate the marriage at nine. Exact wordings.

Only the Quran speaks for islam and not some Sunni or Shia hadiths which are later manufacturings.

So it is not correct to say Muhamamd was a pedophile since this is not based on historic accounts but based on Talmudic influence in Islam. There were many Jews around Medina and Mecca as the Quran testifies.

The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” (See, “Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell”) Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” 5 Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. 6

A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” 7 The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” 8 Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

Sex at Three Years and One Day

In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape.

R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. (Sanh. 55b)

A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation. . . .(Yeb. 57b)

A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them. (Yeb. 60b)

[The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit for cohabitation. . . But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation. (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)

The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”

The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” 9 But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/judaism-israel/31979-pedophilia-talmuds-dirty-secret.html

Yes – watch:

Over-technologization has lead to massive job losses and a huge surplus of labor. Think about it: nowadays machines can do the work of dozens of people in half the time it used to take. Like a bulldozer, for instance – it used to take a couple dozen men a week to move a whole bunch of dirt, but nowadays a bulldozer can do it in 20 minutes. Or manufacturing…it is very automated now, but back in the day before rampant technology it was done by human craftspeople.

I agree, but if our government actually gave a shit, I think they could do more to rectify the situation. Libertarianism combined with high technology doesn’t work. I think in the modern age, the state must be more active.

As I noted in a post I just wrote, I think what happened is before USA was competing the Soviet Union, so it had to reach out to workers. Now it isn’t so it thinks it can ignore workers. It is a very sad view of the world, that the American government has basically abandoned the average person for elites.

Yes, you ought to read Spengler’s MAN AND TECHNICS when you get a chance; it isn’t very long, just a bit over 50 pages, more like a long essay rather than an actual book.

Thanks for the referral.

I agree that collectivism is preferable to fanatical individualism.

However, collectivism is not very inherent within White-Western peoples, it isn’t much in the DNA.

About the best collective strategy one can use to get people moving is religion — the masses are often willing to work together more collectively when it involves religion, God, or a ‘divine mission,’ but are much less willing to work together if it just involves politics, economics, bureaucracy, etc. As the saying goes: “Faith can move mountains.”

I agree with you…to an extent. By white western we are not talking about Slavs and we are not talking about Italians. I think you underestimate the extent that man can program himself. If smart people decide that they want to embrace a new idea, they can embrace it. Religion isn’t necessarily necessary but a devotion to an ideal.

However, collectivism is not very inherent within White-Western peoples, it isn’t much in the DNA.

About the best collective strategy one can use to get people moving is religion — the masses are often willing to work together more collectively when it involves religion, God, or a ‘divine mission,’ but are much less willing to work together if it just involves politics, economics, bureaucracy, etc. As the saying goes: “Faith can move mountains.”

Over-technologization has lead to massive job losses and a huge surplus of labor. Think about it: nowadays machines can do the work of dozens of people in half the time it used to take. Like a bulldozer, for instance – it used to take a couple dozen men a week to move a whole bunch of dirt, but nowadays a bulldozer can do it in 20 minutes. Or manufacturing…it is very automated now, but back in the day before rampant technology it was done by human craftspeople.

Things you need to think about.

I don’t know about you, but what makes me miserable is the state of the economy and the lack of populist leanings of the government. The solutions to those problems involve collectivism rather than naturalistic individualism.

That is not very intelligent. All technology comes from Nature, the raw materials and such. Also, technology is used mostly just to have more mastery over Nature.

If we paved over the entire world and obliterated all of Nature in the name of technology, humanity would eventually go almost entirely extinct. By degrading Nature, we make the continuance of technology impossible.

We are already deracinated from our more natural roots as it is, and it has made many modern people very miserable; it is obvious to many that as modern people have increasingly withdrawn from Nature their souls have begun to degrade as well.

Have you ever read Spengler’s MAN AND TECHNICS? It predicts that non-Whites will use White-invented technologies to overcome the White race — that is exactly what is happening nowadays, actually: http://www.archive.org/details/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253

And since when does a religious text accurately depict what it’s followers do? Consider this- how many Christians belong to sects that claim to be Bible-believing? How many of these Christians claim to follow a literal interpretation of the Bible? All such Christians, as a matter of doctrine, are radically opposed to abortion, claiming it is murder and against God’s law. Many of them have this as their single issue in life. Just one problem; the Bible neither mentions, nor forbids- abortion.

Why are they a “threat” to you? How has Islam negatively affected your life?

I’m not dumb enough to not consider them a spiritual threat just because they look more like me.

Also, in regards to “Caucasoid race”, I was not speaking of those who have a “Mediterranean” look either. I am talking about people who could easily pass for English, German, Russian, Finnish, etc.

It doesn’t matter though. Europe is under invasion via immigration.

Now, on the next bit of retardation from our resident 16 year old editor. Yes, the war on Islam was started by imperialistic policies. It is ridiculous to speak of any “Islam vs. non-Muslim” historical war because since the early days of the Caliphate, Muslim states have fought one another and allied with non-Muslim states in the process.

The rest of your statement sounds like the rant of a socially-awkward, angsty high school student who is just one toilet-dunking away from bringing a gun to school.

I’ll be perfectly honest when I say that I support completely destroying Islam in the middle east too. Not just in europe. I don’t care how much body count it takes. We have hydrogen bombs and they should be used on every theocracy.

And I don’t care if this offends besoshvili, daniel shays, mazdak or any other pro-muslim person here.

Racial consciousness is bullshit because “race” is bullshit. You can prove this easily by showing photographs of people who would never be considered “white”, yet fit the visual profile. If race were real, you wouldn’t need some kind of other information to spot what race someone is. You wouldn’t need their genetic information. We would have seen “Race” play a much larger role in history, when in fact we see that the term took on many different other definitions throughout history.

But you defend them arguing that its just paranoia, whereas Besoshvili argues that Muslims are extreme and enjoys them more because of it. So you are arguing that Muslims are moderates and going against the hardcore ones, whereas Besoshvili is all about the hardcore ones.

What diverse viewpoints you Marxist Leninist have. My viewpoint is that the whole world should eventually be atheistic, scientific, racially conscious and people should focus their collective energy into nation states. Man should overcome nature. Hitler wanted man to submit to nature, but I want man to overcome nature. I wonder how many wars and how much bloodshed it will take to reach that point.

Plus, as technocrats, Constantin and I support technology over nature.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/demographics.asp

To say that Islam is a “threat” to the globe is simply ludicrous. For one thing, most of the wars going on in the Middle East are related to, if not caused by, the imperialist meddling of secular capitalist countries, specifically non-Muslim countries. Also one might think that overpopulation and global warming might present a slightly bigger threat to the world than a religion.

There is no intelligent paranoia.

But I’m not supportive of everything Jews are currently doing politically, even though I have major plans to incorporate Jews into my scheme to destroy liberalism and its twin sisters, capitalism and religion.

Jews may be responsible for Christianity, Judaism and Islam (by proxy) but now Jews are doing more to destroy religion than Arabs. The jew of today is an ally for technocracy, even if the Talmudic Jew is a potential enemy.

The reason you are a philosemite is that you are partially Jewish, am I right?

Well meaning Gentiles who believe Jews have ever really cared about the Anglo-European and American societies they’ve been living in for the last 300 years aren’t completely educated. The history of Jewish perfidy in exile and at home in their ethno-state in Israel is not just “VNN blather.” The more that’s revealed the more pessimistic one’s world view becomes in the 21st century. This knowledge is a curse.

What I find peculiar, is that given such zealous anti-Semitism, they knowingly embrace mischlings without a hesitation.