Why to Oppose Obama’s Assault Rifle Ban
Even bourgeois liberals (Democrats AND Republicans) agree about the entitlement to self-defense. If someone is trying to kill you, you can kill him or her first. Ideas are beautiful and it would be nice if we lived in a Utopian world. We do not and we have to defend ourselves.
I have news for neo-liberal scum : CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY THE LAW. If Assault rifles are outlawed, the serial killer and gangbanger next door will still have one. Only you won’t!
If in a legally protected situation of self-defense, you want to pop someone’s head off like a pumpkin, a glock just does not get the job done. Notice that I said legally protected here; I am not advocating openly breaking the law. If words like this offend you, then you would succumb six feet under because you are a wuss who is offended by even thoughts of violence. And wusses get their asses kicked by people who exploit them.
Life is not the movies where pistols can accurately hit 400 meters away and always finish the job. Shotguns just do not aim precisely. They are good indoors but not outdoors. An assault rifle is really necessary if you want to take someone out in self-defense and leave no doubt that they will not have the last laugh.
July 9th, 2009 at 1:13 am
Kane, you are a budding serial killer. Quit it with the dark thoughts for real.
July 9th, 2009 at 1:36 am
I said self-defense man. Read more closely.
July 31st, 2009 at 2:26 pm
Assault rifles are weapons of war, for shooting and killing lots of ppl at once. Why would you need it for self-defence, if you’re not in a war situation? Or do you expect whole gangs to attack you occasionally? But then they will all have guns and they wont warn you about it, so even if you have an assault rifle, you’ll probably be dead.
“Life is not the movies where pistols can accurately hit 400 meters away and always finish the job”
Why would you want to shoot somebody 400 meters away? I don’t think it’s self-defence if you want to shoot somebody 400 meters away.