Link

1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest;
2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead;
4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults;
5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations;
7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another.

…it sort of reminds me of the people who control America!

It should be noted that in my interpretation, antisocial personality disorder on its own is not psychopathy. Psychopaths display both the traits of sociopaths AND of narcissists concurrently.

To say that nationalism is bad is like saying that the human hand is bad because sometimes it is used to hurt people. – Lawrence Auster

Nationalism is not imperialism. Genghis Khan was an internationalist; Winston Churchill was a nationalist. The argument that nationalists cannot collaborate with other governments and are destined for bloodshed is not very deep. The argument that therefore nationalism should not exist at all is delusional. We can end violence by being more progressive, not more international. Nationalism does not have to be associated with reactionary conservatism. Agents of globalism such as Christianity, Islam, “Democracy” and Marxism without a doubt have shed blood. Trotsky vs. Stalin! Soviets vs. Islamic Fundamentalism! Muslims vs. Buddhists vs. Christians vs. Corporate Zionists! Bush vs. Afghanistan! Blood has been shed in the name of globalism, so why the fear of nationalism? Internationalism is not unconditionally more progressive than nationalism.

If we argue that nationalism can cause human suffering to other nations and to internationalists, it is a weak argument because nationalism can be more progressive as we improve as humans, and because internationalism is equally capable of causing suffering.

Meet activistx, a self-proclaimed race realist with a largely unrecognized blog. What is “race realism?” It means the writer takes the position that the liberal establishment has deluded itself to the point of self-deception on race and realism is the answer. Usually race realists are cynical and perceptive people who simply do not take conventional wisdom for granted.

Race realists believe in truth telling and harsh honesty.  They are not crazy conspiracy theorists. Most who consider themselves “race realists” have nothing to do with the “white nationalist movement.”

How do you feel about not being able to freely speak your mind? “This is America,” you protest, “and I can say anything I want.” Not exactly. It’s true, you can say whatever you want without fear of arrest (with a few exceptions such as screaming fire in a crowded theater) but you had better be careful. If you bring up the wrong topic, you may find yourself in hot water. If you express a taboo opinion, you may be threatened with violence (Metal Gear : Also Economic Discrimination). It’s my belief that we should be able to talk freely about anything, so long as we exercise good manners and use non-inflammatory language.

This blog is about race realism – that is, the acknowledgement and study of demonstrable racial differences. I realize this is a much hated position to take, but I believe there are indeed very real differences between racial groups. Further, I believe these differences affect nearly every aspect of our lives. People prefer to associate with their own stock, as I will argue in future posts, and our multicultural “melting pot” gives rise to all sorts of unnatural and uncomfortable interracial involvement. The news, beneath the surface, is mainly about race, and in future posts I intend to analyze news stories to uncover their hidden racial components.

Race realism is common sense. This blog is one small attempt at bringing sanity to this crazy world. It’s my hope that I can open a few eyes and help folks see what’s right in front of them: namely, race – and the havoc that invariably results from ignoring it.

As I stated above, we should be able to talk about anything as long as we are respectful and avoid inflammatory language. I’m going to politely discuss race on this blog. I will be respectful doing so and I expect the same treatment in return. Therefore, I will be paying a lot of attention to tone when deciding whether or not to approve comments made on this blog. If you use an aggressive tone and rant and rave like a lunatic, don’t cry censorship when I delete your comment.

Lastly, I do not in any way advocate white nationalism. I am in favor of complete freedom of association and critical of immigration. However, I have absolutely no desire for an all white state, and I disagree vehemently with many aspects of the movement. I don’t associate with anyone of that ilk online or in person. Please save yourself some time and don’t accuse me of being a white nationalist or supportive of white nationalist organizations.

If you’re fortunate enough to find yourself OUTSIDE the political mainstream in the United States, and you’re vaguely active in any type of movement, then it’s probably a reasonable assertion that you ought to acquaint yourself with the basics of the American judicial system.

Given FMP’s utter revulsion at nearly all things American (capitalism, bourgeois degeneracy, liberalism, gangsterism, imperialism – just to name a few), we’ll be publishing a weekly informational/educational series on “getting to know the American justice system.”

In this series we hope to provide readers with a sensible understanding of how the American judicial system operates as a political tool of class-oppression. More importantly, we’ll try to provide helpful information and resources with at least some practical importance for political activists.

Finally, if you have questions or would like to see a specific topic covered – please let us know in the comments section and we’ll be sure to cover any requests!

Our first topic will focus on the basics of Grand Juries, a staple of the English and American common law systems that establish whether or not there is suitable evidence for a trial against a suspect (future defendant) to proceed.

Enough writing exists discussing “ideology.” It is time to describe reality.

Get Flash to see this player.

Leonard Lake’s Operation Miranda like Dave Koresh’s Davidian Siege proves that force dictates the identity of the ruling order. While Lake and Koresh had control over territory, they were in charge. I am not necessarily endorsing Lake or Koresh, but proving a point. The American regime re-asserted its authority by force. Force rules everything. Until domestic law enforcement changed the scenario, the rules of the order were temporarily irrelevant. The world is ruled by relative ethics. Human rights and divine power rule nothing. The world is ruled by laws of force, not universal standards of ethics.

I believe there is such a thing as moral reasoning if one is possesses aptitude in philosophical thought, but clearly force defines the order of society. Unlike the fairly tales, “good” does not always beat “evil.”

Up until 2003 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) employed the custom-built the “Carnivore” system that took the guess-work out of monitoring electronic/network communications (i.e. e-mail), along with browsing activities, and other data sent across an internet connection.

This tool, far more sophisticated than your typical packet sniffers (though this is still reason enough to consider encrypting your electronic communications), allowed government agents to extract messages sent over a network while targeting and filtering specific

Carnivore became obsolete when, in 2003, it was replaced with even more sophisticated software that was more precise in deciphering communications and information that could *legally* by intercepted by law enforcement agencies (in accordance to Federal legislation).

While obsolete now (for intelligence gathering information at the level needed by the US government), the Carnivore System was an interesting experiment in how relatively easy (and unsafe) e-mail, and the internet in general, really is.

Using “sniffing” technology, the Carnivore system is installed at an Internet service provider (ISP) to keep court-ordered tabs on a suspect’s e-mail and instant messages. Prior to its becoming obsolete in 2003, it was confirmed to have been used in more than 150 criminal investigations.

Unlike some of the more emerging online-tapping systems, Carnivore had to “physically” be connected to a network in order to conduct surveillance. By connecting to the ISP, the system would then collect e-mails, websites visited, instant messages and all other forms of network activity. From here the aggragated data would be sent through a filter that would weed out information that could not be held up by a Court-ordered mandate allowing for the surveillance of electronic communications in the first place.

After being filtered – the information would then be stored on a removable disk and physically picked up by an FBI agent.

And while Carnivore is no longer the online-tapping system of the FBI anymore, it does give cause for concern about the ways in which anybody should take an active interest in ensuring their information security through a variety of means, ranging from rather simple to the much-more complicated.

On a final note – nearly all information-security experts recommend AGAINST purchasing proprietary security programs. Most so-called security companies, like MacAfee, have no qualms about leaving “back-doors” open for government Trojans. Your best bet is to stick with Open Source, such as the GNU Privacy Guard or even Mozilla’s Thunderbird e-mail client, which includes an easily-installed encryption extension known as “Enigma.”

The moral power of the exemplary person is the wind; that of the petty person is grass. When the wind blows over the grass, it will surely bend. – Confucious

Strike the Shepherd and the Sheep will Scatter – The 48 Laws of Power

Those who most successfully play the game of death – success in the free market, should not be blamed more heavily than the unlucky and weak. They may not be conscious allies, but they serve our inegalitarian interests. Analogously, Dennis Rodman cannot be blamed for the invention of basketball and gangster rapers cannot be blamed for the “harsh reality” of society or for profiting from the liberal capitalist system. Directly blaming the bankers and business men? Get real! The blame should be placed on George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Barack Obama and the architects of society…the politicians, the military, the constitution. NOT the businessmen who happen to be a bit more “crafty” than their opponents. Do not blame Wal-Mart. Blame Washington DC. Let the behavior of Wal-Mart (shipping jobs overseas for low pay) expose Washington DC.

Don’t hate the player who plays the game. Hate the game. Until the military force that controls society is altered, we all play the game. Yes we would like to switch from one set of rules to another set of rules, but do not be jealous and hypocritical. Reject the two party system. All energy and focus should be in redirecting society collectively away from the ruling order, instead of trying to rehabilitate and tweak the regime without the necessary adjustments.

Don’t hate the player. Hate the game. It is not morally or strategically justified to blame the player.

From the FMP News Room – July 27, 2009

Too many people do not stick to their guns or take their convictions to the grave.  Too many people are weak.  Go to a wedding that takes place in a Church, and watch every single non-believer and atheist stand up, pray and pretend to be a believer.  Watch posters cowardly deny their “extreme” ideology when questioned about it off of the internet, instead of explaining it calmly and intellectually.  Watch personalities who swear they are against a clique go back to it and kiss its ass while claiming to be on the side of those who oppose it.    We live in a backstabbing society that feeds itself bullshit and that is why America is as it is.  Hypocrisy needs to be eliminated.